This is probably a result of a new GCC version. C++ symbols can be painful to
manage. This will be trivial to update the next time I update the package.
Scott K
On August 3, 2020 9:15:16 AM UTC, Szczepan Zalega | Nitrokey
wrote:
>On 8/3/20 10:41 AM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>> (optional=templin
On Sun, Aug 02, 2020 at 10:28:04PM +0200, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 05:20:23PM +0300, Peter Pentchev wrote:
> > Now... related to that. I am not sure whether Moritz Muehlenhoff, when
> > reopening this bug, was aware of the fact that Dmitry Bogatov included
>
Package: src:r-cran-findpython
Version: 1.0.5-3
Severity: serious
Tags: sid bullseye
User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: py2unversioned
see
https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/amd64/r/r-cran-findpython/6517588/log.gz
Python2 becomes end-of-live upstream, and Debian aims to r
Package: src:python-socksipy
Version: 1.6.8+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid bullseye
User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: py2unversioned
see
https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/arm64/p/python-socksipy/6517914/log.gz
Python2 becomes end-of-live upstream, and Debian aims to
Package: src:pycparser
Version: 2.20-2
Severity: serious
Tags: sid bullseye
User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: py2unversioned
see
https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/amd64/p/pycparser/6517583/log.gz
Python2 becomes end-of-live upstream, and Debian aims to remove
Python2 fr
Package: src:autodep8
Version: 0.23
Severity: serious
Tags: sid bullseye
User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: py2unversioned
Python2 becomes end-of-live upstream, and Debian aims to remove
Python2 from the distribution, as discussed in
https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/2019/07/msg00
Package: src:ply
Version: 3.11-3
Severity: serious
Tags: sid bullseye
User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: py2unversioned
see https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/amd64/p/ply/6517581/log.gz
Python2 becomes end-of-live upstream, and Debian aims to remove
Python2 from the distri
Package: src:passenger
Version: 5.0.30-1.1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid bullseye
User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: py2unversioned
see
https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/amd64/p/passenger/6517580/log.gz
Python2 becomes end-of-live upstream, and Debian aims to remove
Python
Processing control commands:
> block 967007 by -1
Bug #967007 [rails] rails: package new gem dependencies for autopkgtests
967007 was blocked by: 930918
967007 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 967007: 967031
--
967007: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=967007
9
Package: src:nodejs
Version: 12.18.2~dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid bullseye
User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: py2unversioned
see https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/amd64/n/nodejs/6517579/log.gz
Python2 becomes end-of-live upstream, and Debian aims to remove
Python2 f
Your message dated Mon, 03 Aug 2020 13:33:36 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#957521: fixed in mboxgrep 0.7.9-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #957521,
regarding mboxgrep: ftbfs with GCC-10
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this i
On 8/3/20 10:41 AM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> (optional=templinst|arch=!amd64 !arm64 !x32)
> (optional=templinst)
Hi!
As far as I see the problem comes from the listing format difference,
not the actual symbol change.
E.g.:
```
- (optional=templinst|arch=!amd64 !arm64
!x32)_ZN8nitrokey5proto17Resp
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> affects 966979 - src:mappoxy
Bug #966979 [src:sphinx] mapproxy: FTBFS: dh_sphinxdoc: error:
debian/mapproxy-doc/usr/share/doc/mapproxy/html/search.html does not load
searchindex.js
Removed indication that 966979 affects src:mappoxy
> affects 966
I tryed a new build and I end up with this error
gpgv: unknown type of key resource 'trustedkeys.kbx'
gpgv: keyblock resource '/tmp/dpkg-verify-sig.Wwlhs1jL/trustedkeys.kbx':
General error
gpgv: Signature made Mon Dec 16 20:17:19 2019 UTC
gpgv:using RSA key E8FC295C86B8D7C049F97BA
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 966937 interimap: FTBFS: The extension smart is not supported for man
Bug #966937 [src:interimap] interimap: FTBFS: ThTeh exet exetnsieonsino snm
asmrat irst niots [..]
Changed Bug title to 'interimap: FTBFS: The extension smart is not s
If I read the comments in upstream issue correctly, it will be solved in 2
months (they said 6 months later at April). What's the urgent thing we need
to address in this two months?
// send from my mobile device
Reinhard Tartler 于 2020年8月3日周一 19:38写道：
>
>
>
>>From: Shengjing Zhu
>>To:
Hi Andreas,
On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 10:25 AM Andreas Tille wrote:
>
> Control: tags -1 help
>
> Hi Java team
>
> I admit I have no idea how to tackle this. Any help would be really
> appreciated.
The attached patch should fix the FTBFS you have.
--
Regards
Sudip
Description: Fix FTBFS
The re
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 libpeas,meson
Bug #966951 [src:libpeas] libpeas: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: cd
obj-x86_64-linux-gnu && LC_ALL=C.UTF-8 MESON_TESTTHREADS=4 ninja test returned
exit code 1
Bug reassigned from package 'src:libpeas' to 'libpeas,meson'.
No longer marked as
Control: reassign -1 libpeas,meson
Control: found -1 libpeas/1.26.0-2
Control: found -1 meson/0.55.0-2
On Mon, 03 Aug 2020 at 10:54:40 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Relevant part (hopefully):
> > 1/8 test-engine FAIL 0.02s (killed by signal 6
> > SIGABRT)
> >
> > --- com
Source: ruby-rspec
Version: 3.9.0c1e0m1s2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200802 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> Failure/Error: DEFAU
Source: mapsforge
Version: 0.13.0+dfsg.1-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200802 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering directory
Source: test-kitchen
Version: 1.23.2-5
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200802 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> cannot load such file -- aruba/
Source: eso-midas
Version: 19.02pl1.1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200802 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]: Entering directory '/
Source: libopenshot
Version: 0.2.5+dfsg1-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200802 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /usr/bin/ld: /usr/bin/ld: D
Source: openjdk-13
Version: 13.0.4+8-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200802 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> at
> com.sun.javatest.Te
Source: dogecoin
Version: 1.14.0-1.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200802 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering directory '/<>'
Source: request-tracker4
Version: 4.4.4-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200802 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering directory
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> notfound 960662 spyne/2.12.11-1
Bug #960662 {Done: Bastian Germann } [python-spyne]
spyne: unsatisfiable dependency on lxml
No longer marked as found in versions spyne/2.12.11-1.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if y
Hello,
my system (HP Z220 Workstation) was affected as well.
Steve asked for more information on the users mailing list, which I
try to provide here (it's my first use of the debian bug tracker).
1. Number of disks: 2
2. Filesystem setup
grub is installed in MBR of /dev/sda
# fdisk -l
Disk /de
package: tomcat9
version: 9.0.37-2
the problem is still there - now with other missing files … the problems start
to be visible after deploying some applications
2 new missing files :
java.lang.ClassNotFoundException:
org.apache.tomcat.websocket.pojo.PojoEndpointClient
java.lang.ClassNotFound
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 966595 + ftbfs
Bug #966595 [src:lablgtk-extras] Please port to lablgtk3
Added tag(s) ftbfs.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
966595: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=966595
Deb
Control: reassign -1 meson 0.55.0-2
Control: affects -1 + iagno
On Mon, 03 Aug 2020 at 10:02:31 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
> on amd64.
Some test results:
* Everything from unstable: fails
* Everything from unstable, except
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> affects 967007 ruby-rails-assets-blueimp-gallery
Bug #967007 [rails] rails: package new gem dependencies for autopkgtests
Added indication that 967007 affects ruby-rails-assets-blueimp-gallery
> affects 967007 ruby-rails-assets-favico.js
Bug #9670
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 meson 0.55.0-2
Bug #966854 [src:iagno] iagno: FTBFS:
../src/perfs-tests-generator.vala:45.16-45.20: error: The name `Posix' does not
exist in the context of `PerfsTestsGenerator.handle_local_options'
Bug reassigned from package 'src:iagno' to 'meson'.
N
>From: Shengjing Zhu
>To: Debian Bug Tracking System
>Subject: Not ready for using
>Date: Fri, 29 May 2020 23:36:43 +0800
>
> Package: golang-google-protobuf
> Severity: serious
>
> Though it has been packaged, it's not ready for using.
>
> The current version will generate .pb.go
On Sat, 18 Jul 2020 at 20:07:59 +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Control: affects -1 src:gjs src:iagno src:libpeas
>
> I cannot judge whether this is a meson regression,
> or existing bugs that just happened to work with
> older meson.
Each of these bugs has since been reported separately against the
package src:kakoune
fixed 963409 2020.01.16-2
thanks
On Sun, Jun 21, 2020 at 10:10:07PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Source: kakoune
> Version: 2020.01.16-1
> Severity: serious
> Justification: FTBFS on amd64
> Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
> Usertags: ftbfs-20200620 ftbfs-bullseye
>
> Hi,
>
> Duri
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> package src:kakoune
Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of 'src:kakoune'
Limit currently set to 'package':'src:kakoune'
> fixed 963409 2020.01.16-2
Bug #963409 [src:kakoune] kakoune: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: make -j4
Source: vmem
Version: 1.8-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200802 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[4]: Entering directory '/<>/src/test'
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #966953 in qttools-opensource-src reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/qt-kde-team/qt/qttools/-/commit/eb16df414b2
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #966953 [src:qttools-opensource-src] qttools-opensource-src: FTBFS:
dpkg-gensymbols: error: some symbols or patterns disappeared in the symbols
file: see diff output below
Added tag(s) pending.
--
966953: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugrepo
Control: retitle -1 meson: 0.55.0 considers TAP "ok # SKIP" to be a failure
Control: reassign -1 meson 0.55.0-2
Control: affects -1 + gjs
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/mesonbuild/meson/issues/7515
Control: tags -1 + upstream
On Mon, 03 Aug 2020 at 10:51:25 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>
Processing control commands:
> retitle -1 meson: 0.55.0 considers TAP "ok # SKIP" to be a failure
Bug #966923 [src:gjs] gjs: FTBFS: tests failed
Changed Bug title to 'meson: 0.55.0 considers TAP "ok # SKIP" to be a failure'
from 'gjs: FTBFS: tests failed'.
> reassign -1 meson 0.55.0-2
Bug #966923
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> affects 967007 ruby-rails-assets-autosize
Bug #967007 [rails] rails: package new gem dependencies for autopkgtests
Added indication that 967007 affects ruby-rails-assets-autosize
> ruby-rails-assets-blueimp-gallery
Unknown command or malformed arg
Your message dated Mon, 03 Aug 2020 11:03:31 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#953893: fixed in prometheus-node-exporter-collectors
0+git20200718.57d05ce-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #953893,
regarding prometheus-node-exporter-collectors: autopkgtest failure: Can't find
import pat
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 967007 by 930918
Bug #967007 [rails] rails: package new gem dependencies for autopkgtests
967007 was not blocked by any bugs.
967007 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 967007: 930918
> owner 930918 Pirate Praveen
Bug #93091
Your message dated Mon, 03 Aug 2020 10:48:43 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#966838: fixed in rails 2:6.0.3.2+dfsg-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #966838,
regarding rails: newapp autopkgtest failed and it also broke autopkgtest for
many rails assets packages
to be marked as done.
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 src:sphinx
Bug #966979 [src:mapproxy] mapproxy: FTBFS: dh_sphinxdoc: error:
debian/mapproxy-doc/usr/share/doc/mapproxy/html/search.html does not load
searchindex.js
Bug reassigned from package 'src:mapproxy' to 'src:sphinx'.
No longer marked as found in
Control: reassign -1 src:sphinx
Control: found -1 sphinx/2.4.3-4
Control: affects -1 src:mappoxy
On 8/3/20 11:00 AM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
> on amd64.
>
> Relevant part (hopefully):
>> make[1]: Entering directory '/<>'
>> dh_
Le 03/08/2020 à 11:49, Lucas Nussbaum a écrit :
> During an archive rebuild in unstable/amd64, I ran into many similar
> failures, affecting only ocaml packages (see the list in Affects). An
> example is yojson:
>
>> make[1]: Leaving directory '/tmp/yojson-1.7.0'
>>dh_dwz
>> dwz -- debian
On Sun, 19 Jul 2020 at 10:14:58 +0200, Arnaldo Pirrone wrote:
> Hi, after the update jackd is not starting anymore. Apparently this is
> related.
>
> Sun Jul 19 10:05:53 2020: ERROR: Can't load "/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-
> gnu/jack/jack_alsa.so": /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/jack/jack_alsa.so: undefine
Could not find gem 'webpacker (~> 4.0)' in any of the gem sources
listed in your
Gemfile.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> clone 966838 -1
Bug #966838 [rails] rails: newapp autopkgtest failed and it also broke
autopkgtest for many rails assets packages
Bug 966838 cloned as bug 967007
> retitle -1 rails: package new gem dependencies for autopkgtests
Bug #967007 [rails
Looking at the file :
$ cat /lib/systemd/system/blk-availability.service
[Unit]
Description=Availability of block devices
Before=shutdown.target
After=lvm2-activation.service iscsi-shutdown.service iscsi.service
iscsid.service fcoe.service rbdmap.service
DefaultDependencies=no
Conflicts=shutdown.t
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 advi alt-ergo belenios biniou caml2html camlmix camomile cmdliner
> coccinelle cryptokit easy-format freetennis headache hevea kalzium lablgtk3
> laby liquidsoap menhir ocaml-atd ocamlbuild ocaml-cairo2 ocaml-cry ocaml-csv
> ocaml-ctypes ocamldsort ocam
Package: dh-ocaml
Version: 1.1.1
Severity: serious
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200802 ftbfs-bullseye
Control: affects -1 advi alt-ergo belenios biniou caml2html camlmix camomile
cmdliner coccinelle cryptokit easy-format freetennis headache hevea kalzium
lablgtk3 laby liquidsoap men
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> close 966924 2.5.3-2
Bug #966924 [src:pylint] pylint: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test
--test-pytest -i python{version} -p 3.8 returned exit code 13
Marked as fixed in versions pylint/2.5.3-2.
Bug #966924 [src:pylint] pylint: FTBFS: dh_
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 966896 patch
Bug #966896 [src:fatsort] fatsort: FTBFS: ld: entrylist.o:./src/options.h:38:
multiple definition of `OPT_LOCALE'; fatsort.o:./src/options.h:38: first
defined here
Added tag(s) patch.
> done
Unknown command or malformed argument
I do not understand:
Raspi4: Kernel 5.7.x has mmcblk1p1 and mmcblk1p2 while
Raspi3: Kernel 4.19.0-9 has mmcblk0p1 and mmcblk0p2
why this?
I think this is the reason of this bug
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 help
Bug #966878 [src:figtree] figtree: FTBFS: [javac]
/<>/src/figtree/application/JSONTreeExporter.java:56: error:
JSONTreeExporter is not abstract and does not override abstract method close()
in TreeExporter
Added tag(s) help.
--
966878: https://b
Control: tags -1 help
Hi Java team
I admit I have no idea how to tackle this. Any help would be really
appreciated.
Kind regards
Andreas.
On Mon, Aug 03, 2020 at 10:01:35AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Source: figtree
> Version: 1.4.4-4
> Severity: serious
> Justification: FTBFS on a
Tags: +patch
Hi Lucas,
thanks for reporting this bug. Fortunately, the fix is pretty
straight-forward :)
> Relevant part (hopefully):
> > gcc fatsort.o FAT_fs.o deviceio.o endianness.o sig.o entrylist.o errors.o
> > options.o clusterchain.o sort.o misc.o natstrcmp.o stringlist.o regexlist.o
> >
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forcemerge 966600 966852
Bug #966600 [src:nfstrace] nfstrace: patch for newer json-c/gcc-10
Bug #966600 [src:nfstrace] nfstrace: patch for newer json-c/gcc-10
Added tag(s) bullseye and sid.
Bug #966852 [src:nfstrace] nfstrace: FTBFS: statistics_wi
Source: python-textile
Version: 1:4.0.1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200802 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules build
> dh bui
Source: python-hdf5storage
Version: 0.1.15-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200802 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering directo
Source: singularity-container
Version: 3.5.2+ds1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200802 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]: Entering d
Source: mplcursors
Version: 0.3-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200802 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> dpkg-buildpackage
>
Source: python-cytoolz
Version: 0.10.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200802 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> fakeroot debian/rules clean
On Sun, Aug 02, 2020 at 02:15:53PM -0300, Adilson dos Santos Dantas wrote:
> Package: keepass2
> Version: 2.45+dfsg-1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> After update my system packages, keepas2 stops working. It simply crashes at
> startup. Maybe
Source: nbdkit
Version: 1.20.5-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200802 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[5]: Entering directory '/<>/test
Source: rust-sleef-sys
Version: 0.1.2-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200802 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering directory '/
Source: mochiweb
Version: 2.20.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200802 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering directory '/<>'
>
Source: uftrace
Version: 0.9.4-0.2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200802 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]: Entering directory '/<>'
>
Source: python-peachpy
Version: 0.0~git20200303.f189ad2-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200802 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Ent
Source: tryton-server
Version: 5.0.23-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200802 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering directory '/
Source: msgpack-java
Version: 0.8.20-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200802 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering directory '/<
Source: seaborn
Version: 0.10.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200802 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering directory '/<>'
>
Source: pcc-libs
Version: 1.2.0~DEVEL+20180604-2.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200802 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]: Entering d
Source: python-bleach
Version: 3.1.5-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200802 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering directory '/<
Source: python-skbio
Version: 0.5.6-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200802 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering directory '/<>
Source: xgks
Version: 2.6.1+dfsg.2-9
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200802 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[3]: Entering directory '/<>/
Source: whitedb
Version: 0.7.3-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200802 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[4]: Entering directory '/<>'
> F
Source: subversion
Version: 1.14.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200802 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[3]: Entering directory '/<>/
Source: wand
Version: 0.6.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200802 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]: Entering directory '/<>/docs'
>
Source: mapproxy
Version: 1.12.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200802 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering directory '/<>'
>
Source: xidle
Version: 20161031
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200802 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> fakeroot debian/rules clean
> dh_test
Source: basemap
Version: 1.2.1+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200802 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering directory '/<>
Source: tpot
Version: 0.11.1+dfsg2-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200802 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering directory '/<>'
Your message dated Mon, 03 Aug 2020 09:03:31 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#922692: fixed in galax 1.1-16
has caused the Debian Bug report #922692,
regarding galax: FTBFS - ERROR: unable to find camomileLibrary.cmi in
/usr/lib/ocaml/camomile
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Source: efp
Version: 1.6-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200802 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering directory '/<>'
> perl as
Source: libgpiod
Version: 1.5.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200802 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering directory '/<>'
>
Source: libunity
Version: 7.1.4+19.04.20190319-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200802 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[5]: Entering dir
Source: dune-grid-glue
Version: 2.7.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200802 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[5]: Entering directory '/
Source: in-toto
Version: 0.4.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200802 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering directory '/<>'
> p
Source: adios
Version: 1.13.1-22
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200802 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> ar cru libadios.a core/libadios_a-adi
Source: igraph
Version: 0.8.2+ds-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200802 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering directory '/<>'
>
Source: piexif
Version: 1.0.13-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200802 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules build
> dh build --with
Source: libstatgen
Version: 1.0.14-6
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200802 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering directory '/<>'
Source: datalad
Version: 0.12.6-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200802 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering directory '/<>'
>
Source: qttools-opensource-src
Version: 5.14.2-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200802 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering dir
101 - 200 of 318 matches
Mail list logo
