Processed: pybind11

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forwarded 963659 https://github.com/pybind/pybind11/issues/2404 Bug #963659 [src:pybind11] pybind11: FTBFS with Sphinx 3.1: File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/sphinx/domains/c.py", line 3093, in object_type / raise NotImplementedError() Set

Bug#968588: dovecot-gssapi: GSSAPI login broke

Package: dovecot-gssapi Version: 1:2.3.11.3+dfsg1-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable After upgrading dovecot to 1:2.3.11.3+dfsg1-1, GSSAPI login no longer works. I'm using Thunderbird as client and it says the Kerberos ticket was not accepted. A downgrade back to

Bug#963659: pybind11: FTBFS with Sphinx 3.1: File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/sphinx/domains/c.py", line 3093, in object_type / raise NotImplementedError())

The FTBFS is still happening with sphinx 3.2.1.

Bug#966400: sublime-music: fails to create new server

severity 966400 normal thanks Hi, Thanks for reporting this bug. I'm downgrading the severity, as I'm not able to reproduce the issue on my machine running sid, although I'm sure it's real. The pip version working isn't really relevant, as pip doesn't use Debian dependencies. That and there's

Processed: Re: sublime-music: fails to create new server

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 966400 normal Bug #966400 [sublime-music] sublime-music: fails to create new server Severity set to 'normal' from 'grave' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 966400:

Processed: Re: Bug#967487: libubootenv: Cannot build libubootenv with dpkg-buildpackage

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 967487 important Bug #967487 [src:libubootenv] libubootenv: Cannot build libubootenv with dpkg-buildpackage Severity set to 'important' from 'serious' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. --

Bug#967487: libubootenv: Cannot build libubootenv with dpkg-buildpackage

severity 967487 important thanks Hi, 2020年8月17日(月) 17:15 Gylstorff Quirin : > > > > On 8/12/20 4:29 AM, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Thanks for your report. > > > > 2020年8月4日(火) 19:50 Gylstorff Quirin : > >> > >> Package: libubootenv-tool > >> Version: 0.2-1 > >> Severity: serious >

Bug#964609: pyxdg: Proposed solution for pyxdg test failure and ftbfs

Package: pyxdg Version: 0.26-3 Followup-For: Bug #964609 User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com Usertags: origin-ubuntu groovy ubuntu-patch Dear Maintainer, While reviewing GCC10 FTBFS with ubuntu 20.10 Groovy, I worked on pyxdg failure. After reproducing the failure in a sbuild environment I

Bug#968573: wham-align: autopkgtest arm64 failure: times out after ./sequences:,chr1_100k.fa,Test 1

Source: wham-align Version: 0.1.5-3.1 X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org Severity: serious User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: fails-always timesout Dear maintainer(s), Your package wham-align has an autopkgtest, great. However, it fails on arm64 because it times out. I copied some

Bug#968015: resolvconf-pull-resolved.service fails with systemd 246-2

Am 17.08.20 um 10:41 schrieb Michael Biebl: > I've attached a prospective patch. > > Dan, Dimitri, would welcome your feedback here, since most of the > resolvconf/resolved integration is seemingly coming from you. Btw, I'll add a versioned Breaks: resolvconf (<< 1.83) to systemd, assuming the

Processed: lower severity of RC bug

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # r-cran-rstanarm got removed from testing > severity 962794 normal Bug #962794 [src:r-cran-stanheaders] r-cran-stanheaders: breaks r-cran-rstanarm autopkgtests Severity set to 'normal' from 'serious' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please

Bug#967165: marked as done (libpgm: Unversioned Python removal in sid/bullseye)

Your message dated Mon, 17 Aug 2020 18:48:58 + with message-id and subject line Bug#967165: fixed in libpgm 5.2.122+git20200619~dfsg-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #967165, regarding libpgm: Unversioned Python removal in sid/bullseye to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#967136: marked as done (gfm: Unversioned Python removal in sid/bullseye)

Your message dated Mon, 17 Aug 2020 20:14:40 +0200 with message-id <20200817181440.twsrlqds7uccg...@muandit.de> and subject line Bug caused by uninstallability of libglade2-dev which is now available again has caused the Debian Bug report #967136, regarding gfm: Unversioned Python removal in

Bug#967225: marked as done (tiemu: Unversioned Python removal in sid/bullseye)

Your message dated Mon, 17 Aug 2020 20:14:40 +0200 with message-id <20200817181440.twsrlqds7uccg...@muandit.de> and subject line Bug caused by uninstallability of libglade2-dev which is now available again has caused the Debian Bug report #967225, regarding tiemu: Unversioned Python removal in

Bug#961444: marked as done (grcompiler FTBFS on architectures where char is unsigned)

Greetings, Is there a reason that the second commit [1] to handle this bug is not included in the patches? If it is, and I missed it, please point me to the patch. [1] https://github.com/silnrsi/grcompiler/commit/a02b9a8fbac211051472815b52ae3600a197b7ca On 2020-08-16 4:06 a.m., Debian Bug

Processed: [bts-link] source package src:grcompiler

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # > # bts-link upstream status pull for source package src:grcompiler > # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html > # https://bts-link-team.pages.debian.net/bts-link/ > # > user debian-bts-l...@lists.debian.org

Bug#936880: Bug#966753: fixed in libiptcdata 1.0.5-2.2

The package still depends on python2, so this bug is not yet fixed.

Bug#966989: marked as done (subversion: FTBFS: segfaults)

Your message dated Mon, 17 Aug 2020 17:19:23 + with message-id and subject line Bug#966989: fixed in subversion 1.14.0-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #966989, regarding subversion: FTBFS: segfaults to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If

Bug#968079: [Python-modules-team] Bug#968079: libapache2-mod-wsgi: Package is not installable. Needs older Python2.

On Mon, 17 Aug 2020 at 18:44:58 +0200, Jann Haber wrote: > Wouldn't the easiest fix for this bug and also #937062, #966763 and > #967043 be to just drop the binary package libapache2-mod-wsgi and only > keeping the py3 version around? > > There seem to be no more rdeps in testing, so no other

Bug#957804: marked as done (skinedit: ftbfs with GCC-10)

Your message dated Mon, 17 Aug 2020 17:05:02 + with message-id and subject line Bug#957804: fixed in skinedit 1.27-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #957804, regarding skinedit: ftbfs with GCC-10 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this

Processed: your mail

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reopen 936880 Bug #936880 {Done: Matthias Klose } [src:libiptcdata] libiptcdata: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye Bug reopened Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #936880 to the same values previously set > End of message, stopping

Processed: your mail

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > unmerge 936880 Bug #936880 {Done: Matthias Klose } [src:libiptcdata] libiptcdata: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye Bug #966753 {Done: Matthias Klose } [src:libiptcdata] libiptcdata: Unversioned Python removal in sid/bullseye Disconnected #936880

Bug#968079: [Python-modules-team] Bug#968079: libapache2-mod-wsgi: Package is not installable. Needs older Python2.

Wouldn't the easiest fix for this bug and also #937062, #966763 and #967043 be to just drop the binary package libapache2-mod-wsgi and only keeping the py3 version around? There seem to be no more rdeps in testing, so no other packages are blocking the removal (right?). This would help the

Bug#957646: openvas-manager: ftbfs with GCC-10

Control: tags -1 + patch Hi, the attached patch fixes the FTBFS with GCC-10. Regards, -- Luis Paulo (lpfll) diff -Nru openvas-manager-7.0.3/debian/patches/010_fix-ftbfs-with-gcc-10.patch openvas-manager-7.0.3/debian/patches/010_fix-ftbfs-with-gcc-10.patch ---

Processed: Re: openvas-manager: ftbfs with GCC-10

Processing control commands: > tags -1 + patch Bug #957646 [src:openvas-manager] openvas-manager: ftbfs with GCC-10 Added tag(s) patch. -- 957646: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=957646 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#965001: marked as done (strange version 2.1.0 beta4 fails tests with mpfr4 4.1.0)

Your message dated Mon, 17 Aug 2020 15:41:46 + with message-id and subject line Bug#965001: fixed in python-gmpy2 2.1.0~b5-0.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #965001, regarding strange version 2.1.0 beta4 fails tests with mpfr4 4.1.0 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Processed: limit source to python-gmpy2, tagging 965001

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > limit source python-gmpy2 Limiting to bugs with field 'source' containing at least one of 'python-gmpy2' Limit currently set to 'source':'python-gmpy2' > tags 965001 + pending Bug #965001 [src:python-gmpy2] strange version 2.1.0 beta4 fails

Bug#967014: marked as done (eso-midas: FTBFS: ld: stc.o:./19FEB/libsrc/ftoc/stc.c:56: multiple definition of `ptr1'; genftoc.o:./19FEB/libsrc/ftoc/genftoc.c:50: first defined here)

Your message dated Mon, 17 Aug 2020 15:18:47 + with message-id and subject line Bug#967014: fixed in eso-midas 19.02pl1.1-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #967014, regarding eso-midas: FTBFS: ld: stc.o:./19FEB/libsrc/ftoc/stc.c:56: multiple definition of `ptr1';

Processed: Re: tcpick: ftbfs with GCC-10

Processing control commands: > tags -1 + patch Bug #957860 [src:tcpick] tcpick: ftbfs with GCC-10 Added tag(s) patch. -- 957860: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=957860 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#957860: tcpick: ftbfs with GCC-10

Control: tags -1 + patch Hi, the attached patch fixes the FTBFS with GCC-10. Regards, -- Luis Paulo (lpfll) diff -Nru tcpick-0.2.1/debian/patches/fix-ftbfs-with-gcc-10.patch tcpick-0.2.1/debian/patches/fix-ftbfs-with-gcc-10.patch --- tcpick-0.2.1/debian/patches/fix-ftbfs-with-gcc-10.patch

Processed: Re: Bug#968560: unison-2.48: Bad alternative link for unison

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 968560 + confirmed Bug #968560 [unison-2.48] unison-2.48: Bad alternative link for unison Added tag(s) confirmed. > reassign 968560 unison Bug #968560 [unison-2.48] unison-2.48: Bad alternative link for unison Bug reassigned from package

Bug#968560: unison-2.48: Bad alternative link for unison

tags 968560 + confirmed reassign 968560 unison thanks Le 17/08/2020 à 15:04, frydo bugdeb a écrit : > I don't have unison installed. > Only unison-gtk, unison-2.48 and unison-2.48-gtk > > version for unison-gtk is 2.48.4+3 > and for both unison-2.48 and unison-2.48-gtk is 2.48.4-7 Right. I will

Processed: Re: Bug#965007: pitivi: ships a copy of gstreamer libraries

Processing control commands: > reassign -1 pitivi Bug #965007 [gstreamer1.0-plugins-bad-apps] gstreamer1.0-plugins-bad-apps: /usr/bin/gst-transcoder-1.0 already provided by pitivi Bug reassigned from package 'gstreamer1.0-plugins-bad-apps' to 'pitivi'. Ignoring request to alter found versions of

Bug#965007: pitivi: ships a copy of gstreamer libraries

Control: reassign -1 pitivi Control: retitle -1 pitivi: ships a copy of gstreamer libraries Control: found -1 0.999-2 On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 03:27:21PM +0300, Sebastian Dröge wrote: > On Mon, 2020-08-17 at 09:10 -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > > > > This file is already present in pitivi on

Bug#956982: adns package is undermaintained and needs comaintainers

Hi. I decided to CC the FTBFS bug report so the discussion about the `data' symbol is properly public. I hope that's OK with you. Magnus Holmgren writes ("Re: adns package is undermaintained and needs comaintainers"): > Sorry for not following up on this for almost a year. I felt that I > had

Bug#957087: marked as done (chiark-tcl: ftbfs with GCC-10)

Your message dated Mon, 17 Aug 2020 13:18:24 + with message-id and subject line Bug#957087: fixed in chiark-tcl 1.3.3 has caused the Debian Bug report #957087, regarding chiark-tcl: ftbfs with GCC-10 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If

Bug#963635: marked as done (h5py: FTBFS with Sphinx 3.1: sed: no input files)

Your message dated Mon, 17 Aug 2020 13:18:29 + with message-id and subject line Bug#963635: fixed in h5py 2.10.0-9 has caused the Debian Bug report #963635, regarding h5py: FTBFS with Sphinx 3.1: sed: no input files to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#968560: unison-2.48: Bad alternative link for unison

On Mon, 17 Aug 2020 14:56:58 +0200 =?UTF-8?Q?St=c3=a9phane_Glondu?= wrote: There is no version 2.48.4-7 for package *unison* (there is for package *unison-2.48*. I am asking the version of package *unison* which is installed on your system. Sorry. I don't have unison installed. Only

Bug#968560: unison-2.48: Bad alternative link for unison

Le 17/08/2020 à 14:53, frydo bugdeb a écrit : > I guess I had it at some time, but now it's 2.48.4-7, for which the bug > appeared to me. There is no version 2.48.4-7 for package *unison* (there is for package *unison-2.48*. I am asking the version of package *unison* which is installed on your

Bug#968560: unison-2.48: Bad alternative link for unison

I guess I had it at some time, but now it's 2.48.4-7, for which the bug appeared to me. Le 17/08/2020 à 14:40, Stéphane Glondu a écrit : Le 17/08/2020 à 14:21, frydo bugdeb a écrit : Using unison though network with ssh, since last update I could not have it work. Connection was lost right

Bug#968560: unison-2.48: Bad alternative link for unison

Le 17/08/2020 à 14:21, frydo bugdeb a écrit : > Using unison though network with ssh, since last update I could not have it > work. > Connection was lost right after I give my password. > > Launching unison from a shell, I could see that it was looking for a file, > unison, that could not be

Bug#965067: googler: "No results"

* SZ Lin , 2020-08-17, 17:29: After investigating this issue, I cherry-picked 6 commits [1] to fix this. It works for me now, and it would be great if you can have a test before uploading. debian/patches/series looks broken: every patch name is mentioned twice!? I wasn't able to apply

Bug#965007: pitivi: ships a copy of gstreamer libraries

Control: retitle -1 gstreamer1.0-plugins-bad-apps: /usr/bin/gst-transcoder-1.0 already provided by pitivi Adjusting the bug title accordingly. signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Processed: Re: Bug#965007: pitivi: ships a copy of gstreamer libraries

Processing control commands: > retitle -1 gstreamer1.0-plugins-bad-apps: /usr/bin/gst-transcoder-1.0 already > provided by pitivi Bug #965007 [gstreamer1.0-plugins-bad-apps] pitivi: ships a copy of gstreamer libraries Changed Bug title to 'gstreamer1.0-plugins-bad-apps:

Bug#965007: pitivi: ships a copy of gstreamer libraries

On Mon, 2020-08-17 at 09:10 -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > > This file is already present in pitivi on stable, and > gstreamer1.0-plugins-bad-apps is only present in experimental. testing > and unstable are unaffected by this, or testing would be unaffected if > this hadn't caused pitivi to be

Bug#968560: unison-2.48: Bad alternative link for unison

Package: unison-2.48 Version: 2.48.4-7 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Dear Maintainer, Using unison though network with ssh, since last update I could not have it work. Connection was lost right after I give my password. Launching unison from a shell, I could see that

Bug#937665: Waiting for Python 2-depending reverse dependencies

On 8/17/20 12:50 AM, Ben Finney wrote: > Control: forcemerge -1 967200 > Control: block -1 by 933750 > Control: outlook -1 0 > > The updated package is ready, and waiting for reverse-dependencies (as > described in bug reports blocking this one) to drop Python 2 support. > > On 16-Aug-2020, Jann

Bug#965007: pitivi: ships a copy of gstreamer libraries

Control: reassign -1 gstreamer1.0-plugins-bad-apps On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 01:16:03PM +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > Package: pitivi > Version: 0.999-2 > Severity: serious > User: debian...@lists.debian.org > Usertags: piuparts > > Hi, > > during a test with piuparts I noticed your package

Processed: Re: Bug#965007: pitivi: ships a copy of gstreamer libraries

Processing control commands: > reassign -1 gstreamer1.0-plugins-bad-apps Bug #965007 [pitivi] pitivi: ships a copy of gstreamer libraries Bug reassigned from package 'pitivi' to 'gstreamer1.0-plugins-bad-apps'. No longer marked as found in versions pitivi/0.999-2. Ignoring request to alter fixed

Bug#964536: mutrace should not depend on the shared binutils libraries

Hi Doko, Another ping for this bug report since you have reopened it saying its still found in mutrace/0.2.0-3.4. Can you please let me know what am I missing here or is it good to close the bug report? -- Regards Sudip

Bug#961438: merge request

https://salsa.debian.org/fonts-team/grcompiler/-/merge_requests/2 includes the proposed upstream patches.

Processed: Re: Bug#962995: fixed in testssl.sh 3.0.2+dfsg1-2

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reopen 962995 ! Bug #962995 {Done: =?utf-8?q?Rapha=C3=ABl_Hertzog?= } [testssl.sh] testssl.sh: missing dependencies 'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version; all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may need to

Processed: severity of 963049 is normal

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 963049 normal Bug #963049 [pki-base] pki-base: syntax error in /usr/share/pki/scripts/config Severity set to 'normal' from 'serious' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 963049:

Bug#961438: Fix for: grcompiler FTBFS on i386: compare_PigLatinTest_v2 failed

A fix for this bug is in upstream commit a9e6dec , and has been tested against 32 and 64 bit xenial boxes which were both exhibiting the same bug described here. -- Tim Eves Writing Systems Technology - SIL

Processed: Bug#965067: googler: "No results"

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 965067 + fixed pending Bug #965067 [googler] googler: "No results" Added tag(s) fixed and pending. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 965067:

Bug#965067: googler: "No results"

Hi, Jakub Wilk 於 2020年7月15日 週三 下午10:21寫道： > > Package: googler > Version: 3.7.1-1 > Severity: grave > Control: fixed -1 4.1-1 > > googler in buster seems completely broken. > I get "No results" every time. Thanks for the information since I'm not the stable version user. After investigating

Bug#955082: pexpect: FTBFS with Sphinx 2.4: AttributeError: 'Sphinx' object has no attribute 'info'

Hi all, I proposed a fix to this problem (mostly taken from upstream) and I'm looking for somebody to review/merge it here: https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/modules/pexpect/-/merge_requests/2 Thanks, Lukas On Fri, 27 Mar 2020 15:50:13 +0100 Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > Source: pexpect >

Bug#908234: cjs: Please switch to mozjs68

Hi Simon, thanks for your email. > Make that mozjs68, now. Bad news. > Cinnamon maintainers need to take over mozjs52 or mozjs68 and keep it > alive for bullseye, that would be possible (although the release and > security teams would probably prefer it if we only had one version, > and the

Bug#961993: marked as done (gimp crashes on start up)

Your message dated Mon, 17 Aug 2020 09:47:39 +0100 with message-id <20200817084739.ga141...@espresso.pseudorandom.co.uk> and subject line Re: Bug#961993: gimp crashes on start up has caused the Debian Bug report #961993, regarding gimp crashes on start up to be marked as done. This means that you

Processed: Re: resolvconf-pull-resolved.service fails with systemd 246-2

Processing control commands: > severity -1 serious Bug #968015 [resolvconf] resolvconf-pull-resolved.service fails with systemd 246-2 Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal' > tags -1 + patch Bug #968015 [resolvconf] resolvconf-pull-resolved.service fails with systemd 246-2 Added tag(s) patch.

Processed: Re: Bug#908234: cjs: Please switch to mozjs68

Processing control commands: > retitle 908234 cjs: Please switch to mozjs68 Bug #908234 [src:cjs] cjs: Please switch to mozjs60 Changed Bug title to 'cjs: Please switch to mozjs68' from 'cjs: Please switch to mozjs60'. -- 908234: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=908234 Debian

Bug#908234: cjs: Please switch to mozjs68

Control: retitle 908234 cjs: Please switch to mozjs68 On Fri, 07 Sep 2018 at 12:23:17 -0400, Jeremy Bicha wrote: > Firefox 52 ESR is no longer supported by Mozilla so neither is mozjs52. Neither is mozjs60, and it has been removed from Debian. All other mozjs-dependent packages are now using

Bug#957255: marked as done (garden-of-coloured-lights: ftbfs with GCC-10)

Your message dated Mon, 17 Aug 2020 08:26:44 + with message-id and subject line Bug#957255: fixed in garden-of-coloured-lights 1.0.9-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #957255, regarding garden-of-coloured-lights: ftbfs with GCC-10 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#968208: marked as done (pandas: TestMoments.test_rolling_quantile_interpolation_options fails on i386 - rounding issue)

Your message dated Mon, 17 Aug 2020 08:27:16 + with message-id and subject line Bug#968208: fixed in pandas 0.25.3+dfsg2-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #968208, regarding pandas: TestMoments.test_rolling_quantile_interpolation_options fails on i386 - rounding issue to be marked as done.

Processed: Up the priority of installation breakage

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > clone 960265 -1 Bug #960265 [s390-tools] s390x install Debootstrap warning: Failure while configuring base packages. s390-tools depends on perl:any. Bug 960265 cloned as bug 968549 > reassign -1 debootstrap Bug #968549 [s390-tools] s390x install

Bug#967487: libubootenv: Cannot build libubootenv with dpkg-buildpackage

On 8/12/20 4:29 AM, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote: Hi, Thanks for your report. 2020年8月4日(火) 19:50 Gylstorff Quirin : Package: libubootenv-tool Version: 0.2-1 Severity: serious Tags: patch ftbfs Justification: fails to build from source Dear Maintainer, I tried to build libubootenv-tool with

Bug#960265: marked as done (s390x install Debootstrap warning: Failure while configuring base packages. s390-tools depends on perl:any.)

Your message dated Mon, 17 Aug 2020 10:15:32 +0200 with message-id and subject line Fixed in 2.3.0-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #960265, regarding s390x install Debootstrap warning: Failure while configuring base packages. s390-tools depends on perl:any. to be marked as done. This means

Bug#965359: marked as done (lynis: Denial of service by user creating symlink to /, disk space exhaustion due to verbose logging)

Your message dated Mon, 17 Aug 2020 07:34:28 + with message-id and subject line Bug#965359: fixed in lynis 3.0.0-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #965359, regarding lynis: Denial of service by user creating symlink to /, disk space exhaustion due to verbose logging to be marked as done.

Processed: cluster3: fails to migrate to testing for too long

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > notfound 968436 cluster3/2.4.1-1 Bug #968436 {Done: Graham Inggs } [src:cluster3] cluster3: fails to migrate to testing for too long The source cluster3 and version 2.4.1-1 do not appear to match any binary packages No longer marked as found in

Bug#967174: monster-masher: Unversioned Python removal in sid/bullseye

On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 2:32 AM Matthias Klose wrote: > > Package: src:monster-masher > Version: 1.8.1-8 > Severity: serious > Tags: sid bullseye > User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org > Usertags: py2unversioned > > Python2 becomes end-of-live upstream, and Debian aims to remove > Python2 from the

Bug#968176: marked as done (gdcm: wrong debian/control file (mono archs missing))

Your message dated Mon, 17 Aug 2020 06:48:31 + with message-id and subject line Bug#968176: fixed in gdcm 3.0.7-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #968176, regarding gdcm: wrong debian/control file (mono archs missing) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#967176: marked as done (mialmpick: Unversioned Python removal in sid/bullseye)

Your message dated Mon, 17 Aug 2020 08:40:28 +0200 with message-id and subject line Closing has caused the Debian Bug report #967176, regarding mialmpick: Unversioned Python removal in sid/bullseye to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is

Bug#957884: marked as done (trousers: ftbfs with GCC-10)

Your message dated Mon, 17 Aug 2020 06:03:43 + with message-id and subject line Bug#957884: fixed in trousers 0.3.14+fixed1-1.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #957884, regarding trousers: ftbfs with GCC-10 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Bug#957884: trousers: diff for NMU version 0.3.14+fixed1-1.1

Control: tags 957884 + pending Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for trousers (versioned as 0.3.14+fixed1-1.1) and uploaded it to DELAYED/0 as per the recommended delays from the developers' reference. Best Regards, OdyX diff -Nru trousers-0.3.14+fixed1/debian/changelog

Processed: trousers: diff for NMU version 0.3.14+fixed1-1.1

Processing control commands: > tags 957884 + pending Bug #957884 [src:trousers] trousers: ftbfs with GCC-10 Added tag(s) pending. -- 957884: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=957884 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems