Bug#996871: wmnet: crashes on launch

2021-10-19 Thread Thomas Groman
Package: wmnet Version: 1.06-1+b2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Launching wmnet causes it to crash on launch with the following output: $ wmnet wmnet: using devstats driver to monitor eth0 X Error of failed request: BadName (named color or font does not exist) Major op

Bug#996828: marked as done (llvm-toolchain-12: FTBFS on armel|armhf since 1:12.0.1-10: fatal error: 'gnu/stubs-(hard|soft).h' file not found)

2021-10-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 20 Oct 2021 06:18:48 + with message-id and subject line Bug#996828: fixed in llvm-toolchain-12 1:12.0.1-12 has caused the Debian Bug report #996828, regarding llvm-toolchain-12: FTBFS on armel|armhf since 1:12.0.1-10: fatal error: 'gnu/stubs-(hard|soft).h' file not fou

Bug#996796: marked as done (llvm-toolchain-12: FTBFS on i386|mipsel|powerpc since 1:12.0.1-10: undefined reference to `__udivdi3')

2021-10-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 20 Oct 2021 06:18:48 + with message-id and subject line Bug#996796: fixed in llvm-toolchain-12 1:12.0.1-12 has caused the Debian Bug report #996796, regarding llvm-toolchain-12: FTBFS on i386|mipsel|powerpc since 1:12.0.1-10: undefined reference to `__udivdi3' to be ma

Bug#996863: src:python-novaclient: fails to migrate to testing for too long: unresolved RC bug

2021-10-19 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi, On 20-10-2021 02:07, Thomas Goirand wrote: >> The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing >> and unstable for more than 60 days as having a Release Critical bug in >> testing [1]. Your package src:python-novaclient has been trying to >> migrate for 66 days [2]. Hen

Bug#617856: New version of apt-show-versions fixes 617856

2021-10-19 Thread Paul Wise
On Fri, 8 Oct 2021 11:31:39 +0200 Christoph Martin wrote: > tags 617856 + pending > thanks > > Upload of new version is pending. Could you upload the package? -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Processed: tagging 995015

2021-10-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 995015 + bullseye bookworm sid Bug #995015 [dnsdiag] dnsdiag: Error when running: DeprecationWarning Bug #995016 [dnsdiag] dnsdiag: Error when running: DeprecationWarning Added tag(s) bullseye, bookworm, and sid. Added tag(s) sid, bullseye, a

Bug#983978: marked as done (azure-uamqp-python: ftbfs with GCC-11)

2021-10-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 20 Oct 2021 00:48:32 + with message-id and subject line Bug#983978: fixed in azure-uamqp-python 1.4.2-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #983978, regarding azure-uamqp-python: ftbfs with GCC-11 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been d

Bug#995623: refind FTBFS: error: conflicting types for ‘EFI_DEVICE_PATH_UTILITIES_PROTOCOL’

2021-10-19 Thread Tianon Gravi
(s/grub-efi/gnu-efi/ -- brain fart) Looks like https://sourceforge.net/p/gnu-efi/code/ci/ce0bd62f5c420f0457c58c120497dc16d2e606dd/ is the relevant gnu-efi commit which introduced the new typedef, in case that helps. ♥, - Tianon 4096R / B42F 6819 007F 00F8 8E36 4FD4 036A 9C25 BF35 7DD4 On Tue

Bug#996863: src:python-novaclient: fails to migrate to testing for too long: unresolved RC bug

2021-10-19 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 10/19/21 10:07 PM, Paul Gevers wrote: > Source: python-novaclient > Version: 2:17.2.1-3 > Severity: serious > Control: close -1 2:17.6.0-2 > Tags: sid bookworm > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: out-of-sync > Control: block -1 by 986143 > > Dear maintainer(s), > > The R

Bug#995623: refind FTBFS: error: conflicting types for ‘EFI_DEVICE_PATH_UTILITIES_PROTOCOL’

2021-10-19 Thread Tianon Gravi
Hey Rod, this is an interesting one -- looking at the definitions of the "EFI_DEVICE_PATH_UTILITIES_PROTOCOL" typedef in both refind's code and grub-efi's, they appear to be compatible to me (which makes sense, probably from the same original source?) Is this something you plan to resolve in upstr

Processed: bug 996050 is forwarded to https://github.com/micheleg/dash-to-dock/pull/1531

2021-10-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forwarded 996050 https://github.com/micheleg/dash-to-dock/pull/1531 Bug #996050 [gnome-shell-extension-dashtodock] gnome-shell-extension-dashtodock: does not declare compatibility with GNOME Shell 41 Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://git

Bug#996218: marked as done (ruby-enum: FTBFS with ruby3.0: ERROR: Test "ruby3.0" failed: expected Ruby::Enum::Errors::UninitializedConstantError, got #

2021-10-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 19 Oct 2021 22:48:38 + with message-id and subject line Bug#996218: fixed in ruby-enum 0.9.0+ds-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #996218, regarding ruby-enum: FTBFS with ruby3.0: ERROR: Test "ruby3.0" failed: expected Ruby::Enum::Errors::UninitializedConstantE

Bug#996209: marked as done (ruby-cri: FTBFS with ruby3.0: ERROR: Test "ruby3.0" failed: ArgumentError: wrong number of arguments (given 1, expected 0; required keywords: name, transform))

2021-10-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 19 Oct 2021 21:49:18 + with message-id and subject line Bug#996209: fixed in ruby-cri 2.15.11-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #996209, regarding ruby-cri: FTBFS with ruby3.0: ERROR: Test "ruby3.0" failed: ArgumentError: wrong number of arguments (given 1, expected 0

Bug#996076: marked as done (gnome-shell-extension-weather: does not declare compatibility with GNOME Shell 41)

2021-10-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 19 Oct 2021 21:33:39 + with message-id and subject line Bug#996076: fixed in gnome-shell-extension-weather 0.0~git20210509.d714eb1-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #996076, regarding gnome-shell-extension-weather: does not declare compatibility with GNOME Shell 41 t

Bug#984186: marked as done (libloki: ftbfs with GCC-11)

2021-10-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 19 Oct 2021 20:36:22 + with message-id and subject line Bug#984186: fixed in libloki 0.1.7-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #984186, regarding libloki: ftbfs with GCC-11 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is

Processed: tagging 994790

2021-10-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 994790 + pending Bug #994790 [src:hcxtools] hcxtools: CVE-2021-32286 Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 994790: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=994790 Debi

Processed: src:python-elasticsearch: fails to migrate to testing for too long: uploader built arch:all binaries

2021-10-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > close -1 7.1.0-4 Bug #996864 [src:python-elasticsearch] src:python-elasticsearch: fails to migrate to testing for too long: uploader built arch:all binaries Marked as fixed in versions python-elasticsearch/7.1.0-4. Bug #996864 [src:python-elasticsearch] src:python-e

Bug#996864: src:python-elasticsearch: fails to migrate to testing for too long: uploader built arch:all binaries

2021-10-19 Thread Paul Gevers
Source: python-elasticsearch Version: 7.1.0-3 Severity: serious Control: close -1 7.1.0-4 X-Debbugs-CC: jel...@debian.org Tags: sid bookworm pending User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: out-of-sync Dear maintainer(s), The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync betw

Processed: src:python-novaclient: fails to migrate to testing for too long: unresolved RC bug

2021-10-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > close -1 2:17.6.0-2 Bug #996863 [src:python-novaclient] src:python-novaclient: fails to migrate to testing for too long: unresolved RC bug Marked as fixed in versions python-novaclient/2:17.6.0-2. Bug #996863 [src:python-novaclient] src:python-novaclient: fails to m

Bug#996863: src:python-novaclient: fails to migrate to testing for too long: unresolved RC bug

2021-10-19 Thread Paul Gevers
Source: python-novaclient Version: 2:17.2.1-3 Severity: serious Control: close -1 2:17.6.0-2 Tags: sid bookworm User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: out-of-sync Control: block -1 by 986143 Dear maintainer(s), The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testi

Bug#996861: src:grepmail: fails to migrate to testing for too long: uploader built arch:all binaries

2021-10-19 Thread Paul Gevers
Source: grepmail Version: 5.3104-1 Severity: serious Control: close -1 5.3104-2 X-Debbugs-CC: jel...@debian.org Tags: sid bookworm pending User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: out-of-sync Dear maintainer(s), The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testin

Processed: src:grepmail: fails to migrate to testing for too long: uploader built arch:all binaries

2021-10-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > close -1 5.3104-2 Bug #996861 [src:grepmail] src:grepmail: fails to migrate to testing for too long: uploader built arch:all binaries Marked as fixed in versions grepmail/5.3104-2. Bug #996861 [src:grepmail] src:grepmail: fails to migrate to testing for too long: u

Bug#984217: marked as done (liggghts: ftbfs with GCC-11)

2021-10-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 19 Oct 2021 19:49:18 + with message-id and subject line Bug#984217: fixed in liggghts 3.8.0+repack1-9 has caused the Debian Bug report #984217, regarding liggghts: ftbfs with GCC-11 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. I

Bug#995735: dask.distributed: autopkgtest sometimes times out on ci.d.n worker since dask migrated

2021-10-19 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi Diane, On 18-10-2021 20:53, Diane Trout wrote: > I also glanced at the current CI build results and all the runs with > 2021.09.1+ds.1-1 seem to be finishing in about 25 minutes both passing > and faild tests. I do see the 2h runs with version 2021.08.1+ds.1-1 > https://ci.debian.net/packages/d

Processed: your mail

2021-10-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 996858 normal Bug #996858 [libllvm12] libllvm12:i386 uninstallable and uninstall my desktop Severity set to 'normal' from 'grave' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 996858: https://bugs.debia

Bug#996858: libllvm12:i386 uninstallable and uninstall my desktop

2021-10-19 Thread Sylvestre Ledru
Hello Please provide more information and steps to reproduce. It might come from steam. S Le 19/10/2021 à 21:21, alain a écrit : > Package: libllvm12 > Version: 1:12.0.1-10 > Severity: grave > Tags: upstream > Justification: renders package unusable > X-Debbugs-Cc: compte.perso.de-al...@bbox.f

Bug#996858: libllvm12:i386 uninstallable and uninstall my desktop

2021-10-19 Thread alain
Package: libllvm12 Version: 1:12.0.1-10 Severity: grave Tags: upstream Justification: renders package unusable X-Debbugs-Cc: compte.perso.de-al...@bbox.fr Dear Maintainer, *** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate *** * What led up to the situation? installati

Bug#983988: marked as done (benchmark: ftbfs with GCC-11)

2021-10-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 19 Oct 2021 19:03:51 + with message-id and subject line Bug#983988: fixed in benchmark 1.6.0-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #983988, regarding benchmark: ftbfs with GCC-11 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this

Bug#996050: extension compatibility with GNOME Shell 41

2021-10-19 Thread Christian Lauinger
On Sun, 17 Oct 2021 12:54:28 +0100 Simon McVittie wrote: > Control: severity -1 serious > > On Sun, 10 Oct 2021 at 21:33:02 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: > > The metadata.json for this extension doesn't declare compatibility with > > GNOME 41. I don't know whether the actual code will need changes

Processed (with 1 error): Re: Bug#996730: Certain menus don't work right when chrome is in the Normal Layer

2021-10-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > severity 996730 important Bug #996730 [icewm] Certain menus don't work right when chrome is in the Normal Layer Severity set to 'important' from 'grave' > tags 996730 +notreproducible +upstream Unknown tag/s: notreproducible. Recognized are: patch wontfix moreinfo u

Bug#996730: Certain menus don't work right when chrome is in the Normal Layer

2021-10-19 Thread Eduard Bloch
Control: severity 996730 important Control: tags 996730 +notreproducible +upstream Hallo, * 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson [Mon, Oct 18 2021, 03:42:00AM]: > Package: icewm > Version: 2.8.0-1 > Severity: grave > > Are there any other users who can confirm > https://github.com/ice-wm/icewm/issues/62 ? I have no

Bug#996820: marked as done (gdcm: binary-all FTBFS)

2021-10-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 19 Oct 2021 16:33:56 + with message-id and subject line Bug#996820: fixed in gdcm 3.0.8-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #996820, regarding gdcm: binary-all FTBFS to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the

Bug#996836: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#996836: node-webpack: webpack embeds binary files in es-module-lexer component

2021-10-19 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
Le mar. 19 oct. 2021 à 16:12, Yadd a écrit : > Source: node-webpack > Version: 5.58.2+~cs5.11.7-1 > Severity: serious > Justification: DFSG > > webpack 5.58 uses es-module-lexer. For now, this component is downloaded > including some binary files (WASM,...). This should be fixed before > going to

Bug#996716: pyopencl: autopkgtest regression: test-depends on removed package

2021-10-19 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Followup-For: Bug #996716 Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/inducer/pyopencl/issues/519 Control: retitle -1 pyopencl: FTBFS on 32-bit arches; autopkgtest regression: test-depends on removed package > [...] The package > python3-pyopencl-dbg was dropped in the latest upload but the test sti

Processed: Re: pyopencl: autopkgtest regression: test-depends on removed package

2021-10-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > forwarded -1 https://github.com/inducer/pyopencl/issues/519 Bug #996716 [src:pyopencl] pyopencl: autopkgtest regression: test-depends on removed package Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://github.com/inducer/pyopencl/issues/519'. > retitle -1 pyopencl: FTBFS o

Bug#996849: RM: dlz-ldap-enum -- RoQA, unmaintained, dead-upstream, low popcon

2021-10-19 Thread Tobias Frost
Package: dlz-ldap-enum Severity: serious Dear Maintainer, The package is unmaintained, outdated in terms of packaging standard, very low (as in single digit) popcon and it has no reverse dependencies. I therefore propose to RM the package. If you disagree, just close this bug, but please show t

Bug#996848: bs1770gain FTBFS: error: this ‘if’ clause does not guard... [-Werror=misleading-indentation]

2021-10-19 Thread Helmut Grohne
Source: bs1770gain Version: 0.8.3-2 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs bs1770gain fails to build from source (probably due to gcc-11). A non-parallel build now ends as follows: | gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -I../libpbutil -I../libff -I../lib1770-2 -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -I/usr/include -Ws

Bug#996847: sysrepo-plugind fails to start

2021-10-19 Thread Nicholas Brown
Package: sysrepo-plugind Version: 1.4.70-4 Severity: grave Appears to be due to this error when the error starts: sysrepo-plugind error: Creating plugins dir "/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/sysrepo/plugins" failed (Read-only file system). Should this directory be created as part of the debian package

Processed: severity of 996845 is serious

2021-10-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 996845 serious Bug #996845 [src:hepmc] RM: hepmc -- RoQA, unmaintained, RC-buggy, low-popcon Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 996845: https://bugs.de

Bug#996764: marked as done (FTBFS: test misc/swaplabel failure)

2021-10-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 19 Oct 2021 15:20:08 + with message-id and subject line Bug#996764: fixed in util-linux 2.37.2-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #996764, regarding FTBFS: test misc/swaplabel failure to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.

Bug#996846: RM: pythia8 -- RoQA, unmaintained, low popcon

2021-10-19 Thread Tobias Frost
Source: pythia8 Severity: serious Control: block -1 by 996845 Control: block 996845 by -1 Dear Maintainer, pythia8 is unmaintained (see MIA bug #925039) and was left barely floating by NMUs since 2015. It has no reverse dependencies in Debian, beside hepmc, which is a circular dependency (and al

Processed: RM: hepmc -- RoQA, unmaintained, RC-buggy, low-popcon

2021-10-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > block -1 by 996843 Bug #996845 [src:hepmc] RM: hepmc -- RoQA, unmaintained, RC-buggy, low-popcon 996845 was not blocked by any bugs. 996845 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 996845: 996843 -- 996845: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?b

Bug#996843: RM: rivet -- RoQA, unmaintained, python2, lowpopcon, RC-buggy

2021-10-19 Thread Tobias Frost
Package: rivet Severity: serious rivet is unmaintained (see MIA bug #925075) and lacking serverily behing upsteam. It has no reverse dependencies in Debian. It was never part of any Debian release. It is currently RC buggy with those bugs: #966790 [S| | ] [src:rivet] rivet: Unversioned Python

Processed: openclonk FTCBFS: needs a native build pass

2021-10-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > block -1 by 984274 Bug #996841 [src:openclonk] openclonk FTCBFS: needs a native build pass 996841 was not blocked by any bugs. 996841 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 996841: 984274 -- 996841: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=996

Processed: Bug#996764 marked as pending in util-linux

2021-10-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #996764 [util-linux] FTBFS: test misc/swaplabel failure Added tag(s) pending. -- 996764: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=996764 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#996764: marked as pending in util-linux

2021-10-19 Thread Chris Hofstaedtler
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #996764 in util-linux reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/debian/util-linux/-/commit/80ba1cfe393aae3eeedf98b3a903

Bug#996374: marked as done (python-nanoget: autopkgtest regression)

2021-10-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 19 Oct 2021 14:34:24 + with message-id and subject line Bug#996374: fixed in python-nanoget 1.12.2-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #996374, regarding python-nanoget: autopkgtest regression to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dea

Processed: Bug#996836 marked as pending in node-webpack

2021-10-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #996836 [src:node-webpack] node-webpack: webpack embeds binary files in es-module-lexer component Added tag(s) pending. -- 996836: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=996836 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org

Bug#996836: marked as pending in node-webpack

2021-10-19 Thread Yadd
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #996836 in node-webpack reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/js-team/node-webpack/-/commit/718f958c192e22548eee056

Bug#996836: node-webpack: webpack embeds binary files in es-module-lexer component

2021-10-19 Thread Yadd
Source: node-webpack Version: 5.58.2+~cs5.11.7-1 Severity: serious Justification: DFSG webpack 5.58 uses es-module-lexer. For now, this component is downloaded including some binary files (WASM,...). This should be fixed before going to unstable.

debian-bugs-rc@lists.debian.org

2021-10-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 996764 + upstream fixed-upstream Bug #996764 [util-linux] FTBFS: test misc/swaplabel failure Added tag(s) fixed-upstream and upstream. > forwarded 996764 https://marc.info/?l=util-linux-ng&m=163457954007432&w=2 Bug #996764 [util-linux] FTBFS:

Processed: Re: Bug#996500: wlroots FTBFS: error: ‘av_init_packet’ is deprecated [-Werror=deprecated-declarations]

2021-10-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > fixed -1 wlroots/0.14.1-1 Bug #996500 [src:wlroots] wlroots FTBFS: error: ‘av_init_packet’ is deprecated [-Werror=deprecated-declarations] Marked as fixed in versions wlroots/0.14.1-1. -- 996500: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=996500 Debian Bug

Bug#996500: wlroots FTBFS: error: ‘av_init_packet’ is deprecated [-Werror=deprecated-declarations]

2021-10-19 Thread Guido Günther
control: -1 fixed wlroots/0.14.1-1

Processed: Re: Bug#996828: llvm-toolchain-12: FTBFS on armel|armhf since 1:12.0.1-10: fatal error: 'gnu/stubs-(hard|soft).h' file not found

2021-10-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > found -1 1:12.0.1-10 Bug #996828 [src:llvm-toolchain-12] llvm-toolchain-12: FTBFS on armel|armhf since 1:12.0.1-10: fatal error: 'gnu/stubs-(hard|soft).h' file not found Marked as found in versions llvm-toolchain-12/1:12.0.1-10. > notfound -1 1:12.0.1-8 Bug #996828

Bug#996828: llvm-toolchain-12: FTBFS on armel|armhf since 1:12.0.1-10: fatal error: 'gnu/stubs-(hard|soft).h' file not found

2021-10-19 Thread Simon McVittie
Control: found -1 1:12.0.1-10 Control: notfound -1 1:12.0.1-8 On Tue, 19 Oct 2021 at 13:29:16 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: > Source: llvm-toolchain-12 > Version: 1:12.0.1-8 Sorry, reportbug filled in a default version from the libllvm12 that I have installed locally, but that wasn't the right ver

Bug#963643: marked as done (gammu: FTBFS with Sphinx 3.1: Could not import extension configext (exception: cannot import name 'l_' from 'sphinx.locale' (/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/sphinx/locale/__

2021-10-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 19 Oct 2021 12:33:32 + with message-id and subject line Bug#963643: fixed in gammu 1.42.0-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #963643, regarding gammu: FTBFS with Sphinx 3.1: Could not import extension configext (exception: cannot import name 'l_' from 'sphinx.locale'

Bug#996829: llvm-toolchain-12: 1:12.0.1-9 FTBFS on armel: llvm-ar.cpp.o: undefined reference to symbol '__atomic_fetch_sub_4@@LIBATOMIC_1.0'

2021-10-19 Thread Simon McVittie
Source: llvm-toolchain-12 Version: 1:12.0.1-9 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=llvm-toolchain-12&arch=armel&ver=1%3A12.0.1-9&stamp=1632047469&raw=0 > FAILED: bin/llvm-ar > :

Bug#996828: llvm-toolchain-12: FTBFS on armel|armhf since 1:12.0.1-10: fatal error: 'gnu/stubs-(hard|soft).h' file not found

2021-10-19 Thread Simon McVittie
Source: llvm-toolchain-12 Version: 1:12.0.1-8 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=llvm-toolchain-12&arch=armel&ver=1%3A12.0.1-10&stamp=1634598677&raw=0 > /<>/build-llvm/./bin/cla

Processed: Bug#996820 marked as pending in gdcm

2021-10-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #996820 [src:gdcm] gdcm: binary-all FTBFS Added tag(s) pending. -- 996820: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=996820 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#996820: marked as pending in gdcm

2021-10-19 Thread Mathieu Malaterre
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #996820 in gdcm reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/gdcm/-/commit/0430689f0202806ba81218e5f2b10f7d20f2e2

Bug#996724: ruby3.0: FTBFS on ppc64el: Segmentation fault

2021-10-19 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 01:22:25PM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > On 10/18/21 13:16, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > > I don't think we are on the right track here. I need to read the failing > > test correctly. this "test case" alone is bogus, as > > > > ruby -e 'END {Process.kill :SEGV, $$}

Bug#996071: marked as done (gnome-shell-extension-system-monitor: does not declare compatibility with GNOME Shell 41)

2021-10-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 19 Oct 2021 10:19:48 + with message-id and subject line Bug#996071: fixed in gnome-shell-extension-system-monitor 40-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #996071, regarding gnome-shell-extension-system-monitor: does not declare compatibility with GNOME Shell 41 to be mar

Processed: tagging 996820

2021-10-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 996820 + ftbfs Bug #996820 [src:gdcm] gdcm: binary-all FTBFS Added tag(s) ftbfs. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 996820: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=996820 Debian Bug Tra

Bug#996820: gdcm: binary-all FTBFS

2021-10-19 Thread Adrian Bunk
Source: gdcm Version: 3.0.8-3 Severity: serious https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=gdcm&arch=all&ver=3.0.8-3&stamp=1634638015&raw=0 ... CMake Error at cmake_install.cmake:54 (file): file INSTALL cannot find "/<>/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/Utilities/doxygen/gdcm2pnm.1": No such file or

Bug#993042: nim FTBFS on armhf when built on arm64 hardware

2021-10-19 Thread Nilesh Patra
Hi Federico, On Thu, 26 Aug 2021 21:55:02 +0300 Adrian Bunk wrote:> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=nim&arch=armhf&ver=1.4.8-2&stamp=1629152447&raw=0 ... The uname usage in tools/niminst/makefile.nimf is fragile. Adding cases for armv8l and armv9l might work due to the Debian

Bug#995279: marked as done (ayatana-indicator-datetime: Fails to build from source)

2021-10-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 19 Oct 2021 08:48:42 + with message-id and subject line Bug#995279: fixed in ayatana-indicator-datetime 0.8.3-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #995279, regarding ayatana-indicator-datetime: Fails to build from source to be marked as done. This means that you claim th

Processed: closing 933290

2021-10-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > close 933290 2.6.3.14058+dfsg-1~exp1 Bug #933290 [src:owncloud-client] BD on texlive-generic-extra which isn't build anymore and isn't in bullseye Marked as fixed in versions owncloud-client/2.6.3.14058+dfsg-1~exp1. Bug #933290 [src:owncloud-clie

Processed: closing 945718

2021-10-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > close 945718 2.6.3.14058+dfsg-1~exp1 Bug #945718 [src:owncloud-client] owncloud-client: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye Marked as fixed in versions owncloud-client/2.6.3.14058+dfsg-1~exp1. Bug #945718 [src:owncloud-client] owncloud-client: Python

Bug#996815: libfreetype6: upgrade from 2.10.4+dfsg-1 to 2.11.0+dfsg-1 changes terminal text rendering

2021-10-19 Thread xcdc dxcx
Package: libfreetype6 Version: 2.11.0+dfsg-1 Severity: serious Dear Maintainer, Upgrading libfreetype6 from 2.10.4+dfsg-1 to 2.11.0+dfsg-1 causes terminal text to be rendered wider than expected. Terminal application: rxvt-unicode 9.26-2 Font configuration (~/.Xdefaults line): URxvt*font: xft:L

Bug#996551: llvm-13-dev: Missing dependency to libomp-13-dev

2021-10-19 Thread Sylvain Joubert
Package: llvm-13-dev Version: 1:13.0.0-6 Followup-For: Bug #996551 X-Debbugs-Cc: joubert...@gmail.com Dear Maintainer, I believe this bug still exists in version 1:13.0.0-6 with the same error. With a quick glance at the patch/fix I believe the regex that comments the relevant line is at fault (u

Processed: unarchiving 933290, reopening 933290, unarchiving 945718, reopening 945718, unarchiving 750903 ...

2021-10-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # src:owncloud-client was reintroduced: > https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/546c2c3d77eaef6dc2b26c7ed7663f16df847bda.ca...@debian.org > unarchive 933290 Bug #933290 {Done: Debian FTP Masters } [src:owncloud-client] BD on texlive-generic-extr

Processed: closing 936758

2021-10-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > close 936758 16-1 Bug #936758 [src:jack-mixer] jack-mixer: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye Marked as fixed in versions jack-mixer/16-1. Bug #936758 [src:jack-mixer] jack-mixer: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye Marked Bug as done > thanks Stopping p

Processed: closing 885309

2021-10-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > close 885309 16-1 Bug #885309 [src:jack-mixer] jack-mixer: Depends on unmaintained pygtk Marked as fixed in versions jack-mixer/16-1. Bug #885309 [src:jack-mixer] jack-mixer: Depends on unmaintained pygtk Marked Bug as done > thanks Stopping proce

Processed: unarchiving 885309, reopening 885309, unarchiving 936758, reopening 936758, unarchiving 890152 ...

2021-10-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # src:jack-mixer was reintroduced: > https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/546c2c3d77eaef6dc2b26c7ed7663f16df847bda.ca...@debian.org > unarchive 885309 Bug #885309 {Done: Debian FTP Masters } [src:jack-mixer] jack-mixer: Depends on unmaintained

Bug#996048: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#996048: postfix-mta-sts-resolver: autopkgtest doesn't handle new version of ca-certificates nicely: rehash: warning: skipping ca-certificates.crt, it does not conta

2021-10-19 Thread Julien Cristau
On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 11:05:14PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 10:40:59PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 02:50:50PM +0200, Benjamin Hof wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I think the following change might be the relevant one: > > > > > > --- a/upda