Bug#1001657: Ball fails its autopkgtest - how to properly deal with sip files?

2021-12-15 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Étienne, Am Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 11:23:17PM +0100 schrieb Étienne Mollier: > > I pushed my changes leading to these errors, but getting the > other bugs affecting ball fixed before Christmas might involve > undoing the setting of SIP_LIBRARIES in d/rules. Thanks a lot for your

Bug#1001681: marked as done (sight: FTBFS in unstable)

2021-12-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 16 Dec 2021 06:18:37 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1001681: fixed in sight 21.0.0-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #1001681, regarding sight: FTBFS in unstable to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is

Bug#1001289: marked as done (colorclass: needs update for python3.10: 'Mapping' from 'collections' is removed)

2021-12-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 16 Dec 2021 05:33:30 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1001289: fixed in colorclass 2.2.0-2.2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1001289, regarding colorclass: needs update for python3.10: 'Mapping' from 'collections' is removed to be marked as done. This means

Processed: severity of 1000744 is important

2021-12-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 1000744 important Bug #1000744 [src:emacs] emacs: FTBFS on mipsel: Ran 3873 tests, 3786 results as expected, 1 unexpected, 86 skipped Severity set to 'important' from 'serious' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if

Bug#999109: marked as done (fortunes-fr: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep)

2021-12-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 16 Dec 2021 03:04:29 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1001723: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #999109, regarding fortunes-fr: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep to be marked as done. This means

Bug#1001773: dcontainers: FTBFS on s390x in sid

2021-12-15 Thread Steve Langasek
Source: dcontainers Version: 0.8.0~alpha.16-1 Severity: serious User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com Usertags: origin-ubuntu jammy Hi Matthias, While rebuilding packages in Ubuntu for the libphobos2-ldc ABI change, I found that dcontainers fails to build from source on s390x: [...] [44/44] gdc

Bug#1001765: [Pkg-rust-maintainers] Bug#1001765: src:rust-futures: fails to migrate to testing for too long: makes reverse dependencies uninstallable in testing

2021-12-15 Thread peter green
I know we expect this for some time in the rust ecosystem, but 60 days ought to be enough for that. I appreciate your efforts to keep testing moving forwards. All the crates that are used by applications in testing that had dependencies on rust-futures have been dealt with (generally by

Bug#1001770: libgmsh4 needs Breaks+Replaces: libgmsh4 (>= 4.8.4+ds1-1~)

2021-12-15 Thread Adrian Bunk
Package: libgmsh4 Version: 4.8.4+ds2-1 Severity: serious Unpacking libgmsh4.8:amd64 (4.8.4+ds2-1) ... dpkg: error processing archive /tmp/apt-dpkg-install-g8oaD4/13-libgmsh4.8_4.8.4+ds2-1_amd64.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgmsh.so.4.8.4', which is also in

Processed: Re: [pkg-gnupg-maint] Bug#993578: 90gpg-agent generator: `gpgconf --check-programs` can hang

2021-12-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags 993578 pending Bug #993578 [gpg-agent] 90gpg-agent generator: `gpgconf --check-programs` can hang Added tag(s) pending. -- 993578: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=993578 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#993578: [pkg-gnupg-maint] Bug#993578: 90gpg-agent generator: `gpgconf --check-programs` can hang

2021-12-15 Thread Christoph Biedl
Control: tags 993578 pending Raphael Hertzog wrote... > With the patch in https://salsa.debian.org/debian/gnupg2/-/merge_requests/9 > I no longer have this issue. Thanks for preparing this. > But I'm not sure if the patch is fully correct, the manual page is not > clear whether --check-options

Bug#984388: marked as done (vdr-plugin-live: ftbfs with GCC-11)

2021-12-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 15 Dec 2021 22:09:05 + with message-id and subject line Bug#984388: fixed in vdr-plugin-live 3.1.3-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #984388, regarding vdr-plugin-live: ftbfs with GCC-11 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Bug#999153: marked as done (jpeginfo: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep)

2021-12-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 15 Dec 2021 22:06:36 + with message-id and subject line Bug#999153: fixed in jpeginfo 1.6.1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #999153, regarding jpeginfo: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#999074: iec16022: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep

2021-12-15 Thread Jakob Haufe
I just had a look at this and so far it looks easy to convert to dh. I intend to prepare an NMU for this. Debdiff will follow. Jan: Is that ok with you? Also: Would you be interested in a co-maintainer for iec16022? I am sort of scratching my own itch here as iec16022 is a reverse dependency of

Processed: bug 998294 is forwarded to https://github.com/KhronosGroup/Vulkan-ValidationLayers/issues/3607

2021-12-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forwarded 998294 > https://github.com/KhronosGroup/Vulkan-ValidationLayers/issues/3607 Bug #998294 [src:vulkan-validationlayers] src:vulkan-validationlayers: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on mips*el Set Bug

Bug#1001657: Ball fails its autopkgtest - how to properly deal with sip files?

2021-12-15 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Étienne, Am Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 09:42:00PM +0100 schrieb Étienne Mollier: > > Pushed, Thanks for the nudge. (Sorry, I couldn't push yesterday > for dumb reasons.) Thanks. :-) > > The python package is probably available for the case if you want to use > > the library itself in the

Bug#953380: marked as done (rpmlint: Autopkgtest error (test failure))

2021-12-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 15 Dec 2021 20:43:10 + with message-id and subject line Bug#953380: fixed in rpmlint 2.2.0+ds1-0.2 has caused the Debian Bug report #953380, regarding rpmlint: Autopkgtest error (test failure) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Processed: Re: silx: autopkgtests failures

2021-12-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 1001665 by 1001545 Bug #1001665 [src:silx] silx: autopkgtests failures 1001665 was not blocked by any bugs. 1001665 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 1001665: 1001545 > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me

Bug#1001545: silx: autopkgtests failures

2021-12-15 Thread Paul Gevers
block 1001665 by 1001545 thanks Hi all, On Mon, 13 Dec 2021 22:42:13 +0100 Sebastian Ramacher wrote: The autopkgtests of silx fail with: | [7 8 9]] | Abscissa Ordinate1 ['%d', '%.2f'] 2 [1 2 3] [4 5 6] | Abscissa Ordinate2 ['%d', '%.2f'] 2 [1 2 3] [7 8 9] | Abscissa Ordinate1 ['%d', '%.2f']

Bug#1001766: oomd: ships both ./lib/systemd/system/oomd.service & ./usr/lib/systemd/system/oomd.service

2021-12-15 Thread Jaimos Skriletz
Further information from IRC: The issue was not part of the 0.5.0-1 package from snapshot, but only appeared in the rebuild 0.5.0-1+b1. In building 0.5.0-1 in a clean sid chroot (with usrmerge), I get the same issue of the service file being put in both /lib and /usr/lib. It seems to me the bug

Processed: libexpect-perl: diff for NMU version 1.21-1.2

2021-12-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags 999021 + patch Bug #999021 [src:libexpect-perl] libexpect-perl: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep Added tag(s) patch. > tags 999021 + pending Bug #999021 [src:libexpect-perl] libexpect-perl: missing required debian/rules

Bug#999021: libexpect-perl: diff for NMU version 1.21-1.2

2021-12-15 Thread Damyan Ivanov
Control: tags 999021 + patch Control: tags 999021 + pending Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for libexpect-perl (versioned as 1.21-1.2) and uploaded it to DELAYED/7. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer. Regards, dam diff -u libexpect-perl-1.21/debian/changelog

Bug#995212: ungoogled-chromium? [was: Re: Bug#995212: chromium: Update to version 94.0.4606.61 (security-fixes)]

2021-12-15 Thread Stephen Kitt
Hi Jeff, On Tue, 14 Dec 2021 09:13:42 +, Jeff Blake wrote: [...] > Inspector and convertutf are the worst offenders in terms of being > unnecessary and complex. The disable/catapult.patch could also be dropped, > since profiling might be desirable to some users. convertutf at least is

Bug#999320: marked as done (libwww-indexparser-perl: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep)

2021-12-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 15 Dec 2021 19:18:34 + with message-id and subject line Bug#999320: fixed in libwww-indexparser-perl 0.91-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #999320, regarding libwww-indexparser-perl: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep to be marked as

Bug#997845: Your mail

2021-12-15 Thread nick black
i can happily report that the FTPmasters accepted notcurses 3.0.0 into experimental today, and thus the transition bringing it into unstable ought begin. once that hits, i'll be landing on this with both feet. signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#1001766: oomd: ships both ./lib/systemd/system/oomd.service & ./usr/lib/systemd/system/oomd.service

2021-12-15 Thread Ansgar
Package: oomd Version: 0.5.0-1+b1 Severity: grave oomd ships the same file with different content under / and /usr: +--- | dpkg-deb -c oomd_0.5.0-1+b1_amd64.deb|grep service | -rw-r--r-- root/root 369 2021-08-31 16:24 ./lib/systemd/system/oomd.service | -rw-r--r-- root/root 241

Bug#1001765: src:rust-futures: fails to migrate to testing for too long: makes reverse dependencies uninstallable in testing

2021-12-15 Thread Paul Gevers
Source: rust-futures Version: 0.1.29-3 Severity: serious Control: close -1 0.3.17-2 Tags: sid bookworm User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: out-of-sync Dear maintainer(s), The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing and unstable for more than 60

Processed: src:rust-futures: fails to migrate to testing for too long: makes reverse dependencies uninstallable in testing

2021-12-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > close -1 0.3.17-2 Bug #1001765 [src:rust-futures] src:rust-futures: fails to migrate to testing for too long: makes reverse dependencies uninstallable in testing Marked as fixed in versions rust-futures/0.3.17-2. Bug #1001765 [src:rust-futures] src:rust-futures:

Bug#984232: marked as done (meshlab: ftbfs with GCC-11)

2021-12-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 15 Dec 2021 19:03:27 + with message-id and subject line Bug#984232: fixed in meshlab 2020.09+dfsg1-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #984232, regarding meshlab: ftbfs with GCC-11 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If

Bug#995769: marked as done (dbab: v1.5.7 package fail to upgrade from bullseye (1.5.01-1))

2021-12-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 15 Dec 2021 19:00:09 + with message-id and subject line Bug#995769: fixed in dbab 1.5.7-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #995769, regarding dbab: v1.5.7 package fail to upgrade from bullseye (1.5.01-1) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#995424: marked as done (libgmsh4: SONAME bump without package rename)

2021-12-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 15 Dec 2021 19:00:11 + with message-id and subject line Bug#995424: fixed in gmsh 4.8.4+ds2-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #995424, regarding libgmsh4: SONAME bump without package rename to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#984396: marked as done (vdr-plugin-xine: ftbfs with GCC-11)

2021-12-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 15 Dec 2021 19:00:25 + with message-id and subject line Bug#984393: fixed in vdr-plugin-xineliboutput 2.2.0+git20211212-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #984393, regarding vdr-plugin-xine: ftbfs with GCC-11 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#984395: marked as done (vdr-plugin-vcd: ftbfs with GCC-11)

2021-12-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 15 Dec 2021 19:00:25 + with message-id and subject line Bug#984393: fixed in vdr-plugin-xineliboutput 2.2.0+git20211212-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #984393, regarding vdr-plugin-vcd: ftbfs with GCC-11 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#984392: marked as done (vdr-plugin-streamdev: ftbfs with GCC-11)

2021-12-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 15 Dec 2021 19:00:25 + with message-id and subject line Bug#984393: fixed in vdr-plugin-xineliboutput 2.2.0+git20211212-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #984393, regarding vdr-plugin-streamdev: ftbfs with GCC-11 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#984391: marked as done (vdr-plugin-remote: ftbfs with GCC-11)

2021-12-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 15 Dec 2021 19:00:25 + with message-id and subject line Bug#984393: fixed in vdr-plugin-xineliboutput 2.2.0+git20211212-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #984393, regarding vdr-plugin-remote: ftbfs with GCC-11 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#984390: marked as done (vdr-plugin-satip: ftbfs with GCC-11)

2021-12-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 15 Dec 2021 19:00:25 + with message-id and subject line Bug#984393: fixed in vdr-plugin-xineliboutput 2.2.0+git20211212-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #984393, regarding vdr-plugin-satip: ftbfs with GCC-11 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#984383: marked as done (vdr-plugin-dvbhddevice: ftbfs with GCC-11)

2021-12-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 15 Dec 2021 19:00:25 + with message-id and subject line Bug#984393: fixed in vdr-plugin-xineliboutput 2.2.0+git20211212-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #984393, regarding vdr-plugin-dvbhddevice: ftbfs with GCC-11 to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#984385: marked as done (vdr-plugin-dvd: ftbfs with GCC-11)

2021-12-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 15 Dec 2021 19:00:25 + with message-id and subject line Bug#984393: fixed in vdr-plugin-xineliboutput 2.2.0+git20211212-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #984393, regarding vdr-plugin-dvd: ftbfs with GCC-11 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#984382: marked as done (vdr: ftbfs with GCC-11)

2021-12-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 15 Dec 2021 19:00:25 + with message-id and subject line Bug#984393: fixed in vdr-plugin-xineliboutput 2.2.0+git20211212-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #984393, regarding vdr: ftbfs with GCC-11 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#984248: marked as done (mygui: ftbfs with GCC-11)

2021-12-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 15 Dec 2021 19:00:22 + with message-id and subject line Bug#984248: fixed in mygui 3.4.1+dfsg-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #984248, regarding mygui: ftbfs with GCC-11 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this

Bug#984393: marked as done (vdr-plugin-xineliboutput: ftbfs with GCC-11)

2021-12-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 15 Dec 2021 19:00:25 + with message-id and subject line Bug#984393: fixed in vdr-plugin-xineliboutput 2.2.0+git20211212-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #984393, regarding vdr-plugin-xineliboutput: ftbfs with GCC-11 to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#1001009: marked as done (Downloads external files on install)

2021-12-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 15 Dec 2021 19:00:09 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1001009: fixed in dbab 1.5.7-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1001009, regarding Downloads external files on install to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If

Bug#1001764: mrgingham: autopkgtest failure with python3.10 as a supported version

2021-12-15 Thread Graham Inggs
Source: mrgingham Version: 1.20-3 Severity: serious X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: needs-update User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org Usertags: python3.10 python3-all-dev Control: affects -1 src:python3-defaults Hi Maintainer mrgingham's

Processed: mrgingham: autopkgtest failure with python3.10 as a supported version

2021-12-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > affects -1 src:python3-defaults Bug #1001764 [src:mrgingham] mrgingham: autopkgtest failure with python3.10 as a supported version Added indication that 1001764 affects src:python3-defaults -- 1001764: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1001764

Bug#999041: marked as done (libimage-base-bundle-perl: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep)

2021-12-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 15 Dec 2021 16:34:03 + with message-id and subject line Bug#999041: fixed in libimage-base-bundle-perl 1.0.7-3.4 has caused the Debian Bug report #999041, regarding libimage-base-bundle-perl: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep to be

Bug#999083: gkrellm-leds: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep

2021-12-15 Thread Mike Markley
On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 09:28:39AM +0100, Christoph Biedl wrote: > > The severity of this bug will be changed to 'serious' after a month. > > In coordination with the maintainer, I will take over and do an > upload to resolve the issue soon. Current maintainer acknowledging. Thanks, Christoph.

Bug#1001760: FTBFS: 'placeholders' is ambiguous

2021-12-15 Thread Steve Langasek
Package: dart Version: 6.9.5-4 Severity: serious Tags: patch Justification: ftbfs User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com Usertags: origin-ubuntu jammy ubuntu-patch Hi José Luís, In rebuilding packages in Ubuntu for the liburdfdom-model package rename, I found that dart currently fails to build from

Bug#999282: marked as done (spell: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep)

2021-12-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 15 Dec 2021 16:03:38 + with message-id and subject line Bug#999282: fixed in spell 1.0-24.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #999282, regarding spell: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#999041: libimage-base-bundle-perl: diff for NMU version 1.0.7-3.3

2021-12-15 Thread gregor herrmann
On Tue, 14 Dec 2021 16:55:58 -0800, Don Armstrong wrote: > On Mon, 13 Dec 2021, gregor herrmann wrote: > > I've prepared an NMU for libimage-base-bundle-perl (versioned as 1.0.7-3.3) > > and > > uploaded it to DELAYED/5. Please feel free to tell me if I > > should delay it longer. > Feel free to

Bug#998413: marked as done (gap-float: failed to build on i386 arch: object must be an MPFR, not a integer)

2021-12-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 15 Dec 2021 16:08:53 +0100 with message-id and subject line Re: gap-float: autopkgtest regression: object must be an MPFR, not a integer has caused the Debian Bug report #998413, regarding gap-float: failed to build on i386 arch: object must be an MPFR, not a integer to

Bug#998413: gap-float: autopkgtest regression: object must be an MPFR, not a integer

2021-12-15 Thread Jerome BENOIT
Fixed in package version 1.0.2+ds-1. -- Jerome BENOIT | calculus+at-rezozer^dot*net https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=calcu...@rezozer.net AE28 AE15 710D FF1D 87E5 A762 3F92 19A6 7F36 C68B OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#996946: marked as done (freeipa-server: Server setup can fail due to some race in configuring pki-tomcatd)

2021-12-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 15 Dec 2021 15:03:33 + with message-id and subject line Bug#996946: fixed in freeipa 4.9.8-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #996946, regarding freeipa-server: Server setup can fail due to some race in configuring pki-tomcatd to be marked as done. This means that

Bug#1001667: flam3: flaky autopkgtest on ppc64el

2021-12-15 Thread Peter
Thanks for reporting the problem. flam3-genome has a random element which probably explains the flakiness. However, I have run it thousands of times on my x64 desktop with no segfaults, and the issue does seem to be totally specific to ppc64el. Maybe it is a problem with the compiler or the

Bug#987816: marked as pending in dask.distributed

2021-12-15 Thread Vignesh Raman
Dear Maintainer, On Sun, 28 Nov 2021 07:39:16 + Diane Trout wrote: > Control: tag -1 pending > > Hello, > > Bug #987816 in dask.distributed reported by you has been fixed in the > Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit > message below and you can check the diff

Processed: tagging 1000435

2021-12-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 1000435 + ftbfs Bug #1000435 [src:matplotlib] Matplotlib crashes on mips64el in lines.py Added tag(s) ftbfs. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1000435:

Processed: xdelta: diff for NMU version 1.1.3-9.4

2021-12-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags 999238 patch pending Bug #999238 [src:xdelta] xdelta: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep Added tag(s) pending and patch. -- 999238: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=999238 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact

Bug#999238: xdelta: diff for NMU version 1.1.3-9.4

2021-12-15 Thread Colin Watson
Control: tags 999238 patch pending Hi LaMont, I've prepared an NMU for xdelta (versioned as 1.1.3-9.4) and uploaded it to DELAYED/5. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer. Regards, -- Colin Watson [cjwat...@debian.org] diff -u

Bug#999282: spell: diff for NMU version 1.0-24.1

2021-12-15 Thread Giacomo Catenazzi
Thank you for the patch. No need to have a longer queue. ciao cate On 14.12.2021 19:13, gregor herrmann wrote: Control: tags 999282 + patch Control: tags 999282 + pending Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for spell (versioned as 1.0-24.1) and uploaded it to DELAYED/5. Please

Processed: update bts with metadata

2021-12-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 1001718 src:ccdproc 2.2.0-1 Bug #1001718 {Done: Ole Streicher } [src:astroscrappy, src:ccdproc] astroscrappy breaks ccdproc autopkgtest: detect_cosmics() got an unexpected keyword argument 'pssl' Bug reassigned from package

Bug#984232: status

2021-12-15 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 02:53:40PM -0600, Ryan Pavlik wrote: > Upstream has fixed this, and I have a package with the latest upstream > sources in progress, happy to accept help to put it over the edge. Any progress on this? If necessary, I could NMU with the minimal fix of adding export

Bug#999319: popularity-contest: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep

2021-12-15 Thread Bill Allombert
On Tue, Nov 09, 2021 at 10:28:20PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > Source: popularity-contest > Version: 1.73 > Severity: important > Justification: Debian Policy section 4.9 > Tags: bookworm sid > User: debian...@lists.debian.org > Usertags: missing-build-arch-indep > > Dear maintainer, > > Your

Processed: severity of 999319 is important

2021-12-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 999319 important Bug #999319 [src:popularity-contest] popularity-contest: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep Severity set to 'important' from 'serious' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact

Bug#1001657: Ball fails its autopkgtest - how to properly deal with sip files?

2021-12-15 Thread Nilesh Patra
On 15 December 2021 2:36:14 pm IST, Andreas Tille wrote: >Hi Étienne, > >Am Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 11:13:21PM +0100 schrieb Étienne Mollier: >> Étienne Mollier, on 2021-12-14: >> > However, once the sip file is caught, the package fails to build >> > from source due to various errors in the

Bug#1001657: Ball fails its autopkgtest - how to properly deal with sip files?

2021-12-15 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Étienne, Am Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 11:13:21PM +0100 schrieb Étienne Mollier: > Étienne Mollier, on 2021-12-14: > > However, once the sip file is caught, the package fails to build > > from source due to various errors in the generated code. The > > patch also addresses one of them in its second

Processed: Re: Bug#999083: gkrellm-leds: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep

2021-12-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags 999083 pending Bug #999083 [src:gkrellm-leds] gkrellm-leds: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep Added tag(s) pending. -- 999083: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=999083 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact

Bug#999083: gkrellm-leds: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep

2021-12-15 Thread Christoph Biedl
Control: tags 999083 pending Lucas Nussbaum wrote... > The severity of this bug will be changed to 'serious' after a month. In coordination with the maintainer, I will take over and do an upload to resolve the issue soon. Christoph signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Processed: severity of 1001744 is important

2021-12-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 1001744 important Bug #1001744 [cura] cura: Cura does not start Severity set to 'important' from 'grave' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1001744: