Bug#1041731: groff-base: "-" mapped as HYPHEN

Guillem Jover writes: > On Mon, 2023-08-14 at 14:18:51 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: >> Yes, we'd ideally want to fix all manpages to have everything set >> alright. But we have to do that before the release. And if that's not >> complete, release with the >> >> .char - \- >> >>

Bug#1041731: groff-base: "-" mapped as HYPHEN

Hi! [ CCed Russ for the pod2man side of this. ] On Mon, 2023-08-14 at 14:18:51 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > I'm marking this important, and am tempted to raise it to serious... > > The problem at stake is that we have already a hard time making > newcomers read manpages. If they can't even

Bug#1051592: Regression: Commit "netfilter: nf_tables: disallow rule addition to bound chain via NFTA_RULE_CHAIN_ID" breaks ruleset loading in linux-stable

Hi Timo, On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 11:37:50PM +0200, Timo Sigurdsson wrote: > Hi, > > recently, Debian updated their stable kernel from 6.1.38 to 6.1.52 > which broke nftables ruleset loading on one of my machines with lots > of "Operation not supported" errors. I've reported this to the > Debian

Bug#1050026: marked as done (r-bioc-metagenomeseq: autopkgtest regression)

Your message dated Mon, 11 Sep 2023 23:19:04 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1050026: fixed in r-bioc-metagenomeseq 1.42.0-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1050026, regarding r-bioc-metagenomeseq: autopkgtest regression to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#1051592: Regression: Commit "netfilter: nf_tables: disallow rule addition to bound chain via NFTA_RULE_CHAIN_ID" breaks ruleset loading in linux-stable

Hi, recently, Debian updated their stable kernel from 6.1.38 to 6.1.52 which broke nftables ruleset loading on one of my machines with lots of "Operation not supported" errors. I've reported this to the Debian project (see link below) and Salvatore Bonaccorso and I identified "netfilter:

Processed: tagging 1051740

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 1051740 + upstream Bug #1051740 [src:gpac] gpac: CVE-2023-3012 CVE-2023-3013 CVE-2023-3291 CVE-2023-39562 CVE-2023-4678 CVE-2023-4681 CVE-2023-4682 CVE-2023-4683 CVE-2023-4720 CVE-2023-4721 CVE-2023-4722 CVE-2023-4754 CVE-2023-4755

Processed: tagging 1051737, bug 1051737 is forwarded to https://sourceforge.net/p/freeimage/bugs/298/ ...

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 1051737 + upstream Bug #1051737 [src:freeimage] freeimage: CVE-2020-21427 Added tag(s) upstream. > forwarded 1051737 https://sourceforge.net/p/freeimage/bugs/298/ Bug #1051737 [src:freeimage] freeimage: CVE-2020-21427 Set Bug

Bug#1051740: gpac: CVE-2023-3012 CVE-2023-3013 CVE-2023-3291 CVE-2023-39562 CVE-2023-4678 CVE-2023-4681 CVE-2023-4682 CVE-2023-4683 CVE-2023-4720 CVE-2023-4721 CVE-2023-4722 CVE-2023-4754 CVE-2023-475

Source: gpac X-Debbugs-CC: t...@security.debian.org Severity: grave Tags: security Hi, The following vulnerabilities were published for gpac. CVE-2023-3012[0]: | NULL Pointer Dereference in GitHub repository gpac/gpac prior to | 2.2.2.

Bug#1051738: freeimage: CVE-2020-21428

Source: freeimage X-Debbugs-CC: t...@security.debian.org Severity: grave Tags: security Hi, The following vulnerability was published for freeimage. CVE-2020-21428[0]: | Buffer Overflow vulnerability in function LoadRGB in PluginDDS.cpp | in FreeImage 3.18.0 allows remote attackers to run

Bug#1051722: marked as done (libnvme fails to build from source on unstable)

Your message dated Mon, 11 Sep 2023 21:04:15 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1051722: fixed in libnvme 1.5-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #1051722, regarding libnvme fails to build from source on unstable to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#1051592: linux: Regression - upgrade to 6.1.52-1 breaks nftables

Hi, On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 10:52:12PM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > Hi Timo, > > On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 10:31:56PM +0200, Timo Sigurdsson wrote: > > Hi Salvatore, > > > > Salvatore Bonaccorso schrieb am 11.09.2023 22:20 (GMT +02:00): > > > > > Bisected the issue: > > > > > > $ git

Bug#1051592: linux: Regression - upgrade to 6.1.52-1 breaks nftables

Hi Timo, On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 10:31:56PM +0200, Timo Sigurdsson wrote: > Hi Salvatore, > > Salvatore Bonaccorso schrieb am 11.09.2023 22:20 (GMT +02:00): > > > Bisected the issue: > > > > $ git bisect log > > git bisect start > > # status: waiting for both good and bad commits > > # good:

Bug#1051592: linux: Regression - upgrade to 6.1.52-1 breaks nftables

Hi Salvatore, Salvatore Bonaccorso schrieb am 11.09.2023 22:20 (GMT +02:00): > Bisected the issue: > > $ git bisect log > git bisect start > # status: waiting for both good and bad commits > # good: [61fd484b2cf6bc8022e8e5ea6f693a9991740ac2] Linux 6.1.38 > git bisect good

Bug#1051592: linux: Regression - upgrade to 6.1.52-1 breaks nftables

Hi, On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 04:28:34PM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > Control: found -1 5.10.191-1 > > On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 04:17:46PM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > > Control: tags -1 + confirmed upstream > > > > Hi, > > > > On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 04:08:07PM +0200, Salvatore

Bug#1051729: pmix: CVE-2023-41915

Source: pmix Version: 5.0.0~rc1-2 Severity: grave Tags: security upstream Justification: user security hole X-Debbugs-Cc: car...@debian.org, Debian Security Team Hi, The following vulnerability was published for pmix. CVE-2023-41915[0]: | OpenPMIx PMIx before 4.2.6 and 5.0.x before 5.0.1

Bug#1051355: Processed: your mail

On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 4:10 PM Andres Salomon wrote: > > > > On Mon, Sep 11 2023 at 03:27:30 PM -03:00:00, Leandro Cunha > wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 4:07 AM Andres Salomon wrote: > > So apparently it's already fixed in sid and trixie: >

Bug#1051355: Processed: your mail

On Mon, Sep 11 2023 at 03:27:30 PM -03:00:00, Leandro Cunha wrote: On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 4:07 AM Andres Salomon > wrote: So apparently it's already fixed in sid and trixie:

Processed: your mail

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 1051722 src:libnvme 1.5-2 Bug #1051722 [libnvme] libnvme fails to build from source on unstable Bug reassigned from package 'libnvme' to 'src:libnvme'. No longer marked as found in versions 1.5-2. Ignoring request to alter fixed versions

Processed: your mail

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 1051722 libnvme 1.5-2 Bug #1051722 [src:libnvme] libnvme fails to build from source on unstable Bug reassigned from package 'src:libnvme' to 'libnvme'. No longer marked as found in versions libnvme/1.3-1. Ignoring request to alter fixed

Bug#1051523: Doxygen changes breaks krb5 documentation build

> "Tianyu" == Tianyu Chen writes: Tianyu> During a local rebuild of krb5, your package failed to Tianyu> build. So, I'm guessing this is related to the upgrade in Debian from doxygen 1.9.4 to 1.9.8. The krb5 build process uses doxygen to generate an xml representation of the

Bug#1051355: Processed: your mail

On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 4:07 AM Andres Salomon wrote: > > So apparently it's already fixed in sid and trixie: > > https://tracker.debian.org/news/1454349/accepted-llvm-toolchain-16-11606-11-source-into-unstable/ > > Bug didn't get closed because of the missing "(closes: " in that changelog >

Bug#1051722: libnvme fails to build from source on unstable

Source: libnvme Version: 1.3-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs patch Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) X-Debbugs-Cc: mateus.mor...@canonical.com Hi, Building libnvme from source currently fails during execute_after_dh_auto_install when moving

Processed: reassign 1051294 to src:libxmlb, affects 1051294

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 1051294 src:libxmlb Bug #1051294 [src:libxmlb-dev] fwupd: FTBFS: Run-time dependency xmlb found: NO (tried pkgconfig and cmake) Warning: Unknown package 'src:libxmlb-dev' Bug reassigned from package 'src:libxmlb-dev' to 'src:libxmlb'.

Processed: [bts-link] source package src:numba

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # > # bts-link upstream status pull for source package src:numba > # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html > # https://bts-link-team.pages.debian.net/bts-link/ > # > user debian-bts-l...@lists.debian.org

Bug#1035422: marked as done (librust-barrel+diesel-dev: depends on unavailable librust-diesel-1-dev (>= 1.2-~~))

Your message dated Mon, 11 Sep 2023 17:23:41 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1035422: fixed in rust-barrel 0.7.0-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1035422, regarding librust-barrel+diesel-dev: depends on unavailable librust-diesel-1-dev (>= 1.2-~~) to be marked as done. This means

Processed: reassign 1051294 to src:libxmlb-dev, affects 1051294

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 1051294 src:libxmlb-dev Bug #1051294 [src:fwupd] fwupd: FTBFS: Run-time dependency xmlb found: NO (tried pkgconfig and cmake) Bug reassigned from package 'src:fwupd' to 'src:libxmlb-dev'. Warning: Unknown package 'src:libxmlb-dev'

Processed: severity of 1051717 is wishlist

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 1051717 wishlist Bug #1051717 [bsdgames] split wtf(6) in a separate package? Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'critical' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1051717:

Bug#1051717: split wtf(6) in a separate package?

Package: bsdgames Version: 2.17-29+b1 Severity: critical I wonder if wtf(6) should be split in a separate package. It's a genuinely useful package (as opposed to a "game") that I have only discovered recently, even though I have been familiar with BSD games for more than a few decades at this

Bug#1038135: marked as done (rust-diesel: librust-diesel-dev uninstallable on 32-bit archs)

Your message dated Mon, 11 Sep 2023 16:14:55 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1038135: fixed in rust-diesel 2.0.3-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1038135, regarding rust-diesel: librust-diesel-dev uninstallable on 32-bit archs to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#957501: marked as done (looptools: ftbfs with GCC-10)

Your message dated Mon, 11 Sep 2023 15:19:06 + with message-id and subject line Bug#957501: fixed in looptools 2.16-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #957501, regarding looptools: ftbfs with GCC-10 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this

Bug#1008996: marked as done (opentsne builds with -march=native on amd64)

Your message dated Mon, 11 Sep 2023 15:19:32 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1008996: fixed in opentsne 1.0.0-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1008996, regarding opentsne builds with -march=native on amd64 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#1049903: petsc: misbuild with gcc-13

Source: petsc Followup-For: Bug #1049903 Thanks for the clarification. I'll apply the patch.

Processed: tagging 1051454

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 1051454 + confirmed upstream pending Bug #1051454 [src:librist] librist: FTBFS on 32-bit architectures: "Simple profile unicast packet loss" test segfaults Added tag(s) confirmed, pending, and upstream. > thanks Stopping processing here.

Processed: Re: Bug#1051592: linux: Regression - upgrade to 6.1.52-1 breaks nftables

Processing control commands: > found -1 5.10.191-1 Bug #1051592 [linux] linux: Regression - upgrade to 6.1.52-1 breaks nftables There is no source info for the package 'linux' at version '5.10.191-1' with architecture '' Unable to make a source version for version '5.10.191-1' Marked as found in

Bug#1036076: rust-mysqlclient-sys appears to be unsound when used with mariadb.

On Mon, 15 May 2023 05:47:10 +0100 Peter Green wrote: > Package: rust-mysqlclient-sys > Severity: serious > > I was looking at why rust-diesel was not migrating to testing > (other than the freeze obviously) and noticed that rust-mysqlclient-sys > was not built on 32-bit architectures. As with a

Bug#1051592: linux: Regression - upgrade to 6.1.52-1 breaks nftables

Control: found -1 5.10.191-1 On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 04:17:46PM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > Control: tags -1 + confirmed upstream > > Hi, > > On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 04:08:07PM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > > Control: tags -1 - moreinfo unreproducible > > > > Hi Timo, > > > >

Processed: Re: Bug#1051592: linux: Regression - upgrade to 6.1.52-1 breaks nftables

Processing control commands: > tags -1 + confirmed upstream Bug #1051592 [linux] linux: Regression - upgrade to 6.1.52-1 breaks nftables Added tag(s) upstream and confirmed. -- 1051592: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1051592 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact

Bug#1051592: linux: Regression - upgrade to 6.1.52-1 breaks nftables

Control: tags -1 + confirmed upstream Hi, On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 04:08:07PM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > Control: tags -1 - moreinfo unreproducible > > Hi Timo, > > On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 03:15:18AM +0200, Timo Sigurdsson wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Salvatore Bonaccorso schrieb am

Processed: Re: Bug#1051592: linux: Regression - upgrade to 6.1.52-1 breaks nftables

Processing control commands: > tags -1 - moreinfo unreproducible Bug #1051592 [linux] linux: Regression - upgrade to 6.1.52-1 breaks nftables Removed tag(s) moreinfo and unreproducible. -- 1051592: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1051592 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact

Bug#1051592: linux: Regression - upgrade to 6.1.52-1 breaks nftables

Control: tags -1 - moreinfo unreproducible Hi Timo, On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 03:15:18AM +0200, Timo Sigurdsson wrote: > Hi, > > Salvatore Bonaccorso schrieb am 10.09.2023 12:21 (GMT +02:00): > > > Would it be possible to provide a minimal set of rules triggering the > > issue? Can you reproduce

Bug#1038135: rust-diesel: librust-diesel-dev uninstallable on 32-bit archs

On Thu, 15 Jun 2023 13:32:41 -0700 Steve Langasek wrote: > Package: rust-diesel > Version: 2.0.3-1 > Severity: serious > Tags: patch > Justification: uninstallable > User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com > Usertags: origin-ubuntu mantic ubuntu-patch > > Dear maintainers, > > rust-diesel is not

Bug#957313: marked as done (grsync: ftbfs with GCC-10)

Your message dated Mon, 11 Sep 2023 15:39:30 +0200 with message-id <5101bd52-af40-4b83-99ee-ca6fa8fe1...@debian.org> and subject line Re: grsync: ftbfs with GCC-10 has caused the Debian Bug report #957313, regarding grsync: ftbfs with GCC-10 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Processed: Re: [Debichem-devel] Bug#1037566: abinit: ftbfs with GCC-13

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > fixed 1037566 9.10.4-1 Bug #1037566 {Done: Adrian Bunk } [src:abinit] abinit: ftbfs with GCC-13 Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #1037566 to the same values previously set > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if

Bug#1051563: mutt: CVE-2023-4874 CVE-2023-4875

On Sun, Sep 10, 2023 at 09:59:53PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > Hi Antonio! > > On 2023-09-10 15:57:58 [+0200], Antonio Radici wrote: > > On Sun, Sep 10, 2023 at 01:38:33PM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > > > Hi Antonio, > > > > > > FWIW, I have done the bookworm-security

Processed: Re: [pkg-apparmor] Bug#1050256: autopkgtest fails on debci

Processing control commands: > severity -1 important Bug #1050256 [apparmor,lxc] apparmor makes systemd autopkgtests fail on bookworm Severity set to 'important' from 'serious' -- 1050256: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1050256 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact

Bug#1050256: [pkg-apparmor] Bug#1050256: autopkgtest fails on debci

Control: severity -1 important Am 09.09.23 um 14:20 schrieb intrigeri: Hi again, Thank you all for working both on workarounds for Debian CI and on a proper upstream Linux kernel fix. Impressive cross-team work! :) +1 At this stage it seems clear that the bug and the corresponding ideal

Processed: Re: Mono package in Debian is still very outdated (6.8 but should be 6.12)

Processing control commands: > severity -1 serious Bug #1010445 [mono-complete] mono-complete: Mono package in Debian is very outdated (6.8 but should be 6.12) Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' -- 1010445: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1010445 Debian Bug Tracking

Bug#1041557: marked as done (r-cran-bookdown breaks r-cran-flextable autopkgtest: `bookmarks` has length 3, not length 0)

Your message dated Mon, 11 Sep 2023 11:45:45 +0200 with message-id and subject line Fixed with latest uploads has caused the Debian Bug report #1041557, regarding r-cran-bookdown breaks r-cran-flextable autopkgtest: `bookmarks` has length 3, not length 0 to be marked as done. This means that

Bug#1049872: FTBFS on multiple release architectures

Hello Andrius, On 2023-09-09 08:38, Andrius Merkys wrote: > This is news to me. Could you please point out where in Debian Policy I can > read more about such requirement? I thought I saw packages dropping support > for one or another release architecture without being removed from testing. See

Bug#1050605: marked as done (linux-image-6.4.0-3-amd64: Unable to boot on 2009 13inch MacBook Pro)

Your message dated Mon, 11 Sep 2023 00:42:20 -0700 with message-id <87zg1t17hf@debian-hx90.lan> and subject line Re: linux-image-6.4.0-3-amd64: Unable to boot on 2009 13inch MacBook Pro has caused the Debian Bug report #1050605, regarding linux-image-6.4.0-3-amd64: Unable to boot on 2009

Bug#1051661: /usr/bin/qemu-system-ppc: Package not installable

Control: reassign -1 dak 11.09.2023 08:40, Christian Marillat wrote: Package: qemu-system-ppc Version: 1:8.0.4+dfsg-3+b1 Severity: serious File: /usr/bin/qemu-system-ppc Dear Maintainer, sudo apt-get install qemu-system-ppc qemu-system-data ... The following packages have unmet dependencies:

Processed: closing 1026820

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # builds now > close 1026820 1:2.49.20210628.gitde01f0f-3.1 Bug #1026820 [src:clisp] FTBFS: Fail to build with libunistring5 Marked as fixed in versions clisp/1:2.49.20210628.gitde01f0f-3.1. Bug #1026820 [src:clisp] FTBFS: Fail to build with

Processed: Re: Bug#1051661: /usr/bin/qemu-system-ppc: Package not installable

Processing control commands: > reassign -1 dak Bug #1051661 [qemu-system-ppc] /usr/bin/qemu-system-ppc: Package not installable Bug reassigned from package 'qemu-system-ppc' to 'dak'. Warning: Unknown package 'dak' Warning: Unknown package 'dak' No longer marked as found in versions

Bug#1051355: Processed: your mail

So apparently it's already fixed in sid and trixie: Bug didn't get closed because of the missing "(closes: " in that changelog entry. I'll push the clang-16 stuff to git so you can give it a

Bug#1051355: Processed: your mail

On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 2:37 AM Timothy Pearson wrote: > > For 16 to work we'll need the Debian clang team to include this patchset: > > https://reviews.llvm.org/D158066 > > Any chance of that happening? > > - Original Message - > > From: "Andres Salomon" > > To: "Leandro Cunha" ,