Bug#945820: sysvinit_2.96-2_amd64.changes REJECTED

2019-12-01 Thread Dmitry Bogatov
[2019-11-29 09:49] Aurelien Jarno > On 2019-11-28 22:04, Debian FTP Masters wrote: > > sysvinit-core_2.96-2_amd64.deb: has 2 file(s) with a timestamp too far in > > the past: > > usr/share/doc/sysvinit-core/copyright (Thu Jan 1 00:00:01 1970) > > usr/share/doc/sysvinit-c >

Bug#945464: /lib/init/init-d-script: stop action: missing --oknodo in s-s-d invocation

2019-11-26 Thread Dmitry Bogatov
control: tags -1 +confirmed [2019-11-25 12:06] Jan Braun > Dear Maintainer, > > The /lib/init/init-d-script errorneously returns failure when asked to > stop a non-running service: > [...] > > And indeed, one call to start-stop-daemon in /lib/init/init-d-script is > missing the --oknodo flag.

Bug#939733: lsb-release: lsb_release does not show point release on Debian 10.1

2019-11-10 Thread Dmitry Bogatov
[2019-11-10 02:31] Santiago Vila > > I am losing context. We have at least following three files (oh, why all > > this madness?): > > > > * /usr/lib/os-release > > * /etc/os-release > > * /etc/debian_version > > > > So, in case of conflicts, what should override what? > > Please note that

Bug#939733: lsb-release: lsb_release does not show point release on Debian 10.1

2019-11-09 Thread Dmitry Bogatov
control: tags -1 +help [2019-11-08 13:42] Santiago Vila > Hi. > > I've asked the Release Managers about this here: > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=944351 > > If they say yes, I'll modify base-files accordingly (for Debian 10.2). > > If they say no, please be ready to fix

Bug#941273: marked as pending in runit

2019-09-27 Thread Dmitry Bogatov
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #941273 in runit reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#939733: lsb-release: lsb_release does not show point release on Debian 10.1

2019-09-11 Thread Dmitry Bogatov
control: severity -1 +normal [2019-09-10 10:21] Jonathan Wiltshire > >> The x.y there was a remnant from Debian sarge times. > > > > Up until squeeze I have seen it show x.y.z, then from wheezy to > > stretch I see only x.y, but it does seem new behaviour in buster to > > only show x. > > >

Bug#938952: [debian Buster] [arm64 pinebook] [sysvinit-core] libsoup2.4-1 : Depends: glib-networking (>= 2.32.0) but it is not going to be installed

2019-09-10 Thread Dmitry Bogatov
[2019-09-08 17:53] Jean-Marc LACROIX > > Please: > > > > * Try installing something else, like `tor'. I expect you will get > > similar error (`tor' depends on libsystemd0, sigh) > > ansible@pinebook:~$ sudo apt install tor > [...] Okay, tor installs fine with your apt-pinning. My

Bug#938952: [debian Buster] [arm64 pinebook] [sysvinit-core] libsoup2.4-1 : Depends: glib-networking (>= 2.32.0) but it is not going to be installed

2019-09-01 Thread Dmitry Bogatov
control: tags -1 +moreinfo [2019-08-30 16:44] Jean-Marc LACROIX > Package: sysvinit > Version: 2.93-8 > Severity: grave > > Dear maintainers, > > It seems there is a dependency issue when installing sysvinit-core as > indicated in following trace > [...] > Package: *systemd* > Pin: release *

Bug#932073: closed by Niels Thykier (Bug#932073: fixed in debhelper 12.2.1)

2019-07-19 Thread Dmitry Bogatov
control: tags -1 +confirmed [2019-07-17 07:41] Helmut Grohne > part text/plain1094 > Control: reopen -1 > Control: affects -1 + src:dropbear > > On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 08:42:09PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > >* dh_installinit: Fix regression where

Bug#932339: Building of test packages hangs in Lintian due to commit 789eb18b

2019-07-19 Thread Dmitry Bogatov
[2019-07-17 19:24] Felix Lechner > Hi, > > Updating from version 12.1.1 in testing to 12.2.2 breaks the build > process for test packages in Lintian. The unstable pipelines on > jenkins and Gitlab are failing. > > The command 't/bin/build-test-packages' in Lintian runs for a while > but then

Bug#932073: dh_installinit fails with "--name=foo option specified, but init script not found"

2019-07-16 Thread Dmitry Bogatov
; > > > Helmut > > > > Hi Dmitry, > > This report seems to be a regression related to your patch from #462389. Definitely regression. From a7288f30a003759b186389b93d336bef90491062 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dmitry Bogatov Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2019 16:08:01 + Subject: [PATCH]

Bug#929709: libgdbm6: file exists in libgdbm-dev as well as gdbm

2019-05-30 Thread Dmitry Bogatov
control: severity -1 minor [2019-05-29 13:31] lkcl > Package: libgdbm6 > Version: 1.18.1-4 > Severity: serious > Justification: 2 > > Unpacking libgdbm-dev:amd64 (1.18.1-4) ... > dpkg: error processing archive > /var/cache/apt/archives/libgdbm-dev_1.18.1-4_amd64.deb (--unpack): > trying to

Bug#927442: Bug #927442 in runit marked as pending

2019-04-22 Thread Dmitry Bogatov
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #927442 in runit reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#927442: Bug #927442 in runit marked as pending

2019-04-22 Thread Dmitry Bogatov
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #927442 in runit reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#919296: git-daemon-run: fails with 'warning: git-daemon: unable to open supervise/ok: file does not exist'

2019-03-17 Thread Dmitry Bogatov
[2019-03-16 00:41] Lorenzo Puliti > >Bogatov wrote: > >Dear git maintainer, you could plug this bug by adding > >`/var/lib/supervise/git-daemon' into `debian/git-daemon-run.dirs'. > > Dmitry, are you sure? runsv can create the 'git-daemon' directory if > it's not there, and a dangling symlink

Bug#924327: directfb FTBFS for armel,armhf: error: implicit declaration of function 'makedev'

2019-03-17 Thread Dmitry Bogatov
[2019-03-11 17:55] Helmut Grohne > directfb has build failures. A cross build for armel fails: > > | mknod( C64X_DEVICE, 0666 | S_IFCHR, makedev( 400, 0 ) ); I encountered similar error on one of my packages recently (can't remember which one). It was due upgrade to glibc-2.28 and

Bug#921558: lsb-base: killproc does not pass name parameter to start-stop-daemon

2019-03-13 Thread Dmitry Bogatov
[2019-03-11 21:51] Axel Beckert > > I believe it would be reasonable to add '--name $base' into `else' > > clause. Opinions? > > Sounds sane, I just checked that with #924311 (miredo, uses > start-stop-daemon directly, edited the init script) as well as #924312 > (stunnel4, by editing

Bug#921558: lsb-base: killproc does not pass name parameter to start-stop-daemon

2019-03-10 Thread Dmitry Bogatov
control: tags -1 +moreinfo [2019-02-06 20:20] Andreas Metzler > Package: lsb-base > Version: 10.2018112800 > Severity: serious > > Hello, > > there is a logic error in /lib/lsb/init-functions's killproc: > > base=${1##*/} > if [ ! $pidfile ]; then > name_param="--name $base

Bug#923609: proposed solution

2019-03-10 Thread Dmitry Bogatov
[2019-03-08 22:40] Niko Tyni > On Fri, Mar 08, 2019 at 02:39:53PM +0000, Dmitry Bogatov wrote: > > > I believe this patch would somewhat solve issue. Dear submitter, can you > > please apply this patch, build package and check, that `gdbm_load-nolfs' > > binary from c

Bug#923957: /lib/runit/run_sysv_scripts shouldn't use 'sh -e'

2019-03-09 Thread Dmitry Bogatov
control: severity -1 important [2019-03-07 17:21] Andras Korn > The supplied "/etc/runit/1" calls "/lib/runit/run_sysv_scripts /etc/rcS.d" > during boot. > > /lib/runit/run_sysv_scripts runs under "sh -eu", which has the effect that > if any initscript exits unsuccesfully, all subsequent

Bug#923609: proposed solution

2019-03-08 Thread Dmitry Bogatov
dbbe906795dd977ed16cccaa7b0385ce8654c8a5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dmitry Bogatov Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2019 20:19:11 + Subject: [PATCH] Provide version with LFS support disabled --- debian/rules | 4 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) diff --git a/debian/rules b/debian/rules index fce1572..03b6242 100755

Bug#923609: Binary incompatibility in libgdbm6

2019-03-07 Thread Dmitry Bogatov
[2019-03-05 17:44] Sergey Poznyakoff > Hello, > > Investigation of the attached file has shown that it has been created > by gdbm 1.8.3 compiled without large file support (sizeof(off_t) == 4). > In contrast, gdbm 1.18.1 was compiled with large file support enabled, > which naturally lead to

Bug#923609: Binary incompatibility in libgdbm6

2019-03-05 Thread Dmitry Bogatov
control: tags -1 +upstream +forwarded Hello! Can you please take a look at this Debian bug report [1]. It seems that compatibility issues we discussed before and which were believed to resolved in release 1.18.1 actually still present. Reporter kindly provided receipe to reproduce issue and

Bug#923238: libmarc-charset-perl: needs a rebuild on 32bit architectures?

2019-03-01 Thread Dmitry Bogatov
` [2019-02-28 18:01] Niko Tyni > > > But ideally gdbm would restore compatibility and libmarc-charset-perl > > > would > > > not need any changes. > > > > I believe upstream release 1.8.1 introduced change, that > > made it possible to read old /usr/lib/libmarc-charset-perl/Table. Am I > >

Bug#923238: libmarc-charset-perl: needs a rebuild on 32bit architectures?

2019-02-28 Thread Dmitry Bogatov
[2019-02-27 21:20] Niko Tyni > > - update perl to build-depend on libgdbm-dev (>= 1.18-2) and Break > > older versions of libmarc-charset-perl (and any other perl packages > > bundling GDBM or NDBM databases) > > > > - update libmarc-charset-perl (and any other perl packages bundling > >

Bug#789008: At least on Debian testing it upgraded without an issue.

2019-02-02 Thread Dmitry Bogatov
[2018-12-19 23:40] Dmitry Bogatov > > part text/plain 459 > > control: tags -1 +moreinfo > > [2018-12-18 12:10] shirish शिरीष > > > > Dear all, > > > > At least here it updated without any issues - > > > > $ sudo

Bug#738775: insserv: Insserv 1.16 tries to connect to systemd even though system is running on sysv-init

2019-02-02 Thread Dmitry Bogatov
Since 1.18.0-1 (1.18.0-2 in unstable) debian packaging patch-out integration with systemd, thus closing this bug. Dear submitter, if you can somehow reproduce this bug with current version of insserv, feel free to reopen this bug. -- Note, that I send and fetch email in batch, once

Bug#919296: git-daemon-run: fails with 'warning: git-daemon: unable to open supervise/ok: file does not exist'

2019-01-28 Thread Dmitry Bogatov
[2019-01-23 12:41] Jonathan Nieder > Dmitry Bogatov wrote: > >> Jonathan Nieder wrote: > > >>> + * git-daemon-run: pre-create supervise directory so that postinst > >>> +can start the service (thx Celejar and Dmitry Bogatov; closes: > >>&g

Bug#919296: git-daemon-run: fails with 'warning: git-daemon: unable to open supervise/ok: file does not exist'

2019-01-25 Thread Dmitry Bogatov
[2019-01-23 12:41] Jonathan Nieder > [...] > > It is my fault. I dropped /var/lib/supervise directory in runit=2.1.2-4, > > which was expected by git-daemon-run. > > > > Today runit packaging underwent quite a rework, and packages, providing > > runscripts are encouraged to use dh_runit(1). It

Bug#919296: git-daemon-run: fails with 'warning: git-daemon: unable to open supervise/ok: file does not exist'

2019-01-23 Thread Dmitry Bogatov
[2019-01-21 19:54] Jonathan Nieder > Dmitry Bogatov wrote: > > [2019-01-16 14:49] Dmitry Bogatov > > >> So, should I propose you patch (in 7 days), that merges > >> bin:git-daemon-run into bin:git-daemon, would you be able to review > >> and apply/upload

Bug#919296: git-daemon-run: fails with 'warning: git-daemon: unable to open supervise/ok: file does not exist'

2019-01-23 Thread Dmitry Bogatov
[2019-01-21 20:03] Jonathan Nieder > Jonathan Nieder wrote: > > + * git-daemon-run: pre-create supervise directory so that postinst > > +can start the service (thx Celejar and Dmitry Bogatov; closes: > > +#919296). > > [...] > > Unfortunately, this does

Bug#919296: git-daemon-run: fails with 'warning: git-daemon: unable to open supervise/ok: file does not exist'

2019-01-19 Thread Dmitry Bogatov
[2019-01-16 14:49] Dmitry Bogatov > So, should I propose you patch (in 7 days), that merges > bin:git-daemon-run into bin:git-daemon, would you be able to review > and apply/upload it before hard freeze? Probably, even better would be to merge `git-daemon-run' and `git-daemon-sysvin

Bug#911515: dvtm in backports

2019-01-17 Thread Dmitry Bogatov
Hello? Dear maintainer of ncurses, could you please upload a backport of ncurses-term? pgpLomqpgPKeE.pgp Description: PGP signature

Bug#919296: git-daemon-run: fails with 'warning: git-daemon: unable to open supervise/ok: file does not exist'

2019-01-16 Thread Dmitry Bogatov
control: tags -1 +confirmed [2019-01-14 19:56] Celejar > ~# dpkg-reconfigure git-daemon-run > Service git-daemon already added. > warning: git-daemon: unable to open supervise/ok: file does not exist > > > If I'm lucky then that will get it working. I'll try to reproduce it > > here and set

Bug#917394: gitlint: FTBFS -- test suite fails

2018-12-27 Thread Dmitry Bogatov
Package: gitlint Version: 0.9.0-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Dear Maintainer, gitlint fails to build from source -- it have 3 test cases failing. As I discovered when trying to prepare NMU for #891538, these tests also fail with gitlint-0.10, so I add upstream maintainer to thread.

Bug#789008: At least on Debian testing it upgraded without an issue.

2018-12-19 Thread Dmitry Bogatov
control: tags -1 +moreinfo [2018-12-18 12:10] shirish शिरीष > > Dear all, > > At least here it updated without any issues - > > $ sudo aptitude install insserv -y > The following packages will be upgraded: > insserv > [...] Thank you for help with bug triage, shirish. Dear submitter, can

Bug#911515: dvtm: unsatisfiable dependency in stretch-backports: ncurses-term (>> 6.1+20180210-3)

2018-10-21 Thread Dmitry Bogatov
[2018-10-21 10:44] Andreas Beckmann > Package: dvtm > Version: 0.15-3~bpo9+1 > Severity: serious > User: debian...@lists.debian.org > Usertags: piuparts > during a test with piuparts I noticed your package is not > installable in stretch-backports: > ncurses-term | 6.0+20161126-1+deb9u2 |

Bug#910911: libgdbm6: can't read (some?) older GDBM databases

2018-10-15 Thread Dmitry Bogatov
[2018-10-15 20:18] Niko Tyni > > I am sorry to say it, but probably binNMU or sourceful upload would > > be required for all packages, that bundle gdbm databases, generated > > by (gdbm << 1.9) > > This sounds really sad. So even the gdbm we have in our current stable > release is too old to

Bug#910911: libgdbm6: can't read (some?) older GDBM databases

2018-10-14 Thread Dmitry Bogatov
[2018-10-13 13:20] Niko Tyni > The libgdbm6 transition broke autopkgtest checks of src:perl and > libmarc-charset-perl. > > It looks like some GDBM databases which were working with the older > gdbm are not readable any more with the new one. After a bit more research I deduced, that

Bug#910911: libgdbm6: can't read (some?) older GDBM databases

2018-10-14 Thread Dmitry Bogatov
control: tag -1 +moreinfo [2018-10-13 13:20] Niko Tyni > For reference, the output with libgdbm5 1.14.1-6+b1 is > > % gdbm_dump debian/tests/data/jessie.gdbm > # GDBM dump file created by GDBM version 1.14.1. 03/01/2018 on Sat Oct 13 > 13:15:59 201 > 8 > #:version=1.0 >

Bug#910911: libgdbm6: can't read (some?) older GDBM databases

2018-10-14 Thread Dmitry Bogatov
control: tag -1 confirmed [2018-10-13 13:20] Niko Tyni > > part text/plain1170 > Package: libgdbm6 > Version: 1.18-2 > Severity: grave > X-Debbugs-Cc: p...@packages.debian.org, > libmarc-charset-p...@packages.debian.org > > The libgdbm6 transition broke autopkgtest

Bug#897725: auto-gdbm transition

2018-10-10 Thread Dmitry Bogatov
+++ courier-authlib-0.68.0/debian/changelog 2018-10-10 16:35:27.0 + @@ -1,3 +1,11 @@ +courier-authlib (0.68.0-4.1) unstable; urgency=medium + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * Relax checks for C++ symbols (Closes: #897725) + * Update Vcs-* fields in debian/control + + -- Dmitry Bogatov

Bug#836948: getty-run: fails to remove: warning: getty-tty6: unable to open supervise/ok: file does not exist

2017-01-06 Thread Dmitry Bogatov
control: close -1 [2016-09-07 22:56] Dmitry Bogatov <kact...@gnu.org> > control: tags -1 +fixed-in-experimental > > > >From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...): > > > > Removing getty-run (2.1.2-6) ... > > warning: getty-tty6: unable to

Bug#829299: Bug#847040: evil-el: test suite fails under emacs25

2016-12-14 Thread Dmitry Bogatov
[2016-12-13 11:02] Sean Whitton <spwhit...@spwhitton.name> > On Wed, Dec 07, 2016 at 09:34:13AM +0300, Dmitry Bogatov wrote: > > I switched to emacs25 already (since this bug report). So far, no > > changes. > > > > > - Could you fix #829299 based on th

Bug#838888: closed by Dmitry Bogatov <kact...@gnu.org> (Bug#838888: fixed in dh-haskell 0.3)

2016-09-30 Thread Dmitry Bogatov
> > > I don't see the related changes there, nor attribution (or NACK) for the > > > patch... > > > > I read you patch email *after* I wrote almost same patch myself and > > made RFS. Are there any attribution issues? > > Oh, no attribution issues whatsoever, more of a friendly thing. Always

Bug#838888: closed by Dmitry Bogatov <kact...@gnu.org> (Bug#838888: fixed in dh-haskell 0.3)

2016-09-28 Thread Dmitry Bogatov
> Did you forget to push this to: > > https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/users/kaction-guest/dh-haskell.git No. Now dh-haskell is under umbrella of DHG. Look here: https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-haskell/dh-haskell.git > I don't see the related changes there, nor attribution (or

Bug#836948: getty-run: fails to remove: warning: getty-tty6: unable to open supervise/ok: file does not exist

2016-09-07 Thread Dmitry Bogatov
control: tags -1 +fixed-in-experimental > >From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...): > > Removing getty-run (2.1.2-6) ... > warning: getty-tty6: unable to open supervise/ok: file does not exist > dpkg: error processing package getty-run (--remove): >subprocess installed

Bug#836948: getty-run: fails to remove: warning: getty-tty6: unable to open supervise/ok: file does not exist

2016-09-07 Thread Dmitry Bogatov
> during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to remove. > > >From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...): > > Removing getty-run (2.1.2-6) ... > warning: getty-tty6: unable to open supervise/ok: file does not exist > dpkg: error processing package getty-run (--remove): >

Bug#835903: Same error here

2016-08-31 Thread Dmitry Bogatov
> My (dist-)upgrade attempt failed this morning with the same exact problem : > > - > root@SAP5057241:~# apt-get dist-upgrade -u -f > Lecture des listes de paquets... Fait > Construction de l'arbre des dépendances > Lecture des

Bug#834088: What's up with mongrel2?

2016-08-27 Thread Dmitry Bogatov
control: tags -1 +moreinfo Jan, could you please provide more information? I did not follow. As I understand, there was some problem with mongrel2-run, but, as mongrel2/1.11.0-1 it is no longer case (and I can confirm it, just installed mongrel2-run without any problems), but this bug is still

Bug#832656: runit: breaks users of runit: ln: failed to create symbolic link '/etc/service/bcron-sched': No such file or directory

2016-08-01 Thread Dmitry Bogatov
> I'm not sure, but did you mean to report this bug against bcron package? > I fail to understand why runit should have such problem Well, it is my bad. runit-2.1.2_4 deserved a transition, but now we have at least following uninstallabe packages: bcron-run twoftpd-run tinydns-run

Bug#831342: nis: FTBFS due lacking debhelper compat file

2016-07-14 Thread Dmitry Bogatov
Package: nis Version: 3.17-34 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) Dear Maintainer, Package no longer builds from source in up-to-date sid environment. Build log attached. -- System Information: Debian Release: 8.5 APT prefers stable

Bug#790655: python3-pygithub, remove the package?

2015-08-08 Thread Dmitry Bogatov
* Gianfranco Costamagna costamagnagianfra...@yahoo.it [2015-08-08 07:35:10+] Hi Dmitry, I propose this solution: remove all the Debian patches (actually the python3 patch seems correctly handled by 2to3 at build time) add a new patch to disable the only test actually requiring an

Bug#790655: python3-pygithub, remove the package?

2015-08-08 Thread Dmitry Bogatov
Just a few problems, seems that you didn't start from the last upload you need to start with -3 release with the changes, because otherwise it messes up things (e.g. [...] Nice catch, thanks. Get fixed -4 release from my unstable. -- Accept: text/plain, text/x-diff Accept-Language:

Bug#790655: python3-pygithub, remove the package?

2015-08-08 Thread Dmitry Bogatov
* Gianfranco Costamagna costamagnagianfra...@yahoo.it [2015-08-08 11:22:51+] Nice catch, thanks. Get fixed -4 release from my unstable. Just a little nitpick, please add a Description for the patch, to make lintian silent. Added. if this is ok for you, just ack and I'll upload :) (no

Bug#790655: python3-pygithub, remove the package?

2015-08-07 Thread Dmitry Bogatov
Try this: cd ~kaction-guest/repository/unstable Seems mini-dinstall does not allow others view incoming/ queque. Sorry. -- Accept: text/plain, text/x-diff Accept-Language: eo,en,ru X-Keep-In-CC: yes pgpcOmF5G194e.pgp Description: PGP signature

Bug#790655: python3-pygithub, remove the package?

2015-08-06 Thread Dmitry Bogatov
* Gianfranco Costamagna costamagnagianfra...@yahoo.it [2015-08-06 08:59:21+] Okay. mentors gives me 500 error, probably it dislikes Tor. I will investigate, but now to keep things fast you can git clone git://anonscm.debian.org/users/kaction-guest/pygithub.git and NMU it. Also, I

Bug#790655: python3-pygithub, remove the package?

2015-08-05 Thread Dmitry Bogatov
* Gianfranco Costamagna costamagnagianfra...@yahoo.it [2015-08-05 15:15:00+] Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/PyGithub/PyGithub/issues/331 Hi Dmitry, I guess the package is really not python3 ready, in my opinion we should at least let the python2 version migrate to testing,