Bug#818537: RC bug on maildrop [was Re: freeradius]

2016-10-28 Thread Josip Rodin
On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 03:41:46PM +0200, Tobias Frost wrote: > However may I ask you to take a look at the RC bugs in your DDPO? [2] > ;-) Intriguing, I completely missed that maildrop bug, I think my spam filters somehow ate it. I'll try to figure out both issues, thanks for the hint. --

Bug#806617: freeradius: FTBFS when built with dpkg-buildpackage -A (dh_install: freeradius-common missing files)

2016-08-30 Thread Josip Rodin
On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 11:20:50AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > Josip, do you really still care about this package? I'm pretty sure I told Sam to take it over a few years back...? If you want to fix that, by all means, just work on it. -- 2. That which causes joy or happiness.

Bug#819198: Missing libapache2-mod-auth-radius on Debian 8.3 mirrors.

2016-04-24 Thread Josip Rodin
reassign 819198 www.debian.org thanks On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 03:49:28PM -0300, Js wrote: > Package: libapache2-mod-auth-radius > Version: 1.5 > Severity: serious > Tags: upstream > Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) > > The package

Bug#780227: XSA-123 / CVE-2015-2151 Hypervisor memory corruption due to x86 emulator flaw

2015-03-10 Thread Josip Rodin
Package: xen-hypervisor-4.1-amd64 Version: 4.1.4-3+deb7u4 Severity: critical Hi, Not sure how come I'm the first one to file this kind of a bug report :) but here goes JFTR... http://xenbits.xen.org/xsa/advisory-123.html was embargoed, but advance warning was given to several big Xen VM farms,

Bug#765062: libapache-mod-auth-radius: FTBFS - missing build dependency on libssl-dev

2014-10-16 Thread Josip Rodin
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 09:42:30PM +0100, Michael Tautschnig wrote: On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 09:57:31AM +0100, Michael Tautschnig wrote: apxs2 -c mod_auth_radius-2.0.c /usr/share/apr-1.0/build/libtool --silent --mode=compile --tag=disable-static x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc -std=gnu99

Bug#765062: libapache-mod-auth-radius: FTBFS - missing build dependency on libssl-dev

2014-10-13 Thread Josip Rodin
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 09:57:31AM +0100, Michael Tautschnig wrote: apxs2 -c mod_auth_radius-2.0.c /usr/share/apr-1.0/build/libtool --silent --mode=compile --tag=disable-static x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc -std=gnu99 -prefer-pic -pipe -g -O2 -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat -Werror=format-security

Bug#666852: libapache-mod-auth-radius: diff for NMU version 1.5.8-1.2

2013-07-11 Thread Josip Rodin
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 01:30:02PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: Control: tag -1 patch pending Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for libapache-mod-auth-radius (versioned as 1.5.8-1.2) and uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer. Apologies for

Bug#694407: freeradius: CVE-2011-4966

2012-11-26 Thread Josip Rodin
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 10:24:03AM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: please see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2011-4966 for details and a link to the upstream fix. AFAICT this is a year old, so apparently it's not really so important? :) Do you think we should take the

Bug#576511: Info received (Bug#576511: drbd8-utils: Ships with violent default actions)

2012-10-29 Thread Josip Rodin
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 11:02:39AM +0100, Philipp Hug wrote: In fact, if you had been listening to me from day one, you'd realize that I'm not even asking you to actually fix this problem. I'm merely asking you to make the users who aren't using your personally preferred use case, but are

Bug#576511: Info received (Bug#576511: drbd8-utils: Ships with violent default actions)

2012-10-27 Thread Josip Rodin
Following on Philipp's comment, I went looking for explanation in the old template config file changes, and found the sysrq calls added with no obvious explanation here: http://git.drbd.org/gitweb.cgi?p=drbd-8.3.git;a=commitdiff;h=3b4452d69b4371dbeee5a38f2e248a6360c14c77 But this is still

Bug#576511: drbd8-utils: Ships with violent default actions

2012-10-26 Thread Josip Rodin
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 04:29:47PM +0200, Philipp Hug wrote: It should probably be changed into something like this: /usr/lib/drbd/notify-emergency-reboot.sh; reboot -f ; sync ; sleep 30; echo b /proc/sysrq-trigger; So, we'd have at least time to sync other file systems and try to shutdown

Bug#576511: ditto

2012-10-23 Thread Josip Rodin
These defaults are really bad. I had this happen to a machine running DRBD yesterday: block drbd0: PingAck did not arrive in time. block drbd0: peer( Secondary - Unknown ) conn( Connected - NetworkFailure ) pdsk( UpToDate - DUnknown ) block drbd0: asender terminated block drbd0: Terminating

Bug#685360: Logitech USB keyboard broken with Linux 3.2 (regression from 3.1)

2012-09-17 Thread Josip Rodin
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 12:57:06PM +0200, Jiri Kosina wrote: On Wed, 12 Sep 2012, Nestor Lopez Casado wrote: Take a look at this thread ... where a patch was published ... https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/958174 Your issue may come from the same problem. I will get back

Bug#685360: Acknowledgement (AMD SB 750 + Logitech USB keyboard broken and system unbootable with Linux 3.2 (regression from 2.6.38))

2012-09-11 Thread Josip Rodin
Control: retitle -1 AMD SB 750 + Logitech USB keyboard brokenness with Linux 3.2 (regression from 3.1) On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 06:26:42PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: I'll try to bisect this now with my config. It looks like it's definitely in some way related with the introduction

Bug#685360: Acknowledgement (AMD SB 750 + Logitech USB keyboard broken and system unbootable with Linux 3.2 (regression from 2.6.38))

2012-09-11 Thread Josip Rodin
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 12:46:29AM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 06:26:42PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: I'll try to bisect this now with my config. It looks like it's definitely in some way related with the introduction of CONFIG_HID_LOGITECH_DJ in 3.2+, because 3.1.0

Bug#685360: AMD SB 750 + Logitech USB keyboard broken and system unbootable with Linux 3.2 (regression from 2.6.38)

2012-08-20 Thread Josip Rodin
Package: linux-image-3.2.0-0.bpo.2-amd64 Severity: serious Hi, I've experienced this regression from squeeze, so I'm noting it before I forget and wheezy's released... I have a desktop machine with a motherboard that has an AMD SB 750 south bridge with an integrated USB controller. With Linux

Bug#645998: closed by Josip Rodin joy-packa...@debian.org (Bug#645998: fixed in freeradius 2.1.12+dfsg-1)

2012-07-06 Thread Josip Rodin
On Wed, Jul 04, 2012 at 01:08:59PM +0200, José Antonio Antelo wrote: Is it possible to backport freeradius to stable version? Yes, I'll get to it eventually. You can also request that someone else does it in the backports support channels. And try to add the new FR to debian 7 before being

Bug#667629: libapache-mod-auth-radius: diff for NMU version 1.5.8-1.1

2012-07-06 Thread Josip Rodin
On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 06:08:53AM +0200, Fabio M. Di NItto wrote: On 07/01/2012 02:50 PM, Arno Töll wrote: tags 667629 + patch tags 667629 + pending thanks Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for libapache-mod-auth-radius (versioned as 1.5.8-1.1) and uploaded it to

Bug#645998: freeradius crashes due to segmentation fault

2012-05-17 Thread Josip Rodin
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 10:09:02PM +0200, Rafael Varela Pet wrote: Are there any plans to fix this in a near future? Even though we have a fail over system with three servers, this bug is becoming very annoying... I'm just being tardy with uploading the new version, sorry. Hope to get to it

Bug#672644: Acknowledgement (X on Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Series (Lenovo T400) broken after wheezy upgrade)

2012-05-13 Thread Josip Rodin
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 05:59:31PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: Hi again, Err, another startx attempt a few minutes later - worked! I'll try to reboot and reproduce... Reproduced, it works the second time around. Some sort of race condition on the initial run? -- 2. That which causes

Bug#672644: Acknowledgement (X on Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Series (Lenovo T400) broken after wheezy upgrade)

2012-05-12 Thread Josip Rodin
Hi again, Err, another startx attempt a few minutes later - worked! I'll try to reboot and reproduce... -- 2. That which causes joy or happiness. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact

Bug#669476: libapache-mod-auth-radius: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable: apache2-dev

2012-04-19 Thread Josip Rodin
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 09:36:52PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: Source: libapache-mod-auth-radius Version: 1.5.8-1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120419 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all

Bug#666311: freeradius: FTBFS: libfreeradius-radius-2.1.10.so: could not read symbols: Invalid operation

2012-03-30 Thread Josip Rodin
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 11:18:17AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: Source: freeradius Version: 2.1.10+dfsg-3 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120330 qa-ftbfs qa-ftbfs-buildarch Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of

Bug#648931: failure to handle char(4) = bpchar

2011-11-16 Thread Josip Rodin
Package: postgresql-9.1 Severity: grave Tags: upstream Hi, This is effectively http://bugs.debian.org/632028 but in unstable. We had the bad change reverted in 8.4.x (stable), but the new version has remained unfixed. http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2011-05/msg00080.php

Bug#645998: freeradius crashes due to segmentation fault

2011-10-21 Thread Josip Rodin
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 10:38:46AM +0200, Alan T DeKok wrote: Josip Rodin wrote: On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 04:42:51PM +0200, Alan T DeKok wrote: Josip Rodin wrote: FYI: If I recall correctly, this was a bad pointer in 2.1.10. It was fixed in 2.1.11. Do you have a specific commit

Bug#640874: leave: debian/rules is not a Makefile

2011-09-09 Thread Josip Rodin
On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 04:53:01PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: And still, this is a Makefile so you can quickly reuse Makefile snippets that others have been writing to add support for supplementary targets (like get-orig-source) or even to influence the environment (like the

Bug#640874: leave: debian/rules is not a Makefile

2011-09-09 Thread Josip Rodin
On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 04:18:34PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: (I don't recall if anyone tried to loop you into that discussion; if that didn't happen, that was a flaw in that discussion process to be sure.) Nope, sorry, I missed that. -- 2. That which causes joy or happiness. -- To

Bug#640874: leave: debian/rules is not a Makefile

2011-09-09 Thread Josip Rodin
Since my reasoning here didn't seem to leave a particular positive dent with those tech-ctte members who have responded so far, I would just like to solicit Ian Jackson's input, given his role in defining and implementing the debian/rules calling convention originally. In other worse, if I can't

Bug#640874: leave: debian/rules is not a Makefile

2011-09-08 Thread Josip Rodin
reassign 640874 tech-ctte thanks On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 08:21:32AM +0200, Niels Thykier wrote: Package: leave Severity: serious Justification: Policy 4.9 - must directive User: lint-ma...@debian.org Usertags: debian-rules-not-a-makefile debian-rules-missing-required-target

Bug#640874: leave: debian/rules is not a Makefile

2011-09-08 Thread Josip Rodin
On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 10:43:44AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: Would you mind explaining here why you feel it is important to retain the flexibility of multiple implementation languages for debian/rules? Now, I wouldn't actually put it that way - because that would imply that we could suddenly

Bug#640874: leave: debian/rules is not a Makefile

2011-09-08 Thread Josip Rodin
On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 10:50:33AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: Nevertheless, merely having that doubt in developers' minds is a cost; 17058 packages can definitely use this technique, while for 1 package we have to think about it ... so I would still want to hear of a clear benefit to allowing

Bug#640874: leave: debian/rules is not a Makefile

2011-09-08 Thread Josip Rodin
On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 03:38:39PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: Hi Josip, On Thu, 08 Sep 2011, Josip Rodin wrote: Instead, it is important to retain the age-old idea that the rules file has its own calling convention (an API) that isn't linked to one specific implementation

Bug#636147: /etc/editorrc ?

2011-08-18 Thread Josip Rodin
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 02:00:48PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote: Dixi quod??? Josip Rodin dixit: You can prepare a patch, sure, but while you're at it, do first test the situation where 'editorrc' is a slave to 'editor' so that you can be sure Yup, tested that. Took me quite a few turns

Bug#636147: /etc/editorrc ?

2011-08-03 Thread Josip Rodin
On Tue, Aug 02, 2011 at 04:42:01PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote: Josip Rodin dixit: /var/lib/misc/editorrc could work? Sure would. Do you want me to prepare a patch for joe? If so, should I version it as NMU or regularily? You can prepare a patch, sure, but while you're at it, do first

Bug#636147: /etc/editorrc ?

2011-08-02 Thread Josip Rodin
On Mon, Aug 01, 2011 at 10:28:17PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote: Maybe simply coding it differently inside joe will be the best solution - if it notices that $self is 'editor', then don't just look for /etc/joe/${self}rc but instead look itself up once again through /etc/alternatives/editor to

Bug#636147: /etc/editorrc ?

2011-08-02 Thread Josip Rodin
On Tue, Aug 02, 2011 at 08:03:40AM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote: Josip Rodin dixit: And if you no longer have /etc/joe/editorrc but instead /etc/editorrc, then that still requires source patching for joe to actually *read* it, so you're back to square one. No that???s actually the fun

Bug#636147: /etc/editorrc ?

2011-08-02 Thread Josip Rodin
On Tue, Aug 02, 2011 at 09:10:20AM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote: Josip Rodin dixit: The only question would be whether having a symlink called /etc/editorrc would confuse non-joe users. Hm. Too bad we can't directly link to /etc/alternatives/editorrc... if you have any better place

Bug#636147: /etc/editorrc ?

2011-08-01 Thread Josip Rodin
On Mon, Aug 01, 2011 at 08:20:21PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote: Hi, I just ran into a funny problem regarding update-alternatives and editorrc: if joe is installed, it wants /etc/joe/editorrc whereas jupp reads /etc/jupp/editorrc (I???ll use joe???s for now and symlink to it but that will

Bug#632028: postgresql 8.4.8 regression - failure to handle char(4) = bpchar

2011-06-29 Thread Josip Rodin
Package: postgresql-8.4 Version: 8.4.8-0squeeze1 Severity: grave Hi there, Unfortunately this stable upgrade of PostgreSQL 8.4.7-0squeeze2 to 8.4.8-0squeeze1 introduced a bug apparently from the 9.0 branch that is now consistently breaking queries on our production stable machines. Upstream

Bug#632028: Acknowledgement (postgresql 8.4.8 regression - failure to handle char(4) = bpchar)

2011-06-29 Thread Josip Rodin
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2011-05/msg00738.php Another consideration here is that because I back-ported the 9.0 checking code into REL8_4: http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb?p=postgresql.git;a=commitdiff;h=5d3853a7fa40b28b44b14084863fd83a188c9a9e

Bug#632028: postgresql 8.4.8 regression - failure to handle char(4) = bpchar

2011-06-29 Thread Josip Rodin
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 12:09:13PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 10:32:27AM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: Anyway, this kind of a query fails under PostgreSQL 9.0.4 and 8.4.8: Would you mind completing this testcase for me? I.e. at least acl_inherits is missing. Ah, sure

Bug#630569: [php-maint] Bug#630569: Bug#630569: php5-pgsql and postgresql-9.0 seem to collude never to close idle persistent connections

2011-06-18 Thread Josip Rodin
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 08:17:00PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 04:28:14PM +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote: I still don't see how this could be a php5-pgsql bug since it's caused by pgsql version. I filed it preemptively on all so as to solicit help... if there is no odd

Bug#630569: [php-maint] Bug#630569: Bug#630569: php5-pgsql and postgresql-9.0 seem to collude never to close idle persistent connections

2011-06-17 Thread Josip Rodin
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 04:28:14PM +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote: I still don't see how this could be a php5-pgsql bug since it's caused by pgsql version. I filed it preemptively on all so as to solicit help... if there is no odd variable behavior in php5-pgsql based on server version, please feel

Bug#630569: php5-pgsql and postgresql-9.0 seem to collude never to close idle persistent connections

2011-06-15 Thread Josip Rodin
Package: php5-pgsql, postgresql-9.0 Version: 5.3.3-7+squeeze1, 9.0.4-1~bpo60+1 Severity: serious Hi, After the upgrade of one of our web servers to squeeze, coupled with PostgreSQL 9 from squeeze-backports, the new pg_pconnect()-caused connections seem to get created and left idling forever.

Bug#630569: [php-maint] Bug#630569: php5-pgsql and postgresql-9.0 seem to collude never to close idle persistent connections

2011-06-15 Thread Josip Rodin
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 12:32:35PM +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote: My first question would be if you can repeat same behaviour under unstable (and/or wheezy). I'll try and get back to you on that. (It'll take me a while to replicate a machine and then upgrade it.) -- 2. That which causes joy

Bug#630569: [php-maint] Bug#630569: php5-pgsql and postgresql-9.0 seem to collude never to close idle persistent connections

2011-06-15 Thread Josip Rodin
reassign 630569 postgresql-8.4, postgresql-9.0, php5-pgsql thanks On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 12:32:35PM +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote: My first question would be if you can repeat same behaviour under unstable (and/or wheezy). Before going forward to wheeze, I first tried to reproduce it on clean

Bug#629896: segfault while simply get()ing a value from squeeze memcached

2011-06-09 Thread Josip Rodin
Package: php5-memcache Version: 3.0.4-4 Severity: grave Hi, Something in the squeeze upgrade completely demolished one of our internal PHP applications... our class that extends Memcache and calls parent::get() never returns from the call into memcache.so, whenever memcached is up. If I stop the

Bug#629896: segfault while simply get()ing a value from squeeze memcached

2011-06-09 Thread Josip Rodin
On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 12:10:07PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: Package: php5-memcache Version: 3.0.4-4 Severity: grave Hi, Something in the squeeze upgrade completely demolished one of our internal PHP applications... our class that extends Memcache and calls parent::get() never returns

Bug#626232: freeradius: FTBFS on kfreebsd (radsniff not built)

2011-05-10 Thread Josip Rodin
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 08:12:44AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: Package: freeradius Version: 2.1.10+dfsg-3 Severity: serious See the build logs at https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=freeradius, dh_install fails trying to install radsniff which apparently isn't built for some

Bug#608655: scotch and gbase: error when trying to install together

2011-01-03 Thread Josip Rodin
On Mon, Jan 03, 2011 at 08:16:49PM +, Marcos Marado wrote: Hi there, The problem is in scotch, that changed all the binary names from scotch_$binary to just $binary (see [1]). The gbase in scotch is completely different than the one from the gbase package. My first idea would be to

Bug#600176: freeradius: CVE-2010-3696 CVE-2010-3697

2010-10-14 Thread Josip Rodin
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 12:22:50PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: Package: freeradius Severity: grave Tags: security Justification: user security hole Please see the following links with included references to patches: http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2010-3696

Bug#548648: grub-pc jumps straight to rescue and prints error: no such disk / file not found

2010-08-04 Thread Josip Rodin
On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 02:53:22PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: This behaviour seems to be a problem with grub-probe and its usage by the default config scripts, because the simple most straightforward test fails for one of the RAID devices: % sudo tune2fs -l /dev/md0 | grep UUID

Bug#572442: sparc 2.6.29+ NMI watchdog deadlock on Sun Fire V240 etc

2010-03-04 Thread Josip Rodin
Package: linux-2.6 Severity: serious Tags: upstream patch Hi there, Ever since kernel 2.6.29 came out, several classes of sparc machines have been unable to upgrade, because they would get stuck while initializing the new NMI watchdog code. The process of trying to figure it out is mostly

Bug#565765: ruby1.9.1: FTBFS on sparc

2010-02-25 Thread Josip Rodin
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 05:30:29PM +0100, Marc Brockschmidt wrote: Any chance of upgrading one of the buildds to 2.6.32 to see if it helps? DSA told me that they do not want to run any non-standard (aka, non-Debian stable) kernel on these machines, not even for short tests. I'm not sure

Bug#565765: ruby1.9.1: FTBFS on sparc

2010-02-07 Thread Josip Rodin
On Sun, Feb 07, 2010 at 11:41:51AM +, Jurij Smakov wrote: Josip, are you running lebrun these days? Can you try reproducing the failure there and getting more information about it (logs are not very informative)? I'm a bit reluctant to do a porter upload knowing that

Bug#548648: grub-pc jumps straight to rescue and prints error: no such disk / file not found

2010-02-03 Thread Josip Rodin
On Sat, Jan 02, 2010 at 03:00:39PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote: On Sat, Jan 02, 2010 at 02:29:36PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote: I've got two disks and a software RAID setup on the partition that holds the /boot directory. I have several Linux software RAID partitions, based on this scheme

Bug#565765: ruby1.9.1: FTBFS on sparc

2010-01-23 Thread Josip Rodin
On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 11:13:02AM +, Jurij Smakov wrote: On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 01:33:47PM +1300, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: On 18/01/10 at 23:59 +, Jurij Smakov wrote: On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 06:58:18AM +1300, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: Package: src:ruby1.9.1 Version: 1.9.1.378-1

Bug#554987: marked as done (xvier: crash with xvier: read from xvier_prog failed)

2010-01-23 Thread Josip Rodin
On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 10:42:24PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: Maintainer: Josip Rodin joy-packa...@debian.org Changed-By: Uwe Kleine-König u.kleine-koe...@pengutronix.de Description: xvier - a Four in a row game Closes: 554987 Changes: xvier (1.0-7.5) unstable

Bug#564601: possible problems when switching UID/GIDs in delivery mode when run as root

2010-01-15 Thread Josip Rodin
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 10:52:55PM -0500, Sam Varshavchik wrote: OK, it works when I put it in the first block, where it first does setuid() because of the delivery mode. Then the subprocess gets the group mail. You must be referring to the following. After giving this another good

Bug#564601: possible problems when switching UID/GIDs in delivery mode when run as root

2010-01-14 Thread Josip Rodin
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 07:44:07PM -0500, Sam Varshavchik wrote: Let's try the following patch. I do appreciate your help in testing it. It's not easy for me to test all possible permutations of distro-specific configurations, and platform-specific nuances, that float around. diff -U3

Bug#564601: possible problems when switching UID/GIDs in delivery mode when run as root

2010-01-14 Thread Josip Rodin
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 07:44:07PM -0500, Sam Varshavchik wrote: Let's try the following patch. I do appreciate your help in testing it. It's not easy for me to test all possible permutations of distro-specific configurations, and platform-specific nuances, that float around. diff -U3

Bug#564601: possible problems when switching UID/GIDs in delivery mode when run as root

2010-01-13 Thread Josip Rodin
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 08:02:31PM -0500, Sam Varshavchik wrote: % id testmaildrop uid=1006(testmaildrop) gid=1006(testmaildrop) groups=1006(testmaildrop) uid=1006(testmaildrop) gid=0(root) groups=0(root) That's the problem. After using -d, it changes the user but not the group. Can you

Bug#564601: possible problems when switching UID/GIDs in delivery mode when run as root

2010-01-13 Thread Josip Rodin
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 07:13:38AM -0500, Sam Varshavchik wrote: % id testmaildrop uid=1006(testmaildrop) gid=1006(testmaildrop) groups=1006(testmaildrop) uid=1006(testmaildrop) gid=0(root) groups=0(root) That's the problem. After using -d, it changes the user but not the group. Can you

Bug#564601: possible problems when switching UID/GIDs in delivery mode when run as root

2010-01-12 Thread Josip Rodin
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 09:56:21PM -0500, Sam Varshavchik wrote: Christoph Anton Mitterer writes: On Sun, 2010-01-10 at 12:29 -0500, Sam Varshavchik wrote: This depends on the maildrop configuration, but generally setgroupid won't have any effect if maildrop is invoked as root, since maildrop

Bug#564601: possible problems when switching UID/GIDs in delivery mode when run as root

2010-01-12 Thread Josip Rodin
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 07:13:50AM -0500, Sam Varshavchik wrote: # authtest mr...@courier-mta.com Authentication succeeded. Authenticated: mr...@courier-mta.com (uid 8, gid 12) Home Directory: /var/spool/maildir/mrsam Maildir: (none) Quota: (none) Encrypted

Bug#564601: possible problems when switching UID/GIDs in delivery mode when run as root

2010-01-12 Thread Josip Rodin
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 05:54:56PM -0500, Sam Varshavchik wrote: Josip Rodin writes: On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 07:13:50AM -0500, Sam Varshavchik wrote: # authtest mr...@courier-mta.com Authentication succeeded. Authenticated: mr...@courier-mta.com (uid 8, gid 12) Home Directory: /var

Bug#564601: possible problems when switching UID/GIDs in delivery mode when run as root

2010-01-10 Thread Josip Rodin
On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 05:06:56PM +0100, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote: Not sure if this actually a hole or if I just misunderstand something,... but: In debian /usr/bin/maildrop ist installed: -rwxr-sr-x 1 root mail 163k Nov 9 01:11 /usr/bin/maildrop So I'd expect that the following

Bug#548648: grub-pc jumps straight to rescue and prints error: no such disk / file not found

2010-01-03 Thread Josip Rodin
On Sat, Jan 02, 2010 at 03:00:39PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote: On Sat, Jan 02, 2010 at 02:29:36PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote: I've got two disks and a software RAID setup on the partition that holds the /boot directory. I have several Linux software RAID partitions, based on this scheme

Bug#548648: grub-pc jumps straight to rescue and prints error: no such disk / file not found

2010-01-02 Thread Josip Rodin
On Sat, Jan 02, 2010 at 02:29:36PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote: I've got two disks and a software RAID setup on the partition that holds the /boot directory. I have several Linux software RAID partitions, based on this scheme: sda2+sdb2 - Linux amd64 / sda3+sdb3 - Linux i386 / sda4

Bug#548648: grub-pc jumps straight to rescue and prints error: no such disk / file not found

2010-01-02 Thread Josip Rodin
Hi, I've reported this bug in the Debian BTS, to no avail, so I'm cc:ing the upstream address for help. I've got two disks and a software RAID setup on the partition that holds the /boot directory. I have several Linux software RAID partitions, based on this scheme: sda2+sdb2 - Linux

Bug#559805: CVE-2009-3736 local privilege escalation

2009-12-07 Thread Josip Rodin
On Mon, Dec 07, 2009 at 11:04:38AM -0500, Michael Gilbert wrote: On Mon, 7 Dec 2009 09:16:57 +0100, Josip Rodin wrote: unless this code somehow inexplicalby crept in, there's no bug. please check your linking process, so that there is no uncertainty about this. thank you All

Bug#557425: lenny-squeeze upgrade - system no longer bootable

2009-11-21 Thread Josip Rodin
Package: grub-pc Severity: grave I'm typing this from Windows because the squeeze upgrade a few minutes ago rendered all my Linux GRUB menu entries useless - they all report command not found either for linux or for initrd. During the upgrade, I saw three debconf prompts, and just pressed enter

Bug#557425: lenny-squeeze upgrade - system no longer bootable

2009-11-21 Thread Josip Rodin
On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 01:49:51AM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote: Package: grub-pc Severity: grave I'm typing this from Windows because the squeeze upgrade a few minutes ago rendered all my Linux GRUB menu entries useless - they all report command not found either for linux or for initrd

Bug#554987: xvier: crash with xvier: read from xvier_prog failed

2009-11-09 Thread Josip Rodin
On Sat, Nov 07, 2009 at 08:17:04PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote: On Sat, Nov 07, 2009 at 07:43:00PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote: Package: xvier Version: 1.0-7.4 Severity: grave Hello Josip, This is on lenny-amd64: xvier crash when clicking on the fourth row with xvier: read from

Bug#554987: xvier: crash with xvier: read from xvier_prog failed

2009-11-09 Thread Josip Rodin
On Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 11:04:46PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote: On Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 10:17:51PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote: On Sat, Nov 07, 2009 at 08:17:04PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote: On Sat, Nov 07, 2009 at 07:43:00PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote: Package: xvier Version: 1.0-7.4

Bug#555156: maildrop: invocation of update-alternatives by postinst script fails

2009-11-08 Thread Josip Rodin
On Sun, Nov 08, 2009 at 09:17:01PM +0100, Serafeim Zanikolas wrote: Hi, update-alternatives fails because the binary in the unstable archive doesn't ship /usr/bin/*.maildrop: dpkg -$ dpkg -c /var/cache/apt/archives/maildrop_2.2.0-2_i386.deb | grep usr\/bin drwxr-xr-x root/root 0

Bug#535331: ditto

2009-11-07 Thread Josip Rodin
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 11:54:21AM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: I've experienced the same problem. I've got two lenny machines which have [...] FWIW Here's the last upgrade output pasted exactly as it just happened: % sudo apt-get upgrade Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree

Bug#554987: xvier: crash with xvier: read from xvier_prog failed

2009-11-07 Thread Josip Rodin
On Sat, Nov 07, 2009 at 07:43:00PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote: Package: xvier Version: 1.0-7.4 Severity: grave Hello Josip, This is on lenny-amd64: xvier crash when clicking on the fourth row with xvier: read from xvier_prog failed Hmm, it's actually randomly crashing, I've

Bug#548648: grub-pc: chainload from legacy jumps straight to rescue and prints error: no such disk

2009-09-27 Thread Josip Rodin
Package: grub-pc Version: 1.97~beta3-1 Justification: renders package unusable Severity: grave Hi, I've upgraded from lenny to sid and tried to chainload, but sadly the new version won't do anything useful for me. This is what it prints: Booting 'Chainload into GRUB 2' root (hd0,1)

Bug#524185: ditto

2009-09-24 Thread Josip Rodin
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 08:36:55PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: severity 524185 serious thanks This just happened to me after an upgrade from lenny to current sid, and it's damned annoying. I've logged into the machine over the network and did a sudo killall xfce4-session which seems to have

Bug#515286: Depends on GTK 1.2 and GLIB 1.2

2009-03-28 Thread Josip Rodin
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 12:06:54AM -0400, Barry deFreese wrote: It seems that the new 0.15 upstream uses GTK2. I have packaged up the new upstream and put it here: http://people.debian.org/~bdefreese/gentoo/ Hope you can use it. I know you have RFA'd the package but if you could get

Bug#515286: Depends on GTK 1.2 and GLIB 1.2

2009-03-28 Thread Josip Rodin
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 09:42:24AM -0400, Barry deFreese wrote: It seems that the new 0.15 upstream uses GTK2. I have packaged up the new upstream and put it here: http://people.debian.org/~bdefreese/gentoo/ Hope you can use it. I know you have RFA'd the package but if you could get

Bug#514418: [FIX]: ultra45 boot failing...

2009-02-09 Thread Josip Rodin
On Sun, Feb 08, 2009 at 04:58:08PM -0800, David Miller wrote: So you're saying that X working is more important than machines actually booting at all? These priorities are wrong. When N (where N 0) users complain about dead X, and 0 users complain about not being able to boot, the priorities

Bug#514418: [FIX]: ultra45 boot failing...

2009-02-09 Thread Josip Rodin
On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 12:28:18AM -0800, David Miller wrote: So you're saying that X working is more important than machines actually booting at all? These priorities are wrong. When N (where N 0) users complain about dead X, and 0 users complain about not being able to boot, the

Bug#488669: resolving X Server crashes on SPARC (bugs #488669 and #500358)

2008-10-27 Thread Josip Rodin
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 09:36:39AM +0100, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote: 1. Install the kernel package from http://people.debian.org/~gaudenz/sparc and test if this fixes the problem. This is the same kernel as currently in unstable with the problematic change removed. Please also test this

Bug#500358: mach64 stopped working on the Sun Ultra 5 graphics card after upgrade

2008-09-27 Thread Josip Rodin
Package: xserver-xorg-video-mach64 Version: 6.8.0-1 Severity: grave Hi, With an older kernel, the old version of this driver worked fine. After a kernel upgrade, it stopped working, with a couple of error messages screaming something about memory allocation. Hearing something about how I have

Bug#500358: Xorg with ATI driver and Linux 2.6.25 (on Ultra 5)

2008-09-27 Thread Josip Rodin
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 01:16:35PM +0200, Ludovic Court?s wrote: Jim Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Ludovic Court?s wrote: The current Xorg and ATI driver appear to not work when used with `linux-image-2.6.25-2-sparc64' on an Ultra 5: X.Org X Server 1.4.2 ... Any hint?

Bug#500358: Xorg with ATI driver and Linux 2.6.25 (on Ultra 5)

2008-09-27 Thread Josip Rodin
On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 02:38:04PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 01:16:35PM +0200, Ludovic Court?s wrote: Jim Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Ludovic Court?s wrote: The current Xorg and ATI driver appear to not work when used with `linux-image-2.6.25-2-sparc64

Bug#500358: Xorg with ATI driver and Linux 2.6.25 (on Ultra 5)

2008-09-27 Thread Josip Rodin
On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 02:53:46PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 14:48:42 +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: Oh, and we already have one in 488669, but it's filed against the core X server package. I'll leave it to the X guys to decide where to merge. In any case it's a clear

Bug#498536: .26 breaks firmware loading for qla2xxx on sparc

2008-09-10 Thread Josip Rodin
Package: linux-image-2.6.26-1-sparc64-smp Version: 2.6.26-4 Severity: grave Tags: upstream Hi, qla2xxx's firmware loading thingy got hosed between .25 and .26, I've already reported something along these lines to upstream, but I just verified it with our kernel image so I'm filing it here too.

Bug#332782: Release Notes: license clarification

2008-08-26 Thread Josip Rodin
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 05:42:12AM +0200, W. Martin Borgert wrote: Obviously the implicit copyright all rights reserved would apply by default, but given that all contributions were explicitly published by all of the authors, I think that considering the work to be released into the

Bug#332782: Release Notes: license clarification

2008-08-26 Thread Josip Rodin
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 07:26:38PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote: But, in such an (unlikely) court battle the onus would be on them to prove that the stuff they committed was both copyrightable in the first place as well as not infringing on previous work (which they apparently didn't have any

Bug#332782: Release Notes: license clarification

2008-08-25 Thread Josip Rodin
to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and/or [EMAIL PROTECTED] Many thanks for your collaboration. If I cannot get positive answers within, hm, let's say three weeks, from most main authors, I'll remove all text and start the release notes from scratch :~( Authors mentioned in the release notes: Josip Rodin

Bug#479185: Help for a FTBFS on sparc

2008-06-09 Thread Josip Rodin
On Mon, Jun 09, 2008 at 01:46:23PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: tag 479185 + moreinfo severity 479185 important thanks this fails with 4.1, 4.2 and 4.3. At least 4.1 wasn't changed at all, so I assume the main reason is not GCC, but something else. The configury of this package uses the

Bug#445360: rxvt+mutt crash - solved?

2008-04-23 Thread Josip Rodin
On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 08:48:20PM +0200, Jan Christoph Nordholz wrote: Hi Josip, Okay, I would be happy to try and narrow it down some more - just give me more hints where to look... what would be next - terminfo? locales? good news: I think I've found it. Could you please verify that

Bug#445360: rxvt+mutt crash - new, smaller test case

2008-04-11 Thread Josip Rodin
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 01:26:40PM +0200, Jan Christoph Nordholz wrote: Hi Josip, Ha, found it - it's just one setting: XTerm*termName: xterm-debian The first step to reproduce can be changed to: xrdb -remove xrdb -merge rxvt-bug.Xresources rxvt even with that resource

Bug#445360: rxvt+mutt crash - new, smaller test case

2008-04-09 Thread Josip Rodin
On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 12:21:23PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote: I've run into the bug again a few times, but most recently on a rather inconspicuous bit - just scrolling within one single message crashed rxvt. Because this message wasn't signed or anything, so not that many colors would

Bug#475263: phpldapadmin stopped supporting sambaUnixIdPool, really uncleanly

2008-04-09 Thread Josip Rodin
Package: phpldapadmin Version: 0.9.8.3-8 Severity: serious Hi, The other day I was unpleasantly surprised that the setting: $ldapservers-SetValue($i,'auto_number','mechanism','uidpool'); the equivalent of which worked normally in sarge, doesn't actually work on etch, but is still part of the

Bug#445360: rxvt+mutt crash - new, smaller test case

2008-04-09 Thread Josip Rodin
On Wed, Apr 09, 2008 at 09:51:51PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 12:21:23PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote: I've run into the bug again a few times, but most recently on a rather inconspicuous bit - just scrolling within one single message crashed rxvt. Because this message

Bug#439527: mod_auth_radius-2.0.c and Apache 2.2.x

2008-03-09 Thread Josip Rodin
On Thu, Mar 06, 2008 at 03:36:27AM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote: On Sat, Jul 21, 2007 at 06:08:23PM +0200, joy wrote: Is the mod_auth_radius-2.0.c supposed to work properly with Apache 2.2.x? I can compile it just fine, but can't get it to work on runtime. Maybe, like LDAP, this module

  1   2   >