Dear Kartik,
On Sat, 13 Nov 2010, Kartik Mistry wrote:
> [kar...@olive:~/]% sudo dpkg --purge ttf-oriya-fonts
> (Reading database ... 196545 files and directories currently installed.)
> Removing ttf-oriya-fonts ...
> Purging configuration files for ttf-oriya-fonts ...
> Processing triggers for fo
Hello,
On Tue, 05 May 2009, Petr Pudlak wrote:
> The problem is that if pbuilder is invoked with --binary-arch, it still tries
> to build the whole project, including the documentation (indep). It looks to
> me as if the problem
> is with pbuilder (or with the tools it's invoking), but of course
Hello,
I was unable to reproduce this error on a fresh installation of sid.
On Wed, 18 Mar 2009, Jim Shofstall wrote:
> Recent upgrades of flpsed and ghostscript-x not compatible. Flpsed is not
> displaying pages again.
>
> Current version of flpsed:0.5.2-1
> Current version of ghostscrip
Hello,
On Wed, 18 Mar 2009, Jim Shofstall wrote:
> Recent upgrades of flpsed and ghostscript-x not compatible. Flpsed is not
> displaying pages again.
>
> Current version of flpsed:0.5.2-1
> Current version of ghostscript-x: ghostscript-x_8.64~dfsg-1_i386.deb
>
> Downgrading ghostscrip
Package: flpsed
Version: 0.5.1-1
Severity: grave
Tags: patch
Justification: renders package unusable
I received the following mail on February 4th but noticed it a bit
late :-(. It should really have been filed as a bug report!
Basically, "ghostscript" in lenny does not provide the "x11alpha"
dri
Hello,
On Tue, 09 Sep 2008, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> In Step 3 you added the option "swap" which translates to "Run mkswap on
> the created device." according to man crypttab.
>
> So this will run mkswap on the resume device.
AFAIK, this mkswap operation is run by "/etc/init.d/cryptsetup-early"
wh
reassign 490319 ffmpeg-debian 0.svn20080206-9
thanks
Hello,
On Fri, 11 Jul 2008, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Package: ffmpeg2theora
> Version: 0.21-0.1
> Severity: serious
> User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080710 qa-ftbfs
> Justification: FTBFS on i386
> Relevant part:
> > cc -I/usr/i
Hello,
On Sun, 29 Jun 2008, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 10:52:39PM +0200, buildd wrote:
> > * New upstream release (0.21).
> > Closes: #484813, #482218, #487911.
>
> #482218 was _no_ "new version available" bug. So this changelog lacks
> informations.
Thanks for pointing
Hello,
I am uploading the NMU to DELAYED/3-day.
Why 3-day?
a. The bugs closed are RC bugs so 0-day NMU is permitted since
we are close to freeze.
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2008/06/msg0.html
b. This is a new upstream version so possibly the maintainer wants
s/02-fix_hyphen-used-as-minus_in_manpage.patch:
+replaced incorrect uses of hyphen as minus in ffmpeg2theora.1.
+
+ -- Kapil Hari Paranjape <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wed, 25 Jun 2008 16:42:05 +0530
+
ffmpeg2theora (0.19-1) unstable; urgency=low
* New upstream release (closes: #429937, #368588)
onl
directives in ffmpeg2theora.c to the correct directories.
+ * debian/patches/02-fix_hyphen-used-as-minus_in_manpage.patch:
+replaced incorrect uses of hyphen as minus in ffmpeg2theora.1.
+
+ -- Kapil Hari Paranjape <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wed, 25 Jun 2008 16:42:05 +0530
+
ffmpeg2theora (0.19-
Hello,
On Sat, 12 Apr 2008, Kapil Hari Paranjape wrote:
> On Sat, 12 Apr 2008, Kapil Hari Paranjape wrote:
> > The attached patch to the Makefile fixes this bug.
>
> Oops. The patch got mangled by the editor :-(
And then ... I sent the fixed patch to the wrong report.
Please ig
Hello,
On Sat, 12 Apr 2008, Kapil Hari Paranjape wrote:
> The attached patch to the Makefile fixes this bug.
Oops. The patch got mangled by the editor :-(
Regards,
Kapil.
==
diff -u dict-jargon-4.4.4/debian/rules dict-jargon-4.4.4/debian/ru
tags 470351 + patch
thanks
Hello,
The attached patch to the Makefile fixes this bug.
Regards,
Kapil.
==
--- dict-jargon-4.4.4/jargsrc-4.4.4/Makefile
+++ dict-jargon-4.4.4/jargsrc-4.4.4/Makefile
@@ -50,7 +50,7 @@
./replace 'src="graphics'
Package: approx
Version: 3.0.0+b1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
*** Please type your report below this line ***
After the upgrade from 3.0.0 to 3.0.0+b1, approx refused
to start. It gives the error message:
Starting proxy server for Debian archive files: approxNo byteco
severity 448621 minor
tags 448621 + etch
thanks
Hello,
This report was originally submitted for the version of
flpsed in stable used in combination with the ghostscript
packages of lenny/sid.
It *is* true that flpsed in etch calls "gs-esp" rather than "gs"
so someone who uses an etch version of
tags 463871 + patch
thanks
Hello,
On Sun, 03 Feb 2008, Kevin Baradon wrote:
> After upgrade to version 2.53, dpkg-www doesn't display package list
> anymore. Here is text transcript of the web page shown :
The enclosed patch appears to fix the problem.
Regards,
Kapil.
--
=patch
Hello,
On Fri, 11 Jan 2008, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> It seems that atleast that variable gets overwritten during
> the aes-128-ige test. Running "openssl speed aes-128-ige rsa"
> is enough to make it crash.
Could not reproduce this bug on a "lenny" system with the following
software configuration:
Hello,
On Mon, 12 Nov 2007, Michael Ablassmeier wrote:
> Package: par, libpar-packer-perl
> Severity: serious
> Justification: policy violation
> both par and libpar-packer-perl do ship `/usr/bin/par' but neither conflict or
> add a diversion, thus fail to be installed in the same environment:
W
Hello,
On Tue, 11 Sep 2007, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> Package: linux-modules-extra-2.6
> Version: 2.6.22-1
> Severity: serious
>
> Hi,
>
> Your package is failing to build with the following error:
> /build/buildd/linux-modules-extra-2.6-2.6.22/debian/build/build_amd64_vserver_amd64_aufs/vfsub.h:
>
Hello,
On Mon, 10 Sep 2007, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Package: tex4ht
> version: 20070821-1
> Severity: serious
> User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20070905 qa-ftbfs
> Justification: FTBFS on i386
> The full build log is available from
> http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2007/09/05
I
Hello,
To summarise this thread we have the following statments from the
major contributors, which ought to have been enough.
On Fri, 03 Aug 2007, Marcel J.E. Mol wrote:
> As far as I'm concerned, hte license can be changed to fully GPL and
> the non-commercial statement can be removed.
On Fri,
Hello,
On Tue, 15 May 2007 Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> so this is unclear. I'm still filing as serious, since others have
> treated this program as non-free for a while, e.g. CTAN, and recently a
> SuSE license team research brought it up.
Quoting from README by Marcel J. E. Mol:
Small correction.
On Fri, 22 Dec 2006, Kapil Hari Paranjape wrote:
> Now suppose we get two programs that give us /usr/bin/slirp.comm.
> Then we have:
>
> /usr/bin/slirp.comm -> /etc/alternatives/slirp -> /usr/bin/slirp.comma
That should be:
/usr/bin/
Hello,
On Fri, 22 Dec 2006, Luk Claes wrote:
> Kapil Hari Paranjape wrote:
> >In such a situation it would be incorrect to insist that one of the
> >packages use a binary with a different name---because of (1).
>
> So what's wrong with insisting both of them changin
Hello,
Regarding conflicts like that between "slang-slirp" and "slirp".
(see recent bugs filed by Michael Ablassmeier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
).
I feel that this a currently an area not addressed by policy
sufficiently well.
Assume that:
1. There are
retitle 403998 "Package is not installable"
thanks
Hello,
On Thu, 21 Dec 2006, Steve Langasek wrote:
> severity 403998 serious
> thanks
>
> On Thu, Dec 21, 2006 at 04:41:22PM +0530, Kapil Hari Paranjape wrote:
> > >From: Jonny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
severity 403998 wishlist
retitle 403998 "Please package newer version"
thanks
Hello,
>From: Jonny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: It is not installable
>Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 15:53:09 +0900
>Package: gzip
>Version: 1.3.9-1
>Severity: grave
I do not see version 1.3.9-1 of g
Package: pngcrush
Version: 1.6.4-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hello,
I know! I'm the maintainer but I can't see a fix right away!
After the recent upgrade of libpng (presumably 1.2.13 I haven't been
able to check it fully yet) pngcrush is broken:
$ pngcrush
On Mon, 16 Oct 2006, Johannes Rohr wrote:
> Hi Kapi, thanks for your response.
>
> The only hint I can give would be to install the package dovecot-imapd,
> probably do some mail reading over IMAP (with thunderbird, evolution or
> whatever) and then fire up mutt again and see what happens.
>
> J
On Sat, 30 Sep 2006, Johannes Rohr wrote:
> Someone tagged the bug "moreinfo". I would be more than happy to provide
> additional information, if you give me advise what in particular is
> required.
Could you give sufficent information for people to try to reproduce
the bug? For example, you ment
severity 348729 normal
thanks
Hello,
I see from the related bug reports that Anand forgot to close this
report but closed the others. Perhaps this was deliberate but by
examining the reports and the diagnosis it doesn't seem so.
So, I'm not closing this report just downgrading it. It is more tha
Hello,
On Thu, 28 Sep 2006, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Anyway, is this compatibility between different versions of MBR and stage
> > files?
> > I don't think having version disparity between MBR and stage was meant to be
> > supported.
>
> Right but if
On Mon, 25 Sep 2006, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Kapil Hari Paranjape <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Considering the idea of a "feature freeze" for "grub" and a move to
> > try and consolidate "grub2" instead, I think this solution is si
Hello,
On Sat, 23 Sep 2006, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Kapil Hari Paranjape <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> option C, we create a way to extract the version information from every
> >> grub file. So that the grub shell can check that its version matches
> >&
an/changelog
+++ grub-0.97/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,14 @@
+grub (0.97-15.0pre1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Non-Maintainer Upload.
+ * debian/rules: Fixed up "clean" target as suggested by Joey Hess.
+(Closes #385980)
+ * debian/patches/setup_warn_version.diff: Patch "stage2
Hello,
On reading of this problem in using the grub "shell" setup command
instead of "grub-install" I looked through the documentation since I
was sure that it had asked me to copy the files.
Sure enough, under the node "Installation" in the grub info there is
the following paragraph:
On Thu, 21 Sep 2006, Joey Hess wrote:
> > I this raised the question on debian-qa and the opinion there seemed
> > to be that the "clean" target not be faulted for removing such files.
>
> That's not how I read the short thread; you got one suggestion to remove the
> autogenerated files in the cl
tags 348729 + moreinfo unreproducible
thanks
Hello,
To use a phrase from the the old adventure game.
The door closing time is approaching ...
As indicated by the maintainer the original submitters
have not indicated that the bug is reproduced with the
newer versions (post 0.8) of zeroco
Hello,
I looked at the result of the build-binary-clean cycle.
The files removed are automatically generated files.
I this raised the question on debian-qa and the opinion there seemed
to be that the "clean" target not be faulted for removing such files.
http://lists.debian.org/debian-q
Hello,
On Wed, 02 Aug 2006, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> Kapil Hari Paranjape <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Here is my understanding of the situation of cdrecord with Linux 2.6.x.
> > Please correct me if I am wrong.
> >
> >"cdrecord" will (perh
Hello,
Here is a small patch to cdrecord version 2.01+01a03 which removes
some extra SUID checks that are being made in libscg. This patch
removes a (in the words of the upstream author) "hack to get around
the lack of uid management".
With this patch applied cdrecord works without SUID and appea
Hello,
On Mon, 31 Jul 2006, Richard Thrippleton wrote:
> On Mon Jul 31 12:24, Kapil Hari Paranjape wrote:
> > As far as I can see the latest Ubuntu cdrecord package also uses SUID
> > settings to confer Cd writing privileges to members of the group cdrom.
> Doesn't see
Hello,
Here is my understanding of the situation of cdrecord with Linux 2.6.x.
Please correct me if I am wrong.
"cdrecord" will (perhaps with minor modifications) be able to write
CD's without root privileges for a user with access to rw the relevant
drive. However this will lead to
tags 349674 upstream
thanks
Hello,
As reported in Debian bug #349674 which can be seen at
http://bugs.debian.org/349674
Unison has problems when the file system is removed from under it.
For example, here is the result of my experiment.
Setup: A USB drive is mounted at /media/
tags 377369 moreinfo
thanks
Hello,
It seems to me that the submitter of this bug perhaps
used the wrong path for fonts in the command line. The
current path for fonts installed by xfonts-base is
/usr/share/fonts/X11/misc/. With the following command
line:
Xvnc4 -fp /usr/share/fonts/X11/m
tags 361952 unreproducible
severity 361952 important
thanks
Hello,
On Wed, 12 Apr 2006, Meike Reichle wrote:
> This (the partially upgraded system) might be the source of the problem.
> I just went through a full upgrade + dist-upgrade that also got me the
> new tetex-bin (3.0-15). So, I am sorry
Hello,
On Tue, 11 Apr 2006, Meike Reichle wrote:
> Package: tex4ht-common
> Version: 20060312-1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
>
> Installing tex4ht-common fails with this error message:
>
> update-texmf: Basic configuration file /etc/texmf/texmf.d/05TeXMF.cnf
> m
Hello,
On Sun, 26 Mar 2006, Kapil Hari Paranjape wrote:
> A "hack" which seems to point to a problem in perlmagick:
Additional evidence that the bug is in perlmagick/libmagick
is that the original "webmagick" program works fine
when used with Graphics::Magick in place of I
Hello,
A "hack" which seems to point to a problem in perlmagick:
Apply the enclosed "patch" to webmagick which duplicates the
two "Write" calls that write out the montage.
The program then appears to work properly.
Regards,
Kapil.
--
--- /usr/bin/webmagick 2005-12-07 10:04:09.0 +053
Package: webmagick
Version: 2.02-8
Followup-For: Bug #344152
Hello,
The following alternative way of running webmagick "fixes"
the problem:
webmagick --thumbfont false
However, any other setting for thumbfont like '10x20' also
produces an error message like that reported by the submitte
Hello,
Following the suggestion of Thomas Viehmann I joined the
"png-mng-implement" list where the development of libpng
is discussed by many including among them the author of pngcrush.
My posting there let to the following thread:
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_id=9575058&
Hello,
The following remarks about my previous patch came up on the Debian QA
mailing list.
On Thu, 26 Jan 2006, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Ugh, that's not a very good solution. That means that the next time
> there's a security hole in zlib or libpng, which hasn't been uncommon, it
> may also affect
tags 331068 patch
tags 338659 patch
tags 330026 patch
thanks
Hello,
The enclosed patch will allow pngcrush to build and the resulting
binary seems to work but I don't know if the developer wants to do
things this way.
Upstream author wishes to make use of the png and zlib routines that
are provi
Dear Juhapekka,
On Fri, 16 Dec 2005, Juhapekka Tolvanen wrote:
>
> Package: tex4ht
> Version: 20050402.1817-1
> Severity: grave
>
>
> I was trying to upgarde to version 20051130-1:
Sorry about the goof-up. Version 20051130 is indeed uninstallable
and is superceded by 20051214 which should work
Hello,
On Wed, 14 Dec 2005, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
> Package: tex4ht
> Version: 20051130-1
> Severity: Serious
> Owner: Norbert Preining <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> >piuparts -p /home/pbuilder/result/tex4ht/tex4ht_20051130-1_i386.deb
> >0m0.0s INFO:
> >---
56 matches
Mail list logo
