found 770171 1.0.2-2
tags 770171 + upstream
forwarded 770171 https://github.com/fail2ban/fail2ban/issues/1372
user l...@pca.it
usertags 770171 + pca.it-security
thanks
Hi there,
I just got hit by this as well, plus the nftables issue:
Package: python3-wikitrans
Version: 1.3-2
Severity: grave
Control: affects -1 dico-module-mediawiki
Usertags: pca.it-communication
Hi there,
after the dicod's `load python`[1] and `M4 quoting`[2], querying the
WikiMedia databases gives no match and the following errors in `dicod`:
```
.mocked.com is possible or not.
This can be tested via `iptables -I OUTPUT -p tcp -m tcp -d
test.mocked.com -j $ACTION`:
* DROP, the test does not fail
* REJECT, the test fails
Nevertheless, if no one replies in 7 days, I will upload an NMU with the
solution 3 above (Git patch attached).
T
jessie-pu, the problem is fixed for us using the
jessie-backports package (bug updated).
Thx, bye,
Gismo / Luca
--
Luca Capello
Administrateur GNU/Linux
Infomaniak Network SA
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi there!
On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 04:13:24 +0200, Guido Günther wrote:
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 03:00:54PM +0200, Luca Capello wrote:
On Thu, 18 Apr 2013 08:22:39 +0200, Guido Günther wrote:
It's fixed now in sid. I'm sorry for the long delay.
No problem, and actually I am grateful to you
notfixed 701684 0.5.5+really0.5.4-1
thanks
Hi there!
On Thu, 18 Apr 2013 08:22:39 +0200, Guido Günther wrote:
On Sun, Mar 03, 2013 at 06:46:04PM +0100, Luca Capello wrote:
On Thu, 28 Feb 2013 08:31:22 +0100, Guido Günther wrote:
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 10:54:41PM -0700, Bob Proulx wrote
Hi there!
On Thu, 28 Feb 2013 08:31:22 +0100, Guido Günther wrote:
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 10:54:41PM -0700, Bob Proulx wrote:
After upgrading from yesterday's 0.5.4-1 to today's 0.5.5-3 the
virt-viewer program has disappeared from the system.
# dpkg -L virt-viewer | grep bin/virt-viewer
Package: colorhug-client
Version: 0.1.11-1
Severity: serious
Usertags: debian-packaging
Hi there!
After having got access to my ColorHug (see #697364), I followed the
instructions provided by the producer and got some errors:
=
$ colorhug-cmd set-leds 1 5 200 200 echo OK
OK
$
tags 697373 + patch
thanks
Hi there!
On Fri, 04 Jan 2013 15:22:51 +0100, Luca Capello wrote:
I will provide a Git patch as soon as this bug gets its number. IMHO
this deserves a wheezy unblock, I will be glad to do an NMU and contact
the RM, if needed.
Here we are, attached the Git
Hi there!
On Tue, 16 Oct 2012 00:05:59 +0200, Luca Capello wrote:
On Mon, 08 Oct 2012 23:12:33 +0200, Luca Capello wrote:
At the next reboot mdadm does not segfault anymore, so at least this
problem is fixed in 3.2.5-3~bpo60+1, it could be related to:
http://bugs.debian.org/621786
I am
reassign 599188 ftp.debian.org
retitle 599188 RM: pam-fprint -- ROM; dead upstream, replaced by libpam-fprintd
severity 599188 normal
usertags 599188 + debian-packaging
thanks
Hi there!
On Tue, 13 Mar 2012 16:37:51 -0600, Luca Capello wrote:
So, basically, we should move to fprintd (and pam
Hi there!
On Sun, 24 Jun 2012 19:04:19 +0200, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Sun, 2012-06-24 at 15:52 +0200, Luca Capello wrote:
On Sat, 16 Jun 2012 11:49:34 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'wheezy'.
It installed fine
Hi there!
On Sun, 24 Jun 2012 15:52:43 +0200, Luca Capello wrote:
This is caused by the fact that there is no MySQL server running yet.
While this could be solved via a Pre-Depends: in bacula-director-mysql,
this is actually not possible because the MySQL server could be on a
remote location
affects 677057 + bacula
usertags 677700 + debian-packaging
thanks
Hi Andreas!
IMHO bacula-director-mysql_5.2.6+dfsg-1 is not broken at all, but
leaving Severity: to serious and Cc:ing debian-release@ for an advice.
On Sat, 16 Jun 2012 11:49:34 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
during a test with
found 658326 5.0.2-2.2
tags 658326 + squeeze
found 658326 5.0.3-1
tags 658326 + sid
thanks
Hi there!
On Fri, 15 Jun 2012 14:06:52 +0200, Karl Goetz wrote:
On Wed, 02 May 2012 15:16:36 +0200
Luca Capello l...@pca.it wrote:
Sorry I missed this entire discussion; I forgot about the bug entirely
Hi there!
On Fri, 01 Jun 2012 16:45:24 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 12:17:57 +0100, Martin Pitt wrote:
Luca Capello [2011-10-30 3:26 +0100]:
tags 639466 + pending
Any chance to do an upload soon? I'll bump the severity of the
remaining four 8.4 bugs to RC now
tags 658326 + pending
thanks
Hi there!
On Thu, 17 May 2012 18:05:49 +0200, Luca Capello wrote:
On Mon, 14 May 2012 22:43:12 +0200, Alexander Golovko wrote:
Ok, i add it into master branch
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-bacula/bacula.git;a=commitdiff;h
Hi Alexander!
On Mon, 14 May 2012 22:43:12 +0200, Alexander Golovko wrote:
On Mon, 14 May 2012 14:48:25 +0200, Luca Capello wrote:
On Thu, 10 May 2012 00:06:25 +0200, Alexander Golovko wrote:
Fortunally, there are SHA1 implementation in openssl library.
Used functions have the same names
tags 672765 + pending
usertags 672765 + debian-packaging
thanks
Hi Ben!
On Sun, 13 May 2012 17:30:29 +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote:
This fixes the failure to build.
Thank you for the patch, applied to the Git master branch:
forwarded 672765 http://bugs.bacula.org/view.php?id=1829
thanks
Hi there!
On Thu, 17 May 2012 20:52:11 +0200, Luca Capello wrote:
On Sun, 13 May 2012 17:30:29 +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote:
This fixes the failure to build.
Thank you for the patch, applied to the Git master branch:
I should
Hi there!
On Mon, 14 May 2012 11:18:28 +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
On May 14, Adam Warner li...@consulting.net.nz wrote:
Multiple Debian sid operating systems (amd64 and i386): Could not
connect to them over the network after dist-upgrade and reboot. Isolated
cause to netbase 5.0 (which also
forwarded 658326 http://bugs.bacula.org/view.php?id=1869
tags 658326 + patch
usertags 658326 + debian-packaging
thanks
Hi there!
Re-adding Kefu and Karl to the Cc:.
On Thu, 10 May 2012 00:06:25 +0200, Alexander Golovko wrote:
Fortunally, there are SHA1 implementation in openssl library.
Used
tags 658326 + upstream
notfixed 658326 5.0.3+dfsg-0.1
thanks
Hi there!
On Mon, 30 Apr 2012 11:21:51 +0200, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
Your message dated Mon, 30 Apr 2012 09:17:34 +
with message-id e1somje-0005ra...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#658326: fixed in bacula
[5209]: version 0.8.7 starting
Apr 23 10:27:29 gismo nslcd[5209]: accepting connections
Apr 23 10:27:37 gismo nslcd[5209]: [8b4567] group/member=luca ldap_result()
failed: Insufficient access
[...]
root@gismo:/etc# git log -p -1
commit abc0c29950469771617ffd0be132456669b7d305
Author: Luca Capello
Hi Adam!
On Sat, 03 Mar 2012 16:07:53 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On 05.10.2010 12:47, Dererk wrote:
Following to the FingerForce developers list discussion found here
[1],
I'm filling a dummy bug for the fprint software.
As mentioned on that thread, we will provide newly and well-tested
Hi there!
On Thu, 15 Dec 2011 18:19:54 +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
On Dec 15, Roger Leigh rle...@codelibre.net wrote:
You keep repeating arguments in favour of moving /{bin,sbin,lib}/ to
/usr/ :-)
Well, I think I still need persuading that this is the right direction
to move the files. I
user 619636 l...@pca.it
usertags 619636 + pca-communication
thanks
Hi there!
Cc:ing all the people involved with this bug, sorry for the spam. Also
Cc:ing the Debian X Strike Force for comments about the Mesa part.
On Sat, 16 Apr 2011 17:38:51 +0200, Alex Stewart wrote:
See also bug 620908.
Hi there!
On Wed, 17 Aug 2011 11:59:19 +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 09:54:14PM +0200, Johnny Morano wrote:
Postfix is unable to receive mail and unable to send mail via SASL
authentication, after installing the updates of today. These are the
error messages:
I
Hi there!
On Wed, 17 Aug 2011 15:34:23 +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote:
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 15:05, Sven Joachim svenj...@gmx.de wrote:
So this bug has been triggered by the switch to multiarch paths in
cyrus-sasl2, and postfix is to blame for hardcoding /usr/lib/sasl2.
I guess the Ubuntu
Hi there!
On Sun, 20 Feb 2011 19:39:23 +0100, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 11:24:16AM -0600, Javier Vasquez wrote:
On an amd64 laptop (debian unstable) I've been using qemu with the
following arguments (with windows XP guest):
Same here: Debian sid with the latest qemu and
Hi there!
On Tue, 08 Feb 2011 18:26:09 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
the_...@gmx.net the_...@gmx.net (08/02/2011):
Package: xserver-xorg-core
Version: 1.9.4-1
Severity: grave
not a bug per se. Welcome to sid.
This is questionable, there is a bug (upgrades are not possible, of
course
Hi there!
Cc:ing all the people that have interacted with this bug.
Still true, but this is the last email about this subject from me.
On Sun, 28 Nov 2010 17:47:41 +0100, Luca Capello wrote:
Some hints about the chef package in Debian:
- Debian has (6-month-old) 0.8.16-4.1, while upstream
Hi there!
On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 14:22:51 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 12:42:20 +0100, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
Le Monday 17 January 2011 10:00:08 Julien Cristau, vous avez écrit :
Rescheduling Didier's upload would probably be a good idea. I can
change urgency
Hi Julien!
On Sun, 16 Jan 2011 19:45:04 +0100, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
severity 609761 serious
Bug #609761 [foo2zjs] foo2zjs depends on dc to work
Severity set to 'serious' from 'critical'
tags 609761 - squeeze
Bug #609761 [foo2zjs] foo2zjs depends on dc to work
Removed tag(s)
that there are some other possibilities, thanks to a
posting by Luca Capello [0].
Is there any reason why you did not Cc: me? I was wondering if this bug
was forgot, given that I did not receive any update on it (and no, going
to the BTS or subscribing to *every* bug someone is interacting
Hi there!
On Sat, 04 Dec 2010 19:56:14 +0100, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
Joshua Timberman jos...@opscode.com wrote:
We (Opscode, upstream maintainers of Chef) are fine with removal
of the following chef packages from Debian Squeeze:
I would have preferred to be cc:ed by Joshua in his first reply,
/patches/chef_client_ruby18.patch:
++ fix FTBFS, use a versioned shebang for client binaries, since
+ the chef binary package Depends: on Ruby-1.8 (Closes: #NN).
+
+ -- Luca Capello l...@pca.it Tue, 07 Dec 2010 23:13:49 +0100
+
chef (0.8.16-4.1) unstable; urgency=low
* Non
block 604231 by 606274
tags 604231 + patch
thanks
Hi there!
On Mon, 06 Dec 2010 19:04:38 +0100, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
On 06/12/2010 18:47, Luca Capello wrote:
Hi there!
(I should have CC'ed you too... I'm sorry for that).
Np.
On Sat, 04 Dec 2010 19:56:14 +0100, Mehdi Dogguy wrote
found 603141 8.4.4-1+b1
fixed 603141 8.4.4-2
thanks
Hi there!
On Thu, 11 Nov 2010 10:31:00 +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install due to
incorrect dependencies in the init.d LSB header. Some debian notes are
available from at
the dependent
+ ppp binary package (Closes: #601161).
+
+ -- Luca Capello l...@pca.it Sun, 28 Nov 2010 17:22:22 +0100
+
synce-serial (0.11-5.1) unstable; urgency=low
* Non-maintainer upload.
diff -Nru synce-serial-0.11/debian/control synce-serial-0.11/debian/control
--- synce-serial
clone 602697 -1
retitle -1 chef: remove from squeeze because of solr (#602697)?
found -1 0.8.16-4.1
block 602697 by -1
thanks
Hi there!
Cc:ing all the people that have interacted with this bug.
On Sun, 07 Nov 2010 14:52:24 +0100, Thomas Koch wrote:
Adam D. Barratt:
On Sun, 2010-11-07 at 11:38
retitle 604231 chef-solr: installation fails, unable to connect to node,
nodedown
thanks
Hi there!
On Sun, 21 Nov 2010 11:14:05 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
While testing the installation of all packages in unstable, I ran
into the following problem:
Setting up chef-solr (0.8.16-4.1) ...
Hi there!
Cc:ing all the people involved with this bug (hi, Gregor!).
On Tue, 02 Nov 2010 18:08:13 +0100, Olivier BONHOMME wrote:
When trying to install the bacula meta-package, the aptitude command raises
the following error :
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
Hi Holger!
On Sun, 28 Nov 2010 14:55:46 +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
On Sonntag, 28. November 2010, Luca Capello wrote:
I could not find this version anymore, not in the postgresql-8.4's
debian/changelog nor in snapshots.d.o, where did it come from?
it's there: http://snapshot.debian.org
+ cyrus-sasl2-dbg to Pre-Depends: (Closes: #601977).
+
+ -- Luca Capello l...@pca.it Sat, 27 Nov 2010 20:35:49 +0100
+
cyrus-sasl2 (2.1.23.dfsg1-6) unstable; urgency=low
* Acknowlge NMU (thanks to Ben Hutchings)
diff -u cyrus-sasl2-2.1.23.dfsg1/debian/control
cyrus-sasl2-2.1.23.dfsg1/debian
Hi there!
Cc:ing the three submitters, Colin who is GRUB maintainer and Miguel who
wrote the report for the debian-boot meeting where this bug was still
discussed.
On Sat, 30 Oct 2010 18:19:41 +0200, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
You all reported issues with installing debian with debian-installer
Package: clisp
Version: 1:2.48-1.2
Hi Alexander!
On Wed, 05 May 2010 11:07:25 +0200, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote:
I've prepared an NMU for clisp (versioned as 1:2.48-1.2) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Thank you for the fix, but I
Hi Pierre!
On Sun, 07 Mar 2010 20:05:06 +0100, Marco Túlio Gontijo e Silva wrote:
I installed the newest version of clisp and I got not problem in the
configuration step. Can anyone reproduce this bug?
I can not reproduce it in a clean squeeze chroot, setting the locale to
fr_FR.UTF8 as
Hi there!
I am a happy Xpdf user, for various reasons, the first one being is its
small number of dependencies:
=
r...@gismo:/# apt-get install xpdf
[...]
The following NEW packages will be installed:
defoma file gsfonts lesstif2 libfreetype6 libice6 libmagic1
libnewt0.52 libpaper1
tags 536915 + pending
thanks
Hi Lucas!
On Tue, 14 Jul 2009 15:51:41 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
[...]
; compilation aborted because of fatal error:
; READ failure in COMPILE-FILE:
;
severity 494587 serious
merge 494587 521906
thanks
Hi Daniel!
On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:13:39 +0200, Daniel Schepler wrote:
Package: clisp
Version: 1:2.44.1-4.1
Severity: serious
From my pbuilder build log:
[...]
bdb.c:703: error: 'DB_DIRECT_LOG' undeclared (first use in this function)
This
Hi Peter!
On Fri, 24 Apr 2009 08:38:54 +0200, Peter Van Eynde wrote:
Evgeny M. Zubok wrote:
Peter Van Eynde pvane...@debian.org writes:
* Removed xref.lisp again and added a test in the makefile for it
(Closes: #517205)
And what about Lenny? Does this DFSG violation need a fix in
tags 518877 + pending
thanks
Hi Peter!
On Sat, 21 Mar 2009 04:55:54 +0100, peter green wrote:
The attatched patch makes the package use autoreconf rather than
autoconf so all the autotools stuff is regenerated consistantly.
Thank you, applied:
tags 517839 + upstream
thanks
Hi Christoph!
Cc:ing the slime-devel mailing list, since this is an upstream issue
(already reported, read below). Please keep the Debian BTS as cc:ed (no
subscription requnired).
On Mon, 02 Mar 2009 14:09:10 +0100, Christoph Egger wrote:
Updating SLIME in
Hi Daniel!
On Thu, 05 Mar 2009 08:21:37 +0100, Daniel Schröter wrote:
Luca Capello wrote:
On Wed, 04 Mar 2009 18:39:43 +0100, Андрей Парамонов wrote:
I've just tried to downgrade the hplip and related packages from
2.8.12-3 to 2.8.6.b-4, and the printing works again! So, the problem
Hi Andrey!
The next time that you provide such kind of information, which is
*vital* for a bug, please send it to the bug as well and not only to
cont...@b.d.o, since I needed to open the bug report in order to
understand why the bug was reassigned:
forcemerge 508707 508710
thanks
Hi Brendan!
Please read carefully the instruction at [1], so the pkg-fso-maint
mailing list receives a copy of your bugs.
[1]
http://wiki.debian.org/DebianOnFreeRunner#head-c33d5a71a5654ad5592accc5e699ec6f64933582
On Sun, 14 Dec 2008 14:36:37 +0100, Brendan
severity 477923 important
thanks
Hi ilf!
On Sat, 27 Dec 2008 16:45:04 +0100, ilf wrote:
On 12-22 13:09, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
and subject line Bug#477923: fixed in foo2zjs 20070718dfsg-9
has caused the Debian Bug report #477923,
regarding foo2zjs: Hotplug firmware not loaded
Package: xserver-xorg-core
Version: 2:1.5.3-1
Severity: grave
Hi there!
I tried a configless situation with the latest X.Org in experimental,
but this resulted in X not starting at all:
=
luca$gismo:~$ startx
X.Org X Server 1.5.3
Release Date: 5 November 2008
X Protocol Version 11,
Hi Thomas!
On Sat, 22 Nov 2008 20:22:24 +0100, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
I'm not sure why we have the urgent desire to release with stuff that
is quite mature and has been in production use for years, the
documentation is currently not good enough to support use by the
general public per the
Hi there!
Can you please keep the foo2zjs-maintainer mailing list cc:ed? If you
do so, no need to cc: me, I read the list. TIA.
I'm sorry for the long mail: I performed more tests with the only
foo2zjs printer I have [1] and I found some interesting stuff, please
read below. I tried to be as
Hi Michael!
Adding the d-release mailing list to cc:.
On Fri, 31 Oct 2008 13:41:25 +0100, Michael Gilbert wrote:
i'll go ahead and start the discussion since no one else is running
with it. this matter is rather urgent since the problem is now being
considered release-critical for lenny.
Hi Steffen!
Disclaimer: I'm a biologist [1] and I performed genome-wide analyses.
On Tue, 28 Oct 2008 12:00:02 +0100, Peter Palfrader wrote:
Steffen Möller schrieb am Dienstag, dem 28. Oktober 2008:
To summarise things up: the renaming of the executable of plink to
snplink renders the plink
Hi there!
On Tue, 28 Oct 2008 15:58:20 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
On Tue, 28 Oct 2008, Steffen Möller wrote:
Except that snplink is taken by another program
This is a valid point and should probably be discussed with plink
(and snplink??) authors.
FWIW both software have been published in
Hi there!
I put back d-release to the cc: list, since we previously asked for
their help on this matter.
On Mon, 27 Oct 2008 11:01:31 +0100, Steffen Joeris wrote:
I am upset that you again raised the severity without consulting
anyone.
Which, sadly, went against my specific request to not
Hi there!
On Sun, 26 Oct 2008 08:03:46 +0100, Steffen Joeris wrote:
On Sun, 26 Oct 2008 07:38:51 +0100. Joost Yervante Damad wrote:
I understand your sentiment, and it is indeed a grey area situation. If I
take policy literary, I think this package is fine in main, but it is not
as simple...
Hi Daniel!
I'm sorry for being late: I was hit by two bugs during the etch
installation on QEMU [1][2] and free time is missing here.
On Tue, 07 Oct 2008 15:17:24 +0200, Daniel Leidert wrote:
Am Dienstag, den 07.10.2008, 09:53 +0200 schrieb Luca Capello:
1) IMHO this bug is Severity: important
Hi there!
Some notes before starting:
1) IMHO this bug is Severity: important, it leaves GNOME in an not
usable state (see attached log)
2) I found this bug around one and a half week ago, but I performed more
tests before replying (yes, I'm quite maniac with bugs...)
I reproduced the
Hi Peter!
On Tue, 26 Aug 2008 22:36:11 +0200, Peter De Wachter wrote:
On Tue, 26 Aug 2008 01:08:53 +0200
Luca Capello [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- utilities.lisp doesn't have an IN-PACKAGE form, so it gets loaded
in whatever random package happens to be active.
Since it's loaded by all
severity 495351 minor
thanks
Hi!
Please, if you deal with a Debian bug which has already been reported
(and thus has a number), don't forget to always cc: the bug as well (no
need to subscribe). For the record, the threads on the upstream mailing
list are [1], [2] and [3].
On Sat, 30 Aug 2008
unarchive 483331
forcemerge 483331 497680
severity 483331 minor
thanks
Hi Lucas!
On Wed, 03 Sep 2008 16:24:05 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
During a rebuild of all packages in lenny, your package failed to build on
i386.
[...]
Error in function UNIX::SIGSEGV-HANDLER: Segmentation Violation at
tags 495756 + pending
thanks
Hi Bill!
Please check the bug number you reply, I sent this back to the original
bug report ;-)
On Tue, 26 Aug 2008 14:09:12 +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 11:54:26PM +0200, Luca Capello wrote:
I've added the ECL list to cc:. While I can
Hi Bill!
For the ECL list: this is a 'serious' bug in the Debian BTS [1]. For
the reason why rpath is considered harmful by Debian see [2] and [3].
Please don't Cc: me, I read the list. However, please keep the Debian
bug cc:ed (no need to subscribe), I set the M-F-T and R-T to both the
bug
tags 494404 + upstream
tags 494404 + fixed
thanks
Hi Peter!
Thank you for your reply and sorry for the lag.
On Tue, 12 Aug 2008 00:36:19 +0200, Peter De Wachter wrote:
One of the problems is that the ASDF system definition has unbalanced
parentheses. This makes it impossible to load/use this
Package: cl-geodesics
Version: 20010214-7
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Tags: upstream
Hello,
cl-geodesics doesn't compile with neither SBCL nor CLISP, tested on etch
and sid:
=
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sbcl --eval (require 'geodesics)
; compiling file
notfixed 488817 1:2.44.1-3
tags 488817 normal
thanks
Hello!
On Sun, 20 Jul 2008 17:03:02 +0200, Luca Capello wrote:
On Tue, 08 Jul 2008 01:14:03 +0200, Luca Capello wrote:
I investigated a bit more and actually the problem relies on CLISP's
configure: upstream added the support for autoconf
Hi there!
On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 12:00:37 +0200, Luca Capello wrote:
On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 16:15:46 +0200, SourceForge.net wrote:
Comment By: Sam Steingold (sds)
Date: 2008-07-15 10:15
[...]
this bug has been fixed in clisp 2.45
FWIW, the commit is at:
http://clisp.cvs.sourceforge.net/clisp
Hi Frank!
On Sun, 20 Jul 2008 18:30:32 +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
# pending for longer than two months?
tags 469896 - pending
I don't think that untagging it without prior discussion with the
maintainer is fair.
The fix is quite simple and has been applied, yes, more than two months
ago
tags 490944 + upstream
forwarded 490944
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=101355aid=2018687group_id=1355
tags 490944 + fixed-upstream
thanks
Hello!
On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 16:15:46 +0200, SourceForge.net wrote:
Comment By: Sam Steingold (sds)
Date: 2008-07-15 10:15
[...]
this bug
Package: debsecan
Version: 0.4.10+nmu1
Severity: grave
Hello,
since yesterday I started getting errors from the debsecan daily
cronjob:
=
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Cron Daemon)
Subject: Cron [EMAIL PROTECTED] test -x /usr/bin/debsecan
/usr/bin/debsecan --cron
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date:
Package: clisp
Version: 1:2.44.1-3
Severity: serious
Hello!
This is a remind to track CLISP bugs, full log available at:
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=clispver=1%3A2.44.1-2arch=armstamp=1215636948file=log
=
Automatic build of clisp_1:2.44.1-2 on cats by sbuild/arm 98
Build started
tags 488817 + upstream
forwarded 488817 http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.clisp.devel/18516
thanks
Hi Bastian!
On Wed, 02 Jul 2008 21:39:28 +0200, Luca Capello wrote:
On Wed, 02 Jul 2008 17:23:47 +0200, Luca Capello wrote:
On Wed, 02 Jul 2008 17:17:38 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote
tags 488811 + pending
thanks
Hi Bastian!
On Tue, 01 Jul 2008 14:46:05 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
Automatic build of ecl_0.9j-20080306-2 on lxdebian.bfinv.de by sbuild/s390 98
[...]
dh_testdir -a
dh_testroot -a
ls -l /build/buildd/ecl-0.9j-20080306/debian/ecl-doc/usr/share/info/
ls: cannot
tags 488817 + help
thanks
Hi Bastian!
On Tue, 01 Jul 2008 14:59:22 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
Automatic build of clisp_1:2.44.1-1 on lxdebian.bfinv.de by sbuild/s390 98
[...]
checking dependency style of gcc... (cached) gcc3
Hi Bastian!
Thank you for your fast reply :-)
On Wed, 02 Jul 2008 17:17:38 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Wed, Jul 02, 2008 at 04:43:54PM +0200, Luca Capello wrote:
Is config.log available somewhere?
| configure:5183: checking how to run the C preprocessor
| configure:5299: result: gcc -E
tags 488817 + patch
thanks
Hi Bastian!
On Wed, 02 Jul 2008 17:23:47 +0200, Luca Capello wrote:
On Wed, 02 Jul 2008 17:17:38 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
The configure call lacks a --build=$(DEB_BUILD_GNU_TYPE) argument.
Thank you for the hint, I'll test on raptor.d.o if this is the only
severity 478000 normal
thanks
Hi Bernd!
On Wed, 18 Jun 2008 19:21:06 +0200, Luca Capello wrote:
On Sat, 26 Apr 2008 10:58:07 +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
after lebrun.d.o timed out while building clisp I gave it a try in the
sid chroot of sperger, this time it failed to build, too.
I don't
Hi Lucas!
On Wed, 28 May 2008 14:38:57 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Package: cmucl
Version: 19d-20061116-4.1
[...]
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on i386.
Relevant part:
[...]
Error in batch processing:
Error in function UNIX::SIGSEGV-HANDLER:
Hi Bernd!
On Sat, 26 Apr 2008 10:58:07 +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
after lebrun.d.o timed out while building clisp I gave it a try in the
sid chroot of sperger, this time it failed to build, too.
I don't really understand why lebrun started to build clisp: while the
debian/rules file contains
tags 474810 + pending
thanks
Hi Sebastian!
On Thu, 08 May 2008 19:25:46 +0200, Sebastian Bober wrote:
On Thu, May 08, 2008 at 07:01:19PM +0200, Luca Capello wrote:
I'm reluctant to apply your patch because I could go and package the new
upstream version instead. What do you think?
That's
tags 471223 + pending
thanks
Hi Sebastian!
On Mon, 28 Apr 2008 21:55:04 +0200, Sebastian Bober wrote:
I have changed debian/rules in a way that the Architecture: any
package ecl is created in binary-arch and the Architecture: all
package ecl-doc in binary-indep.
Thank you for the patch, I
Hi Lucas!
On Mon, 10 Mar 2008 22:18:59 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
In a clean unstable i386 chroot:
Setting up cl-asdf (1.111-1) ...
Reinstalling for sbcl
Recompiling Common Lisp Controller for sbcl
/usr/lib/common-lisp/bin/sbcl.sh loading and dumping clc.
[...]
; loading system
Hi Ben!
I'm not sure you're still interested in this bug, in case you don't
please excuse me for the spam :-)
The Debian git repository it at
http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-common-lisp/cl-irc.git;a=summary
On Fri, 09 May 2008 03:28:34 +0200, Luca Capello wrote:
I'd say that the best thing
Hi Sebastian!
I'm sorry to come to you so late, real work and life took precedence...
On Mon, 28 Apr 2008 01:02:06 +0200, Sebastian Bober wrote:
the bug is caused by the specifications in debian/cl-usocket.install
that overwrites the original usocket.asd with a symlink from the
test
tags 469896 + pending
thanks
Hi Sebastian!
On Sun, 27 Apr 2008 22:28:39 +0200, Sebastian Bober wrote:
in my view the correct way to fix this bug is to make the package
Architecture: all as no architecture specific content is generated. An
according patch is attached.
Agreed and patch
tags 471213 + pending
thanks
Hi Sebastian!
On Sun, 27 Apr 2008 22:52:46 +0200, Sebastian Bober wrote:
the latest upload of this package swapped the rules for binary-arch and
binary-indep. This resulted in this FTBFS bug. The attached patch
reverses the change and binary-arch only builds
Hi Sebastian!
On Mon, 28 Apr 2008 01:52:10 +0200, Sebastian Bober wrote:
this bug is fixed in a new upstream version 2.44.1 of clisp. I have
extracted a minimal fix for this build failure.
I'm reluctant to apply your patch because I could go and package the new
upstream version instead. What
clone 440007 -1
retitle -1 cl-irc: Debian changelog doesn't reflect uploaded versions
notfound -1 20060514-dfsg-1
notfixed -1 20070905-dfsg-1
found -1 1:0.8.1-dfsg-1
thanks
Hi Ben!
I cloned this bug since the Debian changelog mess has nothing to do with
the original bug. Please check the new
tags 471219 + pending
thanks
Hi Sebastian!
On Sun, 27 Apr 2008 20:15:29 +0200, Sebastian Bober wrote:
as this package is Architecture: any the binary-arch target in
debian/rules is called for generating the .deb. The attached patch swaps
the binary-* targets in debian/rules.
I applied your
Package: cryptsetup
Version: 2:1.0.6-1
Severity: critical
Hi there!
With the (not so new) cryptsetup version [1], whichever LUKS passhprase
I enter at boot I get the same error with 3 different kernels
(2.6.24-1-amd64, 2.6.25-rc8-amd64 and 2.6.25-trunk-amd64):
=
device-mapper: table: 254:0:
1 - 100 of 123 matches
Mail list logo
