Great, that would be perfect if you’re willing to do so! Just let me know
when that’s done and I can work with the nq debian maintainer to get that
uploaded.
Thanks,
Stephen
On Jun 29, 2024 at 7:11:33 AM, Leah Neukirchen wrote:
> Hi, nq maintainer here.
>
> I propose to make a new release
On May 29, 2024 at 4:04:13 PM, Bastian Germann wrote:
> I suggest fq renames the binary because it was introduced over 4 years
> later and has only been in one release so far.
>
Both packages have very low usage acc to popcon, but for fq the fq binary
is the entire point of the package, whereas
ST_APPEND to DH_RUBY_GEM_INSTALL_INCLUDE
+in debian/rules to work with newer gem2deb
+
+ -- Stephen Gelman Thu, 27 Jul 2023 17:39:10 -0500
+
ruby-aws-partitions (1.653.0-1) unstable; urgency=medium
* Team Upload
diff -Nru ruby-aws-partitions-1.653.0/debian/rules
ruby-aws-partitions-1.653.0/deb
On Aug 29, 2022 at 6:52:06 AM, Luca Falavigna wrote:
> Il giorno lun 29 ago 2022 alle ore 07:34 Stephen Gelman
> ha scritto:
>
> Would you be interested in creating a MR for your changes to salsa? If not
> that’s fine, just let me know and I will pull in the changes myself.
&
On Aug 28, 2022 at 4:29:03 AM, Luca Falavigna wrote:
> Control: tags 1017132 + patch
> Control: tags 1017132 + pending
>
>
> Dear maintainer,
>
> I've prepared an NMU for opentracing-cpp (versioned as 1.6.0-2.1) and
> uploaded it to DELAYED/7. Please feel free to tell me if I
> should delay it
It seems rebuilding the package fixed this…
https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=gdu=5.13.2-1%2Bb1=ppc64el
On May 3, 2022 at 4:07:00 PM, Sebastian Ramacher
wrote:
> Source: gdu
> Version: 5.13.2-1
> Severity: serious
> Tags: ftbfs sid bookworm
> Justification: fails to build from
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #998563 in golang-github-jbenet-go-context reported by you has been fixed
in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Ah good catch, thanks for that!
On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 5:45 PM Andreas Beckmann wrote:
>
> Followup-For: Bug #940485
> Control: tag -1 pending
>
> buster-pu request: https://bugs.debian.org/948854
>
>
> Andreas
>
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #940485 in git-lfs reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Thanks for reporting this and providing a patch! I just uploaded checkinstall
1.6.2-5 which includes your patch. Unfortunately this didn’t make it into
buster but once this fixed version migrates to testing I will upload it to
buster-backports.
Thanks!
Stephen
FYI, unblock request filed as #927099.
Stephen
> On Apr 14, 2019, at 4:04 PM, Santiago Vila wrote:
>
> Please, please, please, let us not release buster with packages
> failing randomly like this.
Santiago,
I agree with you that this should not ship with this issue in buster and will
upload a new release with your patch (and then request
On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 09:32:48 +0700 Arnaud Rebillout
wrote:
> I looked into this a bit yesterday.
>
> As mentioned in the issue upstream at
> https://github.com/etcd-io/etcd/issues/9353, the fix has been merged in
> the master branch of etcd in March 2018, almost a year ago. The
> conversation
I just reassigned this to ronn. It looks like we are hitting the bug
https://github.com/apjanke/ronn-ng/issues/24. Any man page with a
numbered list appears to fail.
On Thu, Feb 7, 2019 at 9:03 AM Shengjing Zhu wrote:
>
> Package: git-lfs
> Version: 2.6.1-3
> Severity: serious
>
> -BEGIN
> On Feb 5, 2019, at 1:17 AM, Martín Ferrari wrote:
>
> On 05/02/2019 06:41, Stephen Gelman wrote:
>
>> I totally understand your concern. I’m at least a few backported bug fixes
>> deep and I am concerned the resulting package will have had so many changes
>>
> On Feb 4, 2019, at 11:59 PM, Martín Ferrari wrote:
>
> On 05/02/2019 04:44, Stephen Gelman wrote:
>
>> I have 0.34.1 almost ready to upload - just waiting on two deps to clear NEW.
>
> Sorry to be a killjoy, but are you sure a new version is needed to solve
> this
> On Jan 21, 2019, at 9:14 AM, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>
> Source: golang-google-cloud
> Version: 0.9.0-7
> Severity: serious
> Tags: ftbfs
>
> https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/golang-google-cloud.html
>
> ...
> dh_auto_build
> cd build && go install
>
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #918516 in git-lfs reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
I took a stab at creating a patch to get this to build on a 4.17 kernel. It
builds, but when I tried to actually use it, it caused a kernel panic. (FYI I
used the instructions at
https://wiki.xenproject.org/wiki/Mounting_a_.vhd_disk_image_using_blktap/tapdisk
to attempt to mount the disk).
Control: tags 905281 + patch
Here is a patch to fix the FTBFS. Looks like this was added in
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/dracut/commit/9f9ec325b9d2960cb1efc92335ad941a2addd141,
however it causes the package to FTBFS and seems unnecessary since the file
still ends up in the package even
Helmut,
Thanks so much for the heads up. I’ll fix that now!
Stephen
> On Jul 5, 2018, at 1:18 PM, Helmut Grohne wrote:
>
> Source: git-lfs
> Version: 2.4.2-1
> Severity: serious
>
> Since ronn got split out of ruby-ronn, git-lfs fails to build from
> source. It was not possible to have
21 matches
Mail list logo
