Bug#924495: Bug #924495 in shimdandy marked as pending

2019-03-19 Thread Tom Marble
/193cb48b5d54971e5373ec5924a6882d76103e23 Build with Clojure 1.10 (Closes: #924495) New upstream version Signed-off-by: Tom Marble (this message was generated automatically

Bug#882247:

2018-01-04 Thread Tom Marble
Mike: There is something wrong with the default locale. Try installing a > locale package (even firefox-l10n-en-gb) or downgrade to 57. Turns out I can't install that from unstable (depends on firefox << 57.0.3-1), however I installed it from experimental (58.0~b4-1) and now firefox works!!! Th

Bug#882247:

2018-01-04 Thread Tom Marble
Package: firefox Version: 58.0~b4-1 Followup-For: Bug #882247 I also have this bug... adding reportbug details... * What led up to the situation? Just starting firefox. * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or ineffective)? Tried on a new user account with no ~/.

Bug#843530: docker.io: docker broken: oci runtime error: could not synchronize with container process

2016-11-07 Thread Tom Marble
I can confirm I am hitting this exact same bug (same system information). --Tom

Bug#769685: awscli: FTBFS: ImportError: Failed to import test module: awscli.testutils

2014-11-17 Thread Tom Marble
Supposedly #769496 fixed this bug, but I continued to have troubles with 'aws' (from package 'awscli'). I suspect the 'monkey patch' fix is very sensitive to import order (?) I partial fix was to make this change in /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/botocore/awsrequest.py #from requests.packages.ur

Bug#639875: fglrx-driver: xorg-video-abi-11

2011-11-17 Thread Tom Marble
Way back on 4 november, Patrick wrote: > 11-11 will be compatible with it, I just tested the next version. ATI just released this version. I tried building it with the 11-10 packaging and failed with errors like: dpkg-source: warning: ignoring deletion of directory arch/x86/etc dpkg-source: warn

Bug#639875: fglrx-driver: xorg-video-abi-11

2011-11-04 Thread Tom Marble
All: I can confirm the segfault with 11-10 :( [42.897] 0: /usr/bin/Xorg (xorg_backtrace+0x26) [0x7fcea52478f6] [42.897] 1: /usr/bin/Xorg (0x7fcea50c3000+0x188559) [0x7fcea524b559] [42.897] 2: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0 (0x7fcea43eb000+0xf020) [0x7fcea43fa020] [42.898]

Bug#639875: fglrx-driver: xorg-video-abi-11

2011-10-31 Thread Tom Marble
All: New upstream has just become available... I'll try it soon. $ wget http://www2.ati.com/drivers/linux/ati-driver-installer-11-10-x86.x86_64.run HTH, --Tom -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@li

Bug#639875: fglrx-driver: xorg-video-abi-11

2011-09-29 Thread Tom Marble
All: I took a chance on rebuilding the driver for the upstream version 11-9 which was released yesterday. I am running a custom 3.1.0-rc7 kernel with unstable+experimental amd64 on an eMachines eME443-BZ602 with a ATI Radeon HD 6250. And it still segfaults :( Snippets from Xorg.0.log below. Reg

Bug#370295: DLJ prevents running jython with sun-java

2006-07-14 Thread Tom Marble
Walter Landry wrote: > [...] > All of the examples given above are good, but libgetenv-java is about > as clear as you can get. It only depends on java2-runtime and libc, > and it serves as a replacement for java.lang.System.getenv. It > creates a hybrid implementation. > > If you want to argue

Bug#370245: Export control problems in license

2006-06-05 Thread Tom Marble
Walter: I have just posted a notice to debian-legal about the availability of new DLJ FAQ [1] which further clarifies our intent. Please see the new FAQ#30 [2]. HTH, --Tom [1] https://jdk-distros.dev.java.net/developer.html [2] http://download.java.net/dlj/DLJ-FAQ-v1.2.html#q30 signature.a

Bug#370295: DLJ prevents running jython with sun-java

2006-06-05 Thread Tom Marble
Walter: I have just posted a notice to debian-legal about the availability of new DLJ FAQ [1] which further clarifies our intent. It is not the intent of the DLJ to prevent running Jython. Please see the new FAQ #13 #14 and #15 [2]. If Sun wanted to discourage innovations like Jython and JRuby

Bug#370296: DLJ only allows distributing the exact same file

2006-06-05 Thread Tom Marble
Walter: I have just posted a notice to debian-legal about the availability of new DLJ FAQ [1] which further clarifies our intent. It is the intent of the DLJ that licensees such as Debian will work towards compatibility with their Operating System [2]. The sun-java5 packages have been split for