Bug#308906: Bug #308906

Hi Quanah, On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 04:51:14PM -0700, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote: > To answer your first question, the 64 bit patch was in response to: > > I'm curious what you think is incorrect about that particular patch. I simply don't kno

Bug#308906: Bug #308906

--On Friday, May 13, 2005 5:06 PM -0700 Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Quanah, On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 04:51:14PM -0700, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote: To answer your first question, the 64 bit patch was in response to: I'm curiou

Bug#308906: Bug #308906

Hi Steve, To answer your first question, the 64 bit patch was in response to: I'm curious what you think is incorrect about that particular patch. As for the serious issue in 2.2.23, it is not addressed by any of my posted patches, they address