Paul Slootman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So does it make sense that I start of with the old ones? I guess I need
Yes...
So you mean the structure won't change much, and if I provide a patch
against that it will still kind of apply to your new ones?
config, postinst and maybe the templates
I also don't have much time currently, therefore I can't promise you a
working patch right now.
I have a version that I think works OK, I'll upload now. (2.9-1).
If there are problems with it, feel free to NMU, using that version
as a basis. I'm away on vacation for a week or so from
Real life delays, sorry...
On Thu 06 Apr 2006, Frank K?ster wrote:
So does it make sense that I start of with the old ones? I guess I need
Yes...
config, postinst and maybe the templates file.
Here's a quick shot, untested:
In wwwoffle.config:
if [ -s /etc/cron.d/wwwoffle ]; then
On Fri 02 Jun 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Paul, what is the status with this package ?
As a result of this problem, wwwoffle has been removed from testing.
Unfortunately real life got into the way.
I hope to upload a fixed version within 10 days.
Paul Slootman
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 06:21:45PM +0200, Paul Slootman wrote:
My problem is with the wording of your bug report, you demand the file
mustn't be recreated. If you now qualify that by saying that if the user
does indeed enter a frequency again then it's OK to recreate the file,
then I indeed
Paul Slootman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm talking about the case where you just entered a value,
interactively.
But I may have changed my mind, and i shouldn't be forced to use debconf
then. No, I *mustn't* be forced.
I'm talking about someone who wants to use debconf...
I'm talking
On Wed 07 Sep 2005, Frank Küster wrote:
/etc/cron.d/wwwoffle contains:
# If you want to disable this, comment out the line
# below (don't simply remove this file).
Note also that your subject is incorrect, it is *not* marked a conffile.
It's not even shipped with the package.
and indeed
Paul Slootman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed 07 Sep 2005, Frank Küster wrote:
/etc/cron.d/wwwoffle contains:
# If you want to disable this, comment out the line
# below (don't simply remove this file).
Note also that your subject is incorrect, it is *not* marked a conffile.
It's not
On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 03:50:48PM +0200, Paul Slootman wrote:
On Wed 07 Sep 2005, Frank K?ster wrote:
and indeed the postinst scripts recreates the file if it has been
deleted. However, the policy says clearly:
,
| 10.7.3 Behavior
|
| Configuration file handling must conform
On Wed 05 Apr 2006, Frank Küster wrote:
Paul Slootman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you enter a value via the debconf dialog that indicates that wwwoffle
should regularly fetch its list, then why remove the cron.d entry...
Because debconf is not a registry. It's a frontend for maintainer
Paul Slootman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed 05 Apr 2006, Frank Küster wrote:
Paul Slootman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you enter a value via the debconf dialog that indicates that wwwoffle
should regularly fetch its list, then why remove the cron.d entry...
Because debconf is not a
On Wed 05 Apr 2006, Frank Küster wrote:
Paul Slootman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed 05 Apr 2006, Frank Küster wrote:
Paul Slootman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you enter a value via the debconf dialog that indicates that wwwoffle
should regularly fetch its list, then why remove
On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 06:21:45PM +0200, Paul Slootman wrote:
My problem is with the wording of your bug report, you demand the file
mustn't be recreated. If you now qualify that by saying that if the user
does indeed enter a frequency again then it's OK to recreate the file,
then I indeed
Package: wwwoffle
Version: 2.8e-2
Severity: serious
Justification: Violates must clause of the policy
/etc/cron.d/wwwoffle contains:
# If you want to disable this, comment out the line
# below (don't simply remove this file).
and indeed the postinst scripts recreates the file if it has been
14 matches
Mail list logo
