On Sun, Mar 11, 2007 at 09:06:16PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Sun, Mar 11, 2007 at 07:30:04PM +, Enrico Zini wrote:
http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms714556.aspx
says that SQL_C_SLONG represents a long int.
Microsoft's docs are totally useless for correctly implementing
On Sun, Mar 11, 2007 at 07:30:04PM +, Enrico Zini wrote:
convert.c has it like this:
case SQL_C_SLONG:
case SQL_C_LONG:
len = 4;
if (bind_size 0)
*((SDWORD *) rgbValueBindRow) = atol(neut_str);
else
On Mon, Mar 12, 2007 at 11:02:30AM +, Enrico Zini wrote:
On Sun, Mar 11, 2007 at 09:06:16PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Sun, Mar 11, 2007 at 07:30:04PM +, Enrico Zini wrote:
http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms714556.aspx
says that SQL_C_SLONG represents a long int.
Hello,
http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms714556.aspx
says that SQL_C_SLONG represents a long int.
convert.c has it like this:
case SQL_C_SLONG:
case SQL_C_LONG:
len = 4;
if (bind_size 0)
*((SDWORD *)
Enrico,
On Sun, Mar 11, 2007 at 07:30:04PM +, Enrico Zini wrote:
http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms714556.aspx
says that SQL_C_SLONG represents a long int.
Microsoft's docs are totally useless for correctly implementing ODBC on
64-bit architectures. Please explain the /problem/
5 matches
Mail list logo
