salut Ralf,
2009/4/3 Ralf Treinen
> Hello Kumar, Arnaud,
>
> On Thu, Apr 02, 2009 at 08:53:21AM -0500, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 02, 2009 at 03:44:05PM +0200, Arnaud Quette wrote:
> > >2009/4/2 Kumar Appaiah <[1]a.ku...@alumni.iitm.ac.in>
> > > I have uploaded speech-tools/1:
On Fri, Apr 03, 2009 at 12:34:52AM +0200, Ralf Treinen wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 02, 2009 at 03:44:05PM +0200, Arnaud Quette wrote:
> > >have you marked the bug as being closed by your upload (ie adding a
> > >"Closes: #520445" in debian/changelog). Since the bug is shared by the
> > > 2
> >
Hello Kumar, Arnaud,
On Thu, Apr 02, 2009 at 08:53:21AM -0500, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 02, 2009 at 03:44:05PM +0200, Arnaud Quette wrote:
> >2009/4/2 Kumar Appaiah <[1]a.ku...@alumni.iitm.ac.in>
> > I have uploaded speech-tools/1:1.2.96~beta-4 to unstable, which is
> > sup
On Thu, Apr 02, 2009 at 03:44:05PM +0200, Arnaud Quette wrote:
>2009/4/2 Kumar Appaiah <[1]a.ku...@alumni.iitm.ac.in>
> I have uploaded speech-tools/1:1.2.96~beta-4 to unstable, which is
> supposed to fix this problem. Unfortunately, it looks as though it
> will not migrate to te
Hi Kumar,
2009/4/2 Kumar Appaiah
> Dear Arnaud and Ralf (Jim kept in CC),
>
> I have uploaded speech-tools/1:1.2.96~beta-4 to unstable, which is
> supposed to fix this problem. Unfortunately, it looks as though it
> will not migrate to testing automatically as it says "Updating
> speech-tools in
Dear Arnaud and Ralf (Jim kept in CC),
I have uploaded speech-tools/1:1.2.96~beta-4 to unstable, which is
supposed to fix this problem. Unfortunately, it looks as though it
will not migrate to testing automatically as it says "Updating
speech-tools introduces new bugs: #520445" on the PTS page. Do
Hi Kumar,
Jim has a point with the compat, and the fact that power related topics are
*very* sensible.
so thanks for opening the door.
2009/3/19 Kumar Appaiah
> Dear Arnaud,
>
> On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 10:39:44PM +0100, Arnaud Quette wrote:
> >The best solution is to solve this upstream, by
Hi Arnaud and Kumar -
In PowerMan, pm is an alias for "powerman". I believe I called that
out as a bad thing in a code review some six years ago, however I failed
to convince the maintainer at the time, and now doing so will likely break
a lot of poeple's scripts. PowerMan is used for example by
Dear Arnaud,
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 10:39:44PM +0100, Arnaud Quette wrote:
>The best solution is to solve this upstream, by renaming one or the other.
>In PowerMan, pm stands well for Power Man, and is the client tool.
>What is exactly pm in speech-tools?
It is a non-sophisticated pi
Salut Ralph, Jim,
@Jim (Powerman upstream):
speech-tools and powerman both install files with the same name (namely "pm"
and its manpage).
while the latter has already been reported and somehow fixed [1] (thanks
Kumar BTW ;-), the former [2] wasn't. The full bug reports are linked below.
A quick
10 matches
Mail list logo