Bug#549736: archivemail: FTBFS: tests failed

2009-10-19 Thread Serafeim Zanikolas
Nikolaus, apologies for forgetting to ack the patch in the changelog, will do so in the next release (it is however noted in the patch itself). Still waiting to hear from you on joint maintenance. -- debtags-organised WNPP bugs: http://members.hellug.gr/serzan/wnpp -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email

Processed: Re: Bug#549736: archivemail: FTBFS: tests failed

2009-10-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 549736 + pending Bug #549736 [src:archivemail] archivemail: FTBFS: tests failed Added tag(s) pending. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator,

Bug#549736: archivemail: FTBFS: tests failed

2009-10-09 Thread Serafeim Zanikolas
tags 549736 + pending thanks Nikolaus, good to hear from you again after such a long time, and thanks for the patch. On Thu, Oct 08, 2009 at 01:27:10PM +0200, Nikolaus Schulz wrote: Yes. This one is easy. There has been a similar report for an XFS On that basis, indeed it's easy to fix. (I

Processed: Re: Bug#549736: archivemail: FTBFS: tests failed

2009-10-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 549736 + patch Bug #549736 [src:archivemail] archivemail: FTBFS: tests failed Added tag(s) patch. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian

Bug#549736: archivemail: FTBFS: tests failed

2009-10-08 Thread Nikolaus Schulz
tags 549736 + patch thanks *hem* On Wed, Oct 07, 2009 at 07:04:08PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: On 07/10/09 at 19:02 +0200, Serafeim Zanikolas wrote: Thanks for this bug report. On Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 08:37:54PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote [edited]:

Bug#549736: archivemail: FTBFS: tests failed

2009-10-07 Thread Serafeim Zanikolas
Thanks for this bug report. On Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 08:37:54PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote [edited]: == FAIL: mbox timestamps should not change after semi-archival

Bug#549736: archivemail: FTBFS: tests failed

2009-10-07 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 07/10/09 at 19:02 +0200, Serafeim Zanikolas wrote: Thanks for this bug report. On Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 08:37:54PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote [edited]: == FAIL: mbox timestamps should not change after semi-archival

Bug#549736: archivemail: FTBFS: tests failed

2009-10-05 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Source: archivemail Version: 0.7.2-6 Severity: serious User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20091005 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: /usr/bin/fakeroot debian/rules clean