Bug#562606: FTBFS: unknown options to dh_ocaml

2010-02-01 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Jan Wagner a écrit : > Thats totally fine and I don't belive anybody is making a backport of ocaml > just for fun. In my case it was a build-dep, needed by another package. Backporting ocaml isn't an easy task, since you'll have to have all OCaml libraries recompiled. Besides, the workflow used i

Bug#562606: FTBFS: unknown options to dh_ocaml

2010-02-01 Thread Mehdi Dogguy
Jan Wagner wrote: > > So maybe I did missinterpret "I will not accept any of the solutions [...] > because the problem arises *only* for the backport." I'd translate it by "None of solutions I've mentioned are satisfying. It's not clear to me how to fix it". I agree that it wasn't clear[1] :) R

Bug#562606: FTBFS: unknown options to dh_ocaml

2010-02-01 Thread Jan Wagner
On Monday 01 February 2010 10:39:50 Mehdi Dogguy wrote: > Jan Wagner wrote: > > On Saturday 30 January 2010 14:47:34 Mehdi Dogguy wrote: > >> Certainly, not users. And, let's make that clear: it's not "in my eyes". > >> Ask other DDs or DMs about this particular question if you want to have > >> an

Bug#562606: FTBFS: unknown options to dh_ocaml

2010-02-01 Thread Mehdi Dogguy
Jan Wagner wrote: > Hi Mehdi, > > On Saturday 30 January 2010 14:47:34 Mehdi Dogguy wrote: >>> Who should do backports in your eyes? Debian Developers? Maintainers? >>> Nobody? >> Certainly, not users. And, let's make that clear: it's not "in my eyes". >> Ask other DDs or DMs about this particular

Bug#562606: FTBFS: unknown options to dh_ocaml

2010-02-01 Thread Jan Wagner
Hi Mehdi, On Saturday 30 January 2010 14:47:34 Mehdi Dogguy wrote: > > Who should do backports in your eyes? Debian Developers? Maintainers? > > Nobody? > > Certainly, not users. And, let's make that clear: it's not "in my eyes". > Ask other DDs or DMs about this particular question if you want to

Bug#562606: FTBFS: unknown options to dh_ocaml

2009-12-26 Thread George Danchev
Hi, Goswin, are you sure that you didn't have locally modified dh-ocaml (how many dh_ocaml's you have to begin with, since it has 3 options and your build lacks 2 of them;-) since ocaml 3.11.1-5 builds just fine in a clean amd64 sid chroot, here. Also your debhelper version 8.0.0~git.1 looks od

Bug#562606: FTBFS: unknown options to dh_ocaml

2009-12-26 Thread Mehdi Dogguy
tag 562606 + unreproducible thanks Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > Package: ocaml > Version: 3.11.1-5 > Severity: normal > > Building ocaml fails with > > # Create .md5sums files and compute dependencies. Use > # 3.11.1 because we know that OCaml ABI represents > # best dependencies for OCaml pack

Processed: Re: Bug#562606: FTBFS: unknown options to dh_ocaml

2009-12-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tag 562606 + unreproducible Bug #562606 [ocaml] FTBFS: unknown options to dh_ocaml Added tag(s) unreproducible. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator,