2011/1/4 Adam D. Barratt :
> As the freebsd-utils change has hit testing after all, is unblocking
> ncurses to go with it sufficient, or do we need further changes?
This is what Petr said after asking me to revert those patches:
Later we might provide sed script to alter loaded keymap
into po
On Wed, 2011-01-05 at 00:17 +0200, Modestas Vainius wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On trečiadienis 05 Sausis 2011 00:09:21 Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On Wed, 2010-12-29 at 20:07 +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
> > > On 2010-12-29 00:36 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 2010-12-27 at 20:44 +0100, Sven
Hello,
On trečiadienis 05 Sausis 2011 00:09:21 Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-12-29 at 20:07 +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
> > On 2010-12-29 00:36 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2010-12-27 at 20:44 +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
> > >> On 2010-12-27 19:51 +0100, Petr Salinger wrote:
>
On Wed, 2010-12-29 at 20:07 +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2010-12-29 00:36 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 2010-12-27 at 20:44 +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
> >> On 2010-12-27 19:51 +0100, Petr Salinger wrote:
> >> > So best option for now seems be to prevent
> >> > freebsd-utils 8.1-3
On 2010-12-29 10:12 +0100, Modestas Vainius wrote:
> On pirmadienis 27 Gruodis 2010 19:52:06 Robert Millan wrote:
>> 2010/12/27 Petr Salinger :
>> > I see two basic options:
>> >
>> > [...]
>> > And there is a third option, mixture of both above. [...]
>>
>> There's a fourth option: backporting
On 2010-12-29 00:36 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-12-27 at 20:44 +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
>> On 2010-12-27 19:51 +0100, Petr Salinger wrote:
>> > So best option for now seems be to prevent
>> > freebsd-utils 8.1-3 from entering testing and a new upload of
>> > kfreebsd-8.
>>
>> F
Hello,
On pirmadienis 27 Gruodis 2010 19:52:06 Robert Millan wrote:
> 2010/12/27 Petr Salinger :
> > I see two basic options:
> >
> > [...]
> > And there is a third option, mixture of both above. [...]
>
> There's a fourth option: backporting TEKEN_XTERM from 9-current.
Actually, I really like
On Mon, 2010-12-27 at 20:44 +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2010-12-27 19:51 +0100, Petr Salinger wrote:
> > So best option for now seems be to prevent
> > freebsd-utils 8.1-3 from entering testing and a new upload of
> > kfreebsd-8.
>
> For the record, freebsd-utils 8.1-3 will migrate in three da
On 2010-12-27 19:51 +0100, Petr Salinger wrote:
>>> The cons25-debian seems be fine for me, as it should be only local
>>> change for one release of Debian GNU/kFreeBSD. The next one will not
>>> use it.
>>
>> Any name is fine with me as long as ncurses upstream accepts it.
>
> The next debian rel
2010/12/27 Petr Salinger :
>
> I see two basic options:
>
> [...]
> And there is a third option, mixture of both above. [...]
There's a fourth option: backporting TEKEN_XTERM from 9-current.
(I'm not speaking in favour of it, I have no idea whether it'd be
feasible or not)
--
Robert Millan
-
On 2010-12-27 09:52 +0100, Petr Salinger wrote:
> I see two basic options:
>
> 1) plain cons25 variant: current sysvinit, ncurses
>and kfreebsd-8 8.1+dfsg-6, freebsd-utils 8.1-2
>
> It does not conform to debian policy, the backspace/delete key is
> somewhat broken on console and somewhat brok
How long is that going to take? In the meantime, console users of
GNU/kFreeBSD are screwed whenever they connect to other systems, since
that means they must change their TERM variable _and_ their backspace
key is broken.
I've attached the necessary patches to create the cons25-debian
terminfo
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> user release.debian@packages.debian.org
Setting user to release.debian@packages.debian.org (was
jcris...@debian.org).
> usertag 607662 squeeze-can-defer
Bug#607662: ncurses-base: backspace key deletes forwards on the kFreeBSD c
user release.debian@packages.debian.org
usertag 607662 squeeze-can-defer
tag 607662 squeeze-ignore
kthxbye
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 22:06:00 +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
> Package: ncurses-base
> Version: 5.7+20100313-4
> Severity: serious
> X-Debbugs-CC: debian-...@lists.debian.org
>
> The cha
On 2010-12-23 19:32 +0100, brian m. carlson wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 05:10:28PM +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
>> I don't see how this follows. People having an xterm-like terminal that
>> is not compatible with Debian's xterm terminfo entry can easily work
>> around it by setting TERM=xterm-
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 05:10:28PM +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
> I don't see how this follows. People having an xterm-like terminal that
> is not compatible with Debian's xterm terminfo entry can easily work
> around it by setting TERM=xterm-r6 or similar when they connect to a
> Debian machine. W
On 2010-12-23 04:17 +0100, Petr Salinger wrote:
>>> It seems that current plain FreeBSD kernel generates events
>>> that fully corresponds to cons25 entry.
>>>
>>> It just uses different definitions for kbs and kdch1 wrt Linux,
>>>
>>> Linux: kbs=\177 kdch1=\E[3~
>>> FreeBSD/cons25 kbs=^
It seems that current plain FreeBSD kernel generates events
that fully corresponds to cons25 entry.
It just uses different definitions for kbs and kdch1 wrt Linux,
Linux: kbs=\177 kdch1=\E[3~
FreeBSD/cons25 kbs=^H kdch1=\177
Emacs, for instance, does not expect ^H to mean "delete
On 2010-12-22 08:41 +0100, Petr Salinger wrote:
> It seems that current plain FreeBSD kernel generates events
> that fully corresponds to cons25 entry.
>
> It just uses different definitions for kbs and kdch1 wrt Linux,
>
> Linux: kbs=\177 kdch1=\E[3~
> FreeBSD/cons25s kbs=^H kdch1=\177
You really can't just unilaterally change the cons25 terminfo entry. If
this proposed change is implemented, people running stock FreeBSD will
have their consoles broken if they log into a Debian system. If
kFreeBSD needs different settings than the stock cons25 entry, it needs
to create and use
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 08:24:35AM +0100, Petr Salinger wrote:
> >You really can't just unilaterally change the cons25 terminfo entry. If
> >this proposed change is implemented, people running stock FreeBSD will
> >have their consoles broken if they log into a Debian system. If
> >kFreeBSD needs
Hello,
On antradienis 21 Gruodis 2010 09:24:35 Petr Salinger wrote:
> >> The changes to the kFreeBSD console and the kbdcontrol package (see
> >> #605065 and #605777) need to be accompanied by changing the cons25
> >> terminfo entry accordingly, otherwise ncurses-based programs severely
> >> misbe
2010/12/21 Petr Salinger :
>
> I propose revert changes in kernel and kbdcontrol and ask for ignore tag
> for this "technology preview" release.
I second this. This would make it easier to coordinate with
upstream and at least agree on what name to use. Release
pressure wouldn't play well with t
2010/12/21 Sven Joachim :
> I suppose that ncurses-base would ship the terminfo entry for it, and
> kfreebsd-image-* packages need to depend on an ncurses-base version that
> has this terminfo entry, right? Any suggestions for the name?
Given that we might want to try merge these changes upstream
On Tue, 21 Dec 2010, Sven Joachim wrote:
On 2010-12-21 04:58 +0100, brian m. carlson wrote:
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 10:06:00PM +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
The changes to the kFreeBSD console and the kbdcontrol package (see
#605065 and #605777) need to be accompanied by changing the cons25
term
The changes to the kFreeBSD console and the kbdcontrol package (see
#605065 and #605777) need to be accompanied by changing the cons25
terminfo entry accordingly, otherwise ncurses-based programs severely
misbehave.
You really can't just unilaterally change the cons25 terminfo entry. If
this pr
On 2010-12-21 04:58 +0100, brian m. carlson wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 10:06:00PM +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
>> The changes to the kFreeBSD console and the kbdcontrol package (see
>> #605065 and #605777) need to be accompanied by changing the cons25
>> terminfo entry accordingly, otherwise n
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 10:06:00PM +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
> The changes to the kFreeBSD console and the kbdcontrol package (see
> #605065 and #605777) need to be accompanied by changing the cons25
> terminfo entry accordingly, otherwise ncurses-based programs severely
> misbehave.
You really c
Package: ncurses-base
Version: 5.7+20100313-4
Severity: serious
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-...@lists.debian.org
The changes to the kFreeBSD console and the kbdcontrol package (see
#605065 and #605777) need to be accompanied by changing the cons25
terminfo entry accordingly, otherwise ncurses-based progr
29 matches
Mail list logo
