Hi Barak,
thanks for the quick upload.
I just wanted to mention, that there is a difference between
*kfreebsd*-yes (my proposed patch)
and
*freebsd*-yes (what was merged upstream [1])
afaik the freebsds don't use the glibc userland and I'm not sure if the thread
libs on freebsd behave like the
> I just wanted to mention, that there is a difference between
>
> *kfreebsd*-yes (my proposed patch)
> and
> *freebsd*-yes (what was merged upstream [1])
>
> afaik the freebsds don't use the glibc userland and I'm not sure if
> the thread libs on freebsd behave like the one on kfreebsd, so I
> jus
Bottou
> Subject: Re: Bug#628800: FTBFS on kfreebsd-*: libdjvulibre.so: undefined
> reference to symbol 'pthread_cancel@@GLIBC_2.3'
>
> > I just wanted to mention, that there is a difference between
> >
> > *kfreebsd*-yes (my proposed patch)
> > and
>
bugs.debian.org; debian-...@lists.debian.org; Leon Bottou
> > Subject: Re: Bug#628800: FTBFS on kfreebsd-*: libdjvulibre.so: undefined
> > reference to symbol 'pthread_cancel@@GLIBC_2.3'
> >
> > > I just wanted to mention, that there is a difference between
> &
4 matches
Mail list logo