Package: mate-polkit-common
Version: 1.6.0-1
Severity: critical
Tags: upstream
Justification: aborts update
Dear Maintainer,
*** Please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
Updating via apt-get
* What was the outcome of this
On 12/29/2013 05:13 PM, Frank McCormick wrote:
>* What led up to the situation?
>
> Updating via apt-get
>
>
>* What was the outcome of this action?
>
> dpkg error
That happens when trying to update the package when using the MATE
Debian repository at the same time and i
On 29/12/13 11:19 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
On 12/29/2013 05:13 PM, Frank McCormick wrote:
* What led up to the situation?
Updating via apt-get
* What was the outcome of this action?
dpkg error
That happens when trying to update the package when using the MAT
(Note: Please keep the bug tracker in CC, I just bounced your mail)
On 12/29/2013 05:29 PM, Franklin McCormick wrote:
> Strange because AFAIK my MATE desktop came from the Debian repositories.
This doesn't contract my previous statement at all. The current problem
with MATE in Debian is that th
Am 29.12.2013 um 17:19 schrieb John Paul Adrian Glaubitz:
> On 12/29/2013 05:13 PM, Frank McCormick wrote:
>>* What led up to the situation?
>>
>> Updating via apt-get
>>
>>
>>* What was the outcome of this action?
>>
>> dpkg error
>
> That happens when trying to update
On 12/29/2013 06:05 PM, Sven Joachim wrote:
> Breaks wouldn't help here, Replaces is what's needed. Considering that
> over 2000 people have the packages from the MATE repositories
> installed[1], adding that might be a good idea.
Oh, yes, you're right. I completely forgot about Replaces.
>> but
On 29/12/13 11:54 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
(Note: Please keep the bug tracker in CC, I just bounced your mail)
On 12/29/2013 05:29 PM, Franklin McCormick wrote:
Strange because AFAIK my MATE desktop came from the Debian repositories.
This doesn't contract my previous statement
7 matches
Mail list logo
