On Mon, 16 Jun 2014 22:17:05 -0700, tony mancill wrote:
Thanks for digging into this. I suggest we move forward with pulling
out the MOZILLA_FIVE_HOME mechanism and do some testing. I can work on
that.
Sounds good, thank you!
Okay, so it's no worse with all of the xulrunner stuff
On 06/15/2014 07:36 AM, gregor herrmann wrote:
On Sat, 14 Jun 2014 09:13:58 -0700, tony mancill wrote:
My tentative conclusion is that MOZILLA_FIVE_HOME was needed at some
time in the past, doesn't get set since ages, which doesn't cause any
visible problems.
So it seems like we can just
On Sat, 14 Jun 2014 09:13:58 -0700, tony mancill wrote:
My tentative conclusion is that MOZILLA_FIVE_HOME was needed at some
time in the past, doesn't get set since ages, which doesn't cause any
visible problems.
So it seems like we can just drop this whole xulrunner/iceweasel
Source: tuxguitar
Version: 1.2-19
Severity: serious
Your package depends on:
xulrunner-29 | xulrunner-24.0 | xulrunner-17.0 | xulrunner-10.0 |
xulrunner-1.9.1
But iceweasel no longer provides a xulrunner binary. Note that the iceweasel
binary
itself ships libxul.so now, so perhaps adding
On Sat, 14 Jun 2014 12:04:00 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
Your package depends on:
xulrunner-29 | xulrunner-24.0 | xulrunner-17.0 | xulrunner-10.0 |
xulrunner-1.9.1
But iceweasel no longer provides a xulrunner binary. Note that the iceweasel
binary
itself ships libxul.so now, so
On 06/14/2014 04:52 AM, gregor herrmann wrote:
On Sat, 14 Jun 2014 12:04:00 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
Your package depends on:
xulrunner-29 | xulrunner-24.0 | xulrunner-17.0 | xulrunner-10.0 |
xulrunner-1.9.1
But iceweasel no longer provides a xulrunner binary. Note that the
6 matches
Mail list logo