Package: libroar-compat2
Version: 1.0~beta11-1
Followup-For: Bug #755846
I'd like to mention that roarify should be able to work with any installed
architecture. If libroar-compat is installed for x68_64 and i386, then it
should be possible to use roarify both on x64_64 binaries as well on i386
affects 755846 libopenal1
thanks
On Thu, 24 Jul 2014 at 19:26:27 +0200, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
Am 24.07.2014 um 12:14 schrieb Philipp Schafft:
upstream speaking,
I think this is a bug in the way OpenAL and/or roaraudio is packaged in
Debian, not in upstream code, so there isn't a great deal
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
affects 755846 libopenal1
Bug #755846 [libroar2] libroar2: no multiarch possible
Added indication that 755846 affects libopenal1
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
755846: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi
reflum,
On Fri, 2014-07-25 at 09:47 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
affects 755846 libopenal1
thanks
On Thu, 24 Jul 2014 at 19:26:27 +0200, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
Am 24.07.2014 um 12:14 schrieb Philipp Schafft:
upstream speaking,
I think this is a bug in the way OpenAL and/or roaraudio
Hey there... an openal-soft maintainer here (who also works closely
with openal-soft upstream),
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 3:20 PM, Philipp Schafft l...@lion.leolix.org wrote:
reflum,
On Fri, 2014-07-25 at 09:47 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
affects 755846 libopenal1
thanks
I will have a look
On 25/07/14 14:20, Philipp Schafft wrote:
I just answerd because this report hit our mailinglist's spam filter
somehow.
As I said, this is entirely about how roaraudio's packaging in Debian
(and that of its dependencies, and that of things that depend on it) is
set up - the optional features
On 25/07/14 15:07, bret curtis wrote:
Is there already a bug filed for librms? If this is the root of all
evil and drama, then it should be handled.
It does not prevent libroar* from being made multiarch-compatible, but
unless libroar* stops depending on it, it does prevent the entire stack
block 755846 by 756032
thanks
On Fri, 25 Jul 2014 at 15:26:33 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
On 25/07/14 15:07, bret curtis wrote:
Is there already a bug filed for librms? If this is the root of all
evil and drama, then it should be handled.
It does not prevent libroar* from being made
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
block 755846 by 756032
Bug #755846 [libroar2] libroar2: no multiarch possible
755846 was not blocked by any bugs.
755846 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 755846: 756032
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you
flum,
upstream speaking,
On Thu, 2014-07-24 at 08:54 +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
libopenal1 depends on libroar-compat2 and a 32 bits libopenal1 is
required for wine, for example. Thus, this bug prevents the
co-installation of 32 and 64 bit OpenAL applications!
Please add
Am 24.07.2014 um 12:14 schrieb Philipp Schafft:
flum,
upstream speaking,
On Thu, 2014-07-24 at 08:54 +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
libopenal1 depends on libroar-compat2 and a 32 bits libopenal1 is
required for wine, for example. Thus, this bug prevents the
co-installation of 32
11 matches
Mail list logo
