Bug#784845: libdevel-gdb-perl: autopkgtest failure in t/expect.t

2016-10-01 Thread gregor herrmann
On Sun, 25 Sep 2016 13:04:33 +0200, gregor herrmann wrote: > Currently I'm very tempted to disable t/expect.t since it's both > unreproducible for me and undebuggable with my amount of tuits. Done. Cheers, gregor -- .''`. Homepage https://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key

Bug#784845: libdevel-gdb-perl: autopkgtest failure in t/expect.t

2016-09-25 Thread gregor herrmann
On Sat, 10 Sep 2016 23:32:48 +0200, gregor herrmann wrote: > On Thu, 30 Jun 2016 14:41:17 +0200, intrigeri wrote: > > I'm going to split the brittle test into two smaller ones, for > > debugging purposes. > - I still can't get t/expect.t to fail, even if running it under > heavy load in a

Bug#784845: libdevel-gdb-perl: autopkgtest failure in t/expect.t

2016-09-10 Thread gregor herrmann
On Thu, 30 Jun 2016 14:41:17 +0200, intrigeri wrote: > The test suite now passes most of the time on ci.d.n, since 2015-11. > > The only recent failure there is > https://ci.debian.net/data/packages/unstable/amd64/libd/libdevel-gdb-perl/20160607_104749.autopkgtest.log.gz > > Still, on the

Bug#784845: libdevel-gdb-perl: autopkgtest failure in t/expect.t

2016-08-17 Thread gregor herrmann
On Tue, 16 Aug 2016 23:33:09 +0100, Santiago Vila wrote: > > Sorry, I don't understand the connection to building with -A. Is > > there a report about the package failing with it? Does it fail for > > you if you build with -A? > I only build with -A, but there are a lot of packages for which a >

Bug#784845: libdevel-gdb-perl: autopkgtest failure in t/expect.t

2016-08-17 Thread Niko Tyni
On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 09:13:55PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote: > IMHO, buildds need to be able to build the packages at any given time, > which means they should always succeed. I agree that they should. I'm just saying that this is not the traditional threshold for release criticality and I'm

Bug#784845: libdevel-gdb-perl: autopkgtest failure in t/expect.t

2016-08-16 Thread Santiago Vila
On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 12:09:27AM +0200, gregor herrmann wrote: > On Tue, 16 Aug 2016 21:13:55 +0100, Santiago Vila wrote: > > BTW: In this particular package, I decided to raise the severity after > > finding the failure myself while checking for bugs regarding > > "dpkg-buildpackage -A" > >

Bug#784845: libdevel-gdb-perl: autopkgtest failure in t/expect.t

2016-08-16 Thread gregor herrmann
On Tue, 16 Aug 2016 21:13:55 +0100, Santiago Vila wrote: > > It did autobuild fwiw. > > > > https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=libdevel-gdb-perl=2.02-3=all > A successful build log just means it did autobuild the last time it > was tried, not that the package "usually autobuilds". >

Bug#784845: libdevel-gdb-perl: autopkgtest failure in t/expect.t

2016-08-16 Thread Santiago Vila
On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 10:04:01PM +0300, Niko Tyni wrote: > On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 07:18:39PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote: > > severity 784845 serious > > retitle 784845 libdevel-gdb-perl: FTBFS: t/expect.t #8 sometimes fails > > thanks > > > Bugs about packages not building from source are RC

Bug#784845: libdevel-gdb-perl: autopkgtest failure in t/expect.t

2016-08-16 Thread Niko Tyni
On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 07:18:39PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote: > severity 784845 serious > retitle 784845 libdevel-gdb-perl: FTBFS: t/expect.t #8 sometimes fails > thanks > Bugs about packages not building from source are RC because there is a > release goal saying "packages must autobuild". It