Bug#828414: libtorrent: a couple of fixes, build with OpenSSL 1.1

2016-12-22 Thread Peter Pentchev
On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 03:22:00PM +0100, Markus Koschany wrote: > Control: tags -1 pending > > On 22.12.2016 13:02, Peter Pentchev wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 11:30:30AM +, Sean Whitton wrote: [snip] > >> It would be great if you could prepare a debdiff for a standard NMU. > > > >

Bug#828414: libtorrent: a couple of fixes, build with OpenSSL 1.1

2016-12-22 Thread Rogério Brito
Hi. I'm one of the persons that used to maintain rtorrent/libtorrent until the last uploads. In my opinion, no one would mind if you committed your work to the collab-maint repos. Oh, BTW, if I am still listed as one of the uploaders, please kindly remove me. I'm swamped with work right now.

Processed: Re: Bug#828414: libtorrent: a couple of fixes, build with OpenSSL 1.1

2016-12-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 pending Bug #828414 [src:libtorrent] libtorrent: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0 Added tag(s) pending. -- 828414: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=828414 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#828414: libtorrent: a couple of fixes, build with OpenSSL 1.1

2016-12-22 Thread Markus Koschany
Control: tags -1 pending On 22.12.2016 13:02, Peter Pentchev wrote: > On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 11:30:30AM +, Sean Whitton wrote: >> Dear Peter, >> >> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 08:37:35AM +0200, Peter Pentchev wrote: >>> Oh, and, of course, if people feel that a collab-maint commit does not >>>

Bug#828414: libtorrent: a couple of fixes, build with OpenSSL 1.1

2016-12-22 Thread Sean Whitton
Hello Peter, On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 02:02:59PM +0200, Peter Pentchev wrote: > On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 11:30:30AM +, Sean Whitton wrote: > > Dear Peter, > > > > On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 08:37:35AM +0200, Peter Pentchev wrote: > > > Oh, and, of course, if people feel that a collab-maint commit

Bug#828414: libtorrent: a couple of fixes, build with OpenSSL 1.1

2016-12-22 Thread Peter Pentchev
On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 11:30:30AM +, Sean Whitton wrote: > Dear Peter, > > On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 08:37:35AM +0200, Peter Pentchev wrote: > > Oh, and, of course, if people feel that a collab-maint commit does not > > really count as a team upload (but isn't this the purpose of

Bug#828414: libtorrent: a couple of fixes, build with OpenSSL 1.1

2016-12-22 Thread Sean Whitton
Dear Peter, On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 08:37:35AM +0200, Peter Pentchev wrote: > Oh, and, of course, if people feel that a collab-maint commit does not > really count as a team upload (but isn't this the purpose of collab-maint?), > I can send another debdiff, formatted as a real NMU, and then

Bug#828414: libtorrent: a couple of fixes, build with OpenSSL 1.1

2016-12-21 Thread Peter Pentchev
On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 01:26:50AM +0200, Peter Pentchev wrote: > On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 03:14:49PM +0100, Markus Koschany wrote: > > On Mon, 28 Nov 2016 13:45:38 +0200 Peter Pentchev wrote: > > [...] > > > So, what do you think about the attached series of patches? > > > - the

Bug#828414: libtorrent: a couple of fixes, build with OpenSSL 1.1

2016-12-21 Thread Peter Pentchev
On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 03:14:49PM +0100, Markus Koschany wrote: > On Mon, 28 Nov 2016 13:45:38 +0200 Peter Pentchev wrote: > [...] > > So, what do you think about the attached series of patches? > > - the first three are actually meant to bring the Git repository in line > >

Bug#828414: libtorrent: a couple of fixes, build with OpenSSL 1.1

2016-12-20 Thread Markus Koschany
On Mon, 28 Nov 2016 13:45:38 +0200 Peter Pentchev wrote: [...] > So, what do you think about the attached series of patches? > - the first three are actually meant to bring the Git repository in line > with what was uploaded as libtorrent-0.13.6-1 > - the next one starts a

Bug#828414: libtorrent: a couple of fixes, build with OpenSSL 1.1

2016-12-14 Thread Andre Heider
Thanks Peter, I can confirm your whole patchset compiles and works for me just fine on armhf!

Bug#828414: libtorrent: a couple of fixes, build with OpenSSL 1.1

2016-11-28 Thread Peter Pentchev
Hi, Thanks for taking care of libtorrent! I took a quick look at #828414 (since how-can-i-help complained that rtorrent was facing autoremoval from testing), and it turns out that it's yet another instance of the opaque DH structure change in OpenSSL 1.1. Well, that's what started the ball