On Fri, May 1, 2020 at 3:05 AM Jeffrey Walton wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 1, 2020 at 2:14 AM Andreas Tille wrote:
> >
> > ...
> > ==13209== Process terminating with default action of signal 10 (SIGBUS)
> > ==13209==at 0x12D5CC: PairDistances (pair_dist.c:346)
> > ==13209==by 0x119410:
On Fri, May 1, 2020 at 2:14 AM Andreas Tille wrote:
>
> ...
> ==13209== Process terminating with default action of signal 10 (SIGBUS)
> ==13209==at 0x12D5CC: PairDistances (pair_dist.c:346)
> ==13209==by 0x119410: AlignmentOrder (clustal-omega.c:835)
> ==13209==by 0x11A6C4: Align
Hi Matthew,
On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 05:53:29PM -0700, Matthew Fernandez wrote:
>
> Is the priority goal here to simply ship a non-crashing clustalo mipsel
> binary that BioPython can depend on? If so, maybe we can just disable
> compiler optimisation (-O0) and this may avoid provoking the bus
> One small issue... Valgrind recommends -O0 or -O1
TIL :) Thanks, Jeff!
> You can sometimes locate a bus error at build time with -Wcast-align.
> At runtime you can usually locate them with -fsanitize=undefined.
I had previously tried UBSan and, while it turned up a number of shifting and
Hi Jeffrey,
thanks a lot for this analysis. Any chance that somebody could
turn this into a patch I could try?
Kind regards
Andreas.
On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 03:40:12PM -0400, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 7:21 AM Andreas Tille wrote:
> > ...
> > So it seems the bus
On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 7:21 AM Andreas Tille wrote:
> ...
> So it seems the bus error occures somehow here:
>
>
> https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/clustalo/-/blob/master/src/clustal/pair_dist.c#L346
NewProgress is at
On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 7:21 AM Andreas Tille wrote:
>
> Control: tags -1 help
>
> as it can be seen on the recent build log of clustalo on mips[1] the
> build fails with
>
> # Run additional test from python-biopython package to verify that
> # this will work as well
> src/clustalo -i
On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 10:33 AM Matthew Fernandez
wrote:
>
> > On Apr 30, 2020, at 00:31, Andreas Tille wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 05:51:26PM -0700, Matthew Fernandez wrote:
> >
> >> The other option I suggested was Valgrind, but if you can’t run apt-file
> >> you probably can’t
On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 07:17:50AM -0700, Matthew Fernandez wrote:
>
> Valgrind, in its default mode, checks for a variety of memory issues
> (use-after-free, write out-of bounds, …). You don’t need any special
> configure/build options, but you probably want to enable debug symbols
> (`export
> On Apr 30, 2020, at 00:31, Andreas Tille wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 05:51:26PM -0700, Matthew Fernandez wrote:
>
>> The other option I suggested was Valgrind, but if you can’t run apt-file you
>> probably can’t install Valgrind either.
>
> Well, I guess apt-get is permitted for
Hi Matthew,
On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 05:51:26PM -0700, Matthew Fernandez wrote:
> > Any more help from debian-mipsel is really appreciated.
>
> Hm yes, “--disable-libsanitizer” is rather ominous. I guess the mipsel GCC
> package has been built without ASan support. Surprising that it fails so
>
> On Apr 29, 2020, at 09:04, Andreas Tille wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 07:14:30AM -0700, Matthew Fernandez wrote:
>
>> For those on this thread who have access to mipsel hardware or can shell in
>> to one of the mipsel build machines, I would suggest running an
>> ASan-instrumented
Hi Matthew,
On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 07:14:30AM -0700, Matthew Fernandez wrote:
>
> To add another data point to this discussion, one other (fruitless) thing I
> tried previously was cross-compiling Clustal Omega. From an amd64 host, it’s
> possible to target mipsel using the GCC
> On Apr 29, 2020, at 02:12, Andreas Tille wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 10:30:35AM +0800, 黄佳文 wrote:
>> I am a developer from Loongson company (R & D CPU/mip64el), I've been
>> looking at this recently.
>
> Very nice to see mips developers to care for biological software. :-)
>
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 10:30:35AM +0800, 黄佳文 wrote:
> I am a developer from Loongson company (R & D CPU/mip64el), I've been
> looking at this recently.
Very nice to see mips developers to care for biological software. :-)
> I did two experiments, and I found that when I used Python 3,7 to
Control: affects -1 src:python-biopython
On Tue, 14 Apr 2020 at 17:39, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Control: reassign -1 clustalo
> Control: retitle -1 "clustalo: Bus error on mipsel"
> Control: tags -1 upstream
> Control: forwarded -1 clust...@ucd.ie
Marking this bug as affecting
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 src:python-biopython
Bug #956324 [clustalo] "clustalo: Bus error on mipsel"
Added indication that 956324 affects src:python-biopython
--
956324: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=956324
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact
Hi Matthew,
many thanks again for your investigation.
On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 01:15:49PM -0700, Matthew Fernandez wrote:
> > Upstream is in the row of this investigation. Its quite interesting
> > that the issue could also observed on amd64. So probably this is a real
> > issue which is just
> On Apr 17, 2020, at 22:39, Andreas Tille wrote:
>
> Hi Matthew,
>
> thanks a lot for your detailed investigation.
>
> On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 04:28:23PM -0700, Matthew Fernandez wrote:
>>> Program received signal SIGBUS, Bus error.
>>> 0x5556a1b8 in PairDistances (distmat=0x7fff278c,
Hi Matthew,
thanks a lot for your detailed investigation.
On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 04:28:23PM -0700, Matthew Fernandez wrote:
> > Program received signal SIGBUS, Bus error.
> > 0x5556a1b8 in PairDistances (distmat=0x7fff278c, mseq=0x55692a30,
> > pairdist_type=, bPercID=, istart=0, iend=3,
> >
> On Apr 17, 2020, at 13:18, Andreas Tille wrote:
>
> Hi Matthew,
>
> On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 08:18:29AM -0700, Matthew Fernandez wrote:
>>> Thanks for the patch which I applied to packaging Git. I assume you
>>> want to express that while these fixes are definitely good coding
>>> practice
Hi Matthew,
On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 08:18:29AM -0700, Matthew Fernandez wrote:
> > Thanks for the patch which I applied to packaging Git. I assume you
> > want to express that while these fixes are definitely good coding
> > practice the bus error problem is not fixed by it, right?
>
> Thanks,
On Fri, 17 Apr 2020 at 08:09, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Matthew,
>
> On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 07:40:54AM -0700, Matthew Fernandez wrote:
> >
> > As a jumping off point, the attached patch fixes some issues with
> logging calls in the upstream 1.2.4 source release.
>
> Thanks for the patch which I
Hi Matthew,
On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 07:40:54AM -0700, Matthew Fernandez wrote:
>
> As a jumping off point, the attached patch fixes some issues with logging
> calls in the upstream 1.2.4 source release.
Thanks for the patch which I applied to packaging Git. I assume you
want to express that
> On Apr 17, 2020, at 04:20, Andreas Tille wrote:
>
> Control: tags -1 help
>
> Hi,
>
> as it can be seen on the recent build log of clustalo on mips[1] the
> build fails with
>
>
> # Run additional test from python-biopython package to verify that
> # this will work as well
> src/clustalo
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 help
Bug #956324 [clustalo] "clustalo: Bus error on mipsel"
Added tag(s) help.
--
956324: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=956324
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 help
Hi,
as it can be seen on the recent build log of clustalo on mips[1] the
build fails with
# Run additional test from python-biopython package to verify that
# this will work as well
src/clustalo -i debian/tests/biopython_testdata/f002 --guidetree-out
temp_test.dnd -o
Control: reassign -1 clustalo
Control: retitle -1 "clustalo: Bus error on mipsel"
Control: tags -1 upstream
Control: forwarded -1 clust...@ucd.ie
Hi,
I took over the test done by biopython into the clustalo build time and
autopkgtest. As Peter assumed this is an issue in clustalo as you can
see
28 matches
Mail list logo