Bug#997758: nose: FTBFS: There is a syntax error in your configuration file: invalid syntax (conf.py, line 220)

Dmitry Shachnev writes: > Hi all! > > On Sun, Oct 24, 2021 at 01:49:30PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: >> Source: nose >> Version: 1.3.7-7 >> Severity: serious >> Justification: FTBFS >> Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs >> User: lu...@debian.org >> Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm >> >> Hi, >> >> D

Bug#997758: nose: FTBFS: There is a syntax error in your configuration file: invalid syntax (conf.py, line 220)

On 10/25/21 8:18 PM, Dmitry Shachnev wrote: > However, it would be still nice to remove nose at some future point, maybe > before Bookworm release. Will do, probably for the next version of OpenStack (last one made me update 220 packages: that's a good way to review everything). > I'm impressed b

Bug#997758: nose: FTBFS: There is a syntax error in your configuration file: invalid syntax (conf.py, line 220)

Hi Thomas and all! On Sun, Oct 24, 2021 at 11:53:19PM +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote: > Hi, > > I'm referenced for 55 packages. Please don't force me to do this right > away, that's too much work. I very much would prefer if we could have a > smoother transition. > > Note that it's possible that for

Bug#997758: nose: FTBFS: There is a syntax error in your configuration file: invalid syntax (conf.py, line 220)

Control: tags -1 + patch * Dmitry Shachnev , 2021-10-24, 16:24: setuptools v58.0.0 removed support for 2to3 during builds, which nose relied on (because it has a Python 2 codebase). You can convert the source to be compatible with Python 3 with these commands: patch -p1 unit_tests/test_is

Processed: Re: Bug#997758: nose: FTBFS: There is a syntax error in your configuration file: invalid syntax (conf.py, line 220)

Processing control commands: > tags -1 + patch Bug #997758 [src:nose] nose: FTBFS: There is a syntax error in your configuration file: invalid syntax (conf.py, line 220) Added tag(s) patch. -- 997758: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=997758 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow

Bug#997758: nose: FTBFS: There is a syntax error in your configuration file: invalid syntax (conf.py, line 220)

On 10/24/21 3:24 PM, Dmitry Shachnev wrote: > Hi all! > > On Sun, Oct 24, 2021 at 01:49:30PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: >> Source: nose >> Version: 1.3.7-7 >> Severity: serious >> Justification: FTBFS >> Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs >> User: lu...@debian.org >> Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookwor

Bug#997758: nose: FTBFS: There is a syntax error in your configuration file: invalid syntax (conf.py, line 220)

On 2021-10-24 16:24:31 +0300 (+0300), Dmitry Shachnev wrote: [...] > If anyone is still using nose (1.x), please port your packages to > nose2, pure unittest or pytest. I am attaching a dd-list and I > intend to do a MBF in a few weeks when I have more time. Further alternatives include https://pa

Bug#997758: nose: FTBFS: There is a syntax error in your configuration file: invalid syntax (conf.py, line 220)

Hi all! On Sun, Oct 24, 2021 at 01:49:30PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > Source: nose > Version: 1.3.7-7 > Severity: serious > Justification: FTBFS > Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs > User: lu...@debian.org > Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm > > Hi, > > During a rebuild of all packages in sid, yo

Bug#997758: nose: FTBFS: There is a syntax error in your configuration file: invalid syntax (conf.py, line 220)

Source: nose Version: 1.3.7-7 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bookworm Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > make[1]: Entering directo