Hi,
Am 07.07.20 um 21:21 schrieb Evgeny Kapun:
>> but how did you get into this situation?
>
> I've run `apt-get --with-new-pkgs upgrade`. This upgraded some
> libreoffice packages including libreoffice-l10n-ru, but not
> libreoffice-common because this would require it to remove
> libreoffice-sty
On Tue, Jul 07, 2020 at 09:30:23PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Am 07.07.20 um 21:21 schrieb Evgeny Kapun:
> >> but how did you get into this situation?
> >
> > I've run `apt-get --with-new-pkgs upgrade`. This upgraded some
> > libreoffice packages inc
tag 964471 - moreinfo
tag 964471 - unreproducible
Hi,
Am 07.07.20 um 23:05 schrieb Evgeny Kapun:
> On 07.07.2020 22:40, Rene Engelhard wrote:
>> Even that worked for me in said testing VM "upgraded" to unstable with
>> your apt-get --with-new-pkgs upgrade.
>>
>
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #964944 in libreoffice reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/libreoffice-team/libreoffice/libreoffice/-/commit/c860
/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
> ++
Yeah, known bug. Already fixed in 6.4.2-3 which I cannot backport yet
due to it not being in testing yet.
libreoffice (1:6.4.2-3) unstable; urgency=medium
[...]
- libreoffice-math: Add Breaks/R
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #956450 in libreoffice reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/libreoffice-team/libreoffice/libreoffice/-/commit/15aa
rol.in, debian/rules, debian/libreoffice-base.p*.in:
simplify and revert diversion of AccessBase basic stuff.
* debian/libreoffice-common.docs, debian/libreoffice-common.doc-base,
debian/patches/add-access2base-doc.diff: install
www.access2base.com/access2base.html into libreoffice-common as d
Hi,
On Sat, Apr 11, 2020 at 03:11:46PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> [Rene Engelhard]
> > I think if it was a generic problem this would have been reported
> > LOOONG go:
>
> No idea if it is a generic problem, but we ran into it on two different
> machines, one
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #956450 in libreoffice reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/libreoffice-team/libreoffice/libreoffice/-/commit/15aa
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #956450 in libreoffice reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/libreoffice-team/libreoffice/libreoffice/-/commit/15aa
severity 954323 serious
retitle 954323 libreoffice-common 6.4.2 breaks older versions
found 954323 1:6.4.2~rc1-1
thanks
Am 20. März 2020 09:17:51 MEZ schrieb Ara Keary :
>Package: libreoffice-common
>Version: 1:6.4.2-1
>Severity: grave
>Justification: renders package unusable
Sigh.
>. or the doc
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #954323 in libreoffice reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/libreoffice-team/libreoffice/libreoffice/-/commit/1bdb
severity 970009 important
tag 970009 + moreinfo
tag 970009 + unreproducible
thanks
Am 10.09.20 um 06:30 schrieb hyiltiz:
> Package: libreoffice
> Version: 1:7.0.1-1+b1
> Severity: serious
Nonsense.
It's not a RC bug and no policy violation. Please use proper bug severities.
> This has alre
tag 964613 + pending
retitle 964613 liborcus: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: make -j4 check VERBOSE=1
returned exit code 2 when built with mdds 1.6.0
thanks
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 10:08:30PM +0300, Dmitry Shachnev wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 09, 2020 at 01:01:01PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > Hi,
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #964613 in liborcus reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/libreoffice-team/liborcus/-/commit/3595669f85eb33083f0df3
us
is built with x, rebuild ixion with x first" (at least for this specific
mdds version) which ttbomk is not possible to express.
On Sat, Sep 12, 2020 at 01:02:58PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> It *does* work though with liborcus 0.16.0 which I just uploaded to NEW,
> so we probably sh
On Sun, Sep 13, 2020 at 10:36:26AM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> @-release: please
>
> nmu libixion . ANY . -m 'rebuild with mdds >= 1.6.0 (closes: #964613)'
Nevermind, I just remembered I have those "Debian Janitor" changes
pending. Will do a source upload.
Regards,
Rene
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #964613 in libixion reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/libreoffice-team/libixion/-/commit/ba542780f4585d4015e035
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #964613 in liborcus reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/libreoffice-team/liborcus/-/commit/46c5b36895304a8918f44a
On Sun, Sep 13, 2020 at 11:44:59AM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Nevermind, I just remembered I have those "Debian Janitor" changes
> pending. Will do a source upload.
Done now. (And a new liborcus with bumped build-dep.)
Regards,
Rene
retitle 952625 libspdlog-dev: .pc Requires: fmt which doesn't have a .pc file,
breaking pkg-config on spdlog.pc
reassign 952625 libspdlog-dev
affects 952625 src:libixion
found 952625 1:1.5.0+ds-2
thanks
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 05:15:19PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Source: libixion
> Vers
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 06:06:57PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> root@frodo:/# pkg-config --cflags spdlog
> Package fmt was not found in the pkg-config search path.
> Perhaps you should add the directory containing `fmt.pc'
> to the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variab
retitle 952625 libspdlog-dev: needs to Depend on libfmt-dev (>= 6.1.2+ds-1)
(Requires: fmt)
thanks
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 08:30:29PM +0100, Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
> [...]
> > Or fmt gets a .pc file (Cced.)
>
> Thanks for the message. Upstream started to provide .pc-file in relatively
Ji,
Am 7. Februar 2020 09:47:30 MEZ schrieb Laurent Bigonville :
>While updating a system (partially up-to-date), I got the following
>error:
>
>Dépaquetage de libreoffice-help-fr (1:6.4.1~rc1-1) sur (1:6.4.0-1) ...
>dpkg: erreur de traitement de l'archive
>/tmp/apt-dpkg-install-APTwY9/254-libreof
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #950833 in libreoffice reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/libreoffice-team/libreoffice/libreoffice/commit/829ade
Hi,
On Fri, Feb 07, 2020 at 10:10:24AM +0100, rene.engelh...@mailbox.org wrote:
> >Looks like there is a missing Breaks/Replaces between
> >libreoffice-help-common and libreoffice-help-fr?
>
> Looks like those localized pngs moved packages unexpectedly...
>
> Will look...
Caused by
https://cgit
Package: libtinfo6
Version: 6.2+20200918-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
in a (dist-|cowbuilder ) upgrade of my i386 chroot:
$ sudo cowbuilder --update --basepath /var/cache/pbuilder/base.cow.i386/
--bindmounts /home
I: Copying COW directory
I: forking: rm -rf /var/cache/pbuilder/build/cow.26407
I: fo
Hi,
Am 11.10.20 um 21:12 schrieb Jessica Clarke:
>> Preparing to unpack .../09-libreoffice-common_1%3a7.0.2-1_all.deb ...
>> dpkg-maintscript-helper: error: file
>> '/usr/lib/libreoffice/share/registry/math.xcd' not owned by package
>> 'libreoffice-common:all'
>> dpkg-maintscript-helper: error:
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #972043 in libreoffice reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/libreoffice-team/libreoffice/libreoffice/-/commit/d2ca
Hi,
just saw this bug while working on a patch which properly documents the
library dependencies (aka "replace libreoffice-java-common in
build-depends with explicit libjuh-java, libjurt-java, libridl-java,
libunoil-java
and add these as explicit Depends/Recommends in addition to
libreoffice-java
Hi,
Am 16.07.20 um 17:27 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
> All of thse libs above are now dummy libs for liblibreoffice.jar. They
> are empty and just contain Class-Path:
Should be obvious from the rest but this of course should read
"All of thse libs above are now dummy libs for libr
tag 964706 + patch
thanks
Hi,
Am 16.07.20 um 17:27 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
>
>>> Replacing org.openoffice:juh:jar:4.1.2 ->
>>> org.libreoffice:juh:jar:debian
>>> Replacing org.openoffice:jurt:jar:4.1.2 ->
>>> org.
Hi,
Am 16.07.20 um 23:28 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
> tag 964706 + patch
[...]
> This is what I did now...
[...]
https://salsa.debian.org/java-team/jabref/-/merge_requests/2
Regards,
Rene
severity 966087 important
tag 966087 + moreinfo
tag 966087 + unreproducible
thanks
Hi,
Am 22.07.20 um 22:36 schrieb Liam K Morland:
> Every time I try to save a document, I get:
>
> Error saving document
> General Error:
> General input/outpur error
>
> The document does n
On Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 04:31:08PM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote:
> tags 817592 + pending patch
> thanks
>
> I've uploaded myspell 3.0+pre3.1-24.2 to DELAYED/5:
>
> myspell (1:3.0+pre3.1-24.2) unstable; urgency=medium
>
> * Non-maintainer upload.
> * Move to debhelper compat level 9. (Cl
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 11:02:33AM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote:
> > If people really rely on this oboslete software they should adopt it.
> > But: I believe myspell should be removed. It actually should have been
> > *years* ago.
>
> This is not obvious from the outside, so from my perspective I
4cde5a5cff94e7e919844ba6b4d524160f114428
Author: Rene Engelhard
Date: Mon Sep 26 21:13:09 2016 +0200
add 3.0+pre3.1-24.2 NMU
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index 753b2b2..2db12c8 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+myspell (1:3.0+pre3.1-24.2) unstable; urgency=medium
2dabe8b7c8fd9f93638a5d6f2230fb1afe7fdc92
Author: Rene Engelhard
Date: Tue Oct 4 23:06:22 2016 +0200
changelog for 0.1.6-5
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index d85b9d3..f57f4a3 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+libetonyek (0.1.6-5) unstable; urgency=medium
found 840333 0.12~git20141031-3
thanks
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 07:18:48PM +0200, Tobias Frost wrote:
> The library includes the jsonchecker testsuite, which is from json.org.
> Upstream of rapidjson mentions in a later README that this is under the
> particular license here:
>
> https://githu
Hi,
Am 23.12.23 um 02:40 schrieb Bastian Germann:
graph_legend.dot should have quotes around the font name references.
Ah, thanks. Unfortunately this is a generated file...
This is probably a doxygen bug.
Probably. That's why there's no action here. TBH I don't think this is
the only occurance
Hi,
Am 23.12.23 um 11:43 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
Hi,
Am 23.12.23 um 02:40 schrieb Bastian Germann:
graph_legend.dot should have quotes around the font name references.
Ah, thanks. Unfortunately this is a generated file...
And yes, I also noticed that the FreeSans.ttf is at fault. Indeed I
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1052740 in graphite2 reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/libreoffice-team/graphite2/-/commit/966553657a7a75e527c
Hi,
Am 25.12.23 um 16:31 schrieb Aron Xu:
Hi Rene,
On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 3:39 AM Rene Engelhard wrote:
Am Tue, Dec 19, 2023 at 08:03:56PM +0100 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
LibreOffice builds (patch available), but doesn't yet build with 2.12.
"... but doesn't yet succeed the
Hi,
Am 25.12.23 um 22:33 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
The tests are still failing and there is no patch anywhere yet, see
Sorry, link got lost:
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158423
and c) you ignore the actual issue here at hand and that is that the new
libxml2 breaks the
Hi,
Am 25.12.23 um 22:57 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
I didn't file it for the plain build issue. Nevertheless, if it broke so
many projects you probably should do a full-fledged rebuild and send
Well, mitigated by 2.12.3, but still.
But again, this is completely off-topic to what I fil
severity 1036805 important
thanks
Hi,
> Serious severity because it has a major effect on the usability of the
> package without rendering it completely unusable, not minor
No, it's not.
"serious" has it's own meaning though and that's not it.
At most it's important but I don't buy this sin
tag 1068479 + moreinfo
tag 1068479 + unreproducible
severity 1068479 important
thanks
Hi,
Am 06.04.24 um 00:34 schrieb José Luis González:
The setting for spacing between paragraphs is missing in the spacing
and indentation tab of the paragraph dialog.
?
It's definitely there. Format ->
{mysql,firebird}.ucf: add
* debian/control.in: add Breaks: -sdbc-{mysql,firebird} (<< 4:24.2.2-2)
to libreoffice-common
-- Rene Engelhard Sat, 30 Mar 2024 09:30:30 +
even though -2 was never attempted on armhf due to that build-dep (-3
was built then)
Hi,
Am 17.08.24 um 05:58 schrieb Aron Xu:
After some research, I prefer making a t64-like transition for libxml2
for the following reasons:
- Upstream is not prepared to bump the SONAME to something like
libxml3. Given the long history of this function library, determining
which APIs should be
reopen 1077197
reopen 1077190
thanks
Hi,
Am 27.07.24 um 06:34 schrieb Debian FTP Masters:
* debian/control: make libcurl*-dev packages Recommends -dev packages.
(Closes: #1077197, #1077190)
This is not going to work.
a) Is this needed for anything using liburls .pc. A pure --cf
Hi,
Am 27.07.24 um 08:00 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
a) Is this needed for anything using liburls .pc. A pure --cflags now needs
those.
Even when not doing static linking. Recommends here is wrong.
This needs to be a Depends.
b) even more, pbuilder disables the install of recommends. That means
Hi,
Am 27.07.24 um 08:00 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
b) even more, pbuilder disables the install of recommends. That means builds
inside pbuilder still will fail.
This doesn't even work in sbuild (and thus the buildds). After I gave back
libreoffice I got
https://buildd.debian.org/s
Hi again,
Am 27.07.24 um 08:07 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
Am 27.07.24 um 08:00 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
b) even more, pbuilder disables the install of recommends. That means builds
inside pbuilder still will fail.
This doesn't even work in sbuild (and thus the buildds). After I gave
Hi Lucas,
this is no bug in the package AFAICS.
libreoffice-draw-nogui is clearly only in Build-Depends-Indep:
Build-Depends: debhelper-compat (= 13),
fpc,
libgtk2.0-dev,
lcl,
lcl-qt5,
Build-Depends-Indep:
libreoffice-draw-nogui,
libreoffice-writer,
So it's only needed for _all builds. S
Hi,
Am 24.04.24 um 21:35 schrieb Peter B:
Why is it bad? The nogui's are lighter dependencies than the gui
packages.
Exactly. That#s why they should be used in package building for
converting stuff.
One or the other is needed. Surely better to use the nogui if its
available?
It is available
close 1069835 4:24.2.2-1
forwarded 1069835 https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
tag 1069835 + moreinfo
thanks
Am 25.04.24 um 17:03 schrieb Andreas B. Mundt:
Package: libreoffice-kf5
Version?
Severity: grave
Come on... Not downgrading just yet, but I don't believe
Hi,
Am 25.04.24 um 17:03 schrieb Andreas B. Mundt:
For now, we traced the issue back to libreoffice-kf5. If this package
is removed, neither the document disappears on closing libreoffice nor
the popup is shown when 'nobrl' is removed from the mount options.
Which doesn't do IO itself though?
Hi,
Am 25.04.24 um 18:37 schrieb Andreas B. Mundt:
On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 05:43:29PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
Am 25.04.24 um 17:03 schrieb Andreas B. Mundt:
For now, we traced the issue back to libreoffice-kf5. If this package
is removed, neither the document disappears on closing
Hi,
Am 19.10.23 um 19:08 schrieb Adrian Bunk:
Source: libixion
Version: 0.17.0-3
0.17.0-3
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs trixie sid patch
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=libixion&arch=i386&ver=0.19.0-1&stamp=1697292545&raw=0
So not 0.17.0.
Or does it also happen on sid? Yes,
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1054239 in libixion reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/libreoffice-team/libixion/-/commit/c2c9031ec56f689294bc9
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1054239 in libixion reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/libreoffice-team/libixion/-/commit/c2c9031ec56f689294bc9
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1055267 in libreoffice reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/libreoffice-team/libreoffice/libreoffice/-/commit/d2e
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1055267 in libreoffice reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/libreoffice-team/libreoffice/libreoffice/-/commit/d2e
tag 1066473: + pending
thanks
Hi,
Am 13.03.24 um 12:53 schrieb Lucas Nussbaum:
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Interesting. I almost wanted to tag it unreproducible since it didn't
happen in my already-existing chroot... But it definitely does
Source: esnacc
Version: 1.8.1-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-impfuncdef
Hi,
esnacc FTBFS:
gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -I./asn1specs
-I./asn1specs -I./c-lib/inc -g -O2 -Werror=implicit-function-declar
block 1058545 by 1058653
tag 1058545 + patch
thanks
Hi,
This is due to
> dh_installdocs: error: Cannot find (any matches for) "doc/Esnacc.pdf"
(tried in .)
which is due to
(cd /home/rene/esnacc-1.8.1/doc && unzip eSNACCManuals.zip &&
libreoffice --headless --convert-to pdf Esnacc.doc)
Arc
block 1058545 by 1058653
tag 1058545 + patch
thanks
Hi,
This is due to
dh_installdocs: error: Cannot find (any matches for) "doc/Esnacc.pdf"
(tried in .)
which is due to
(cd /home/rene/esnacc-1.8.1/doc && unzip eSNACCManuals.zip &&
libreoffice --headless --convert-to pdf Esnacc.doc)
Arc
Hi,
Am 13.12.23 um 16:19 schrieb Andreas Tille:
Control: tags -1 help
Am Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 09:52:48PM +0100 schrieb Lucas Nussbaum:
/usr/bin/install: cannot stat './parallel_cheat_bw.pdf': No such file or
directory
This file is (re-)created via
libreoffice --headless --convert-to pdf
Package: libxml2
Version: 2.12.3+dfsg-0exp1
Severity: serious
Dear Maintainer,
Hi,
LibreOffice builds (patch available), but doesn't yet build with 2.12.
But that is not the point of this issue.
While test building current 24.2 snapshot which will become 24.2 rc1
later this week I get
[build L
Am Tue, Dec 19, 2023 at 08:03:56PM +0100 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
> LibreOffice builds (patch available), but doesn't yet build with 2.12.
"... but doesn't yet succeed the tests with 2.12"
> S=/home/rene/LibreOffice/git/libreoffice-24-2 && I=$S/instdir &
Package: libxml2-dev
Severity: serious
Version: 2.12.7+dfsg-1
root@frodo:/# dpkg -l | grep lzma
ii liblzma5:amd64 5.6.1+really5.4.5-1
amd64XZ-format compression library
root@frodo:/# pkg-config --cflags libxml-2.0
Package liblzma was not found in the pkg-conf
Hi,
Am 25.05.24 um 14:00 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
root@frodo:/# pkg-config --cflags libxml-2.0
Package liblzma was not found in the pkg-config search path.
Perhaps you should add the directory containing `liblzma.pc'
to the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable
Package 'liblzma
Hi,
same with zlib:
Package 'zlib', required by 'libxml-2.0', not found
(from https://ci.debian.net/packages/i/igraph/testing/amd64/47001876/)
Regards,
Rene
severity 1051474 important
thanks
Hi,
Am 08.09.23 um 19:19 schrieb Bastien Roucariès:
Source: libreoffice
Severity: serious
Tags: security
Justification: Document embdeded code copy + copyright
X-Debbugs-Cc: Debian Security Team
Since when is that serious? It isn't. There have been no compl
Source: lasso
Severity: serious
Version: 2.8.2-1
Tags: patch
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: time-t
Hi,
I just saw lasso has
libxmlsec1-dev,
libxmlsec1-openssl,
in Build-Depends. What for? If this was versioned this could be
understandable, but it isn't.
And give
Hi,
Am 02.03.24 um 18:42 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
So as this library is now libxmlsec1t64-openssl this Build-Depends: is
now unfullfillable.
At least for 32bit archs like armel/armhf (which don't have Provides:
libxmlsec1-openssl) or a future package-named package due to ABI changes
Hi,
Am 05.03.24 um 00:47 schrieb Andreas Beckmann:
Preparing to unpack .../libreoffice-common_4%3a24.2.1-3_all.deb ...
Unpacking libreoffice-common (4:24.2.1-3) over (4:24.2.0-1) ...
dpkg: error processing archive
/var/cache/apt/archives/libreoffice-common_4%3a24.2.1-3_all.deb (--unpac
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1065461 in libreoffice reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/libreoffice-team/libreoffice/libreoffice/-/commit/6bf
severity 1070862 serious
thanks
Hi,
this is even worse. It looses the library file for the "non-main"
libraries after cleanup:
Clean testing chroot.
# apt install libpoppler-dev libpoppler-cpp-dev
[...]
# apt update
# apt dist-upgrade
The following packages were automatically installed and
tag 36 - patch
thanks
Damyan Ivanov wrote:
> attached is a patch to make softmac-snapshot build again. It basically
> does s/2.6.15-1/2.6.16-2/ and fixes Build-Depends to use
> linux-headers-2.6.16-2-all.
>
> Also, Standards-Version is bumped (no changes).
>
> pbuilder builds the package, li
Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 10, 2006 at 04:41:31PM +0300, Damyan Ivanov wrote:
> > This package may get removed right now then. It dosen't build now and
> > will never build (IIUC) so...
>
> In that case, you might want to file a bug against the ftp.debian.org
> pseudopackage and req
Filipus Klutiero wrote:
> Rene, what evidence is there that this bug affects Etch?
Because I somehow thought the sarge-security fixed libfreetype6 went
into etch, too thorough the propagation mechanism (or at least did so).
also got a report on etch after that upgrade with that version number.
An
Package: tetex-doc
Version: 3.0-11
Severity: serious
Removing tetex-doc ...
mktexlsr: Updating /var/lib/texmf/ls-R-TEXMFMAIN...
mktexlsr: Updating /var/lib/texmf/ls-R-TEXMFDIST-TETEX...
mktexlsr: Updating /var/cache/fonts/ls-R...
mktexlsr: Updating /var/lib/texmf/ls-R...
mktexlsr: Done.
rm: cannot
[ note that I am *not* myspell-et's maintainer, but myspell-de-*'s which also
is buiolt from ispell, but with upstreams Makefile. Which is apparently what
Björn does also for the de_DE* stuff for the zips ]
Hi,
most packages in Debian do build directly from the ispell stuff and work.
Thast est
Hi,
Well, I first received that error as I deinstalled libpam-opensc and
installed libpam-p11 instead. Then I started to get that error. So I
don't think it has to do with wrong PIN input
*IIRC* I also reinstalled pam-opensc and it then worked. but not sure
anymore.
Regards,
Rene
signatur
Package: eclipse
Version: 3.1.2-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
sorry, no log available but eclipse tried to overwrite file(s) (iirc
/usr/bin/eclipse) from eclipse-platform-common but fails to declare
appropriate relationships which does fail on a upgrade run where
eclipse is unpacked first...
Regards,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
tag 358833 + confirmed
# there isn't "cantfix"...
tag 358833 + wontfix
# the module will be in 2.6.17
tag 358833 + fixed-upstream
thanks
Hi,
For the bugs sake info:
- - Forwarded message from Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: ooqstart-gnome
Severity: grave
The openoffice.org packages in sid conflict against the current
oooqstart-gnome in sid because it needs to be updated because OOo2 does
not accept the arguments used by oooqstart-gnome anymore.
Please update; suitable patches can for example be found in the
tag 339439 + moreinfo
tag 339439 + unreproducible
severity 339439 important
thanks
Hi,
Alexander Schmehl wrote:
> > when an image is inserted in a presentation from a file, the image
> > colors are wrongly rendered during a fullscreen slide show. The color
> > rendering is correct in the windowe
Matej Cepl wrote:
> On Sat 10. December 2005 16:47, Matej Cepl wrote:
> > I am not sure, whether it is correct, but when applied patch
> > from http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=47835, I
> > was able to create new version of package which seems to work.
>
> Correction, no it doesn't
tag 358570 + pending
thanks
Julien Langer wrote:
> Seems like this error was caused by an old version of
> openoffice.org-gnome.
> I upgraded the openoffice.org-gnome package from 2.0.1-5 to 2.0.2-2 and
> now everything works fine again.
Ah. Thanks. Although I wonder how you got that mismatch; pr
reassign 359297 openoffice.org
severity 359297 grave
merge 358570 359297
thanks
Hi,
Tom Parker wrote:
> openoffice.org-writer had been upgraded to 2.0.2-2, but
> openoffice.org-gnome was still at 2.0.1-5. With this combination, writer
> crashes on startup with the appended debug log. Upgrading -g
Package: openoffice.org2-soikko
Version: 1.0.1-1
Severity: serious
1) You only build-depend on openoffice.org-dev (>= 2.0) which is not
enough. You need to build-depend on openoffice.org-dev (>= 2.0.2)
because there the SDK wrapper scripts got added again. With earlier
versions you need to set LD_
Package: openoffice.org2-soikko
Version: 1.0.1-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
you install the component via a uno package system-wide using unopkg.
While this is the normal way this is to be done it doesn't reliably work
on OOo upgrades. At least with the Wikipedia plugin for OOo I somethimes
had to rem
tag 360489 + moreinfo
thanks
Hi,
Bill Allombert wrote:
> When doin a upgrade of a clean sarge installation, apt-get and aptitude
> attempt to remove openoffice.org. This is 100% reproducible.
>
> # aptitude --with-recommends dist-upgrade
> The following packages will be REMOVED:
> base-config
Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Bill Allombert wrote:
> > When doin a upgrade of a clean sarge installation, apt-get and aptitude
> > attempt to remove openoffice.org. This is 100% reproducible.
> >
> > # aptitude --with-recommends dist-upgrade
> > The following pac
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[ it would be nice if you could send mail also to me when you ask
something to me. thanks. hint: [EMAIL PROTECTED] only goes to the
*maintainer* and the buglog ]
Hi,
Jarno Elonen wrote:
> > you install the component via a uno package system-wide usin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[ please keep me in the loop. Hint: [EMAIL PROTECTED] does *not* go
to the submitter but only to the maintainer and the buglog ]
Hi.
Jarno Elonen wrote:
> > 4) You build with g++-3.3, you *sure* that it will work with the g++-4.0
> > built OOo and li
Hi,
Jarno Elonen wrote:
> > 2) the default *is* 4.0. since months.
>
> Yes, however, OOo doesn't seems to be compiled with it yet.
wrong. It is. We use g++ 4.0. Since it became default.
> > > How about CPPUHELPERLIB? Will libuno_cppuhelpergcc4 appear automatically
> > > once OOo is rebuilt with
tag 360548 + moreinfo
thanis
Am Montag 03 April 2006 09:05 schrieb Rami Lehti:
> Openoffice crashes on every startup.
> Other GTK apps work normally. And in case you are wondering
> ii libgtk2.0-02.8.16-1 The GTK+ graphical user interface
> library
>
>
> Program received signal SIGSEGV,
301 - 400 of 1325 matches
Mail list logo
