Hello,
I just finished using the "Pseudo-Image Kit" to get the iso image of
2.2_rev2 and wanted to comment on one minor thing in the "readme.txt"
file. (btw, I was using the Windows .zip version)
The example of the rsync command still shows /2.1/ as part of the path
and while I was aware tha
Le Sun, Apr 15, 2001 at 06:55:43PM +0200, Attila Nagy écrivait:
> So could somebody tell what are the exact parameters of a good Debian CD?
- bootable (at least the first CD)
- good official packages
- good documentation
- works with dpkg-multicd and apt-cdrom
It's difficult to check automatical
On Sun, 15 Apr 2001, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Le Sun, Apr 15, 2001 at 12:18:26AM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe écrivait:
> > 1) Make the empty file dists/woody/aptignr
> > - This tells apt-cdrom that the CD is foobar'd below this directory
> >and it should just ignore it.
>
> Does thi
On Sat, 14 Apr 2001, Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn wrote:
>On Sat, 14 Apr 2001, Santiago Vila wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 13 Apr 2001, Philip Charles wrote:
>>
>> > On Fri, 13 Apr 2001, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>> >
>> > > No more than all the other ugly things that have been suggested, and this
>> > > only aff
Hello,
> If it is unoffical, loop mount it and compare the image's /md5sums.txt
> with the archives ./indices/md5sums.gz
That's not enough.
For example I have Packages* files with a length of 0 byte. It could be
important to check the MD5 checksums, but it is more important to check
the other sm
Le Sun, Apr 15, 2001 at 12:18:26AM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe écrivait:
> 1) Make the empty file dists/woody/aptignr
> - This tells apt-cdrom that the CD is foobar'd below this directory
>and it should just ignore it.
Does this feature already exist ? If not, please consider calling i
Le Sat, Apr 14, 2001 at 08:15:49PM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe écrivait:
> > > It will add them both and it becomes trivial for someone to defeat the
> > > security mechanisms.
>
> > Why ?
>
> What do you mean 'Why?' Put the bad files in the insecure space and
> let-er-rip.
I can't understand tha
On Sat, Apr 14, 2001 at 05:02:10PM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
[snip]
> I *really* don't see why this is necessary. How is writing:
> deb file:/.../ woody-secured main
> any better than writing
> deb-partial file:/.../ woody main
> ?
>
> Even with this scheme you still need to have the 'deb-par
On Sun, 15 Apr 2001, Attila Nagy wrote:
> Hello,
>
> > > I have used this myself. It is a good way to test an image. It is also
> > > used by people who have borrowed CDs and do not have a burner.
> I think a validity checking part in debian-cd would be very nice.
>
> BTW, what's the correct
On Sat, 14 Apr 2001, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>
> On Sat, 14 Apr 2001, Philip Charles wrote:
>
> > A CD (or iso image) is essentially one file and the integrity of this can
> > be verified by a single signed checksum.
>
> No, that is such an oversimplification and what you have described of the
10 matches
Mail list logo
