Package: cdimage.debian.org
As a reminder for me: the latest weekly build failed, looks like
source packages no longer fit???
--
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com
"C++ ate my sanity" -- Jon Rabone
Hi,
Wilhelm MOSER (2022-06-18):
> Ja, das ist mir schon klar nur wenn debina das release macht dann muss doch
> zumindest das notwendigste funktionieren.
> Wenn in der LXDe dann bei XY die Maus nicht geht ist das eben ein bug wenn
> ich das ding sber nich mal installieren kann dann setzt es aus.
Ja, das ist mir schon klar nur wenn debina das release macht dann
muss doch zumindest das notwendigste funktionieren.
Wenn in der LXDe dann bei XY die Maus nicht geht ist das eben ein bug
wenn ich das ding sber nich mal installieren kann dann setzt es aus.
Und ich hab null bock das Ding am H
Das generelle Problem dürfte U-Boot sein #76 beschäftigt sich mit diesem
Problem. Offensichtlich muß man sich den Loader selbst
zusammenbasteln...?
https://forum.pine64.org/showthread.php?tid=9744&pid=110033#pid110033
Am 17.06.2022 16:52, schrieb Wilhelm MOSER:
Hi,
tried to do an install
Hi,
tried to do an install from usb like I did on amd64 (without any
problems and WiFi support) and run
into several troubles:
1. it took 5 minutes to reckon that the LAN is not present why?
2. Wireless keyboard not detected - USB-Cord is OK.
3. grub installer - install and graphical -
Hi Charles,
Thanks for taking the time to report your problems - it's appreciated!
If you can answer some of my questions below, that would be very
helpful too.
On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 01:49:48PM +1300, schatzclan wrote:
>Package: cdimage.debian.org
>
>I have two PC boxes:
>
>1997-vintage - i586-
Hi,
Sam Hartman wrote:
> I'd ask that when interacting with end users, you be more clear about
> what you're trying to do.
I am trying to answer this question from the bug report:
> > Could it be that the hybrid CD/USB iso is causing problems?
The answer is for now:
It might be a problem with M
> "Thomas" == Thomas Schmitt writes:
Thomas> Hi,
Thomas> Sam Hartman wrote:
>> Why do we care if it mounts on a third mac?
Thomas> I care in my role as upstream of xorriso.
OK.
I'd ask that when interacting with end users, you be more clear about
what you're trying to do.
I'
Hi,
Sam Hartman wrote:
> Why do we care if it mounts on a third mac?
I care in my role as upstream of xorriso.
As for debian-cd, any oddity of installation ISOs should be inspected
and judged whether it demands action.
I see i forgot to Cc: the bug reporter.
Hi ! There are replies to see at:
Why does mountability matter anyway?
The interesting question is whether it boots on the target system,
right? Why do we care if it mounts on a third mac?
Hi,
(This is about the aspect Mac mountability, not about the aspect of
suitable performance during or after installation..)
Shirish Agarwal wrote:
> Would it be possible to upload the image to someplace where the OP
> could download and use it and see if that works for him.
It is nearly 4 GB o
at bottom :-
On 17/01/2017, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> i made a copy + paste error with the repacking command.
> Option -apm-block-size lacks its parameter "2048".
>
> Correct would be:
>
> mount debian-8.6.0-i386-DVD-1.iso /mnt/iso
>
> xorriso -as mkisofs \
> -o test.iso \
> -
Hi,
i made a copy + paste error with the repacking command.
Option -apm-block-size lacks its parameter "2048".
Correct would be:
mount debian-8.6.0-i386-DVD-1.iso /mnt/iso
xorriso -as mkisofs \
-o test.iso \
-V 'Debian 8.6.0 i386 1' \
--modification-date='2016091713290100' \
Hi,
schatzclan wrote:
> unexpectedly larger
> actual file size (642M) vs reported size (613M) for the “i386 8.x.0 LXDE
> CD#1” iso.
This is explainable from the difference of programmer's MiB and IEC's MB:
642.0 / 1024 / 1024 * 1000 * 1000 = 612.2589111328125
> The “i386 8.5.0 XFCE CD#1” ISO
at bottom :-
On 17/01/2017, schatzclan wrote:
> Package: cdimage.debian.org
>
> I have two PC boxes:
>
> 1997-vintage - i586-200Mhz/128M/6.3G. I have given up installing Debian
> due to performance issues and a problem with “i386 8.x.0 LXDE CD#1”, as
> the hybrid iso images on versions 8.5.0, 8.6
Package: cdimage.debian.org
I have two PC boxes:
1997-vintage - i586-200Mhz/128M/6.3G. I have given up installing Debian
due to performance issues and a problem with “i386 8.x.0 LXDE CD#1”, as
the hybrid iso images on versions 8.5.0, 8.6.0 and 8.7.0 seem to be
damaged. The MD5 checksums all s
Pressage gravure duplication de vos supports numériques CD DVD CD-ROM BLU-RAY
CONTACT Patrick cont...@pressage-cd-dvd-somuch.com Port: 06.11.54.05.80.
Bienvenue sur le site de So Much, votre partenaire pour le pressage, la gravure
et la duplication de
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 10:24:14PM +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
>Hi Steve,
>
>Steve McIntyre wrote:
>> I know that the kFreeBSD ports are not being officially released
>> [1]. What plans (if any) have been made for any *un*official releases?
>> I've just removed the BSD builds from the debian-c
Hi Steve,
Steve McIntyre wrote:
> I know that the kFreeBSD ports are not being officially released
> [1]. What plans (if any) have been made for any *un*official releases?
> I've just removed the BSD builds from the debian-cd architecture lists
> in preparation for next weekend, but I've not heard
Jimmy Johnson (2015-04-21):
> Can the mini.iso be made to work with "unetbootin" or any of the iso's
> for that matter ? I've been trying off and on for month's to get
> KFeeBSD installed with no luck.
Don't use unetbootin and just use dd, cat, or cp as advised in the
installation guide. unetboo
On 04/19/2015 08:04 AM, Steve McIntyre wrote:
Hi folks,
I know that the kFreeBSD ports are not being officially released
[1]. What plans (if any) have been made for any *un*official releases?
I've just removed the BSD builds from the debian-cd architecture lists
in preparation for next weekend,
Steve McIntyre (2015-04-19):
> I know that the kFreeBSD ports are not being officially released
> [1]. What plans (if any) have been made for any *un*official releases?
> I've just removed the BSD builds from the debian-cd architecture lists
> in preparation for next weekend, but I've not heard an
Hi folks,
I know that the kFreeBSD ports are not being officially released
[1]. What plans (if any) have been made for any *un*official releases?
I've just removed the BSD builds from the debian-cd architecture lists
in preparation for next weekend, but I've not heard anything more...
[1] https:/
I wrote Makefile for Debian CD/DVD labels.
http://akuroiwa.env-reform.com/en/many-labels/html/index.html
Please download the tarball which includes labels here:
http://akuroiwa.env-reform.com/
Sincerely yours,
--
Akihiro Kuroiwa
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-cd-requ
Dear all:
(The entire email refers specifically to KDE on Debian_7.7.0_amd64)
I am new to Debian.
I need to be able to install packages offline through the CD/DVD sets.
According to page 103 of "debian-handbook.pdf", I need to execute *apt-cdrom
add* before *apt-get install [name]*
I have setup a new mirror.
Site: mirror.agmn.ca
CD/DVD Images over HTTP: /mirror/debian-cd/
IPv6: Yes
Main mirror is updated from: cdimage.debian.org
Mirrored architectures: All
Location: Toronto, Canada
Speed: 100mbps
Site Maintainer: Kaleb
Email of site maintainer: mirrorad...@agmn.ca
Milan Kupcevic (2013-05-02):
> Hi Cyril,
>
> Patch [0] supplied by Frank Fegert fixes this bug. Can we push partconf
> 1.41 with this fix in Wheezy r1? It will allow installation of Debian on
> VIOS virtual drives in LPAR's of IBM Power machines.
>
> Milan
>
> [0] http://lists.gnu.org/archive/h
name:didik imam muslimin. Mailling address: jalan raya sambikenceng no
23 ds sambikenceng ds katerban rt 7 rw 11 baron. City: ngamjuk. State:
jawatimur. Code: 64394 country : indonesia. Ponsel: 081515189064.
Email: pvc...@gmail.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-cd-requ...@lists.debian.org
w
ebsd-*, another is the rest.
Since most users' needs is limited to those x86, I guess. If we'd use
new device to create x86 images at least, it's better than now.
(probably we can create *hourly* CD/DVD images)
It's not perfect choice (of course) but better cost performanc
Hey Hideki,
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 10:34:13PM +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote:
>On Sun, 16 Jun 2013 02:26:01 +0100
>Steve McIntyre wrote:
>> Building a (potentially large) set of images for an individual
>> architecture takes ~30-40 minutes end-to-end; we currently build for
>> the following 15 arche
Hi Steve,
Thank you for your reply.
On Sun, 16 Jun 2013 02:26:01 +0100
Steve McIntyre wrote:
> Building a (potentially large) set of images for an individual
> architecture takes ~30-40 minutes end-to-end; we currently build for
> the following 15 arches:
>
> i386 source amd64 multi-arch powe
On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 09:54:27AM +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote:
>Hi,
>
> @debian tweeted as https://twitter.com/debian/status/330678506121994240
> "#Debian #wheezy - CD/DVD/Blue-Ray image building expected to take around 8
> hours end to end"
>
> How long does it
Hi,
@debian tweeted as https://twitter.com/debian/status/330678506121994240
"#Debian #wheezy - CD/DVD/Blue-Ray image building expected to take around 8
hours end to end"
How long does it take to create image on cdimage build server, and
what takes so long time (8 hours)? Becaus
On Tue, 14 May 2013 15:34:50 +0100
Steve McIntyre wrote:
> >> This is a (very, very) frequently asked question:
> >>
> >> http://www.debian.org/CD/faq/#not-all-images
> >>
> >> Other disc images are meant to be downloaded/assembled with jigdo.
> >
> > Thanks Mateusz, that's what I want :)
> >
>
On Tue, 14 May 2013 15:33:53 +0100
Steve McIntyre wrote:
> On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 05:03:04PM +0200, Mateusz Poszwa wrote:
> >On Sun, 12 May 2013 20:35:51 +0900
> >Hideki Yamane wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> During Tokyo Debian meeting on Saturday, one participant asked
> >> "why there's les
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 09:52:24AM +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote:
>On Sun, 12 May 2013 17:03:04 +0200
>Mateusz Poszwa wrote:
>> This is a (very, very) frequently asked question:
>>
>> http://www.debian.org/CD/faq/#not-all-images
>>
>> Other disc images are meant to be downloaded/assembled with jigd
On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 05:03:04PM +0200, Mateusz Poszwa wrote:
>On Sun, 12 May 2013 20:35:51 +0900
>Hideki Yamane wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> During Tokyo Debian meeting on Saturday, one participant asked
>> "why there's less DVD images on cdimage.d.o than MD5SUMS files?"
>>
>> Probably this woul
On Sun, 12 May 2013 17:03:04 +0200
Mateusz Poszwa wrote:
> This is a (very, very) frequently asked question:
>
> http://www.debian.org/CD/faq/#not-all-images
>
> Other disc images are meant to be downloaded/assembled with jigdo.
Thanks Mateusz, that's what I want :)
And how about adding "If-
On Sun, 12 May 2013 20:35:51 +0900
Hideki Yamane wrote:
> Hi,
>
> During Tokyo Debian meeting on Saturday, one participant asked
> "why there's less DVD images on cdimage.d.o than MD5SUMS files?"
>
> Probably this would be to reduce unnecessary download, but
> is there any information for
Hi,
During Tokyo Debian meeting on Saturday, one participant asked
"why there's less DVD images on cdimage.d.o than MD5SUMS files?"
Probably this would be to reduce unnecessary download, but
is there any information for this? (just curious)
--
Regards,
Hideki Yamane henrich @ debian.
Hi Debain team,
I want to share my new CD/DVD art for Debian Wheezy:
http://wiki.debian.org/DebianArt/Themes/growing#Install_DVD_cover
http://wiki.debian.org/DebianArt/Themes/penguinSpirit#Install_CD_cover
http://wiki.debian.org/DebianArt/Themes/onFire#Install_CD_cover
And I think the
Control: reassign -1 partconf
Control: tag -1 +wheezy +pending
Control: severity -1 serious
Hi Cyril,
Patch [0] supplied by Frank Fegert fixes this bug. Can we push partconf
1.41 with this fix in Wheezy r1? It will allow installation of Debian on
VIOS virtual drives in LPAR's of IBM Power machin
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 cdrom-checker
Bug #701099 [debian-cd] debian-cd: installer fails with two CD/DVD drives
Bug reassigned from package 'debian-cd' to 'cdrom-checker'.
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #701099 to the same values
Control: reassign -1 cdrom-checker
Control: severity -1 important
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 03:58:36PM +0100, Andreas Stempfhuber wrote:
>Package: debian-cd
>Severity: critical
>Tags: d-i
>Justification: breaks the whole system
Dropping the severity and reassigning. This definitely isn't an issue
i
o continue the installation.
I assume this is a general issue when there is more than one CD/DVD drive
available on the system.
I made a few photos to document the issue and uploaded them to
http://www.afulinux.de/tmp/debian-cd/
Thanks
Andi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-cd-requ...@lists.
do at the OF prompt that will
load and run the stage-one boot loader?
I was not able to figure out how to do it from OF. Apple machines are
looking for the blessed file if 'C' key is held pressed during the
machine start-up. It is the "official" manufacturer prescribed way to
boot
7;C' key is held pressed during the
machine start-up. It is the "official" manufacturer prescribed way to
boot a Mac from a CD/DVD.
Booting Apple PowerPC machines form USB is undocumented and unsupported
by the manufacturer. Thus the troubles an inconsistencies.
>
> If it's not p
essed stage one boot loader script. That is making the difference.
I just tried booting that installer from a physical CD-ROM on the
G4. I
got the expected (32-bit) messages.
So, I guess booting from a CD sets something in the OF environment
that
isn't being set when booting from
from a physical CD-ROM. Should that
>> make any difference?
When you load yaboot binary directly from Open Firmware you are skipping
blessed stage one boot loader script. That is making the difference.
>
> I just tried booting that installer from a physical CD-ROM on the G4. I
>
On Aug 29, 2012, at 4:25 PM, Rick Thomas wrote:
I just tried booting a PowerMac G4 with the Wheezy installer image
"built on 20120826-03:23" (details of where I downloaded it from,
etc available on request).
The G4 is a 32-bit machine, but it seems to be offering me the
choices for a 6
On Aug 4, 2012, at 10:22 AM, Milan Kupcevic wrote:
On 08/04/2012 12:41 PM, Steve McIntyre wrote:
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 05:56:54PM -0400, Milan Kupcevic wrote:
This is a Debian installation ${MEDIA_TYPE},
built on ${BUILD_DATE}.
+
Enter one of the following options to begin:
-install 3
Your message dated Fri, 24 Aug 2012 14:47:43 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#678066: fixed in debian-cd 3.1.10
has caused the Debian Bug report #678066,
regarding Proposal to simplify PowerPC CD/DVD boot options
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 678066 +pending
Bug #678066 [debian-cd] Proposal to simplify PowerPC CD/DVD boot options
Bug #614583 [debian-cd] debian-cd: Boot prompt for powerpc does not make
install64 sufficiently prominent
Added tag(s) pending.
Added tag(s) pend
tags 678066 +pending
thanks
On Sat, Aug 04, 2012 at 01:22:19PM -0400, Milan Kupcevic wrote:
>On 08/04/2012 12:41 PM, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 05:56:54PM -0400, Milan Kupcevic wrote:
>>> This is a Debian installation ${MEDIA_TYPE},
>>> built on ${BUILD_DATE}.
>>>
>>> +
>>> E
On 08/04/2012 12:41 PM, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 05:56:54PM -0400, Milan Kupcevic wrote:
>> This is a Debian installation ${MEDIA_TYPE},
>> built on ${BUILD_DATE}.
>>
>> +
>> Enter one of the following options to begin:
>>
>> -install 32-bit processor (G4 or earlier)
>> -
Hi Milan,
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 05:56:54PM -0400, Milan Kupcevic wrote:
>Package: debian-cd
>Tags: patch d-i wheezy
>Severity: wishlist
>
>Hello,
>
>I would like to propose a slight change in the way PowerPC CD/DVD boots.
OK...
>CD/DVD boot-script, which runs on P
Any chance d-i beta 1 install CD/DVDs for PowerPC will get simplified
boot options?
Milan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-cd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4fe2a230.8090...@physics.ha
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 678066 +sid
Bug #678066 [debian-cd] Proposal to simplify PowerPC CD/DVD boot options
Added tag(s) sid.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
678066: http://bugs.debian.org/c
Package: debian-cd
Tags: patch d-i wheezy
Severity: wishlist
Hello,
I would like to propose a slight change in the way PowerPC CD/DVD boots.
CD/DVD boot-script, which runs on PowerPC Mac machines, can detect
whether it runs on 32-bit or 64-bit processor, then offer boot options
accordingly
I share Steve's opinion.
Em 26-11-2011 13:22, Steve McIntyre escreveu:
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 05:21:34PM +0200, Alexey Eromenko wrote:
Hi All !
Proposal: Replace CD media with BD (Blu-Ray Disc, 25 GB) media on HTTP
mirrors for Wheezy.
After looking a bit at Debian mirrors, the situation loo
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 05:21:34PM +0200, Alexey Eromenko wrote:
>Hi All !
>
>Proposal: Replace CD media with BD (Blu-Ray Disc, 25 GB) media on HTTP
>mirrors for Wheezy.
>
>After looking a bit at Debian mirrors, the situation looks as-if
>pre-made CDs becoming a dead animal.
>
>Seriously.. look her
Hi All !
Proposal: Replace CD media with BD (Blu-Ray Disc, 25 GB) media on HTTP
mirrors for Wheezy.
After looking a bit at Debian mirrors, the situation looks as-if
pre-made CDs becoming a dead animal.
Seriously.. look here:
http://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/6.0.3/amd64/iso-cd/
Debian Squeeze
Dear all,
I have notified Debian that I have establised a Debian CD/DVD store on
http://www.zenika.gr that is in Greece but still not see it on the
Debians website.
Can anyone help me find out why?
Alexius Dionysius Diakogiannis
Chief Executive Officer
Zenika Hellas
t: 801 700 7374 / +30 211
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 05:14:03PM +0200, null0xff0...@gmail.com wrote:
>Hello!
>
>I downloaded debian testing DVD and CD 1 of weekly-builds, 7/6/2010 and
>today, week 14/6/2010. All CD's and DVD fails in the installation in the
>point to create file system ext3. I burning different CD's and DVD's,
Hello!
I downloaded debian testing DVD and CD 1 of weekly-builds, 7/6/2010 and
today, week 14/6/2010. All CD's and DVD fails in the installation in the
point to create file system ext3. I burning different CD's and DVD's, but
the same problem. The MD5 is correct for all isos... and if* I use and o
huge
> > amounts of space on the mirrors.
>
> Umm... may be I mis-interpreted the contents of MD5SUMS and SHA1SUMS as
>
> "There are all of these ISO files here, which have these sums
> values that should be checked after these ISOs downloaded, before
and SHA1SUMS as
"There are all of these ISO files here, which have these sums
values that should be checked after these ISOs downloaded, before
they get burned into CD/DVD/BD".
So it might be my ignorant, but should there be something such as
On Wednesday 03 March 2010, Simon Paillard wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 02, 2010 at 11:03:26AM +0700, Chatchai Jantaraprim wrote:
> > Does the contents there up-to-date? For example
> > http://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/5.0.4/i386/iso-bd/
All the "missing" images are not included *as ISOs* on purpose. S
Package: cdimage.debian.org
Hi,
Based on a report from Chatchai Jantaraprim on debian-mirr...@lists.d.o.
On Tue, Mar 02, 2010 at 11:03:26AM +0700, Chatchai Jantaraprim wrote:
> Does the contents there up-to-date? For example
> http://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/5.0.4/i386/iso-bd/
>
> the MD5SU
company name :Digital studios
URL : http://www.digitalstudios.tk
e-mail address : tahwe...@gmail.com
phone number :00923343755124
country :Pakistan
whether you ship internationally : yes
Allow contribution: no
Architecture :i386, amd64,source
company name :Digital studios
URL : http://www.digitalstudios.tk
e-mail address : tahwe...@gmail.com
phone number :00923343755124
country :Pakistan
whether you ship internationally : yes
The daily and weekly builds for alpha haven't been working for quite a
while, and it's not expected to release with squeeze. Hence I've
turned off those builds now.
--
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com
"The problem with defending the purity of the Engl
ok, i know that You wont post it:) but just take a look at those links to my
cd/dvd labels, i have added few more interesting files today, so go:
http://www.debianart.org/cchost/?ccm=/media/files/gggrzesiek/570
warm regards
gggrzesiek
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 01:45:52PM +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 04:07:15PM +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>>As promised to various people, just a quick heads-up of the likely
>>image names and layout for the lenny build at the weekend. I've been
>>doing test runs today and th
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 04:07:15PM +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>As promised to various people, just a quick heads-up of the likely
>image names and layout for the lenny build at the weekend. I've been
>doing test runs today and the names should be very like the following
>(i386-only, but I'm sure
As promised to various people, just a quick heads-up of the likely
image names and layout for the lenny build at the weekend. I've been
doing test runs today and the names should be very like the following
(i386-only, but I'm sure you can extrapolate). For the base directory
for these when I build
On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 10:51:41AM +0100, Mattias Wadenstein wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Dec 2008, Frans Pop wrote:
> >On Thursday 04 December 2008, Frank Lin PIAT wrote:
> >>I have noticed that Ubuntu only advertises CD1 on their download page.
> >>I think it is really sensible: The CD-1 contains Xwindow,
On Dec 30, 2008, at 1:36 PM, Frans Pop wrote:
On Tuesday 30 December 2008, Rick Thomas wrote:
Given that all the necessary packages will be available on the DVD,
doesn't it make more sense to do the selection in tasksel, rather
than at boot-time? It would certainly be more convenient for the
On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 10:23:33PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
>
>I think we have the following options here:
>1) keep the m-a DVD as it is: GNOME only and i386/amd64/ppc/source
> (3rd column in 1st table, or 1st column in 2nd table)
>2) drop ppc from existing m-a DVD, GNOME only, but with hugely inc
On Tuesday 30 December 2008, Rick Thomas wrote:
> Given that all the necessary packages will be available on the DVD,
> doesn't it make more sense to do the selection in tasksel, rather
> than at boot-time? It would certainly be more convenient for the
> user. IMHO, doing it at boot time violates
On Dec 30, 2008, at 6:52 AM, Frans Pop wrote:
On Tuesday 30 December 2008, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 09:11:20AM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
The regular powerpc DVD will switch from GNOME-based to all-desktop.
The only thing missing is offering boot options to select different
On Tuesday 30 December 2008, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 09:11:20AM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> > The regular powerpc DVD will switch from GNOME-based to all-desktop.
> > The only thing missing is offering boot options to select different
> > desktop environments as we'll now do
On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 09:11:20AM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> The regular powerpc DVD will switch from GNOME-based to all-desktop. The
> only thing missing is offering boot options to select different desktop
> environments as we'll now do for x86, but that could possibly be
> implemented by some
On Tuesday 30 December 2008, Andrew Lee wrote:
> So the question would be source vs ppc arch support, which is more
> useful for our users on the multi-arch DVD for the purpose?
>
> I think only people who don't have good internet connection would need
> source packages. And I guess rare of these p
On Tuesday 30 December 2008, Rick Thomas wrote:
> I'm only a user and a tester, so I don't get to vote, but I'd go for
Of course you get to vote (and "vote" here is more just an expression of
preference than an official count anyway).
> the increased utility of dropping ppc from the multi-arch/m
Hello folks,
Frans Pop wrote:
> I think we have the following options here:
> 3) change m-a DVD to support all desktop environments; drop powerpc
>(3rd column in 2nd table)
> 4) something I have not investigated: drop source...
>
> My personal vote goes to option 3.
For my personal opinion,
On Dec 29, 2008, at 4:43 PM, Frans Pop wrote:
Powerpc is very definitely losing its user base (just compare the
number
of macbooks (ppc based!) you see now at conferences with what you
saw 3
or 4 years ago.
Actually, "MacBook" is the name for the Intel-based Apple laptops.
The PowerPC bas
On Thursday 04 December 2008, peter green wrote:
> > The i386/amd64/powerpc DVD is more problematic as having all desktops
> > will completely fill the DVD leaving no room for other packages with
> > a high popcon score.
> > Proposal is therefore to drop powerpc support from this DVD. With
> > only
On Wednesday 03 December 2008, Frans Pop wrote:
> multi-arch images
> -
> The i386/amd64/powerpc DVD is more problematic as having all desktops
> will completely fill the DVD leaving no room for other packages with a
> high popcon score.
> Proposal is therefore to drop powerpc suppo
On Mon, 29 Dec 2008, Frans Pop wrote:
On Thursday 04 December 2008, Frank Lin PIAT wrote:
I have noticed that Ubuntu only advertises CD1 on their download page.
I think it is really sensible: The CD-1 contains Xwindow, so a [new]
user gets a usable desktop... even if he/she face network connect
On Thursday 04 December 2008, Christian Perrier wrote:
> In short: installs from CD will offer all desktops but only GNOME is
> installable without the network or other CDs. Do I understand
> correctly?
Not quite.
Installs from CD will _offer_ only the default GNOME: there will be no
option to s
On Thursday 04 December 2008, Frank Lin PIAT wrote:
> I have noticed that Ubuntu only advertises CD1 on their download page.
> I think it is really sensible: The CD-1 contains Xwindow, so a [new]
> user gets a usable desktop... even if he/she face network connectivity
> problem.
Actually I think U
Quoting Frans Pop ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Now that everybody has had a chance to take a look at the patches and try
> out the test images (ahem...) we should decide how to use the new options
Ahem, as you say...:-)
I was planning to do such testing next week-end as I had no
opportunity to do it
The i386/amd64/powerpc DVD is more problematic as having all desktops will
completely fill the DVD leaving no room for other packages with a high
popcon score.
Proposal is therefore to drop powerpc support from this DVD. With only
i386 and amd64 there is still room for the top ~2600 packages o
Hi,
[My two cents tips below]
On Wed, 2008-12-03 at 23:32 +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> Now that everybody has had a chance to take a look at the patches and try
> out the test images (ahem...) we should decide how to use the new options
> and what it will mean for the images we make available for
Now that everybody has had a chance to take a look at the patches and try
out the test images (ahem...) we should decide how to use the new options
and what it will mean for the images we make available for Lenny.
Everything in this mail is a proposal (i.e. open for discussion), loosely
based o
When I look at the Etch DVD download page, there's a bunch of
hyperlinks in the middle of the screen and my first thought is
"those are the files that I want".
With the equivalent CD page, my first thought is "that's a lot of
files, more than I want".
I think having white space between disk 1 and
On Sun, Aug 31, 2008 at 09:47:39PM -0400, Daniel Dickinson wrote:
> I'm interested. I know nothing of jigdo, but this would allow me to
> make torrent images available more quickly. Also, can you do this with
> any pool (such as one from apt-cacher-ng)?
As long as its creates a cache directory (
On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 19:46:09 +0100
Steve Cotton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's not necessary to download the ISO before seeding it. Jigdo
> can take a template (28MB for DVD1) and combine it with files from
> /var/cache/apt. BitTorrent can take the result, ignore the parts
> corresponding to
On Thu, 28 Aug 2008, Steve Cotton wrote:
May be its better to say that torrent download will be Faster and
usual http download will be easier,
If we say its faster - we dont force them, but just advertise this
method as optimal way of downloading, and they will have more
stimulus to find out ho
1 - 100 of 203 matches
Mail list logo
