On Sun, Feb 26, 2006 at 10:22:35AM -0500, Raul Miller wrote:
Ok... silence.
This might mean:
(1) everyone is busy
(2) people feel they need to think about this further
(3) the modified version of Ian's proposal that I posted doesn't
properly address some ndiswrapper issue
(4) that
Raul Miller writes (Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main):
This is my rephrasing of Ian's proposal. Changes:
(*) Emphasize the debian dependency issue.
(*) Emphasize that this is a recommendation, not a command.
Basically, I'm repeating what Ian has already said.
I'm proposing this as a
Steve Langasek writes (Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main):
1+5. As noted in my follow-up comments to Ian's proposal, I think the
rationale is great, but I draw the opposite conclusion from it. :)
I'm afraid you'll have to elaborate on that :-).
I also didn't see that you had called for a
Steve Langasek writes (Re: Technical committee chair rotation, draft
resolution):
Voting no, for the record. In addition to the points raised regarding the
length of term, this resolution purports to be a decision in advance about
who will be elected chair at various future points, which I
On 2/27/06, Margarita Manterola [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/21/06, Raul Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1 open source windows driver available (can be used with ndiswrapper)
Well, I couldn't find any trace of 1 ever happening. If it ever
happened, then it's ok. But as far as I know, the
Hi,
6.1.7: ... the committee votes starting one week before the
post will become vacant (or immediately, if it is
already too late).
So, the voting period started when Ian said he was stepping down.
The vote finishes when all the members
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Steve Langasek) writes:
I would defer to you as outgoing
chair regarding the validity of the other two votes. Please comment whether
you interpret Bdale's and Andi's votes as valid ballots equivalent to 1)
Steve 2) Further
On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 03:04:40PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
Of course, a GR to disambiguate section 6.1.7 would be OK too :)
I think we should consider this -- the constitution talks about the technical
ctte proposing resolutions (4.2(2)(2)), but if we're going to, we probably
8 matches
Mail list logo
