On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 11:35:02AM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> I've taken a look at the bug logs and I'm very disappointed with the
> maintainer's lack of engagement. There seem to be a lot of people who
> are interested in helping maintain this package.
> Would any of the keen people we see invo
On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 11:26:56AM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Steve Langasek writes ("Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main"):
> > 1+5. As noted in my follow-up comments to Ian's proposal, I think the
> > rationale is great, but I draw the opposite conclusion from it. :)
> I'm afraid you'll have t
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 07:27:41PM -0500, Raul Miller wrote:
> On 3/2/06, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > With that in mind, policy on contrib says that contrib is for
> > > "wrapper packages or other sorts of free accessories for non-free
> > > programs."
> > > http://www.debian.o
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 09:21:33PM -0500, Raul Miller wrote:
> On 3/2/06, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 07:42:42PM -0500, Raul Miller wrote:
> > > On 3/2/06, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > > > But it doesn't -- ndiswrapper will sit there quite beningly if the
> > > > non-free
> > >
On 3/2/06, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 07:42:42PM -0500, Raul Miller wrote:
> > On 3/2/06, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > > But it doesn't -- ndiswrapper will sit there quite beningly if the
> > > non-free
> > > driver isn't present. It'll do everything it's supposed to -- link with
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 07:42:42PM -0500, Raul Miller wrote:
> On 3/2/06, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 10:15:04PM -0500, Raul Miller wrote:
> > > Ok, we should probably find a different word to describe this
> > > relationship.
> > > Perhaps it could be phrased that ndiswrapper
On 3/2/06, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 01:35:11PM -0500, Raul Miller wrote:
> > But I think this case -- < > install non-free software, in order to make the package work the way that
> > people typically think of as using it>>... I think this case is on the w
On 3/2/06, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 10:15:04PM -0500, Raul Miller wrote:
> > Ok, we should probably find a different word to describe this
> > relationship.
> >
> > Perhaps it could be phrased that ndiswrapper has a need for the presence
> > of some software which is not avai
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 04:43:45PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Wed, 01 Mar 2006, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Of course, I can be convinced that the constitution does give the ctte that
> power, but so far, I am not. Otherwise, why didn't we pose to the ctte a
> request for how the
On 3/2/06, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > With that in mind, policy on contrib says that contrib is for
> > "wrapper packages or other sorts of free accessories for non-free programs."
> > http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-archive.html#s-contrib
>
> > And I think ndiswrapper
On Wed, 01 Mar 2006, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 01:03:56AM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > Otherwise, the ctte could overrule just about everything in Debian. Were
> > they not bound by the SC themselves, they could overrule even the SC itself
> > by determining
* Anthony Towns (aj@azure.humbug.org.au) [060302 12:11]:
> On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 08:51:10AM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > > > ] So I propose we establish a rule that we won't make decisions on
> > > > ] issues that aren't ready for an immediate NMU when we make that
> > > > ] decision.
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 08:51:10AM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > > ] So I propose we establish a rule that we won't make decisions on
> > > ] issues that aren't ready for an immediate NMU when we make that
> > > ] decision.
> BTW, I think something similar should be done, but not as stri
Hello Sebastien,
On Thu, 2006-03-02 at 00:24 +0100, Sebastien J. Gross wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 11:35:02AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I've taken a look at the bug logs and I'm very disappointed with the
> > maintainer's lack of engagement. There seem to be a lot of people who
> >
14 matches
Mail list logo