Bug#766708: Processed: Re: Bug#766708: breaks multiarch cross building

2014-11-19 Thread Ben Longbons
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 4:41 PM, Don Armstrong wrote: > Are people who are doing cross-building like this actually using the > code which will be in jessie? I (perhaps naïvely) would expect them to > be primarily using the code in unstable, and maybe at a late stage of > bring-up rebuilding all of

Bug#766708: Processed: Re: Bug#766708: breaks multiarch cross building

2014-11-19 Thread Ben Longbons
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 6:05 PM, Don Armstrong wrote: > On Wed, 19 Nov 2014, Ben Longbons wrote: >> The code I work on isn't packaged for Debian yet, but without having >> cross-compilers to play with, I will *never* be able to support >> anything other than x86-

Bug#771070: requirements for cross toolchain packages in the distribution

2014-12-18 Thread Ben Longbons
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 8:36 AM, Wookey wrote: > MA-built vs in-arch > --- > I guess an interesting question is 'what does the cross-compiler > actually _use_ the foreign arch libc for'? Does it need its own > independent copy? What happens when the compiler libc-$arch-cross and >