On 2022-09-27 10:26:36 -0400, Zack Weinberg wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2022, at 5:15 AM, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> >> I'd like to make sure that the bug submitter has not identified
> >> something new here.
> >
> > I've not seen any new issues appearing since t
ople would look at it.
> I'd hope the TC would be open to considering newly documented technical
> problems as an example.
> But because the decision has been made, the bar for blocking things is a
> lot higher at this point than turse descriptions on a wiki page.
>
--
Sebastian Ramacher
te the transition. Obviously
> those people might want to ask the TC for advice, but I think that would be
> up to them at least in the first instance.
Is there a package in the archive that has this issue? If so, can you
point me to a bug report?
Cheers
--
Sebastian Ramacher
encies.
tempfile(1) however is used in maintainer scripts with the potential for
upgrade failures. At least for that case I would expect that all the
users are fixed in release $x and then tempfile could be removed in $x
+ 1.
For all the other uses of tempfile, I'm currently lacking an overview.
Cheers
>
> Thanks,
> smcv
--
Sebastian Ramacher
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
4 matches
Mail list logo
