]] Russ Allbery
My question here is: am I missing something in systemd? Did I just look
at the wrong files, or not look deeply enough, or is there orientation
documentation somewhere else where I didn't see it? Is there something
about this comparison that's unfair?
Did you see the
Tollef Fog Heen tfh...@err.no writes:
Did you see the «Documentation for Developers» section on
http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/ ? It's more of an
overview/design doc than function documentation, but it might be some of
what you're looking for.
I've also forwarded your
Russ Allbery r...@debian.org writes:
This documentation is really, really nice, but it's a bit different than
what I was talking about. I should be clear, though (and please also do
mention this to Lennart): the user-facing and the integration
documentation for systemd seems quite good. This
Eugene Zhukov writes (Bug#727708: systemd code documentation):
The frequency of comments sometimes reflects poor quality of code.
When you feel compelled to add a comment, consider rewriting the code
to make it clearer.
Please can we avoid arguing about this particular bikeshed here.
Thanks
Eugene Zhukov jevgeni...@gmail.com writes:
The frequency of comments sometimes reflects poor quality of code. When
you feel compelled to add a comment, consider rewriting the code to make
it clearer.
That would indeed be a succinct statement of the other perspective on code
comments, which
I should say up-front that I don't consider this to be a decisive issue,
but since it was raised and I did a bit of investigation, I wanted to
report my initial conclusions and see if I missed anything or got anything
wrong.
I did a quick code inspection of the code base for both upstart and
6 matches
Mail list logo
