After getting in touch with Michael Shields [EMAIL PROTECTED], the
current maintainer of netcat, I've decided to make a non-maintainer
release of netcat with the version 1.10-3.1. It should let us close all
the distribution-specific bug reports for that package:
* #5304: missing man page
On 30 Dec 1997, Mark W. Eichin wrote:
: From: Mark W. Eichin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
: Date: 30 Dec 1997 22:04:51 -0500
: Subject: libnfslock (or dftp?) install dangerous...
:
: I was just upgrading a system from [hamm a few weeks old] to [hamm
: today] using, for
13526 bulkmail_1.6-2.1_i386.deb Libc6!
34084 chord_3.6.1-1.1_i386.debLibc6!
9980dbview_1.0.3-3.1_i386.deb Libc6!
290268 defrag_0.70-3_i386.deb
25474 grmonitor_0.53-2.1_i386.deb Libc6!
40024 lurkftp_0.99-1.1_i386.deb
288158
OK, I put all of that stuff in Incoming.
Thanks
Bruce
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
We need someone to do a non-maintainer upgrade of libc5-altdev, installing
the patch in David Engel's mail. I'm busy with boot floppies. Can someone
pretty please do this?
Also, it looks to me as if libc6 depends on versions of kernel-headers
and kernel-source that are _not_ in hamm at the
Please pardon the cross-posting to two unrelated lists, but I'm not
sure if this is a mysql problem or a libc6 problem. I suspect the latter.
After working just fine with libc6-2.0.5c, I'm not able to compile
mysql under the new libc6-2.0.6 packages. The first noticable symptom
is that the
I apologize profusely for this posting. Here it goes again. Before I get
started, yes, I have read the nice mail from Linux about the kernel headers,
and I have respectfully read the many emails I have received on this topic
from thoughtful developers. But I am still confused. I am sorry, but
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 16391 patch
Bug#16391: Patching the kernel leads to segmentation fault
Bug assigned to package `patch'.
reassign 16439 general
Bug#16439: dselect removed nolonger available
Bug assigned to package `general'.
merge 16440 16444
Bug#16440:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
OK, I put all of that stuff in Incoming.
It's going to get rejected if his key isn't in the keyring.
Guy
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
On Thu, Jan 01, 1998 at 07:34:00AM -0800, Guy Maor wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
OK, I put all of that stuff in Incoming.
It's going to get rejected if his key isn't in the keyring.
He has already submitted his new-maintainer request. Please
wait until has been finished.
Regards
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 31.12.97 in [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Please be aware that the GIF patent issue is for WRITERS only. Readers
do not use the patented algorithm. Often you can put the writer in non-free
and leave the rest of the program in main.
Indeed.
The problem is the compression
Hi Adam,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Adam Heath) wrote on 31.12.97 in [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
| On Wednesday, 31 December 97, at 2:18:00 PM
| Kai wrote about My own Libc6 progress and package adoption drive, and I
need a mas Hi Adam,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Adam Heath) wrote on 31.12.97 in
[EMAIL
On Thu, Jan 01, 1998 at 07:08:44AM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We need someone to do a non-maintainer upgrade of libc5-altdev, installing
the patch in David Engel's mail. I'm busy with boot floppies. Can someone
pretty please do this?
I've tried to, but it missed a description for the -dbg
Boris D. Beletsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Gee, I dunno, maybe it's, at least in part, for the developers who
still haven't upgraded their packages to libc6, despite it being
available since April.
It will be available in the next few days,
Like Jed was going to be done this weekend
Hi Adam,
418408 tkdesk_1.0b4-2.1_i386.deb Libc6!
1.0b5 is out, and has some nice stuff added.
Why don't you package that?
Please someone give me an account on master so that I can spread my work to
the
debian public.
Why dont you upload to chiark? If you PGP is in maintainer
Hi Marco,
On 31 Dic, Marco Budde wrote:
Moin Moin!
Today I've released the latest version of my HTML online help system for
Debian. Bugs reports are welcome :).
dhelp
I like it but...
1) How about dwww? (Yes, I know dwww needs a web server...)
2) I
Kai Henningsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
: Well, when the original maintainer asked on -devel, I said that I'd take
: it over, and I did. I have no idea why it landed on that list.
Did you let the maintainer of the list (I think it was Phillipe Troin)
know you were taking maintenance of this
On Thu, Jan 01, 1998 at 05:10:09PM +, James Troup wrote:
Oh really? What about such inessentials and trivialities such as our
default MTA?
Well... Please take a look at
ftp://ftp.infodrom.north.de/pub/people/soenke/debian-beta/
and test the smail inside.
And if there was a deadline
Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Oh really? What about such inessentials and trivialities such as
our default MTA?
Well... Please take a look at
ftp://ftp.infodrom.north.de/pub/people/soenke/debian-beta/ and
test the smail inside.
Wouldn't that be better tested if it were
Kai Henningsen writes:
Plus, dpkg isn't thorough enough with dependencies. This is what leads to
dselect install-configure-remove-install-configure-remove cycles, and
sometimes to installs breaking the system - dpkg doesn't take into account
how dependencies etc. change during
On Thu, Jan 01, 1998 at 05:58:30PM +, James Troup wrote:
Oh really? What about such inessentials and trivialities such as
our default MTA?
Well... Please take a look at
ftp://ftp.infodrom.north.de/pub/people/soenke/debian-beta/ and
test the smail inside.
Wouldn't that be
Am 31.12.97 schrieb borik # isracom.net.il ...
Moin Boris!
BDB Do we have any dates for Debian 2.0
BDB release/code-freze/dead-line/anything?
No.
BDB If not, shouldn't we schedule one already. What are we waiting for?
Are really good question. We should hurry a litte bit.
cu, Marco
--
Uni:
I started compiling libc5 with Ray Dassen's patch. It will probably
take a few hours to complete.
I changed the patch a bit more. I added the following lines to the
control entry for libc5-dev:
Conflicts: libc (4.6.27-11), libc-dev
Provides: libc-dev
Replaces: ppp (2.2.0f-22)
I took
adavis == adavis [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
adavis I was able to install using
adavis --ignore-depends=linux-kernel-headers-2.0.32.
I had to do the similar thing, and found that I also had to update
the symlinks /usr/include/{asm,linux} by hand. I have the symlink
/usr/src/linux -
Richard,
Is libc5-altdev OK in its present state?
Thanks
Bruce
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
libc5-dev for hamm??? And what's wrong with libc5 in hamm?
IMO it's a waste of time to upgrade the bo version now that we're close
to completing hamm.
Michael
--
Dr. Michael Meskes, Projekt-Manager| topystem Systemhaus GmbH
[EMAIL PROTECTED]| Europark A2, Adenauerstr. 20
| On Thursday, 1 January 98, at 10:34:00 AM
| Guy wrote about My own libc6 progress, and package adoption drive. Give me
an account on master!
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
OK, I put all of that stuff in Incoming.
It's going to get rejected if his key isn't in the keyring.
YEs, that is the
On Thu, 1 Jan 1998, Adam wrote:
Adam wu-ftpd_2.4-27.1_i386.deb Libc6! 88624 xinetd_2.2.1-1_i386.deb
Adam Libc6! New upstream version
I think I already told you. Xinetd is not orphaned, I am going to
release the libc6 package in a few.
thks,
borik
__
Boris D. Beletsky
| On Thursday, 1 January 98, at 3:17:38 PM
| Boris wrote about My own libc6 progress, and package adoption drive. Give
me an account on master!
On Thu, 1 Jan 1998, Adam wrote:
Adam wu-ftpd_2.4-27.1_i386.deb Libc6! 88624 xinetd_2.2.1-1_i386.deb
Adam Libc6! New upstream version
I think I
On Thu, 1 Jan 1998, Adam wrote:
Adam | On Thursday, 1 January 98, at 3:17:38 PM | Boris wrote about
Adam My own libc6 progress, and package adoption drive. Give me an
Adam account on master! On Thu, 1 Jan 1998, Adam wrote:
Adam
Adam Adam wu-ftpd_2.4-27.1_i386.deb Libc6! 88624
Adam Adam
Actually, I'm not sure there is a problem with libc5-altdev. There definitely
is a dependency clash between libc5 and libc6, which David Engel thinks we
should patch by producing an upgrade for libc5. This will have to be installed
before hamm. It's not yet clear to me that we can make this
What's going on is that we will have an alpha-testable system by the weekend
with any luck, and we can then set deadlines.
Bruce
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
18970 pacman_10-4.1_i386.deb Libc6! and doesn't segfault!
There was an error in the source. A struct was referenced after it was freed.
I am surprised that it worked on libc5. It should have segfaulted with that.
Maybe that is a bug with libc5? I am in win right now, so
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Eloy A. Paris) wrote on 01.01.98 in [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Kai Henningsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
: Well, when the original maintainer asked on -devel, I said that I'd take
: it over, and I did. I have no idea why it landed on that list.
Did you let the maintainer of the
On Thu, Jan 01, 1998 at 08:23:04PM +0100, Meskes, Michael wrote:
libc5-dev for hamm??? And what's wrong with libc5 in hamm?
IMO it's a waste of time to upgrade the bo version now that we're close
to completing hamm.
No it's not. If we don't have a working libc5 for hamm people
can't
[I emailled the talk about procps and colors on debian-private, but on second
thoughts it probably should go here]
Ok, so I have patched procps so it now does colors, and compiles and works.
But, killall is no longer in procps. It is now part of a package called
psmisc. This was done by the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
will NOT HAVE KILLALL. I think this is probably a Bad Thing.
Two options:
I merge the psmic into procps
I create a new package called psmisc.
The second, and make procps recommend or suggest the new psmisc package.
--
see shy jo
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS
37 matches
Mail list logo
