On Thu, Oct 08, 1998 at 09:55:19AM -0400, Stephen J. Carpenter wrote:
I'm sure someone would be happy to package it in .deb format, but by the
sounds of your message neither source is included and only non-commercial
use is permitted. Either one of these would cause Debian to place your
I installed a second CD rom drive in my computer. Some people have CD
'changers' that can have 3 - 5 disks in the stack. (Some of these
take up several drive letters in windows/dos...do they appear as
separate lun's in scsi or separate partitions under linux)
There should be support for
I was right in that lesstif causes my problems. After reverting to the hamm
version everything is fine again. So there either is a bug in lesstifg or an
incompatibility.
Michael
--
Dr. Michael Meskes | Th.-Heuss-Str. 61, D-41812 Erkelenz | Go SF49ers!
Senior-Consultant | business:
On Thu, Oct 08, 1998 at 01:52:43AM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
But occasionally I notices that dpkg first unpacks and installs
the files in a particular package and checks dependencies afterwards.
Sure does.
This means that wrong dependencies are discovered when it is
too late since the old
I just saw that nedit's layout changed. Between menu and text there is a hug
gray area that hasn't been there before. Since I also experienced missing
buttons in mpsql I wonder if both are related to lesstifg. Guess I try to
reget the old version.
Michael
--
Dr. Michael Meskes |
Michael == Michael Meskes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Michael On Wed, Oct 07, 1998 at 12:32:32PM -0700, Ben Gertzfield
Michael wrote:
Ben I'm pretty sure policy states that a package cannot depend
Ben wholly on a virtual package; it has to depend on a real,
Ben preferred
Kenneth Scharf wrote:
I installed a second CD rom drive in my computer. Some people have CD
'changers' that can have 3 - 5 disks in the stack. (Some of these
take up several drive letters in windows/dos...do they appear as
separate lun's in scsi or separate partitions under linux)
On Sun, Oct 04, 1998 at 11:34:55AM -0400, Brian Almeida wrote:
On Sun, Oct 04, 1998 at 12:44:36PM +0100, Tom Lees wrote:
1.1.
I am using the libgtk1.1 1.1.2-2 and libgtk1.1-dev 1.1.12-2 packages
With the default setup:
--
Script started on Sun Oct 4 11:30:52 1998
make[1]:
Tom Lees wrote:
Wow, it looks nice. However I wonder why you changed the ordering
of the two main windows.
Regards,
Joey
PS: I also wonder if one may express wishlists.
--
The only stupid question is the unasked one.
On Thu, Oct 08, 1998 at 05:53:39PM +0200, J.H.M.Dassen wrote:
2) Are we really going to freeze slink in 7 days?
Yes.
Oops, I better hurry with my pending iceconf upload. :-)
Michael
--
Dr. Michael Meskes | Th.-Heuss-Str. 61, D-41812 Erkelenz | Go SF49ers!
Senior-Consultant |
On Thu, Oct 08, 1998 at 06:39:11PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
David Welton writes (File renamer):
Hi, a friend of mine wrote a thing to rename a bunch of files, say
*.jpg to *.gif. Yes, he realizes you can do the same thing with a
shell script, but he wrote this thing just the same, because
Michael Meskes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I just saw that nedit's layout changed. Between menu and text there is a hug
gray area that hasn't been there before. Since I also experienced missing
buttons in mpsql I wonder if both are related to lesstifg. Guess I try to
reget the old version.
Hi,
Last Monday I uploaded a new version of one of my packages. In my
~/.dupload.conf file I've defined the parameter 'fullname' as my full
name :-). The dupload script passes this parameter to the -F flag of
sendmail as '($fullname)'.
Everything went ok, accept that sendmail complained that
On Thu, Oct 08, 1998 at 11:18:25AM -0700, Joseph Carter wrote:
On Thu, Oct 08, 1998 at 09:55:19AM -0400, Stephen J. Carpenter wrote:
I'm sure someone would be happy to package it in .deb format, but by the
sounds of your message neither source is included and only non-commercial
use is
Hi,
This probably means that the @INC built-in array of Perl is not
containing the directory /usr/lib/perl5/5.005.
If you run
perl -e 'print @INC \n;'
you should see the list of directories Perl searches for modules and
such. On my i386 machine this lists the directories
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Ardo van Rangelrooij [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Last Monday I uploaded a new version of one of my packages. In my
~/.dupload.conf file I've defined the parameter 'fullname' as my full
name :-). The dupload script passes this parameter to the -F flag of
sendmail as
Ardo van Rangelrooij [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
snip
Since /usr/lib/perl5/5.005 is not listed we're probably having a
problem at hand. Maybe a Perl bug?
I meant here of course /usr/lib/perl5/5.004.
Thanks,
Ardo
--
Ardo van Rangelrooij
home email: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
home
On Wed, 07 Oct, 1998, Martin Schulze wrote:
Hi,
tonight I was thinking about implementing @authors.debian.org which
would enable a way for us to get in touch with the upstream authors of
some piece of software without the need of looking into the copyright
file or digging in the source if
Yes, a bug... due to socks support (which is being taken out until
I figure a better way to handle it; runsocks just don't cut it).
This, and a few more will be corrected very quick now
--
Rick Nelson
On 8 Oct 1998, Ardo van Rangelrooij wrote:
Date: 08 Oct 1998 21:19:27 +0200
From: Ardo van
Le Thu, Oct 08, 1998 at 09:36:21PM +0200, Ardo van Rangelrooij écrivait:
Hi,
This probably means that the @INC built-in array of Perl is not
containing the directory /usr/lib/perl5/5.005.
No, it's the contrary. He uses perl5.005 which do not look
into /usr/lib/perl5 but in
Slashdot has posted an article about the decision to remove the KDE binaries
right now.
Francesco
Version 2.0a of the I2O spec (dated 3 Feb 1998) has been sent to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Is this the same version that was made available
before?
Jay Treacy
On Thu, Oct 08, 1998 at 05:18:01PM -0400, James A. Treacy wrote:
Version 2.0a of the I2O spec (dated 3 Feb 1998) has been sent to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Is this the same version that was made available
before?
Did it come from anyplace interesting, out of curiousity?
Ciao,
--
David Welton
On Thu, 8 Oct 1998, David Welton wrote:
On Thu, Oct 08, 1998 at 05:18:01PM -0400, James A. Treacy wrote:
Version 2.0a of the I2O spec (dated 3 Feb 1998) has been sent to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Is this the same version that was made available
before?
no, that was version 1.5.
Did it come from
[EMAIL PROTECTED](James A. Treacy) writes:
Version 2.0a of the I2O spec (dated 3 Feb 1998) has been sent to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Is this the same version that was made available
before?
No, that was version 1.5, at least according to the filename. The
date of download I have is 3 March
Your message dated Fri, 9 Oct 1998 07:59:02 +1000 (EST)
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line use leading slash in autoup ftp path
has caused the attached bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
alpha 2 is released at http://www.lpsg.demon.co.uk/gdselect/
--
Tom Lees [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lpsg.demon.co.uk/
PGP Key: finger [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.lpsg.demon.co.uk/pgpkeys.asc.
Quoting Martin Schulze ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Michael Stone wrote:
Except that this isn't what's happening; the new perl is ignoring
/usr/lib/perl5. (E.g., I couldn't install netstd the other day because
That's the main cause of this thread...
it couldn't find DebianNet.pm--which is in
On Thu, Oct 08, 1998 at 08:55:55PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
Tom Lees wrote:
Wow, it looks nice. However I wonder why you changed the ordering
of the two main windows.
Gtk's panels don't size properly by default (i.e. on maximise)
otherwise - the list of packages gets tiny, but the
101 - 129 of 129 matches
Mail list logo
