On Wed, Feb 02, 2005 at 08:23:20AM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 04:46:51PM +, Stephen Quinney wrote:
> >
> > The changes between major versions of Request Tracker are typically
> > substantial and one usually wants the opportunity to test an
> > installation of the ne
Le Mer 2 Février 2005 09:52, Stephen Quinney a écrit :
> On Wed, Feb 02, 2005 at 08:23:20AM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 04:46:51PM +, Stephen Quinney wrote:
> > > The changes between major versions of Request Tracker are
> > > typically substantial and one usually w
On Wednesday 02 February 2005 06.35, Brian M. Carlson wrote:
> I think you meant to ask, "Why would anyone want to execute the C
> library?"
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ /lib/ld-linux.so.2 /lib/libc.so.6
Ok, this is off topic for this thread, but still, strangely:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ /lib/ld-2.3.2.s
On Tuesday 01 February 2005 21.49, Raphael Bossek wrote:
> Message was signed by [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Key ID: 0x376941AB835EB2FF).
> Warning: The signature is bad.
Something's broken somewhere...
Can anybody confirm so I can stop worrying about my set up?
thanks
-- vbi
--
Press CTRL-ALT-DEL to c
On Wednesday 02 February 2005 10:21, Adrian von Bidder wrote:
> On Tuesday 01 February 2005 21.49, Raphael Bossek wrote:
> > Message was signed by [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Key ID: 0x376941AB835EB2FF).
> > Warning: The signature is bad.
>
> Something's broken somewhere...
>
> Can anybody confirm so I can
Millions of l onely women mostly looking for more then friends ;)
find one while she's there
http://pptxui.lardtard.com/toss/cheatinghousewifeservices/
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: btexmms
Version : x.y.z
Upstream Author : Name <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.example.org/
* License : (GPL, LGPL, BSD, MIT/X, etc.)
Description : XMMS plugin to use some (Sony) Ericsson phones as a
hi,
I had a look on the rc bugs.
what about:
237156 it is very old and has a working patch. the
maintainer has not reacted. maybe we should do an nmu?
233981 and 272393 should be easy to fix too.
I think there are many other bugs which can be fixed
quickly. Especially the bugs which are there beca
On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 09:46:19PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> With the proviso that static linking against libc6 is more likely to
> introduce ABI problems via nss than just dynamically linking against an old
> libc6 ABI (i.e., GLIBC_2.0 or GLIBC_2.1).
Not to mention the LGPL too. Static lin
[Please Cc me on replies to this thread]
mpalmer wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 06:27:30PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > Request Tracker is a development framework for trouble ticket systems.
> > Users are encouraged to add new code to its (Perl) packages, and
> > there's an overlay mechanism
Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> hi,
> I had a look on the rc bugs.
> what about:
> 237156 it is very old and has a working patch. the
> maintainer has not reacted. maybe we should do an nmu?
Please read the bug, and read it _completely_. Watch the tags.
>
> 233981
same here.
> and 2
James,
Would you consider the possibility of accepting co-maintainers for gnupg,
pehaps through an Alioth project?
What would be your conditions on co-maintainer behaviour for this? (e.g.
"never upload to Debian sid without my explicit approval, but Debian
experimental is ok")
--
"One disk to
* Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo
| On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 01:12:45PM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
| > | > ,>scp to a Debian host (like gluck or merkel) and ftp from there. Or
| > | > >just scp it to the DELAYED queue on gluck (1day) and let it ftp it for
| > | > >you ;)
| > |
| > | > Does it ftp in
Hi David!
You wrote:
> > > Message was signed by [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Key ID: 0x376941AB835EB2FF).
> > > Warning: The signature is bad.
> >
> > Something's broken somewhere...
> >
> > Can anybody confirm so I can stop worrying about my set up?
>
> Me too, but I noticed an escaped >From in the mess
Op wo, 02-02-2005 te 13:53 +0100, schreef Bas Zoetekouw:
> Hi David!
> > Me too, but I noticed an escaped >From in the message and didn't
> > investigate
> > further.
>
> AFAIK, gpg signs the body only.
Yes, but a leading 'From' on a line will be escaped to '>From' in
transit. This is because s
On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 09:55:51PM +, Tim Cutts wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 07:37:27PM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
> > Would any people around have pointers which could be given to such
> > people?? Do we already have an entry point for such technical issues
> > as proprietary SW vendo
* Matthew Palmer:
> On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 06:27:30PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> * Lars Wirzenius:
>>
>> > ti, 2005-02-01 kello 15:25 +, Stephen Quinney kirjoitti:
>> >> This is the 3.4 series of RT, it can be installed alongside the 3.0
>> >> and 3.2 series without any problems. This
Hi,
On Wednesday 02 February 2005 10:21, Adrian von Bidder wrote:
> > Warning: The signature is bad.
>
> Something's broken somewhere...
>
> Can anybody confirm so I can stop worrying about my set up?
I cannot confirm this, the signature is valid here. I have no valid trust path
to the key, but
Le Mer 2 Février 2005 14:38, Florian Weimer a écrit :
> As Andrew noted, we already do similar things for library packages.
> There's a growing trend to provide different version which can be
> installed in parallel for other infrastructure packages, too (IIRC,
> PostgreSQL is heading in this direc
* Wouter Verhelst [Wed, 02 Feb 2005 14:15:35 +0100]:
> Op wo, 02-02-2005 te 13:53 +0100, schreef Bas Zoetekouw:
> > Hi David!
> > > Me too, but I noticed an escaped >From in the message and didn't
> > > investigate
> > > further.
> > AFAIK, gpg signs the body only.
> Yes, but a leading 'From' o
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Guillaume Pellerin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: ezstream
Version : 0.2.0
Upstream Author : oddsock.org <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.oddsock.org/
* License : (GPL, LGPL, BSD, MIT/X, etc.)
Description
On Wed, Feb 02, 2005 at 02:50:56PM +0100, Guillaume Pellerin wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Guillaume Pellerin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
> * Package name: ezstream
> * License : (GPL, LGPL, BSD, MIT/X, etc.)
^
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: limma
Version : 1.8.16
Upstream Author : Gordon Smyth < [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://bioinf.wehi.edu.au/limma
* License : LGPL
Description : [Biology] library for linear models and differential gene
e
On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 08:54:18AM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > Oh, are we turning into a children's distribution now?
>
> I hope not.
I think it's fairly obvious that we're a wanker's distribution, not a
children's distribution.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 02:28:44AM +1100, Sam Watkins wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 08:54:18AM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > > Oh, are we turning into a children's distribution now?
> >
> > I hope not.
>
> I think it's fairly obvious that we're a wanker's distribution, not a
> children's distr
Jesus Climent wrote:
On Wed, Feb 02, 2005 at 02:50:56PM +0100, Guillaume Pellerin wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Guillaume Pellerin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: ezstream
* License : (GPL, LGPL, BSD, MIT/X, etc.)
^
On Sat, Jan 29, 2005 at 07:59:14AM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
> The average girl would rather have beauty than brains because she
> knows that the average man can see much better than he can think.
> Ladies' Home Journal
Your sig quote seems strangely appropriate to this thread, Ron.
I was trying
On Wed, Feb 02, 2005 at 03:33:53PM +, Brett Parker wrote:
> Any chance that we can avoid statements like that, please.
sorry, I couldn't resist!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 2005-02-02 at 10:41 +0100, Peter 'p2' De Schrijver wrote:
> * Package name: btexmms
xmms plugins would be better named xmms- (btexmms for the
source should be fine though)
> Version : x.y.z
> Upstream Author : Name <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL : http://www.examp
* Sam Watkins ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
[snip]
> 2. Should Debian publish highly offensive content which is DFSG free?
>
>I say "no". There are limits to what is acceptable in Debian.
>The anarchist FAQ is acceptable. The bible is acceptable.
>A package of hardcore pictures is obvio
Sigh. Either I'm being dense, or google has failed me, or
the Developer's Reference has failed me. I suspect the first
of these, naturally
How does one simply see what's in the NEW queue? Call me
paranoid, but what I would like to do is just verify that
packages that I've uploaded haven't
[Al Stone]
> How does one simply see what's in the NEW queue?
There is an experimental service available from
http://developer.skolelinux.no/~pere/debian-NEW.html>, updated at
random times whenever I feel like it (normally at least once a day).
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
Sam Watkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>This is NOT a censorship issue, but a matter of appropriate
>packaging. The way it is, it's like having a XXX magazine hidden
>among the comic-books in a newsagent.
No. It's like having a sexy adult comic book "hidden" among the rest
of the c
On Wed, Feb 02, 2005 at 10:01:11AM -0700, Al Stone wrote:
> Sigh. Either I'm being dense, or google has failed me, or
> the Developer's Reference has failed me. I suspect the first
> of these, naturally
>
> How does one simply see what's in the NEW queue? Call me
Google 'new queue', first
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Martin Orr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Package name: libpam-smb
Version : 1.9.9+2.0.0-rc6
Upstream Author : Dave Airlie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
URL : http://www.csn.ul.ie/~airlied/pam_smb/
License : GPL
Description : Plugg
On Wed, 2005-02-02 at 18:30 +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> [Al Stone]
> > How does one simply see what's in the NEW queue?
>
> There is an experimental service available from
> http://developer.skolelinux.no/~pere/debian-NEW.html>, updated at
> random times whenever I feel like it (normally a
On Wed, Feb 02, 2005 at 06:28:58PM +0100, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
>
> Debian New queue summary,
> http://developer.skolelinux.no/~pere/debian-NEW.html
i never made this question to myself but i'm finding the answer very
interesting.
just a curiosity. why there are packages like kernel-patch
On Wed, Feb 02, 2005 at 10:42:26 -0700, Al Stone wrote:
> > http://developer.skolelinux.no/~pere/debian-NEW.html>, updated at
> Hmm. Saw this in google and couldn't get it to work last
> Saturday (I got an empty page, and _that_ didn't make sense :).
Probably due to Merkel being down around that
On Thu, 03 Feb 2005, Sam Watkins wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 29, 2005 at 07:59:14AM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > The average girl would rather have beauty than brains because she
> > knows that the average man can see much better than he can think.
> > Ladies' Home Journal
>
> Your sig quote seems stran
* Al Stone ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050202 19:05]:
> Ah, this is what I was looking for; thanks. I had tried a
> couple of other machines but not merkel.
Please see the Developer's Reference, 4.4.2 The ftp-master server:
http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/ch-resources.en.html#s-servers-ft
[Cc ing Frankie as the [EMAIL PROTECTED] addresses appear to be non-functional]
On 2005-01-31 Francesco Paolo Lovergine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 29, 2005 at 02:34:07PM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> > These four packages also link against both libpam and libmysqlclient10
> > and mi
Am 2005-02-03 03:15:41, schrieb Sam Watkins:
> 1. People (including children) will get a nasty surprise when they
>choose to download all the comics to see what is available.
My daughter had this problem several times...
> 2. Should Debian publish highly offensive content which is DFSG f
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: zen-cart
Version : 1.2.3d
Upstream Author : Ian C Wilson
* URL : http://www.zen-cart.com/
* License : GPL
Description : simple SQL and php based e-commerce solution
Zen Cart is a php driven e-commerce sol
Sam Watkins writes:
> Another issue - if a script is designed specifically to download non-free
> content, shouldn't it go in contrib? According to Debian's official view
> that anything made of bits is software, the scripts to fetch the comics
> should go in contrib.
Only a miniscule fraction of
On Wed, Feb 02, 2005 at 09:49:31PM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote:
>
> > For what concern proftpd, it does not use libpam-mysql at all,
> > so I see no problem for that.
>
> Hello,
> Ehh. As maintainer of a PAM-using application you usually have no
> control which PAM modules are used. You just shi
John Hasler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Sam Watkins writes:
> > Another issue - if a script is designed specifically to download non-free
> > content, shouldn't it go in contrib? According to Debian's official view
> > that anything made of bits is software, the scripts to fetch the comics
> >
On Wed, Feb 02, 2005 at 04:41:15PM +, Paul Brossier wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-02-02 at 10:41 +0100, Peter 'p2' De Schrijver wrote:
> > * Package name: btexmms
>
> xmms plugins would be better named xmms- (btexmms for the
> source should be fine though)
>
So xmms-btexmms would be better ?
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Otto Wyss) writes:
> Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Otto Wyss) writes:
>>
>> > Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >
>> >> > Sure? Anyway DpartialMirror "http://dpartialmirror.sourceforge.net/";
>> >> > can.
>> >> >
>> > I
Raphael Bossek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> I'm a active member of the dpkg-cross package part of the www.emdebian.org
> project.
>
> A long outstanding feature request was to support APT for dpkg-cross. The
> realisation
> result in diversion of apt-get, apt-cache and apt-config which
Domenico Andreoli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, Feb 02, 2005 at 06:28:58PM +0100, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
>>
>> Debian New queue summary,
>> http://developer.skolelinux.no/~pere/debian-NEW.html
>
> i never made this question to myself but i'm finding the answer very
> interesting.
>
On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 03:15:41AM +1100, Sam Watkins wrote:
> Another issue - if a script is designed specifically to download
> non-free content, shouldn't it go in contrib? According to Debian's
> official view that anything made of bits is software, the scripts to
> fetch the comics should go
Glenn Maynard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It doesn't matter if a piece of software works with non-free stuff, or even
> if most of its use, by design, is for non-free stuff. All that matters is
> that there exists some free stuff that it works with. For example, the
> vast majority of the stuff
On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 06:24:31PM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
> Osamu Aoki wrote:
> Or see and follow the instructions summarised on
> http://master.debian.org/~joey/misc/webwml.html#ddp
>
> > PS: If you are in rush, I or javi should be able to add you as a pserver
> > access user just like othe
On Wed, Feb 02, 2005 at 11:41:55PM +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > It doesn't matter if a piece of software works with non-free stuff, or even
> > if most of its use, by design, is for non-free stuff. All that matters is
> > that there exists some free stuff that it works with. For example, the
On Wed, Feb 02, 2005 at 02:38:10PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Matthew Palmer:
>
> > On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 06:27:30PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> >> * Lars Wirzenius:
> >>
> >> > ti, 2005-02-01 kello 15:25 +, Stephen Quinney kirjoitti:
> >> >> This is the 3.4 series of RT, it can b
On 02-Feb-05, 18:31 (CST), Matthew Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> So archive bloat is not a problem for you, and "apt-get dist-upgrade" not
> actually providing upgrades to the latest versions of everything is
> perfectly fine?
In the case of RT, yes.
I notice that there are several di
On Wed, Feb 02, 2005 at 07:04:40PM -0600, Steve Greenland wrote:
> On 02-Feb-05, 18:31 (CST), Matthew Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > So archive bloat is not a problem for you, and "apt-get dist-upgrade" not
> > actually providing upgrades to the latest versions of everything is
> > per
On Wed, 2005-02-02 at 15:46 -0500, Tim Peeler wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
>
>
> * Package name: zen-cart
> Version : 1.2.3d
> Upstream Author : Ian C Wilson
> * URL : http://www.zen-cart.com/
> * License : GPL
> Description : simple SQL a
On Wed, Feb 02, 2005 at 10:17:07PM +0100, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> Am 2005-02-03 03:15:41, schrieb Sam Watkins:
>
> > 1. People (including children) will get a nasty surprise when they
> >choose to download all the comics to see what is available.
>
> My daughter had this problem several
On Wed, Feb 02, 2005 at 06:28:58PM +0100, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> As a DD, you can ls /org/ftp.debian.org/queue/new on merkel, daily
> synced. Beware, there are 2826 files in there atm, so ls via grep or
> something.
And while we are on the subject, what's with NEW not being processed?
On Wed, Feb 02, 2005 at 07:39:50PM -0600, Joe Wreschnig wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-02-02 at 15:46 -0500, Tim Peeler wrote:
> > Package: wnpp
> > Severity: wishlist
> >
> >
> > * Package name: zen-cart
> > Version : 1.2.3d
> > Upstream Author : Ian C Wilson
> > * URL : http
Maybe there needs to be an "Advertisement:" header in the package
description...
-Miles
--
Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum viditur.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 2005-02-02 at 19:04 -0600, Steve Greenland wrote:
> On 02-Feb-05, 18:31 (CST), Matthew Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > So archive bloat is not a problem for you, and "apt-get dist-upgrade" not
> > actually providing upgrades to the latest versions of everything is
> > perfectly
Hi Goto,
On Wed, Feb 02, 2005 at 01:54:54PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> At Thu, 27 Jan 2005 07:30:57 -0800,
> Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 27, 2005 at 01:19:36PM +0100, Christoph Berg wrote:
> > > I upgraded a Woody box last week to Sarge's glibc/apt/dpkg/
> > > openoffice.org/perl last
--
Has decidido el mejor precio. Has decidido IBERIA.com
You´ve chosen the best price. You´ve chosen IBERIA.com
--
http://www.iberia.com
65 matches
Mail list logo
