Release update: debian-installer, kernels, infrastructure, freeze, etch, arm

2005-04-01 Thread Andreas Barth
Hello world, Let's take a break from talking about etch plans to talk about sarge again, shall we? Debian Installer RC3, kernels - The RC3 release of the debian-installer has been published. As Joey Hess mentions in his announcement[0], this has been the

Minimizing ld dependencies with --as-needed

2005-04-01 Thread Ron Johnson
What are the opinions of d-d's of --as-needed? http://www.ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=17287 According to this thread, the number of dependencies can sometimes be slashed drastically. (Of course, it would have to wait until Sarge becomes Stable.) --

Bug 456789: ITP: libjustdoit -- Always does what you want

2005-04-01 Thread Jörg Jaspert
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: libjustdoit Version : 1.0 Upstream Author : Noone. It was just there. * URL or Web page : Just open your webbrowser after you installed the lib. And the Homepage will be there! * License : Whatever you

Bug 456789: ITP: libjustdoit -- Always does what you want

2005-04-01 Thread Jörg Jaspert
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: libjustdoit Version : 1.0 Upstream Author : Noone. It was just there. * URL or Web page : Just open your webbrowser after you installed the lib. And the Homepage will be there! * License : Whatever you

Re: NEW handling: About rejects, and kernels

2005-04-01 Thread Eduard Bloch
#include hallo.h * Thomas Bushnell BSG [Thu, Mar 31 2005, 06:52:24PM]: Eduard Bloch [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: That is bullshit/lies/cheating (pick one). It should be worded: We are not willing to support his hardware just because we (at least some of us) decided to demonstrate how can

Re: Minimizing ld dependencies with --as-needed

2005-04-01 Thread Andrew Suffield
On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 02:34:44AM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote: What are the opinions of d-d's of --as-needed? It's a method of working around bugs. Just fix the bugs instead. Update libtool to the latest version and don't -l stuff you don't need to -l. -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew

Re: Preparation of the next stable Debian GNU/Linux update

2005-04-01 Thread Steve Langasek
Hi Joey, On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 09:49:10AM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote: Changelog - 2005/04/01 09:47 MET * Accepted netkit-telnet * Investigation of netkit-telnet-ssl * Accepted samba Please note bug #302378, opened yesterday and still being worked on. Sorry for not being in

Re: Minimizing ld dependencies with --as-needed

2005-04-01 Thread Tollef Fog Heen
* Andrew Suffield | It's a method of working around bugs. Just fix the bugs | instead. Update libtool to the latest version and don't -l stuff you | don't need to -l. pkgconfig does add a bunch of gratious -l, similar to what libtool used to. This will be fixed, but I'm not sure I want to

Re: Bug#250202: Standardizing make target for 'patch' and 'upstream-source'

2005-04-01 Thread Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt
Scott James Remnant [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: There's also the issue of how do you clean or put a source package back together, when it's got the patches all applied -- how do you know which patch any modifications should go into? Well, the easiest way would be to unpack all patches into

Re: Minimizing ld dependencies with --as-needed

2005-04-01 Thread Andrew Suffield
On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 12:24:23PM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: * Andrew Suffield | It's a method of working around bugs. Just fix the bugs | instead. Update libtool to the latest version and don't -l stuff you | don't need to -l. pkgconfig does add a bunch of gratious -l, similar to

Re: Bits from the DAMs ( Co)

2005-04-01 Thread Ron
Wasn't this supposed to be announced _after_ project scud took power? Ron On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 08:31:23AM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote: Hi, in the tradition of Bits[1] from the DAMs, started in January, we are now sending another mail to inform you about recent decisions we made.

Re: Bits from the DAMs ( Co)

2005-04-01 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Fri, 01 Apr 2005, Joerg Jaspert wrote: in the tradition of Bits[1] from the DAMs, started in January, we are now sending another mail to inform you about recent decisions we made. groan, it is that day of the year again... -- One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to

Re: Minimizing ld dependencies with --as-needed

2005-04-01 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le vendredi 01 avril 2005 à 02:34 -0600, Ron Johnson a écrit : What are the opinions of d-d's of --as-needed? http://www.ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=17287 According to this thread, the number of dependencies can sometimes be slashed drastically. I'm moving all my packages to use it.

Re: Minimizing ld dependencies with --as-needed

2005-04-01 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 12:53:27PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote: Le vendredi 01 avril 2005 à 02:34 -0600, Ron Johnson a écrit : What are the opinions of d-d's of --as-needed? http://www.ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=17287 According to this thread, the number of dependencies can

Re: Bug#250202: Standardizing make target for 'patch' and 'upstream-source'

2005-04-01 Thread David Schmitt
[Cc:s trimmed. Probably should go to -dpkg] On Friday 01 April 2005 02:12, Scott James Remnant wrote: On Wed, 2005-03-30 at 11:37 +0200, David Schmitt wrote: To prepare the sourcecode for inspection and/or minor modifications an additional argument for debian/rules would fit well into the

Re: Minimizing ld dependencies with --as-needed

2005-04-01 Thread Ron Johnson
On Fri, 2005-04-01 at 03:09 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 12:53:27PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote: Le vendredi 01 avril 2005 à 02:34 -0600, Ron Johnson a écrit : What are the opinions of d-d's of --as-needed? http://www.ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=17287

Reply Message From Primestaff.

2005-04-01 Thread Jobs
Reply Message From Primestaff. Thank you for your mail the contents of which are noted. We appreciate your response and will revert to you as soon as possible. Best regards. PrimeStaff Management Services Pte Ltd The Preferred Human Resource Consultant -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL

Re: Minimizing ld dependencies with --as-needed

2005-04-01 Thread Gustavo Franco
On Apr 1, 2005 7:32 AM, Andrew Suffield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 12:24:23PM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: * Andrew Suffield | It's a method of working around bugs. Just fix the bugs | instead. Update libtool to the latest version and don't -l stuff you | don't

Re: init.d script dependencies for etch?

2005-04-01 Thread martin f krafft
[taking to devel, per your suggestion] also sprach Lars Wirzenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005.04.01.1546 +0200]: I would like to work on making this happen for etch. I don't have an implementation yet, let alone a plan for how to do it, and I won't start work until after sarge is released, so this

Re: Release update: debian-installer, kernels, infrastructure, freeze, etch, arm

2005-04-01 Thread Bill Allombert
On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 03:48:00PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: Debian Installer RC3, kernels - The RC3 release of the debian-installer has been published. As Joey Hess mentions in his announcement[0], this has been the best-tested Debian Installer release

Re: Minimizing ld dependencies with --as-needed

2005-04-01 Thread GOMBAS Gabor
On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 06:01:27AM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote: And since these are (always?) dependencies on shared objects, these libraries never get used, except to say, Here I am!, right? The runtime linker still loads them, which can be expensive (esp. if there are many relocation records),

Re: Minimizing ld dependencies with --as-needed

2005-04-01 Thread GOMBAS Gabor
On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 12:53:27PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote: I'm moving all my packages to use it. It's not only a workaround for libtool or pkgconfig bugs, it's also a great tool when some upstream authors gratuitously adds unneeded -l flags. General note: you have to be careful with

Re: init.d script dependencies for etch?

2005-04-01 Thread Frank Küster
martin f krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [taking to devel, per your suggestion] also sprach Lars Wirzenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005.04.01.1546 +0200]: I would like to work on making this happen for etch. I don't have an implementation yet, let alone a plan for how to do it, and I won't start

How to handle unreproducible RC bugs when the submitter is MIA?

2005-04-01 Thread Frank Küster
Dear release team, #297181 is unreproducible, and the submitter has not answered to our questions for a while. I am quite confident that this bug is really PEBCAK, or more specifically a local misconfiguration, or some old locally installed Emacs lisp files lying around. I do not think that

Re: Minimizing ld dependencies with --as-needed

2005-04-01 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 03:09:13AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 12:53:27PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote: Le vendredi 01 avril 2005 à 02:34 -0600, Ron Johnson a écrit : What are the opinions of d-d's of --as-needed?

Re: Minimizing ld dependencies with --as-needed

2005-04-01 Thread Tollef Fog Heen
* Gustavo Franco | I agree, but are we tracking all these post-sarge issues that are | coming on d-d and others lists? I hope that after sarge we start | working on these issues before etch came closer. I'm doing a rebuild of sarge with a changed pkg-config now, to see what breaks. -- Tollef

Re: Release update: debian-installer, kernels, infrastructure, freeze, etch, arm

2005-04-01 Thread Ken Bloom
On Fri, 01 Apr 2005 16:32:25 +0200, Bill Allombert wrote: On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 03:48:00PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: Debian Installer RC3, kernels - The RC3 release of the debian-installer has been published. As Joey Hess mentions in his announcement[0],

Re: Minimizing ld dependencies with --as-needed

2005-04-01 Thread Gustavo Franco
On Apr 1, 2005 1:58 PM, Tollef Fog Heen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * Gustavo Franco | I agree, but are we tracking all these post-sarge issues that are | coming on d-d and others lists? I hope that after sarge we start | working on these issues before etch came closer. I'm doing a rebuild

How to find out why a package was removed from testing?

2005-04-01 Thread Frank Küster
Hi, how can I find out why a package was removed from testing? I tried to find this out for wwwoffle, and looked at - its resolved bugs (no indication) - its open bugs (one RC, but worked on) - ftp.debian.org's bugs: nothing - Search on debian-release: nothing. Where else can I look?

Re: How to find out why a package was removed from testing?

2005-04-01 Thread Jeroen van Wolffelaar
On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 07:28:35PM +0200, Frank K?ster wrote: Hi, how can I find out why a package was removed from testing? I tried to find this out for wwwoffle, and looked at This type of information is unfortunately not readily available, you can find it in some ftp-master logfiles

Re: init.d script dependencies for etch?

2005-04-01 Thread Thomas Hood
On Fri, 01 Apr 2005 16:50:20 +0200, martin f krafft wrote: I think we need to establish a header format policy, and I suggest something similar to debian/control, e.g. #!/bin/sh -e # init.d script for sshd # #% Depends: network, iptables # if $1 ... This has been

Re: How to find out why a package was removed from testing?

2005-04-01 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-04-01 19:28]: - its open bugs (one RC, but worked on) http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/hints/vorlon contains # bug #295060 remove wwwoffle/2.8e-1 So, yes, because of an RC bug. -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Re: Bug 456789: ITP: libjustdoit -- Always does what you want

2005-04-01 Thread Henning Makholm
Scripsit Jörg Jaspert [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Package name: libjustdoit Version : 1.0 Upstream Author : Noone. It was just there. * URL or Web page : Just open your webbrowser after you installed the lib. And the Homepage will be there! The binary package

Re: How to find out why a package was removed from testing?

2005-04-01 Thread Frank Küster
Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 07:28:35PM +0200, Frank K?ster wrote: - its open bugs (one RC, but worked on) Right, but open for 47 days already. If for this amount of days an RC bug is open and nobody seems to have cared enough to fix it or even

Re: How to find out why a package was removed from testing?

2005-04-01 Thread Frank Küster
Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-04-01 19:28]: - its open bugs (one RC, but worked on) http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/hints/vorlon contains # bug #295060 remove wwwoffle/2.8e-1 So, yes, because of an RC bug. Is it not usual practice

Unsubscribe

2005-04-01 Thread Juan Vitor Maqueda
-- Juan Maqueda Infraestrutura - Predicta tel: +55 (11)3054-2522 cel: +55 (11)9624-1145 ICQ: 2027526

Re: How to handle unreproducible RC bugs when the submitter is MIA?

2005-04-01 Thread Thomas Hood
Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable At http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#severities, grave is glossed as: makes the package in question unusable or mostly so, or causes data loss, or introduces a security hole allowing access to the accounts of users who use

Re: How to find out why a package was removed from testing?

2005-04-01 Thread Bastian Blank
On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 08:00:19PM +0200, Frank Kster wrote: Is it not usual practice to send a note about this to the bug? I think this would be a good idea, both for documentation purposes, and to wake up lazy maintainers. No, maintainers have to know about there bugs. And RC bugs with this

Re: init.d script dependencies for etch?

2005-04-01 Thread Bastian Blank
On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 04:28:33PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote: I think we need to establish a header format policy, and I suggest something similar to debian/control, e.g. I must say, that the Gentoo-Way looks better than this. Bastian -- Vulcans believe peace should not depend on force.

Re: init.d script dependencies for etch?

2005-04-01 Thread Wouter van Heyst
On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 08:16:58PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 04:28:33PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote: I think we need to establish a header format policy, and I suggest something similar to debian/control, e.g. I must say, that the Gentoo-Way looks better than

Re: How to handle unreproducible RC bugs when the submitter is MIA?

2005-04-01 Thread Steve Greenland
On 01-Apr-05, 10:08 (CST), Frank K?ster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I do not think that this bug justifies auctex's removal from testing; on the other hand, I don't think it would be proper to lower its severity before we know more. But we cannot know whether the submitter will answer again and

Re: init.d script dependencies for etch?

2005-04-01 Thread Bastian Blank
On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 08:18:56PM +0200, Wouter van Heyst wrote: On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 08:16:58PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: I must say, that the Gentoo-Way looks better than this. What is the Gentoo-Way? | opts=depend checkconfig start stop reload | | depend() { | # Make

Re: init.d script dependencies for etch?

2005-04-01 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Bastian Blank [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005.04.01.2031 +0200]: | # Make networking dependency conditional on configuration | case $(sed 's/#.*//' /etc/syslog-ng/syslog-ng.conf) in | *source*tcp*|*source*udp*|*destination*tcp*|*destination*udp*) |

Re: init.d script dependencies for etch?

2005-04-01 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Thomas Hood [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005.04.01.1930 +0200]: This has been standardized by LSB: http://refspecs.freestandards.org/LSB_3.0.0/LSB-Core-generic/LSB-Core-generic/initscrcomconv.html Clearly this is the way to go then. After all, we are striving to be LSB-compliant, so why

Re: init.d script dependencies for etch?

2005-04-01 Thread Bastian Blank
On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 08:48:36PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote: Uh, this looks like a pull type of thing in which ever init.d script starts its dependencies. I don't think this is a good idea. No, it is not. The dependencies are cached. Bastian -- Get back to your stations!

Re: init.d script dependencies for etch?

2005-04-01 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Bastian Blank [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005.04.01.2104 +0200]: Uh, this looks like a pull type of thing in which ever init.d script starts its dependencies. I don't think this is a good idea. No, it is not. The dependencies are cached. Cached? As in queried beforehand? As in two-pass

Re: Bug 456789: ITP: libjustdoit -- Always does what you want

2005-04-01 Thread Joerg Jaspert
On 10246 March 1977, Henning Makholm wrote: * License : Whatever you wish it is. Have you cleared this with -legal? Usually licenses are not considered Free if one needs to invoke wishful thinking to fit them to the DFSG. Eh, if you ask -legal its always non-free, so no need to. :)

Re: NEW handling: About rejects, and kernels

2005-04-01 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
Eduard Bloch [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: As said, burn all hardware in your house. Now. Please. Then you have definitely defeated the evil non-freeness. As I have said, I don't think non-free software is evil. I just think it is not part of the Debian main archive. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email

Re: Release update: debian-installer, kernels, infrastructure, freeze, etch, arm

2005-04-01 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
Andreas Barth [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: With these changes done, we are now on the home stretch for the sarge release. We are now only waiting on the arm buildds to recover and catch up to a reasonable extent, and on one last glibc upload -- and then sarge is FREEZING. This is, therefore,

Re: How to handle unreproducible RC bugs when the submitter is MIA?

2005-04-01 Thread Frank Küster
Thomas Hood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: That is, if the package isn't unusable by everyone (if the bug only affects some users) then the bug is not grave. If the bug is unreproducible then it can't be the case that the package is unusable to everyone. So I'd say that a downgrade is

Re: How to find out why a package was removed from testing?

2005-04-01 Thread Frank Küster
Bastian Blank [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 08:00:19PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote: Is it not usual practice to send a note about this to the bug? I think this would be a good idea, both for documentation purposes, and to wake up lazy maintainers. No, maintainers have to

Re: How to handle unreproducible RC bugs when the submitter is MIA?

2005-04-01 Thread Thomas Hood
On Fri, 2005-04-01 at 22:22 +0200, Frank Küster wrote: (bugs in maintainer scripts are a policy violation) I don't recall policy saying that maintainer scripts must be entirely bug free. Obviously they _should_ be bug free, but bugs in maintainer scripts aren't always RC. -- Thomas Hood

Re: How to find out why a package was removed from testing?

2005-04-01 Thread Andreas Barth
* Jeroen van Wolffelaar ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050401 19:35]: On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 07:28:35PM +0200, Frank K?ster wrote: how can I find out why a package was removed from testing? I tried to find this out for wwwoffle, and looked at This type of information is unfortunately not readily

Re: How to find out why a package was removed from testing?

2005-04-01 Thread Andreas Barth
* Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050401 19:55]: Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-04-01 19:28]: - its open bugs (one RC, but worked on) http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/hints/vorlon contains # bug #295060 remove wwwoffle/2.8e-1

Re: init.d script dependencies for etch?

2005-04-01 Thread Thomas Hood
On Fri, 01 Apr 2005 20:40:08 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: | need clock hostname | provide logger I take it that this is Richard Gooch's simpleinit system as furnished in util-linux. http://www.atnf.csiro.au/people/rgooch/linux/boot-scripts/ Before commenting, people should

Re: Release update: debian-installer, kernels, infrastructure, freeze, etch, arm

2005-04-01 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 03:48:00PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: ... Major changes in etch - If you intend to make major changes (like a C++ ABI bump) during the development of etch, please speak with the release team as soon as possible, describing the changes you're

Re: How to handle unreproducible RC bugs when the submitter is MIA?

2005-04-01 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 12:05:59PM -0600, Steve Greenland wrote: On 01-Apr-05, 10:08 (CST), Frank K?ster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I do not think that this bug justifies auctex's removal from testing; on the other hand, I don't think it would be proper to lower its severity before we know

Re: Bug#250202: Standardizing make target for 'patch' and 'upstream-source'

2005-04-01 Thread Michael Banck
On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 01:12:53AM +0100, Scott James Remnant wrote: On Wed, 2005-03-30 at 11:37 +0200, David Schmitt wrote: To prepare the sourcecode for inspection and/or minor modifications an additional argument for debian/rules would fit well into the current model. Calling

Re: Release update: debian-installer, kernels, infrastructure, freeze, etch, arm

2005-04-01 Thread Matthew Garrett
Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It doesn't need to be an exact date, but someting like third quarter of 2005 or mid-2008 would help to avoid situations like the sarge C++ transition that was too early [1] or the more than two years old X11 that will ship with sarge (and that doesn't

crediting debconf translators, revisited

2005-04-01 Thread sean finney
hi all, some time back, i remember somebody asking what the proper way was to credit translators who provided debconf template translations. the consensus seemed to be that mentioning them in the changelog was sufficient. not being satisfied with that, however, i wrote up a small script to

Re: intend-to-implement: script to obtain Debian Source

2005-04-01 Thread Adam Heath
On Sun, 27 Mar 2005, Lars Wirzenius wrote: su, 2005-03-27 kello 09:01 +0200, George Danchev kirjoitti: I second suggestion given at #250202 and like to see unpacked and patched targets to hit Policy 4.8. I hear that Adam Heath (doogie for those on IRC) has been working on a new source

Re: How to find out why a package was removed from testing?

2005-04-01 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 07:59:01PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote: Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 07:28:35PM +0200, Frank K?ster wrote: Right, but open for 47 days already. If for this amount of days an RC bug is open and nobody seems to have cared

Bug#302641: ITP: debhelper-dwim -- debhelper extension to do what the maintainer wants

2005-04-01 Thread Steve Langasek
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Package name: debhelper-dwim Version : 1.0.0 Upstream Author : Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] * URL : http://www.yagoohoogle.com/ * License : Abridged Public Rights International

Re: How to find out why a package was removed from testing?

2005-04-01 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 06:56:45PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 07:59:01PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote: Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 07:28:35PM +0200, Frank K?ster wrote: Right, but open for 47 days already. If for this

Re: Bits from the DAMs ( Co)

2005-04-01 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
April Fool! :-) Ritesh On Friday 01 Apr 2005 12:01 pm, Joerg Jaspert wrote: Hi, in the tradition of Bits[1] from the DAMs, started in January, we are now sending another mail to inform you about recent decisions we made. Topics in this mail --- 1. Handling of Accounts

Accepted tor 0.0.9.7-1 (i386 source)

2005-04-01 Thread Peter Palfrader
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2005 09:52:12 +0200 Source: tor Binary: tor Architecture: source i386 Version: 0.0.9.7-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Peter Palfrader [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Peter Palfrader [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Accepted python2.4 2.4.1-1 (i386 source all)

2005-04-01 Thread Matthias Klose
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 19:42:03 +0200 Source: python2.4 Binary: python2.4-doc python2.4-dev python2.4-gdbm python2.4-dbg python2.4 python2.4-tk idle-python2.4 python2.4-examples Architecture: source all i386 Version: 2.4.1-1 Distribution:

Accepted scim-chewing 0.2.0-2 (i386 source)

2005-04-01 Thread Andrew Lee
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 19:57:26 +0800 Source: scim-chewing Binary: scim-chewing Architecture: source i386 Version: 0.2.0-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: high Maintainer: Andrew Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Andrew Lee [EMAIL

Accepted libchewing 0.2.6+svn20050326-1 (i386 source all)

2005-04-01 Thread Kanru Chen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 21:46:31 +0800 Source: libchewing Binary: libchewing2-dev libchewing-data libchewing2 Architecture: source i386 all Version: 0.2.6+svn20050326-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: high Maintainer: Kanru Chen [EMAIL

Accepted scim-chewing 0.2.0-2.1 (i386 source)

2005-04-01 Thread Andrew Lee
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2005 17:36:19 +0800 Source: scim-chewing Binary: scim-chewing Architecture: source i386 Version: 0.2.0-2.1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Andrew Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Andrew Lee [EMAIL

Accepted upx-ucl-beta 1:1.94+0.20050331cvs-1 (i386 source)

2005-04-01 Thread Robert Luberda
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 19:15:58 +0200 Source: upx-ucl-beta Binary: upx-ucl-beta Architecture: source i386 Version: 1:1.94+0.20050331cvs-1 Distribution: experimental Urgency: low Maintainer: Robert Luberda [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By:

Accepted afterstep 2.00.04-2 (i386 source)

2005-04-01 Thread Robert Luberda
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 22:45:56 +0200 Source: afterstep Binary: libafterstep0 afterstep libafterimage-dev libafterimage0 Architecture: source i386 Version: 2.00.04-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Robert Luberda [EMAIL

Accepted kid 0.6.3-2 (all source)

2005-04-01 Thread Ross Burton
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2005 11:11:51 +0100 Source: kid Binary: kid Architecture: source all Version: 0.6.3-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Ross Burton [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Ross Burton [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description:

Accepted gnump3d 2.9.3-1 (all source)

2005-04-01 Thread Steve Kemp
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Friday, 1 Apr 2005 11:14:19 + Source: gnump3d Binary: gnump3d Architecture: source all Version: 2.9.3-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Steve Kemp [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Steve Kemp [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Accepted php4-auth-pam 0.4-7 (i386 source)

2005-04-01 Thread Carsten Wolff
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2005 04:28:49 +0200 Source: php4-auth-pam Binary: php4-auth-pam Architecture: source i386 Version: 0.4-7 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Carsten Wolff [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Carsten Wolff [EMAIL

Accepted osdsh 0.7.0-8 (i386 source)

2005-04-01 Thread Joachim Breitner
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2005 13:15:07 +0200 Source: osdsh Binary: osdsh Architecture: source i386 Version: 0.7.0-8 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Joachim Breitner [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Joachim Breitner [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Accepted openldap2.2 2.2.23-0.pre6 (i386 source)

2005-04-01 Thread Torsten Landschoff
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2005 12:26:35 +0200 Source: openldap2.2 Binary: slapd ldap-utils libldap-2.2-7 Architecture: source i386 Version: 2.2.23-0.pre6 Distribution: experimental Urgency: low Maintainer: Torsten Landschoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Accepted alexandria 0.5.1-2 (all source)

2005-04-01 Thread Dafydd Harries
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2005 00:48:04 +0200 Source: alexandria Binary: alexandria Architecture: source all Version: 0.5.1-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Dafydd Harries [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Dafydd Harries [EMAIL

Accepted lessdisks 0.5.3cvs.20040906-12 (all source)

2005-04-01 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2005 12:22:42 +0200 Source: lessdisks Binary: lessdisks-doc lessdisks lessdisks-terminal lessdisks-xterminal kernel-image-netbootable lessdisks-easydialog initrd-netboot-tools lessdisks-cloner-server

Accepted gmp-ecm 6.0.1-1 (powerpc source)

2005-04-01 Thread Laurent Fousse
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2005 15:02:22 +0200 Source: gmp-ecm Binary: gmp-ecm Architecture: source powerpc Version: 6.0.1-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Laurent Fousse [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Laurent Fousse [EMAIL

Accepted mozilla-thunderbird 1.0.2-2 (i386 source)

2005-04-01 Thread Alexander Sack
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 07:00:00 +0100 Source: mozilla-thunderbird Binary: mozilla-thunderbird-dev mozilla-thunderbird-inspector mozilla-thunderbird mozilla-thunderbird-typeaheadfind mozilla-thunderbird-offline Architecture: source i386

Accepted lessdisks 0.5.3cvs.20040906-13 (all source)

2005-04-01 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2005 15:00:56 +0200 Source: lessdisks Binary: lessdisks-doc lessdisks lessdisks-terminal lessdisks-xterminal kernel-image-netbootable lessdisks-easydialog initrd-netboot-tools lessdisks-cloner-server

Accepted arts 1.3.2-3 (i386 source all)

2005-04-01 Thread Debian Qt/KDE Maintainers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2005 12:19:49 +0200 Source: arts Binary: libarts1 libarts1-dev libartsc0-dev libartsc0 arts Architecture: source i386 all Version: 1.3.2-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Qt/KDE Maintainers

Accepted libant1.6-java 1.6.2-2.1 (all source)

2005-04-01 Thread Lars Wirzenius
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2005 16:07:00 +0200 Source: libant1.6-java Binary: libant1.6-java Architecture: source all Version: 1.6.2-2.1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Java Maintainers [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Lars

Accepted rmatrix 0.95.5-1 (i386 source)

2005-04-01 Thread Douglas Bates
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2005 07:49:15 -0600 Source: rmatrix Binary: r-cran-matrix Architecture: source i386 Version: 0.95.5-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Douglas Bates [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Accepted autofs 4.1.3+4.1.4beta2-4 (i386 source)

2005-04-01 Thread Steinar H. Gunderson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2005 15:58:20 +0200 Source: autofs Binary: autofs-hesiod autofs-ldap autofs Architecture: source i386 Version: 4.1.3+4.1.4beta2-4 Distribution: unstable Urgency: high Maintainer: Steinar H. Gunderson [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Accepted irssi-scripts 20050401 (all source)

2005-04-01 Thread Florian Ernst
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2005 16:06:17 +0200 Source: irssi-scripts Binary: irssi-scripts Architecture: source all Version: 20050401 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Florian Ernst [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Florian Ernst [EMAIL

Accepted libdc1394 1.1.0-2 (mips source)

2005-04-01 Thread p2
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2005 15:56:47 +0200 Source: libdc1394 Binary: libdc1394-examples libdc1394-13-dev libdc1394-13 Architecture: source mips Version: 1.1.0-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Peter De Schrijver (p2) [EMAIL

Accepted perlpanel 1:0.9.0+cvs20050401-1 (all source)

2005-04-01 Thread Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2005 14:11:18 +0200 Source: perlpanel Binary: perlpanel Architecture: source all Version: 1:0.9.0+cvs20050401-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Marc

Accepted coriander 1.0.1-2 (mips source)

2005-04-01 Thread p2
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2005 16:06:00 +0200 Source: coriander Binary: coriander Architecture: source mips Version: 1.0.1-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Peter De Schrijver (p2) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Peter De Schrijver

Accepted autofs 4.1.3+4.1.4beta2-5 (i386 source)

2005-04-01 Thread Steinar H. Gunderson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2005 16:26:17 +0200 Source: autofs Binary: autofs-hesiod autofs-ldap autofs Architecture: source i386 Version: 4.1.3+4.1.4beta2-5 Distribution: unstable Urgency: high Maintainer: Steinar H. Gunderson [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Accepted netselect 0.3.ds1-4 (i386 source all)

2005-04-01 Thread Filippo Giunchedi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2005 11:11:13 +0200 Source: netselect Binary: netselect netselect-apt Architecture: source i386 all Version: 0.3.ds1-4 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Filippo Giunchedi [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By:

Accepted abcde 2.2.4-1 (all source)

2005-04-01 Thread Jesus Climent
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2005 15:14:24 +0200 Source: abcde Binary: abcde Architecture: source all Version: 2.2.4-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Jesus Climent [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Jesus Climent [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Accepted gaim 1:1.2.0-3 (i386 source all)

2005-04-01 Thread Robert McQueen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2005 15:17:19 +0100 Source: gaim Binary: gaim gaim-dev gaim-data Architecture: source i386 all Version: 1:1.2.0-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: high Maintainer: Robert McQueen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Robert

Accepted libclass-dbi-asform-perl 2.41-2 (all source)

2005-04-01 Thread Stephen Quinney
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2005 16:05:19 +0100 Source: libclass-dbi-asform-perl Binary: libclass-dbi-asform-perl Architecture: source all Version: 2.41-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: high Maintainer: Stephen Quinney [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By:

Accepted mozilla-firefox 1.0.2-2 (i386 source)

2005-04-01 Thread Eric Dorland
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2005 01:18:18 -0500 Source: mozilla-firefox Binary: mozilla-firefox mozilla-firefox-gnome-support mozilla-firefox-dom-inspector Architecture: source i386 Version: 1.0.2-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: high Maintainer:

Accepted mydns 1.0.0-3 (i386 source all)

2005-04-01 Thread Philipp Kern
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2005 08:54:32 + Source: mydns Binary: mydns-pgsql mydns-common mydns-mysql Architecture: source i386 all Version: 1.0.0-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Philipp Kern [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By:

Accepted zsh-beta 4.3.0-dev-1+20050401-1 (all source)

2005-04-01 Thread Clint Adams
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2005 10:25:12 -0500 Source: zsh-beta Binary: zsh-beta-static zsh-beta-doc zsh-beta Architecture: source all Version: 4.3.0-dev-1+20050401-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Clint Adams [EMAIL PROTECTED

Accepted gambas 1.0.3-1 (i386 source all)

2005-04-01 Thread Jos L. Redrejo Rodrguez
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2005 12:14:33 +0200 Source: gambas Binary: gambas-gb-sdl gambas-gb-qt-editor gambas-gb-db-sqlite gambas-runtime gambas-gb-net gambas gambas-gb-xml gambas-gb-qt-ext gambas-gb-compress gambas-gb-vb gambas-doc

Accepted lessdisks 0.5.3cvs.20040906-14 (all source)

2005-04-01 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2005 16:12:19 +0200 Source: lessdisks Binary: lessdisks-doc lessdisks lessdisks-terminal lessdisks-xterminal kernel-image-netbootable lessdisks-easydialog initrd-netboot-tools lessdisks-cloner-server

  1   2   >