Re: unrar version confusion

On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 12:20:47AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Fri, May 20, 2005 at 10:58:52PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > On Fri, May 20, 2005 at 03:45:10PM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: > > > Quoting Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > >Why is the latest version in debian lower than

Re: RFC on mysql 4.1 in sarge

On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 12:01:58AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 02:49:13AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > >... > > I see the same three options. Joey has said he is working on a final woody > > point release for the last weekend in May; you'll probably need to > > coordinate

sshs.. get low cost software cds or download!

Need software? Click here. http://hgkd.rgv6c89ko1ryosr.aladfala9.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Example where testing-security was used?

As far as I understood it, the missing infrastructure for testing-security was the reason why the release of sarge was delayed by more than half a year. As far as I have seen, it seems most security updates go either through unstable or through testing-proposed-updates. Can anyone point me to

Re: unrar version confusion

On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 06:24:50PM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: > Adrian Bunk wrote: > > Repairing this issue by simply renaming the non-free package back to > > unrar and giving the free program a different name should be pretty > > straightforward and doable for sarge. > > > Package unrar

Re: [frankie@debian.org: Status of kernel-patches in sarge]

On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 10:04:02AM +0200, Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote: > The check shown below is almost complete (but for a couple of 2.2 patches > and per-arch patches). > I'm asking if mass bug report filing is opportune at this stage. > IMHO patches which cannot be applied to debian kernel

Re: unrar version confusion

Adrian Bunk wrote: > Repairing this issue by simply renaming the non-free package back to > unrar and giving the free program a different name should be pretty > straightforward and doable for sarge. > Package unrar * stable (utils): Unarchiver for .rar files [non-free] 2.71-1: alpha

Re: unrar version confusion

On Fri, May 20, 2005 at 10:58:52PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > On Fri, May 20, 2005 at 03:45:10PM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: > > Quoting Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > >Why is the latest version in debian lower than the one before? > > >Regards Nico > > > > Becuase it is, in fact, a

Re: [repost] Policy for Scheme implementations supporting SRFI 22, also virtual packages

* Jorgen Schaefer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Note: > This is a repost of the mail at > http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/04/msg01000.html - no > replies were received at that time. I have now created a bug > report against debian-policy (#310113) requesting the creation > of t

Re: RFC on mysql 4.1 in sarge

On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 08:35:03AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 05:08:28PM +0200, GOMBAS Gabor wrote: > > On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 02:49:13AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > > > 3 does not sound so bad to me; it's arguably user error anyway to replace > > > a > > > packa

Re: RFC on mysql 4.1 in sarge

On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 02:49:13AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: >... > I see the same three options. Joey has said he is working on a final woody > point release for the last weekend in May; you'll probably need to > coordinate with him and get something uploaded soon if you want to try for > this

Re: RFC on mysql 4.1 in sarge

On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 05:33:01PM -0400, sean finney wrote: > On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 11:00:29PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: >... > > Other issues like #308762 are also still possible on direct > > mysql-server/woody -> mysql-server-4.1/sarge upgrade paths - and > > there will be users doing such up

Re: Inconsistent handling of sourceless packages in main

On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 10:12:43AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: >... > And all have problems: > > package | danger > -+-- > kernel-image*| kernel-source* update replaces source > | rebuild differs > |

Re: Release update: freeze progress, closing date for non-RC fixes

On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 07:17:46PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 12:55:12AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 04:42:35PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > >... > > > According to , the official > > > count of rele

I can see you like watching tv

Hi, Do you wanna watch TV for free? SURE YOU DO! Will work on all U.S. and Canadian cable systems! Check it out: 1clickchannel.com Thanks, Billie Lewis blue watermellon cyan grapefruit Were those science teachers missing walking a few days ago?. Have you missed reading recently?. yellow gra

Bug#294397: I am willing to make this package

Package: wnpp Followup-For: Bug #294397 Owner: Romain Beauxis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Hi! I had already tried to package it few mounths ago, for my first try... So that was not that clean.. ;) Now I'm restarting from scratch, and I will do the following packages: -- mediabox404-web: package with al

[repost] Policy for Scheme implementations supporting SRFI 22, also virtual packages

Note: This is a repost of the mail at http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/04/msg01000.html - no replies were received at that time. I have now created a bug report against debian-policy (#310113) requesting the creation of the virtual packages mentioned in the policy. I will wait

Re: [PATCH] dpkg: add transparency support to dselect, misc. fixes

> "adeodato" == Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: adeodato> * Bernhard Fischer [Fri, 20 May 2005 18:23:14 +0200]: >> Hi, adeodato> Hi Bernhard, I'm not a dpkg person at all, but the adeodato> following advice sounds like common sense to me, and adeodato> perhap

mdadm+udev needs testing!

[Bcc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mdadm has three udev-related RC bugs (#294404, #273182 and #301560), which I seem to have been able to fix using previous work by Steve Langasek and Marco d'Itri. Since mdadm is a critical piece of software, I herewith call to those of you with the ability to test it in a u

Bug#310048: kicker: sometimes eats 100% CPU after logout from KDE

Package: kicker Version: 4:3.3.2-1 Severity: important Sometimes after I log out from KDE, the kicker remains hanging and starts eating 100% CPU. It doesn't die off even when I log in again, so I have to kill it with SIGKILL. This happens or not happens without obvious reasons, and the probability

Re: [frankie@debian.org: Status of kernel-patches in sarge]

On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 10:04:02AM +0200, Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote: > The check shown below is almost complete (but for a couple of 2.2 patches > and per-arch patches). > I'm asking if mass bug report filing is opportune at this stage. > IMHO patches which cannot be applied to debian kernel-

Bug#310044: ITP: proguard -- java class file shrinker, optimizer, and obfuscator

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Sam Clegg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: proguard Version : 3.2 Upstream Author : Eric Lafortune <[EMAIL PROTECTED] * URL : http://proguard.sourceforge.net/ * License : GPL Description : java class file shrinke

[frankie@debian.org: Status of kernel-patches in sarge]

The check shown below is almost complete (but for a couple of 2.2 patches and per-arch patches). I'm asking if mass bug report filing is opportune at this stage. IMHO patches which cannot be applied to debian kernel-sources are almost unuseful and should be removed from sarge... - Forwarded m