On Mon, May 30, 2005 at 08:14:09AM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> * Eric Dorland
>
> [Substituting your fixed sentence in the text below]
>
> | I think a build-dependency on automake and autoconf is almost always
> | a bad idea. It makes the build more unpredictable, which is
> | generally a ba
* Eric Dorland
[Substituting your fixed sentence in the text below]
| I think a build-dependency on automake and autoconf is almost always
| a bad idea. It makes the build more unpredictable, which is
| generally a bad thing. You should just run automake and/or autoconf
| on the unpacked source
[Adam Heath]
> "are not very knowledgable in IP security."
"knowledgeable", even. Unless this is another spelling variant brought
to us by differences in regional dialects..
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
[Nicolas François]
> I'm looking for really old sources of the shadow package.
> With http://snapshot.debian.net, the latest I can find is 2902-12
> (2002/06/04).
>
> Does anybody know where I can find older sources?
Google for mirrors of archive.debian.org.
Until archive went offline, it c
On Mon, May 30, 2005 at 07:21:41AM +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
> On Monday 30 May 2005 06:01, Laszlo Boszormenyi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > (*) I don't have time to take on another package at the moment. But I
> > > would be happy to help someone who wants to package auditd.
> > I have a l
On Sun, May 29, 2005 at 11:03:14PM -0400, Eric Dorland wrote:
> * Roberto C. Sanchez ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > On Sun, May 29, 2005 at 06:40:26PM -0400, Eric Dorland wrote:
> > >
> > > I don't think a dependency on automake and autoconf are almost always
> > > bad ideas. It makes the build mo
On Sun, 29 May 2005, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> On Mon, May 30, 2005 at 12:53:24PM +1200, Nigel Jones wrote:
> > Package: wnpp
> > Severity: wishlist
> > Owner: Nigel Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> >
> > * Package name: ipkungfu
> > Version : 0.5.2
> > Upstream Author : Rocco Sta
* Roberto C. Sanchez ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Sun, May 29, 2005 at 06:40:26PM -0400, Eric Dorland wrote:
> >
> > I don't think a dependency on automake and autoconf are almost always
> > bad ideas. It makes the build more unpredictable, which is generally a
> > bad thing. You should just ru
* Roberto C. Sanchez ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Sun, May 29, 2005 at 06:49:22PM -0400, Eric Dorland wrote:
> > * Eric Dorland ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > > I don't think a dependency on automake and autoconf are almost always
> > > bad ideas. It makes the build more unpredictable, which is
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Nigel Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: ipkungfu
Version : 0.5.2
Upstream Author : Rocco Stanzione <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.linuxkungfu.org/
* License : GPL
Description : iptables-based Linux
True I must say, it's not very user-friendly which we want debian to be.
On 30/05/05, Roberto C. Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, May 30, 2005 at 12:53:24PM +1200, Nigel Jones wrote:
> > Package: wnpp
> > Severity: wishlist
> > Owner: Nigel Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> >
> > * Packa
On Mon, May 30, 2005 at 12:53:24PM +1200, Nigel Jones wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Nigel Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
> * Package name: ipkungfu
> Version : 0.5.2
> Upstream Author : Rocco Stanzione <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL : http://www.lin
On Sun, May 29, 2005 at 06:40:26PM -0400, Eric Dorland wrote:
>
> I don't think a dependency on automake and autoconf are almost always
> bad ideas. It makes the build more unpredictable, which is generally a
> bad thing. You should just run automake and/or autoconf on the
> unpacked source and sh
On Sun, May 29, 2005 at 06:49:22PM -0400, Eric Dorland wrote:
> * Eric Dorland ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > I don't think a dependency on automake and autoconf are almost always
> > bad ideas. It makes the build more unpredictable, which is generally a
> > bad thing. You should just run automake
Hello,
I'm looking for really old sources of the shadow package.
With http://snapshot.debian.net, the latest I can find is 2902-12
(2002/06/04).
Does anybody know where I can find older sources?
TIA,
--
Nekral
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe".
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Uwe Mayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: lmc
Version : 0.12.1
Upstream Author : Uwe Mayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : https://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/lmc/
* License : GPLv2
Description : lmc is a database
If you read their downloads page they actually have some debs on their
own site, maybe instead of getting another lot of packages around the
world, convince them to get a sponsor and upload it to debian
directly...
Heres some links:
http://people.debian.org/~mpalmer/debian-mentors_FAQ.html - how
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: gajim
Version : 0.7
Upstream Author : Yann Le Boulanger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Vincent Hanquez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Nikos Kouremenos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Alex Podaras <[EMAIL PRO
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Laszlo Boszormenyi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: auditd
Version : 0.9
Upstream Author : Started by Rik Faith, maintained by Steve Grubb
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://people.redhat.com/sgrubb/audit/
*
On 29 May 2005 at 23:59, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
| On Sun, May 29, 2005 at 04:05:42PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| >
| > My ggobi package recently made it from non-free/math to math (as the AT&T
| > license was replaced by the CPL, same as for graphviz). However, as shown
by
| > igloo's script,
* Eric Dorland ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I don't think a dependency on automake and autoconf are almost always
> bad ideas. It makes the build more unpredictable, which is generally a
> bad thing. You should just run automake and/or autoconf on the
> unpacked source and ship it in the .diff.gz.
* Peter Samuelson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> [Roberto C. Sanchez]
> > > W: toshutils; Package Build-Depends on automake* or autoconf.
> > > This package Build-Depends on automake* or autoconf. This is almost
> > > never a good idea, as the package should run autoconf or automake on
> > > th
On Sun, May 29, 2005 at 04:05:42PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>
> My ggobi package recently made it from non-free/math to math (as the AT&T
> license was replaced by the CPL, same as for graphviz). However, as shown by
> igloo's script, buildds are not picking it up:
>
> http://people
My ggobi package recently made it from non-free/math to math (as the AT&T
license was replaced by the CPL, same as for graphviz). However, as shown by
igloo's script, buildds are not picking it up:
http://people.debian.org/~igloo/package-status.php?package=ggobi
Is there something I nee
On Monday 30 May 2005 06:01, Laszlo Boszormenyi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > (*) I don't have time to take on another package at the moment. But I
> > would be happy to help someone who wants to package auditd.
>
> I have a little time and would like to package auditd. There are two
> problems
On Sun, May 29, 2005 at 02:12:27PM -0400, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
> On Sun, 29 May 2005, ratikanta rath wrote:
>
> >Note- I began liking debian after i heard of it.
> >Please help this poor student by mailing me the CDs if
> >you have
> >
>
> How far away are you from Bhubaneswar? There is a Linu
On Sun, May 29, 2005 at 01:31:31PM -0500, Peter Samuelson wrote:
> Build-depend on autotools-dev, and copy /usr/share/misc/config.guess
> and config.sub into place at build time. ln -fs also works. It's a
> very light build dep, so there's not much point in patching the right
> files into the sou
On Sun, 2005-05-29 at 16:09 +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
> The option CONFIG_AUDIT needs to be enabled to allow SE Linux access denials
> to be logged, without this it is impossible to use SE Linux. While making
> such changes enabling the option CONFIG_AUDITSYSCALL would be useful, this
> enabl
On Sun, May 29, 2005 at 01:31:31PM -0500, Peter Samuelson wrote:
>
> [Roberto C. Sanchez]
> > > W: toshutils; Package Build-Depends on automake* or autoconf.
> > > This package Build-Depends on automake* or autoconf. This is almost
> > > never a good idea, as the package should run autoconf or a
On Sun, May 29, 2005 at 01:31:31PM -0500, Peter Samuelson wrote:
>
> [Roberto C. Sanchez]
> > > W: toshutils; The file config.guess contains a timestamp line that is
> > > less than 2002.
> > > The autoconf file shown above contains a timestamp variable that has a
> > > year that is less than
[Roberto C. Sanchez]
> > W: toshutils; Package Build-Depends on automake* or autoconf.
> > This package Build-Depends on automake* or autoconf. This is almost
> > never a good idea, as the package should run autoconf or automake on
> > the source tree before the source package is built.
There'
On Sun, 29 May 2005, ratikanta rath wrote:
Note- I began liking debian after i heard of it.
Please help this poor student by mailing me the CDs if
you have
How far away are you from Bhubaneswar? There is a Linux User Group there
which can possibly assist you with CDs and other Linux help.
Good news men! All your problems with small penis and poor erections will
become history!!!
http://www.jnaz.net/ss/
Nothing spoils a confession like repentance.
Experience is what you get when you don't get what you want.
Adversity makes men, and prosperity makes monsters.
No o
On Sun, May 29, 2005 at 09:45:25PM +1000, Anibal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
> drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2005-05-29 21:45:04 ./usr/bin/
> -rwxr-xr-x root/root 7784 2005-05-29 21:45:04 ./usr/bin/fan
> -rwxr-xr-x root/root 9108 2005-05-29 21:45:04 ./usr/bin/svpw
> -rwxr-xr-x root/root
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: hurd-trans-unionfs
Version : CVS
Upstream Author : Moritz Schulte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Gianluca Guida <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://sv.gnu.org/projects/hurdextras
* License : GPL
Descri
Note- I began liking debian after i heard of it.
Please help this poor student by mailing me the CDs if
you have
Dear Sir/Madam,
I am Ratikanta Rath from Angul(Orissa). I am a below
middle-class(above poverty) boy living in a village of
Jarasigha, near Angul town.
Two months ago, I heard of linu
C'est quoi cet abruti qui envoie des messages aussi cons et qui en plus font
2,6 Mo?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
75% Off for All New Software.
http://xsnlz.5c9kqmnykfnc2o5.solesbikje.com
I can remember when the air was clean and sex was dirty.
Celibacy is not hereditary.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Le Dim 29 Mai 2005 11:38, Mark Purcell a écrit :
> * URL : http://www.twinklephone.org/
I guess you meant .com ? the .org one does not exists.
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··O[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OOO
On Sun, May 29, 2005 at 10:38:06AM +0100, Mark Purcell wrote:
> Twinkle contains the following 3rd party software packages:
Shouldn't these really be packaged as separate packages?
/* Steinar */
--
Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mark Purcell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: twinkle
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Michel de Boer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.twinklephone.org/
* License : GPL
Description : VoIP Softphone
Softphon
On Sat, May 28, 2005 at 07:10:35PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> I will not be online between June 2nd and 5th. Don't release without me! ;-)
>
> --
> see shy jo
is that the day that you fly a kite with a built-in webcam (kitenet?)
cheers,
kev
--
counter.li.org #238656 -- goto counter.li.org and be
42 matches
Mail list logo
