On 2005-07-05 Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> Besides the C++ ABI change, all m68k and hppa packages depending on
> libgcc1 have to be rebuilt to use libgcc2.
[...]
Hej,
Who is responsible for this? The porters/buildd-maintainers
(recompiling just for these architectures and maki
On Tue, Jul 05, 2005 at 10:36:49AM -0700, John H. Robinson, IV wrote:
> Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > Or a "Package-Type: application | lib | data | doc | dev | common |
> > dummy". A yes/no field is hard to extend to more cases.
> While I do find the above idea very useful, how does it help wi
On Tue, Jul 05, 2005 at 10:36:49AM -0700, John H. Robinson, IV wrote:
> Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
>
> While I do find the above idea very useful, how does it help with the
> circular dependency issue? Could there be another tag
> ``In-Case-Of-Ci
Hej.
Come watch Liza get freaky!
When he unbuttoned his pants, she was wide-eyed looking at its massive girth in
horror!
But she finally managed to choke it down and then got it stuffed in her hole !
Cherry loved getting that black pole inserted way deep up inside her and she
moaned and groan
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Florian Ragwitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: hs-plugins
Version : 0.9.8
Upstream Author : Don Stewart
* URL : http://www.cse.unsw.edu.au/~dons/hs-plugins/
* License : GPL-2
Description : Dynamically Loaded Has
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> If you produce a List with name, keyid, length/algo and fingerprint one can
> use that list for checkmarking the read fngerprints.
Sorry I didnt notice that you provide multiple lists.
Bernd
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subje
[Goswin von Brederlow]
> Isn't that a policy violation in itself already?
He said the same *source*, not the same binary package.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> "Matthias" == Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Matthias> - Rebuild C++ applications, which do not depend on any
> Matthias> other C++ library besides libstdc++.
>
> Matthias> - Rename and rebuild C++ libraries, which do not d
"John H. Robinson, IV" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> Or a "Package-Type: application | lib | data | doc | dev | common |
>> dummy". A yes/no field is hard to extend to more cases.
>> As a bonus the 'Package-Type: dummy" would be packages needed to
>> handle package r
Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Jul 05, 2005 at 05:54:27PM +0200, Johann Glaser wrote:
>> Is there a way to find out what the "base path" of a Packages file is
>> supposed to be?
>
> No
There are only 2 cases:
Having 'dists///binary-/' in the path and not.
You could
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> I'll change the scripts to list the keyids as well. As I'm going
> to publish the keyring and the list of fingerprints in a couple of
> hours, that change will be effective next time I organize a ksp.
If you produce a List with name, keyid, length/algo a
Brian May writes:
> > "Matthias" == Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Matthias> - Rebuild C++ applications, which do not depend on any
> Matthias> other C++ library besides libstdc++.
>
> Matthias> - Rename and rebuild C++ libraries, which do not depend
> Matthi
On Tue, Jul 05, 2005 at 11:41:21AM +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote:
>On Sun, 26 Jun 2005, Anibal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
>
>>A list of names of accepted keys is listed at [1].
>>
>>[1] http://people.debian.org/~anibal/ksp-dc5-names.txt
>
>It would be nice to have a list of keyids, not just a list of n
> "Matthias" == Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Matthias> - Rebuild C++ applications, which do not depend on any
Matthias> other C++ library besides libstdc++.
Matthias> - Rename and rebuild C++ libraries, which do not depend
Matthias> on any other C++ library bes
ti, 2005-07-05 kello 21:18 +0300, Lars Wirzenius kirjoitti:
> I have the package ready:
>
> Package: piuparts
I forgot to add the URL, sorry.
http://liw.iki.fi/liw/download/piuparts/
(That's a somewhat temporary location, however.)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subjec
Roger Lynn wrote on 03/06/2005 00:29:
> On Tue, 31 May 2005 21:37:28 -0700, Stephen Birch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>Darren Salt([EMAIL PROTECTED])@2005-05-31 21:49:
>>
>>>For those who've missed the first three broadcasts today, there's one more at
>>>01:05 GMT; also see http://news.bbc.co.uk
On Tue, Jul 05, 2005 at 07:34:37PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote :
> Le mardi 05 juillet 2005 ? 18:27 +0200, Jean-Philippe Garcia Ballester a
> ?crit :
> > I see your point. I tried to fix that. Hope I didn't do it wrong
> > (again). If someone could check...
>
> I don't understand your modificati
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Lars Wirzenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: piuparts
Version : 0.6
Upstream Author : Lars Wirzenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : none
* License : GPL version 2
Description : .deb package installation, upgrading
On Tue, Jul 05, 2005 at 06:44:16PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Jul 05, paddy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > http://www.senderbase.org/?searchBy=ipaddress&sb=1&searchString=140.211.166.43&showRBL=1
> >
> > Is there a better way to do this ?
>
> We would need smarter users, and people would
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rob Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, 2005-06-27 at 11:27 +0900, Kenshi Muto wrote:
>> At Sun, 26 Jun 2005 21:11:22 +0100,
>> Roger Leigh wrote:
>> > This mail is just to test the water to see if there is any interest in
>> > forming a prin
On Sun, 03 Jul 2005 the mental interface of
Matthias Klose told:
> This week, we will change the GCC default versions from 3.3 to 4.0
Do we have to put
CFLAGS += -Wno-pointer-sign
by default to each rules file?
Elimar
--
Never make anything simple and efficient when a way
can be found t
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >> But that doesn't realy solve the problem on its own. It would be nice if
> >> packages could be consistently taged with "Application:
> >> yes|no|" signifying that
Le mardi 05 juillet 2005 à 18:27 +0200, Jean-Philippe Garcia Ballester a
écrit :
> I see your point. I tried to fix that. Hope I didn't do it wrong
> (again). If someone could check...
I don't understand your modifications. There are differences in the
Makefile.in and configure files, but no diffe
On Tue, Jul 05, 2005 at 05:54:27PM +0200, Johann Glaser wrote:
> Is there a way to find out what the "base path" of a Packages file is
> supposed to be?
No
> > So all cases are explained by this or by the woody-proposed-updates
> > thingy.
>
> When will the woody-proposed-updates Packages files
> spohr is listed on spamcop.
>
> http://www.senderbase.org/?searchBy=ipaddress&sb=1&searchString=140.211.166.43&showRBL=1
>
> Is there a better way to do this ?
This is completely expected because of the way the Spamcop blacklist
is operated: It is maintained by the same stupid users that reguarl
On Jul 05, paddy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://www.senderbase.org/?searchBy=ipaddress&sb=1&searchString=140.211.166.43&showRBL=1
>
> Is there a better way to do this ?
We would need smarter users, and people would need to stop using spamcop
do block mail.
(I had it delisted.)
--
ciao,
Ma
On Tue, Jul 05, 2005 at 04:39:14PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote :
> Le mardi 05 juillet 2005 ? 16:34 +0200, Jean-Philippe Garcia Ballester a
> ?crit :
> > > 1. It's linking with openssl, and claiming to be LGPL, which
> > > I understand to be incompatible.
> >
> > I assume that linking with li
Hi!
> The first few are not supposed to work with 'normal' sources.list
> entries, but with 'deb
> http:///debian/dists/sarge/main/update-kernel ./'.
I see, thanks.
Is there a way to find out what the "base path" of a Packages file is
supposed to be?
> So all cases are explained by this or by t
On Tue, Jul 05, 2005 at 05:21:37PM +0200, Johann Glaser wrote:
> Jeroen wrote:
> > woody-proposed-updates got dropped because there is no more point
> > release of woody, so the proposed-updates of it simply are no longer
> > relevant.
>
> I see. Thus, I simply have to wait until woody-proposed-up
Johann Glaser wrote:
>Hi!
>
>
>Ok, great. Lets have a look. This is the output of my script checking
>our internal mirror. It searches all "Packages" files, filters the lines
>starting with "Filename:" and checks if these files are present. For a
>few weeks it complains about these missing files:
>
On Tue, Jul 05, 2005 at 04:34:42PM +0200, Jean-Philippe Garcia Ballester wrote :
> On Tue, Jul 05, 2005 at 08:26:25PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote :
> > Hi,
> >
> > > > > The package can be downloaded at http://dgnr.free.fr/repository, or
> > > > > with apt-get with "deb http://dgnr.free.fr/ reposi
On Mon, 2005-06-27 at 11:27 +0900, Kenshi Muto wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi Roger,
>
> At Sun, 26 Jun 2005 21:11:22 +0100,
> Roger Leigh wrote:
> > This mail is just to test the water to see if there is any interest in
> > forming a printing group for coordinati
Hi!
> At least some of them are of woody-proposed-updates, which got dropped
> from the database, and hence from pool. Indeed, the corresponding
> Packages.gz files on the mirrors didn't get dropped yet, which is a
> minor bug.
>
> woody-proposed-updates got dropped because there is no more poin
On Tue, Jul 05, 2005 at 05:02:56PM +0200, Johann Glaser wrote:
> Ok, great. Lets have a look. This is the output of my script checking
> our internal mirror. It searches all "Packages" files, filters the lines
> starting with "Filename:" and checks if these files are present. For a
> few weeks it c
Hi!
Am Montag, den 04.07.2005, 11:55 +0200 schrieb Goswin von Brederlow:
> Johann Glaser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Hi!
> >
> > For a few weeks there are discrepancies between some "Packages" files
> > and the files in the ./pool/ directory. Unfortunately the debian-mirrors
> > list is dea
Le mardi 05 juillet 2005 à 16:34 +0200, Jean-Philippe Garcia Ballester a
écrit :
> > 1. It's linking with openssl, and claiming to be LGPL, which
> > I understand to be incompatible.
>
> I assume that linking with libcrypto.so and not libssl.so does not
> change the problem?
> I'll talk to upst
On Tue, Jul 05, 2005 at 08:26:25PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote :
> Hi,
>
> > > > The package can be downloaded at http://dgnr.free.fr/repository, or
> > > > with apt-get with "deb http://dgnr.free.fr/ repository/"
> > >
> > > From the look of it, your packaging looks wrong.
> > > You're probably
interested please send more
info?
Le mardi 05 juillet 2005 à 20:26 +0900, Junichi Uekawa a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> > > > The package can be downloaded at http://dgnr.free.fr/repository, or
> > > > with apt-get with "deb http://dgnr.free.fr/ repository/"
> > >
> > > From the look of it, your packaging looks wrong.
> > > You're probably
Hi,
Since the move of the BTS from master to spohr, the PTS keyword for
control@ bugs messages accidently changed from 'bts-control' to 'bts'.
Since nobody complained (afaik) for nearly 1.5 years, I guess this
feature wasn't really used anyway, and I propose dropping it. People's
bts keyword will
Hi,
> > > The package can be downloaded at http://dgnr.free.fr/repository, or
> > > with apt-get with "deb http://dgnr.free.fr/ repository/"
> >
> > From the look of it, your packaging looks wrong.
> > You're probably creating a package that ignores SONAME versioning.
>
> I'm not exactly sure to
Hi,
spohr is listed on spamcop.
http://www.senderbase.org/?searchBy=ipaddress&sb=1&searchString=140.211.166.43&showRBL=1
Is there a better way to do this ?
Regards,
Paddy
--
Perl 6 will give you the big knob. -- Larry Wall
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "uns
On Tue, Jul 05, 2005 at 11:00:51AM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> [Hamish Moffatt]
> > I thought policy said something stronger than that, but I seem to be
> > wrong. Best practice used to be to ask questions only when there was
> > no sensible default whatsoever. Not to ask everything possibl
Hi,
> >>
> >>This coming Sunday is 3 July. So the deadline is the end of Sunday
> >>3 July 2005 in timezone UTC -1200.
>
> That was the deadline for sending keys.
>
> >Am I missing something or are the keys going to be prepared ?
>
> They will be ready on Wednesday 6 July.
Oops, thanks.
regar
On Tue, Jul 05, 2005 at 10:37:00AM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote :
>
> Hi,
>
> > The package can be downloaded at http://dgnr.free.fr/repository, or
> > with apt-get with "deb http://dgnr.free.fr/ repository/"
>
> From the look of it, your packaging looks wrong.
> You're probably creating a packag
On 7/2/05, Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Kevin Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-07-01 23:34]:
> > > and we are doing a sociological survey on Debian in order to
> > > better understand the Debian community.
> >
> > didn't tbm do some research into this?
>
> Yes and no. There is cu
On Sun, 26 Jun 2005, Anibal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
> A list of names of accepted keys is listed at [1].
>
> [1] http://people.debian.org/~anibal/ksp-dc5-names.txt
It would be nice to have a list of keyids, not just a list of names.
--
PGP signed and encrypted | .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux *
Hi!
Petter Reinholdtsen [2005-07-05 11:00 +0200]:
> [Hamish Moffatt]
> > I thought policy said something stronger than that, but I seem to be
> > wrong. Best practice used to be to ask questions only when there was
> > no sensible default whatsoever. Not to ask everything possible just
> > because
[Hamish Moffatt]
> I thought policy said something stronger than that, but I seem to be
> wrong. Best practice used to be to ask questions only when there was
> no sensible default whatsoever. Not to ask everything possible just
> because you can.
Keeping the question priority at 'low' make sure m
On Tue, Jul 05, 2005 at 07:26:33AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Quoting Peter Palfrader ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> > OTOH, if there is a sensible default (and there is for jed), just pick
> > one and be done with it. No need to burden the admin with yet another
> > question.
>
> I beg to disa
Hola debian-devel,
Alguna ves tuviste que hacer el texto vendedor de un folleto o carpeta de
presentación?
Te sucedió que un texto tuvo más resultado que el otro y no sabes porque?
En una reunión con tu jefe, proveedor, empleado o socio
sentiste que algunas veces fuiste más convincente que otras
51 matches
Mail list logo
