Re: Work done on the WNPP front

2005-10-02 Thread Matej Vela
David Moreno Garza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...] > A fourth shoot was intended a couple of minutes ago on the ITA bugs. The > ITAs were a little bit different. Since they represent existing > packages, the mechanism used here was intended to close bugs, but > retitling into O. ITAs are a very

subscribe

2005-10-02 Thread Javier E. Perez P.
-- Javier E. Perez P. (aka dvst) GPG KeyID: 441C47B4 fingerprint = AB52 DC66 A8A3 2E93 59E4 87E0 372D 91FD 441C 47B4 Maracay - Venezuela signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Bug#331325: ITP: xfce4-cpufreq-plugin -- cpufreq information plugin for the Xfce4 panel

2005-10-02 Thread Stefan Ott
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Stefan Ott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: xfce4-cpufreq-plugin Version : 0.1 Upstream Author : Joshua Kwan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://triplehelix.org/blog/ * License : BSD Description : cpufreq informat

Bug#331319: ITP: ksubtile -- subtitle editor for KDE

2005-10-02 Thread Isaac Clerencia
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Isaac Clerencia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: ksubtile Version : 1.1 Upstream Author : Tom Deblauwe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://ksubtile.sourceforge.net * License : GPL Description : subtitle editor for

Re: Bug#331287: ITP: criawips -- full featured presentation tool

2005-10-02 Thread Ben Pfaff
David Moreno Garza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Criawips aims to become a full featured presentation application > that offers the perfect platform both for small presentations > used to explain a few things to other people and for big > presentations used for commercial presentations. > > Thu

Re: Everyone go test aptitude 0.3.4!

2005-10-02 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sun, Oct 02, 2005 at 03:37:53PM +0200, Bernd Schubert wrote: > >> I suppose so -- it'll probably take a while before the translations are > >> ready anyway. When do you think apt 0.6.41 and its related packages will > >> go in? > > Not until gcc-4.0 and perl are both updated in testing, whi

Bug#331287: ITP: criawips -- full featured presentation tool

2005-10-02 Thread David Moreno Garza
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: David Moreno Garza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 * Package name: criawips Version : 0.0.11 Upstream Author : Sven Herzberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://www.nongnu.org/criawips * License

Re: time seen at top of /var/log/boot

2005-10-02 Thread Anthony DeRobertis
Dan Jacobson wrote: > No its not my BIOS time. It appears to be a timezone 4 timezones east > of New Zealand, GMT+16, i.e., out of this world. How about on your machine? [EMAIL PROTECTED]:anthony$ perl -nwe 'next unless /Setting the System Clock/../System Clock set/; s/: S.*//;print' /var/log/boo

Bug#331268: ITP: loop-aes-modules -- auto-build loop-AES binary modules

2005-10-02 Thread Max Vozeler
Package: wnpp Owner: Max Vozeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Severity: wishlist * Package name: loop-aes-modules Version : 3.0d+3.0b+1 Upstream Author : Max Vozeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://svn.decl.org/public/loop-aes-modules * License : GPL Description

ITP, RFH: pcsx -- Sony PlayStation emulator

2005-10-02 Thread Ryan Schultz
reopen 137355 retitle 137355 ITP: pcsx -- Sony PlayStation emulator owner 137355 ! thanks bts, daisuki da yo Package: wnpp Owner: Ryan Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Severity: wishlist * Package name: pcsx Version : 1.6f Upstream Authors : Ryan Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: Accepted aptitude 0.3.4-1 (source all i386)

2005-10-02 Thread Steve Greenland
On 02-Oct-05, 09:34 (CDT), "Bernhard R. Link" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [051002 05:57]: > > > - The password database is used instead of $HOME to determine where > > >aptitude's configuration file goes, so people using sudo don't end > > > up > > >

Re: bogus lintian warning

2005-10-02 Thread Henning Makholm
Scripsit Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sure you can. Lintian could (relatively) easily check whether the > problem is in the .orig.tar.gz before application of the Debian diff, > and suppress the message in that case. Better yet: Warn if (there are CVS directories in the .diff.gz) OR ((t

Re: bogus lintian warning

2005-10-02 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Sun, 02 Oct 2005, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On Sun, 02 Oct 2005, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > >> Easily caught: check to make sure the CVS files are not in the > >> .orig.tz before complaining. > > > > You keep assuming the bogus stu

Re: Accepted aptitude 0.3.4-1 (source all i386)

2005-10-02 Thread Henning Makholm
Scripsit "Bernhard R. Link" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > * Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [051002 05:57]: >> > - The password database is used instead of $HOME to >> > determine where aptitude's configuration file goes, so >> > people using sudo don't end up with root-owned mode 0700 >> >

Re: bogus lintian warning

2005-10-02 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Sun, 02 Oct 2005, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> No; it should not report uncorrectible warnings. > > *IT* *IS* *NOT* *UNCORRECTIBLE*. If you have a good reason to, you can and > > should correct it. You are just not supposed to do it

Re: Everyone go test aptitude 0.3.4!

2005-10-02 Thread Guilherme de S. Pastore
Em Sáb, 2005-10-01 às 21:43 -0400, Travis Crump escreveu: > That's the stale 0.3.3 aptitude, looks like the new one won't hit the > archives til tomorrow[or it needs to be autobuilt]... The dinstall run will happen in approximately 4h30, according to http://people.debian.org/~joerg/dinstall.html =

Re: Accepted aptitude 0.3.4-1 (source all i386)

2005-10-02 Thread Bernhard R. Link
* Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [051002 05:57]: > > - The password database is used instead of $HOME to determine where > >aptitude's configuration file goes, so people using sudo don't end up > >with root-owned mode 0700 files in their home directory. > >(Closes: #2724

Re: bogus lintian warning

2005-10-02 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sun, 02 Oct 2005, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: >> Easily caught: check to make sure the CVS files are not in the >> .orig.tz before complaining. > > You keep assuming the bogus stuff ends up in the diff. It once happened to > me that it en

Re: bogus lintian warning

2005-10-02 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> No; it should not report uncorrectible warnings. > > *IT* *IS* *NOT* *UNCORRECTIBLE*. If you have a good reason to, you can and > should correct it. You are just not supposed to do it just to shut lintian > up, use an override for that.

Re: bogus lintian warning

2005-10-02 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Sun, 02 Oct 2005, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > Easily caught: check to make sure the CVS files are not in the > .orig.tz before complaining. You keep assuming the bogus stuff ends up in the diff. It once happened to me that it ended up on the .orig.tar.gz, but I don't recall exactly what kind o

Re: please upload gal0.x-0.24-2

2005-10-02 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The build of gal0.x-0.24-2 is complete on alpha, i386, mips, and > mipsel, but has not been uploaded to the archive. Users are starting > to notice and complain. Can you please upload them ASAP? Thanks. Whoops, there's a dangling antecedent if

Re: Everyone go test aptitude 0.3.4!

2005-10-02 Thread Bernd Schubert
> >> I suppose so -- it'll probably take a while before the translations are >> ready anyway. When do you think apt 0.6.41 and its related packages will >> go in? > > Not until gcc-4.0 and perl are both updated in testing, which block much > of > the archive from being updated right now. gcc-

please upload gal0.x-0.24-2

2005-10-02 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
The build of gal0.x-0.24-2 is complete on alpha, i386, mips, and mipsel, but has not been uploaded to the archive. Users are starting to notice and complain. Can you please upload them ASAP? Thanks. Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troubl

Re: bogus lintian warning

2005-10-02 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > dpkg-buildpackage in a cvs-checkout directory with strange things in the > parent dir, for example, because of test builds leaving weird shit on the > parent directory + lack of coffee + typing dpkg-buildpackage instead of > cvs-buildpackag

Re: bogus lintian warning

2005-10-02 Thread Colin Watson
On Sun, Oct 02, 2005 at 03:07:51AM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > On Sat, 01 Oct 2005, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > > But lintian is not there to warn about unfixable problems with > > You cannot reliably determine wether the maintainer is doing something > stupid, or upstream is. Su

Re: bogus lintian warning

2005-10-02 Thread Colin Watson
On Sat, Oct 01, 2005 at 06:59:19PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote: > Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Or those who screw up and add it to a non-orig .orig.tar.gz (and by that I > >> do NOT mean a modified upstream one, I mean

Re: renaming mysql++

2005-10-02 Thread Henning Glawe
On Sun, Oct 02, 2005 at 01:17:12PM +0200, Henning Makholm wrote: > Scripsit Henning Glawe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > one minor point would be "apt-get install" interpreting + and - > > appended to package names for manual conflict resolution.so "apt-get > > install ... libmysql++ ..." could have di

Re: Circular testing excuses for swt-gtk and swingwt

2005-10-02 Thread Steve Langasek
On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 11:02:59AM -0600, Shaun Jackman wrote: > I am trying to help move swt-gtk into testing. The excuses [1] for > swingwt, which depends on swt-gtk, says... > * swingwt is waiting for swt-gtk > * Updating swt-gtk makes 2 depending packages uninstallable on arm: > libswing

Re: renaming mysql++

2005-10-02 Thread Henning Makholm
Scripsit Henning Glawe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > one minor point would be "apt-get install" interpreting + and - > appended to package names for manual conflict resolution.so "apt-get > install ... libmysql++ ..." could have different meanings in > different context It wouldn't matter for a library p

Re: Advices needed for moving {add|remove}-shell from passwd to debianutils

2005-10-02 Thread Peter Samuelson
[Christian Perrier] > Peter Samuelson mentioned passwd being Essential because it depends > on passwd. This is actually right. However this dependency is just > the consequence of bash needing the add-shell and remove-shell > utilities...so, in the future, bash shouldn't depend on passwd > anymore

Re: renaming mysql++

2005-10-02 Thread Henning Glawe
On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 09:41:45AM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote: > I intend to rename the binary packages for mysql++ with the upload of 2.0.5. > They've been called libsqlplus* for a while now, which isn't overly > intuitive (I've had multiple people not realize mysql++ was packaged for > debian, d

Re: Bug#331072: ITP: cinelerra-cvs -- non-linear video editor and compositor for Linux.

2005-10-02 Thread Adrian von Bidder
On Saturday 01 October 2005 17.07, Andreas Kuckartz wrote: > But your reaction proves that the name "cinelerra-cvs" is misleading. But IMHO that's not something the Debian packager can do anything other than write it in the description. Renaming the package would only confuse users searching fo

Re: Everyone go test aptitude 0.3.4!

2005-10-02 Thread Marc Haber
On Sun, 2 Oct 2005 02:57:43 +0200, "Steinar H. Gunderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Am I missing something here? > >baby:~> LANG=C sudo aptitude -t experimental install aptitude The package is in incoming, you cannot apt it yet. Greetings Marc -- -- !! No c

Re: How to generate a patch?

2005-10-02 Thread Lars Wirzenius
su, 2005-10-02 kello 09:20 +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen kirjoitti: > [Robert Epprecht] > > I have a suggestion for a new feature of a program which I'd like to > > sent to the author. What is the exact command to generate the patch > > in the usual format? > > This was answered on the list not too l

Re: gal0.x not being added to archive?

2005-10-02 Thread Loïc Minier
Hi, On Sat, Oct 01, 2005, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > > Why is gal0.x not being added to the archive on alpha, i386, mips, and > mipsel? According to the buildd logs, it compiled successfully on all > those archs over ten days ago. > > It was uploaded for all the other archs. I think

Re: How to generate a patch?

2005-10-02 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
[Robert Epprecht] > I have a suggestion for a new feature of a program which I'd like to > sent to the author. What is the exact command to generate the patch > in the usual format? This was answered on the list not too long ago. Use for example 'diff -ur original yourver' to get the patch betwee

How to generate a patch?

2005-10-02 Thread Robert Epprecht
I have a suggestion for a new feature of a program which I'd like to sent to the author. What is the exact command to generate the patch in the usual format? Sorry, for the very basic question ;-) Robert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Con