Re: Marking BTS spam

2006-02-24 Thread Cord Beermann
Hallo! Du (Blars Blarson) hast geschrieben: The lists.debian.org spam button doesn't have much immediate effect. correct, but we are working on it. Cord -- http://lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL

Re: On binary compatibility

2006-02-24 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Thu, 23 Feb 2006, Michael Gilbert wrote: First of all, I think it is useful to analyze Ubuntu's motivation -- releasing well-integrated bleeding-edge software. The easiest way to accomplish this goal is by branching from sid. This means that Ubuntu libraries differ from the stable Debian

Re: On binary compatibility

2006-02-24 Thread Reinhard Tartler
Michael Gilbert wrote: I've read a lot about the binary incompatibility concern between Debian and Ubuntu. It is a design decision of ubuntu to ensure source code compatibility only. Binary compatibility to debian/stable is not a release goal. I think that Ubuntu's motivation to provide the

lists.d.o Spam (was: Marking BTS spam)

2006-02-24 Thread Cord Beermann
Hallo! Du (Nico Golde) hast geschrieben: At the moment the spam-report.pl script uses: input type=hidden name=listname value=debian-devel / input type=hidden name=msg value=msg00065.html / input type=hidden name=date value=2005/09 / To identify the message, this wouldn't work with a MUA so the

Packaing Xen 3.0 etc for Debian

2006-02-24 Thread Matthew Grant
Ralph, I am a Debian Maintainer who is seriously considering getting Xen into Debian and Ubuntu. I have been installing xen-unstable.hg from source on my AMD 64 and have been impressed with its relative stability. I am prepared to sponsor your packages into Debian if we can get them cleaned

Re: Packaing Xen 3.0 etc for Debian

2006-02-24 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 11:02:57PM +1300, Matthew Grant wrote: I am a Debian Maintainer who is seriously considering getting Xen into Debian and Ubuntu. I have been installing xen-unstable.hg from source on my AMD 64 and have been impressed with its relative stability. I am prepared to

Re: Packaing Xen 3.0 etc for Debian

2006-02-24 Thread Norbert Tretkowski
* Matthew Grant wrote: We would need the Debian security team to give us access to a patch repository for all the Linux security patches. Those patches are in the kernel svn repository.

Re: Problems found by piuparts

2006-02-24 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Don Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Thu, 23 Feb 2006, Frank Küster wrote: Don Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 22 Feb 2006, Frank Küster wrote: Adeodato Simó [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Correct, so one would put in foo.postrm: rmdir --ignore-fail-on-non-empty

Re: Packaing Xen 3.0 etc for Debian

2006-02-24 Thread Bastian Blank
On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 11:02:57PM +1300, Matthew Grant wrote: I am a Debian Maintainer who is seriously considering getting Xen into Debian and Ubuntu. The debian kernel team will maintain xen images with the linux-2.6 source. I currently prepare both xen 3.0 and unstable packages, which can

Re: Packaing Xen 3.0 etc for Debian

2006-02-24 Thread Ralph Passgang
Am Freitag, 24. Februar 2006 11:02 schrieb Matthew Grant: Ralph, Hi Matthew, I am a Debian Maintainer who is seriously considering getting Xen into Debian and Ubuntu. I have been installing xen-unstable.hg from source on my AMD 64 and have been impressed with its relative stability. I am

Re: lists.d.o Spam (was: Marking BTS spam)

2006-02-24 Thread Cord Beermann
Hallo! Du (Cord Beermann) hast geschrieben: The idea of having a reporting address is good, i'll will announce one in the next days and then lets see what happens. ok, here it is: (alpha release, lets see what happens and if it is useful.) If you get spam via our lists, BOUNCE[1] it to [EMAIL

Re: lists.d.o Spam (was: Marking BTS spam)

2006-02-24 Thread Nico Golde
Hi, * Cord Beermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-02-24 14:31]: Hallo! Du (Cord Beermann) hast geschrieben: The idea of having a reporting address is good, i'll will announce one in the next days and then lets see what happens. ok, here it is: (alpha release, lets see what happens and if it is

./configure in debian/rules

2006-02-24 Thread Pjotr Kourzanov
Dear developers, In a number of packages (e.g., busybox, dash and many more) the debian/rules Makefile calls ./configure without --host argument. This makes the life quite difficult for cross-compilation - for every such package I need to add --host=$(DEB_HOST_GNU_TYPE) to every configure

Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Re: Packaing Xen 3.0 etc for Debian

2006-02-24 Thread Guido Trotter
Bastian Blank wrote: Hi! The debian kernel team will maintain xen images with the linux-2.6 source. I currently prepare both xen 3.0 and unstable packages, which can be hopefully uploaded today. Maintainer will be the kernel team, as there are heavy dependencies between xen and the kernel.

Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Re: Packaing Xen 3.0 etc for Debian

2006-02-24 Thread Bastian Blank
On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 04:22:23PM +0100, Guido Trotter wrote: This is great! In the meantime we are working on uploading xen 3.0 to unstable, and our packages I think are almost ready too! This is insufficient. Either maintain both 3.0 and unstable or none. In the meantime, the kernel team

debian zeroconf group?

2006-02-24 Thread Joey Hess
[Ccing maintainers of mdns stuff, please followup to debian-devel] With avahi in unstable we seem to have a fairly capable set of zeroconf/mdns tools in Debian now, albeit with some holes. There are for example some things like mod_dnssd that are not packaged yet and some interesting patches that

Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Re: Packaing Xen 3.0 etc for Debian

2006-02-24 Thread Guido Trotter
On Fri, 24 Feb 2006 at 03:30:55 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: Hi! Bastian Blank, a member of the Debian kernel team, is looking at integrating XenoLinux builds into the official linux-2.6 package. I think that's a much better option, and would strongly encourage anyone interested in Xen

Re: Honesty in Debian (was Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract

2006-02-24 Thread Michelle Konzack
Hello Sven, Sorry for the late reponse, but I am currently Off-Line. Am 2006-02-13 15:54:23, schrieb Sven Luther: Like the mips binary which is part of the tg3 (or some other of those) driver and uploaded to to the mips core on the card in question ? Does that mean that we will also

Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Re: Packaing Xen 3.0 etc for Debian

2006-02-24 Thread Julien Danjou
On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 04:37:56PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote: This is insufficient. Either maintain both 3.0 and unstable or none. In the meantime, the kernel team will maintain both. As far as I understand, you will just maintain Xen kernel images. (for dom0 only ?). We just have to duplicate

Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Re: Packaing Xen 3.0 etc for Debian

2006-02-24 Thread Guido Trotter
On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 04:37:56PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote: Hi, This is great! In the meantime we are working on uploading xen 3.0 to unstable, and our packages I think are almost ready too! This is insufficient. Either maintain both 3.0 and unstable or none. In the meantime, the

Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Re: Packaing Xen 3.0 etc for Debian

2006-02-24 Thread Guido Trotter
On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 04:54:24PM +0100, Julien Danjou wrote: Hi, As far as I understand, you will just maintain Xen kernel images. (for dom0 only ?). Actually I think he meant the hypervisors too... Anyway I also think that if the kernel team is going to maintain the kernel images there

Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Re: Packaing Xen 3.0 etc for Debian

2006-02-24 Thread Bastian Blank
On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 04:54:24PM +0100, Julien Danjou wrote: As far as I understand, you will just maintain Xen kernel images. (for dom0 only ?). No. The kernel team will maintain xen (in variants 3.0 and unstable). Bastian -- Vulcans worship peace above all. -- McCoy,

Re: ./configure in debian/rules

2006-02-24 Thread Frank Küster
Pjotr Kourzanov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dear developers, In a number of packages (e.g., busybox, dash and many more) the debian/rules Makefile calls ./configure without --host argument. This makes the life quite difficult for cross-compilation - for every such package I need to add

Re: debian zeroconf group?

2006-02-24 Thread Sjoerd Simons
On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 10:38:24AM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: [Ccing maintainers of mdns stuff, please followup to debian-devel] With avahi in unstable we seem to have a fairly capable set of zeroconf/mdns tools in Debian now, albeit with some holes. There are for example some things like

Re: debian zeroconf group?

2006-02-24 Thread Frederic Peters
Joey Hess wrote: If people agree let me know and I can do the standard alioth dance. I would be interested in participating in such a group. Regards, Frederic -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: debian zeroconf group?

2006-02-24 Thread Jeremie Corbier
Frederic Peters a écrit : Joey Hess wrote: If people agree let me know and I can do the standard alioth dance. I would be interested in participating in such a group. I'm interested too. Regards, -- Jérémie signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: debian zeroconf group?

2006-02-24 Thread Sebastien Estienne
On 2/24/06, Sjoerd Simons [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 10:38:24AM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: [Ccing maintainers of mdns stuff, please followup to debian-devel] With avahi in unstable we seem to have a fairly capable set of zeroconf/mdns tools in Debian now, albeit with

Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Re: Packaing Xen 3.0 etc for Debian

2006-02-24 Thread Julien Danjou
On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 05:05:33PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote: No. The kernel team will maintain xen (in variants 3.0 and unstable). Okay, I misunderstood. You will maintain userland tools too ? Is you work is already finished and available somewhere ? Right, I am juste a little disapointed. :)

Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Re: Packaing Xen 3.0 etc for Debian

2006-02-24 Thread Isaac Clerencia
On Friday, 24 February 2006 16:56, Guido Trotter wrote: So... what do you think we can do now? Can we join our efforts on xen or you strongly think it should be left to the kernel team, and we should just close the alioth project? Well, if the kernel team answers left to the kernel team and you

Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Re: Packaing Xen 3.0 etc for Debian

2006-02-24 Thread Guido Trotter
On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 05:20:17PM +0100, Isaac Clerencia wrote: Hi, Well, if the kernel team answers left to the kernel team and you close the alioth project, I guess you can always move into the kernel team ;) Yes, we could, of course... But on the other hand I believe that the xen

Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Re: Packaing Xen 3.0 etc for Debian

2006-02-24 Thread Isaac Clerencia
On Friday, 24 February 2006 17:34, Guido Trotter wrote: Yes, we could, of course... But on the other hand I believe that the xen hypervisor and userspace tools are actually different from the linux kernel (as they support multiple kernels and operating systems), even though the linux kernel

Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Re: Packaing Xen 3.0 etc for Debian

2006-02-24 Thread Jurij Smakov
On Fri, 24 Feb 2006, Bastian Blank wrote: On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 04:54:24PM +0100, Julien Danjou wrote: As far as I understand, you will just maintain Xen kernel images. (for dom0 only ?). No. The kernel team will maintain xen (in variants 3.0 and unstable). Bastian, as far as I know, you

Re: ./configure in debian/rules

2006-02-24 Thread Per Olofsson
Frank Küster: Were can I read up on how and why I should do this? /usr/share/doc/autotools-dev/README.Debian.gz -- Pelle -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Re: Packaing Xen 3.0 etc for Debian

2006-02-24 Thread Guido Trotter
On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 05:41:53PM +0100, Isaac Clerencia wrote: Hi, I agree. I just would like to ask that, please, don't disband just because of disagreement with the kernel team, but try to cooperate anyway. I don't think we want to! And I hope there is no disagreement (we still don't

Re: ./configure in debian/rules

2006-02-24 Thread Aaron M. Ucko
Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Were can I read up on how and why I should do this? AFAIR, the policy /usr/share/doc/autotools-dev/README.Debian.gz has advice on how to run configure scripts sanely. -- Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org) Finger [EMAIL

Re: debian zeroconf group?

2006-02-24 Thread Simon Richter
Hi, Joey Hess wrote: With avahi in unstable we seem to have a fairly capable set of zeroconf/mdns tools in Debian now, albeit with some holes. There are for example some things like mod_dnssd that are not packaged yet and some interesting patches that aren't applied to some apps. And adding

Re: lists.d.o Spam (was: Marking BTS spam)

2006-02-24 Thread Blars Blarson
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: on 2: we would need a whole spam-mail including all headers so we can find charakteristika to filter on, so i now take all nominated postings, and try to find patterns with some black shell-magic. Is sa-learn --spam

Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Re: Packaing Xen 3.0 etc for Debian

2006-02-24 Thread Bastian Blank
On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 04:56:35PM +0100, Guido Trotter wrote: On the other hand Xen is not the kernel, so isn't it better if there is a team for it, even if strongly connected with the kernel one? It is a sort of kernel. And no, I don't think it

Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Re: Packaing Xen 3.0 etc for Debian

2006-02-24 Thread Marc Haber
On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 06:06:22PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote: I won't reject the help of volunteers but I strongly think that the kernel team needs to have its hands on them. How many members of the kernel team are planning to do active work on Xen, kernel and userspace? Greetings Marc --

Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Re: Packaing Xen 3.0 etc for Debian

2006-02-24 Thread Guido Trotter
On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 06:06:22PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote: Hi, It is a sort of kernel. Yeah, it's a sort of kernel, but it's not the linux kernel... And it seems the kernel team is about the linux kernel, not just any kernel, isn't it? Just to say, how connected xen to linux is: For

Re: ./configure in debian/rules

2006-02-24 Thread Frank Küster
Per Olofsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Frank Küster: Were can I read up on how and why I should do this? /usr/share/doc/autotools-dev/README.Debian.gz Thanks - but I think this should be documented at a more visible place. If it's not the policy, developer's reference. Regards, Frank --

Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main

2006-02-24 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
Adam McKenna [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 01:30:25PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: Help me out then. You seemed to suggest that not putting ndiswrapper in main would be to ignore rules that are very clearly laid out in the SC and DFSG. I suggested that the CTTE

Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main

2006-02-24 Thread Adam McKenna
On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 09:56:46AM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: I think this is clearly incorrect. The DFSG and the SC do not say anything about the requirements for main that I can see. And it is the *job* of the tech-ctte to resolve disputes. I don't enjoy speaking with you, and I'm

Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main

2006-02-24 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
Adam McKenna [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 09:56:46AM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: I think this is clearly incorrect. The DFSG and the SC do not say anything about the requirements for main that I can see. And it is the *job* of the tech-ctte to resolve disputes.

Re: Honesty in Debian (was Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract

2006-02-24 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
Michelle Konzack [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The first one load a BLOB/Firmware into a Hardware which runs ON the Hardware and not in the OS. The OS *all* runs ON the Hardware. But Debian's determination is about what we distribute. We don't distribute non-free things as part of Debian main.

Bug#98549: Obtained DIplomas in 2 Weeks zoe8C

2006-02-24 Thread Forest Whaley
Lazy to attend exam or classes? We have Diplomas, Degrees, Masters' or Doctorate to choose from any field of your interest. Only 2 weeks require to delivers the prestigious non-accredited universities paper to your doorstep. Do not hesitate to give us a call today! 1-484-693-8861 n7b --

Re: debian zeroconf group?

2006-02-24 Thread Sylvain Le Gall
Hello, On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 10:38:24AM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: [Ccing maintainers of mdns stuff, please followup to debian-devel] With avahi in unstable we seem to have a fairly capable set of zeroconf/mdns tools in Debian now, albeit with some holes. There are for example some things

Re: ./configure in debian/rules

2006-02-24 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Fri, 24 Feb 2006, Frank Küster wrote: Per Olofsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Frank Küster: Were can I read up on how and why I should do this? /usr/share/doc/autotools-dev/README.Debian.gz Thanks - but I think this should be documented at a more visible place. If it's not the

Re: Problems found by piuparts

2006-02-24 Thread Gustavo Franco
On 2/20/06, Lars Wirzenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In the past six months, I've filed about 260 bug reports based on what piuparts has found. About 40% of those have been fixed so far. Below is a summary of the common problems, hopefully the list will help everyone to find and especially

Re: Problems found by piuparts

2006-02-24 Thread Peter Samuelson
[Gustavo Franco] I think some of these problems can be detected by lintian, adding some more checks there. It could bring more visibility to so common errors. Comments ? A better way to phrase Comments? would be: Here is a proof-of- concept patch to lintian to demonstrate which of these

Re: Problems found by piuparts

2006-02-24 Thread Gustavo Franco
On 2/24/06, Peter Samuelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [Gustavo Franco] I think some of these problems can be detected by lintian, adding some more checks there. It could bring more visibility to so common errors. Comments ? A better way to phrase Comments? would be: Here is a proof-of-

Re: Problems found by piuparts

2006-02-24 Thread Russ Allbery
Gustavo Franco [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On 2/20/06, Lars Wirzenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In the past six months, I've filed about 260 bug reports based on what piuparts has found. About 40% of those have been fixed so far. Below is a summary of the common problems, hopefully the list will

Re: ./configure in debian/rules

2006-02-24 Thread Russ Allbery
Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Pjotr Kourzanov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In a number of packages (e.g., busybox, dash and many more) the debian/rules Makefile calls ./configure without --host argument. This makes the life quite difficult for cross-compilation - for every such

Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Re: Packaing Xen 3.0 etc for Debian

2006-02-24 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
On Fri, 24 Feb 2006 18:04:03 +0100 Guido Trotter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The reason I think xen would be better served having its own committed team, repository, etc, is that it would be easier for anyone interested in xen to follow just mailing lists dedicated to it and its repository

Re: Problems found by piuparts

2006-02-24 Thread Gustavo Franco
On 2/24/06, Russ Allbery [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Gustavo Franco [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On 2/20/06, Lars Wirzenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In the past six months, I've filed about 260 bug reports based on what piuparts has found. About 40% of those have been fixed so far. Below is a

Re: ./configure in debian/rules

2006-02-24 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Fri, 24 Feb 2006, Russ Allbery wrote: Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Pjotr Kourzanov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In a number of packages (e.g., busybox, dash and many more) the debian/rules Makefile calls ./configure without --host argument. This makes the life quite difficult

Re: ./configure in debian/rules

2006-02-24 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Fri, 24 Feb 2006, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: If config.sub is not needed, I am almost sure that --host is not needed. Nor is --build, or --target. They are not supposed to be able to work without config.sub to canonize them. Very well, I have verified this now to be _wrong_.

Bug#354267: ITP: libghc6-newbinary-dev -- Binary IO Module for ghc

2006-02-24 Thread Charles Stevenson
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Charles Stevenson [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Package name: libghc6-newbinary-dev Version : x.y.z Upstream Author : Name [EMAIL PROTECTED] * URL : http://www.example.org/ * License : (GPL, LGPL, BSD, MIT/X, etc.) Description

Bug#354268: ITP: libghc6-crypto-dev -- GHC 6 libraries for the Haskell Cryptographic Library

2006-02-24 Thread Charles Stevenson
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Charles Stevenson [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Package name: libghc6-crypto-dev Version : x.y.z Upstream Author : Name [EMAIL PROTECTED] * URL : http://www.example.org/ * License : (GPL, LGPL, BSD, MIT/X, etc.) Description

Bug#354269: ITP: libghc6-http-dev -- GHC 6 libraries for the Haskell HTTP client library

2006-02-24 Thread Charles Stevenson
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Charles Stevenson [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Package name: libghc6-http-dev Version : x.y.z Upstream Author : Name [EMAIL PROTECTED] * URL : http://www.example.org/ * License : (GPL, LGPL, BSD, MIT/X, etc.) Description :

Re: Bug#354269: ITP: libghc6-http-dev -- GHC 6 libraries for the Haskell HTTP client library

2006-02-24 Thread John Goerzen
On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 02:09:14PM -0800, Charles Stevenson wrote: * Package name: libghc6-http-dev This already exists in unstable. See http://packages.qa.debian.org/h/haskell-http.html Also, libghc6-http-dev is not an appropriate source package. And finaly, I am concerned that you don't

Bug#354271: ITP: gwydion-dylan -- The Gwydion Dylan Runtime Environment

2006-02-24 Thread Charles Stevenson
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Charles Stevenson [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Package name: gwydion-dylan Version : x.y.z Upstream Author : Name [EMAIL PROTECTED] * URL : http://www.gwydiondylan.org/ * License : CMU Description : The Gwydion Dylan

Re: ./configure in debian/rules

2006-02-24 Thread Russ Allbery
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Please just add the recommended --host and --build makefile snippet and feed that to configure in *all* packages. It is better in the long run, and for many packages that is enough to have it cross-compile correctly. Okay, will do. This

Bug#354272: ITP: gwydion-dylan-dev -- Gwydion Dylan Development Tools

2006-02-24 Thread Charles Stevenson
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Charles Stevenson [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Package name: gwydion-dylan-dev Version : 2.4.1 Upstream Author : Gwydion Dylan Hackers * URL : http://www.gwydiondylan.org/ * License : CMU Description : Gwydion Dylan

Bug#354273: ITP: mindy -- A Dylan interpreter.

2006-02-24 Thread Charles Stevenson
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Charles Stevenson [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Package name: mindy Version : 2.4.1 Upstream Author : Gwydion Dylan Hackers * URL : http://www.gwydiondylan.org/ * License : CMU Description : A Dylan interpreter. Mindy is a

Bug#354304: ITP: libalgorithm-c3-perl -- A module for merging hierarchies using the C3 algorithm

2006-02-24 Thread Krzysztof Krzyzaniak (eloy)
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Krzysztof Krzyzaniak (eloy) [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Package name: libalgorithm-c3-perl Version : 0.01 Upstream Author : Stevan Little, [EMAIL PROTECTED] * URL :

Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Re: Packaing Xen 3.0 etc for Debian

2006-02-24 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 06:32:10PM +0100, Guido Trotter wrote: On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 06:06:22PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote: It is a sort of kernel. Yeah, it's a sort of kernel, but it's not the linux kernel... And it seems the kernel team is about the linux kernel, not just any kernel,

Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Re: Packaing Xen 3.0 etc for Debian

2006-02-24 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 04:22:23PM +0100, Guido Trotter wrote: The debian kernel team will maintain xen images with the linux-2.6 source. I currently prepare both xen 3.0 and unstable packages, which can be hopefully uploaded today. Maintainer will be the kernel team, as there are heavy

Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Re: Packaing Xen 3.0 etc for Debian

2006-02-24 Thread Guido Trotter
On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 05:34:44PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: Hi, Yeah, it's a sort of kernel, but it's not the linux kernel... And it seems the kernel team is about the linux kernel, not just any kernel, isn't it? The dom0 kernel is a Linux kernel built for the Xen hypervisor

Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Re: Packaing Xen 3.0 etc for Debian

2006-02-24 Thread Guido Trotter
On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 05:40:04PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: Hi, FWIW, the policy on kernel patches for sarge was that if it didn't apply to the kernel sources we shipped, it didn't need to be included as a package in stable. We're obviously not shipping a 2.6.12 kernel for etch, so I

Accepted sysstat 6.1.1-1 (source i386 all)

2006-02-24 Thread Robert Luberda
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 21:59:28 +0100 Source: sysstat Binary: isag sysstat Architecture: source i386 all Version: 6.1.1-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Robert Luberda [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Robert Luberda [EMAIL

Accepted dbs 0.38 (source all)

2006-02-24 Thread Robert Luberda
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 22:07:22 +0100 Source: dbs Binary: dbs Architecture: source all Version: 0.38 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Robert Luberda [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Robert Luberda [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description:

Accepted linux-kernel-di-ia64-2.6 1.6 (ia64 source)

2006-02-24 Thread dann frazier
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 00:42:20 -0700 Source: linux-kernel-di-ia64-2.6 Binary: usb-modules-2.6.15-1-itanium-smp-di nic-modules-2.6.15-1-itanium-smp-di usb-storage-modules-2.6.15-1-itanium-smp-di firmware-modules-2.6.15-1-itanium-smp-di

Accepted openrpg 1.6.3-1 (source all)

2006-02-24 Thread Isaac Clerencia
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 14:29:13 +0100 Source: openrpg Binary: openrpg Architecture: source all Version: 1.6.3-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Isaac Clerencia [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Isaac Clerencia [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Accepted glark 1.7.7-1 (source all)

2006-02-24 Thread Michael Ablassmeier
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 09:30:51 +0100 Source: glark Binary: glark Architecture: source all Version: 1.7.7-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Michael Ablassmeier [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Michael Ablassmeier [EMAIL

Accepted workrave 1.8.2-1 (source i386)

2006-02-24 Thread Michael Piefel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 09:21:00 +0100 Source: workrave Binary: workrave Architecture: source i386 Version: 1.8.2-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Michael Piefel [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Michael Piefel [EMAIL

Accepted libhttp-request-ascgi-perl 0.5-1 (source all)

2006-02-24 Thread eloy
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 10:52:34 +0100 Source: libhttp-request-ascgi-perl Binary: libhttp-request-ascgi-perl Architecture: source all Version: 0.5-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Catalyst Maintainers [EMAIL

Accepted shorewall 3.0.5-1 (source all)

2006-02-24 Thread Lorenzo Martignoni
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 09:59:08 +0100 Source: shorewall Binary: shorewall Architecture: source all Version: 3.0.5-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Lorenzo Martignoni [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Lorenzo Martignoni [EMAIL

Accepted nut 2.0.3-2 (source i386)

2006-02-24 Thread Arnaud Quette
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 10:05:25 +0100 Source: nut Binary: nut nut-usb nut-dev nut-snmp nut-cgi Architecture: source i386 Version: 2.0.3-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Arnaud Quette [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Arnaud

Accepted shorewall-doc 3.0.5 (source all)

2006-02-24 Thread Lorenzo Martignoni
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 10:11:27 +0100 Source: shorewall-doc Binary: shorewall-doc Architecture: source all Version: 3.0.5 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Lorenzo Martignoni [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Lorenzo Martignoni

Accepted libcatalyst-perl 5.65-1 (source all)

2006-02-24 Thread eloy
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 11:14:20 +0100 Source: libcatalyst-perl Binary: libcatalyst-perl Architecture: source all Version: 5.65-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Catalyst Maintainers [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By:

Accepted linux-kernel-di-powerpc-2.6 1.10 (source powerpc)

2006-02-24 Thread Colin Watson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 09:29:13 + Source: linux-kernel-di-powerpc-2.6 Binary: hfs-modules-2.6.15-1-powerpc-miboot-di scsi-core-modules-2.6.15-1-powerpc-di cdrom-core-modules-2.6.15-1-powerpc-miboot-di

Accepted ttf-sazanami 0.0.1.20040629-3 (source all)

2006-02-24 Thread GOTO Masanori
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2005 11:41:36 +0900 Source: ttf-sazanami Binary: ttf-sazanami-mincho ttf-sazanami-gothic Architecture: source all Version: 0.0.1.20040629-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: GOTO Masanori [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Accepted libmail-spf-query-perl 1:1.999-2 (source all)

2006-02-24 Thread eloy
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 11:06:27 +0100 Source: libmail-spf-query-perl Binary: libmail-spf-query-perl Architecture: source all Version: 1:1.999-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Perl Group [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By:

Accepted linux-kernel-di-arm-2.6 0.4 (source arm)

2006-02-24 Thread Martin Michlmayr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 10:02:32 + Source: linux-kernel-di-arm-2.6 Binary: cdrom-core-modules-2.6.15-1-s3c2410-di ide-modules-2.6.15-1-footbridge-di nic-modules-2.6.15-1-footbridge-di md-modules-2.6.15-1-nslu2-di

Accepted tora 1.3.21-1 (source i386)

2006-02-24 Thread Michael Meskes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 15:02:29 +0100 Source: tora Binary: tora Architecture: source i386 Version: 1.3.21-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Michael Meskes [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Michael Meskes [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Accepted gok 1.0.6-1 (source i386 all)

2006-02-24 Thread J.H.M. Dassen (Ray)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 11:10:02 +0100 Source: gok Binary: gok gok-doc Architecture: source i386 all Version: 1.0.6-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: J.H.M. Dassen (Ray)

Accepted xdaliclock 2.23-1 (source i386)

2006-02-24 Thread Florian Ernst
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 11:48:26 +0100 Source: xdaliclock Binary: xdaliclock Architecture: source i386 Version: 2.23-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Florian Ernst [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Florian Ernst [EMAIL

Accepted madwifi 0.svn20060207-2 (source i386 all)

2006-02-24 Thread Kel Modderman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 19:29:42 +1000 Source: madwifi Binary: madwifi-dev madwifi-tools madwifi-source Architecture: source i386 all Version: 0.svn20060207-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian madwifi team [EMAIL

Accepted gnome-user-share 0.9-3 (source i386)

2006-02-24 Thread Sebastian Dröge
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 19:51:20 +0100 Source: gnome-user-share Binary: gnome-user-share Architecture: source i386 Version: 0.9-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Sebastian Dröge [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Sebastian

Accepted sphinx2 0.6-2 (source all i386)

2006-02-24 Thread Isaac Clerencia
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 12:08:11 +0100 Source: sphinx2 Binary: libsphinx2g0 sphinx2-hmm-6k libsphinx2-dev sphinx2-bin Architecture: source all i386 Version: 0.6-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Isaac Clerencia [EMAIL

Accepted ttf-kochi-naga10 1.0.20030809-4 (source all)

2006-02-24 Thread GOTO Masanori
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2006 13:12:29 +0900 Source: ttf-kochi-naga10 Binary: ttf-kochi-mincho-naga10 ttf-kochi-gothic-naga10 Architecture: source all Version: 1.0.20030809-4 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: GOTO Masanori [EMAIL

Accepted ttf-kochi 1.0.20030809-4 (source all)

2006-02-24 Thread GOTO Masanori
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2006 13:12:19 +0900 Source: ttf-kochi Binary: ttf-kochi-gothic ttf-kochi-mincho Architecture: source all Version: 1.0.20030809-4 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: GOTO Masanori [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By:

Accepted xrsh 5.92-8 (source all)

2006-02-24 Thread Harald Dunkel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 10:59:10 +0100 Source: xrsh Binary: xrsh Architecture: source all Version: 5.92-8 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Harald Dunkel [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Accepted rng-tools 2-unofficial-mt.10-2 (source i386)

2006-02-24 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 09:49:44 -0300 Source: rng-tools Binary: rng-tools Architecture: source i386 Version: 2-unofficial-mt.10-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By:

Accepted dpkg-sig 0.13 (source all)

2006-02-24 Thread Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 01:05:53 +0100 Source: dpkg-sig Binary: dpkg-sig Architecture: source all Version: 0.13 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt

Accepted texinfo 4.8-5 (source i386)

2006-02-24 Thread Norbert Preining
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 12:35:27 +0100 Source: texinfo Binary: texinfo info Architecture: source i386 Version: 4.8-5 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Norbert Preining [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Norbert Preining [EMAIL

Accepted linux-kernel-di-m68k-2.6 0.70 (source m68k)

2006-02-24 Thread Stephen R. Marenka
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 07:37:06 -0600 Source: linux-kernel-di-m68k-2.6 Binary: kernel-image-2.6.15-1-mac-di reiserfs-modules-2.6.15-1-amiga-di fat-modules-2.6.15-1-mvme147-di ppp-modules-2.6.15-1-mac-di reiserfs-modules-2.6.15-1-hp-di

Accepted bricolage 1.8.9-1 (source all)

2006-02-24 Thread Daniel Baumann
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 14:13:00 +0100 Source: bricolage Binary: bricolage bricolage-queued libbric-perl bricolage-cms bricolage-db Architecture: source all Version: 1.8.9-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Daniel Baumann

Accepted lastfmsubmitd 0.22-1 (source all)

2006-02-24 Thread Decklin Foster
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 14:44:58 -0500 Source: lastfmsubmitd Binary: lastfmsubmitd Architecture: source all Version: 0.22-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Decklin Foster [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Decklin Foster [EMAIL

  1   2   >