On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 04:20:13PM +0300, Linas Žvirblis wrote:
> Joey Hess wrote:
> Z
> > If so, I would be happy to add this to tasksel, so that the desktop task
> > automatically installs it if it detects a system that is not easily
> > capable of running kde/gnome. Tasksel has the infrastructur
#include
* André Luiz Rodrigues Ferreira [Tue, Apr 11 2006, 01:44:57PM]:
> Hi !
>
> I'm creating a meta package for install a lite desktop for old
> machines with poor hardware.
> I would like to receive opinions about my packages list:
>
> - x-window-system-core
> - xfce4 (beautiful!)
Depends.
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Christophe Prud'homme" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: trilinos
Version : 6.0.16
Upstream Author : Sandia National Laboratories
* URL : http://software.sandia.gov/trilinos/index.html
* License : LGPL
Programming La
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name : hotpotatoonline
Version : 1.2.0
Upstream Author : Jean-Francois Perusse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Thiery Adam, Bertrand Bry-Marfaing,
Brad Fish
* URL : http://www.hotpotatoonline.com/
* Li
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Oleksandr Moskalenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: scribus-ng-doc
Version : 1.3.3.1
Upstream Author : Scribus development team <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.scribus.net/
* License : OPLv1.0
Description
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Oleksandr Moskalenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: scribus-ng
Version : 1.3.3.1
Upstream Author : Scribus development team <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.scribus.net/
* License : GPLv2
Programming Lang: C+
On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 07:09:55PM -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> *Think* for a moment about the consequences. This is not a simple
> rebuild, this is a serious problem.
I agree and I take full responsibility for the issue. I'm sorry for the
trouble. I'm fully willing to put back the .la files
Greetings..
On Sun, 2006-04-09 at 07:36 +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> > "HAM" is not an acronym, so "Ham Radio" would be more appropriate.
> >
> > Even better (IMHO) is the full term "Amateur Radio", but some may
> > disagree. I've CC'd debian-hams for
signature.asc
Description: Questa è una parte del messaggio firmata digitalmente
On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 06:52:52PM +0200, Marco Cabizza wrote:
> I experienced the issue while recompiling some gnome packages. Is sed
> "s##/usr/lib/libXrender.la ##g" (in the .la references, ie
> libgdk-x11-2.0.la) the "best" temporary solution by now?
s##/usr/lib/libXrender.la##-lXrender##g, I
On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 06:52:52PM +0200, Marco Cabizza wrote:
> I experienced the issue while recompiling some gnome packages. Is sed
> "s##/usr/lib/libXrender.la ##g" (in the .la references, ie
> libgdk-x11-2.0.la) the "best" temporary solution by now?
Anything uploaded this way will still fail
Il giorno gio, 13/04/2006 alle 19.12 +0300, Daniel Stone ha scritto:
> On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 11:12:06AM -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> > Please tell me if I have this right:
> > * You don't like .la files
>
> Yes.
>
> > * So you're unilaterally removing them from a core package
>
On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 07:12:48PM +0300, Daniel Stone wrote:
> Is a rebuild really that phenomenally onerous for you? In the time
> spent arguing this point, tons of packages could've been simply rebuilt.
> I don't see where the problem lies, unless you happen to enjoy random
> flamebait more th
On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 11:12:06AM -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> Please tell me if I have this right:
> * You don't like .la files
Yes.
> * So you're unilaterally removing them from a core package
> (libxcursor) with dozens of reverse-depends, breaking all of
> them
On Thu, 2006-04-13 at 17:41 +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 12:13:57AM -0700, Erast Benson wrote:
> > On Thu, 2006-04-13 at 00:04 +0200, Loïc Minier wrote:
> > > Why not simply Provide: sunwlxsl all of the
> > > time, doesn't it provide sunwlxsl on other arches?
> >
> > Bu
On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 01:54:07PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Lionel Elie Mamane ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060412 13:49]:
>> mailman (2.1.5-8sarge3) stable; urgency=high
>> .
>>* Don't delete other package's ucf-managed configuration files
>> (closes: #358575)
>> Files:
>> 2a02b24630b7
On Thu, 2006-04-13 at 12:18 +0300, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 12:13:57AM -0700, Erast Benson wrote:
> > On Thu, 2006-04-13 at 00:04 +0200, Loïc Minier wrote:
> > > Why not simply Provide: sunwlxsl all of the
> > > time, doesn't it provide sunwlxsl on other arches?
> >
> > But
André Luiz Rodrigues Ferreira wrote:
> 2006/4/13, Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Le Jeu 13 Avril 2006 15:20, Linas Žvirblis a écrit :
> > > > I think this would be better than a meta package because it would
> > > > be available in the regular install, and it would avoid some of the
> > >
2006/4/13, Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Le Jeu 13 Avril 2006 15:20, Linas Žvirblis a écrit :
> > > I think this would be better than a meta package because it would
> > > be available in the regular install, and it would avoid some of the
> > > issues with meta packages.
> >
> > Meta pack
On Thu, 2006-04-13 at 15:28 +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> Le Jeu 13 Avril 2006 15:20, Linas Žvirblis a écrit :
> > > I think this would be better than a meta package because it would
> > > be available in the regular install, and it would avoid some of the
> > > issues with meta packages.
> >
> >
Le Jeu 13 Avril 2006 15:20, Linas Žvirblis a écrit :
> > I think this would be better than a meta package because it would
> > be available in the regular install, and it would avoid some of the
> > issues with meta packages.
>
> Meta package or not, I do not consider "Light Desktop" a good name
>
Joey Hess wrote:
> If so, I would be happy to add this to tasksel, so that the desktop task
> automatically installs it if it detects a system that is not easily
> capable of running kde/gnome. Tasksel has the infrastructure needed to
> support doing this kind of thing, just a matter of finding ap
On Thu, 2006-04-13 at 09:26 -0300, André Luiz Rodrigues Ferreira wrote:
> to control processes (kill for sample) ?
there is an xfce4-taskmanager not yet in the archive.
see http://heracles.corsac.net/~corsac/xfce4-taskmanager.png
Maybe it would fit your needs ?
--
Yves-Alexis Perez
--
To UNS
At 1144766211 past the epoch, Daniel Dickinson wrote:
> > - x-window-system-core
> > - xfce4 (beautiful!)
>
> You may want to offer a choice of window manager. On
> low-end machines I'm partial to WindowMaker, but IceWm,
> FluxBox, or BlackBox are also good choices.
I'd use Recommends or Suggest
Quoting Joey Hess ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> I think this would be better than a meta package because it would be
> available in the regular install, and it would avoid some of the issues
> with meta packages.
I second this proposal. Indeed, I was about pinging Joey about this
thread because it fits
On Thu, 13 Apr 2006, Luca Capello wrote:
> > Well, the wiki page has a "last change" date. The AM (or FD) will
> > notice that it's not up-to-date and they can ask you to update it.
>
> Thank you for the explanation.
>
> Last questions:
>
> - is there something like a template for an NM page?
N
2006/4/13, Linas Žvirblis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Frank Küster wrote:
>
> >> Not only that, but Evince can be quite slow at rendering complex documents.
> >
> > Are there any benchmarks on that? poppler (on which evince is based)
> > aims to be better than xpdf in that, but it seems some of the add
2006/4/12, Margarita Manterola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Some comments on the choice of programs.
>
> On 4/11/06, André Luiz Rodrigues Ferreira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > - mozilla-firefox
> > - mozilla-thunderbird
>
> As other pointed out, I'd go for dillo and Sylphed. Maybe include the
> mozi
On Thu, 2006-04-13 at 08:22 -0300, André Luiz Rodrigues Ferreira wrote:
> 2006/4/11, Yves-Alexis Perez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Do you plan to add a music/media player ? a slow machine can't play HD
> > videos but can play music so
>
> Yeap! XMMS ?
xmms is gtk1 so maybe it will not fit nicely
Frank Küster wrote:
>> Not only that, but Evince can be quite slow at rendering complex documents.
>
> Are there any benchmarks on that? poppler (on which evince is based)
> aims to be better than xpdf in that, but it seems some of the additional
> functions have slowed it down. The poppler peo
2006/4/11, Bernhard R. Link <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> * Andr Luiz Rodrigues Ferreira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [060411 18:45]:
> > - x-window-system-core
> > - xfce4 (beautiful!)
> > - gdm
> [...]
> > - gnome-ppp
> > - gnome-utils
>
> Definitions differ, but I'd not call something "light" pulling in
> half
2006/4/11, Daniel Dickinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Tue, 11 Apr 2006 13:44:57 -0300
> "André Luiz Rodrigues Ferreira" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi !
> >
> > I'm creating a meta package for install a lite desktop for old
> > machines with
2006/4/11, Yves-Alexis Perez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Tue, 2006-04-11 at 13:44 -0300, André Luiz Rodrigues Ferreira wrote:
> > Hi !
> >
> > I'm creating a meta package for install a lite desktop for old
> > machines with poor hardware.
>
> Great task.
> > I would like to receive opinions about my
Hello!
On Thu, 13 Apr 2006 10:19:41 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Well, the wiki page has a "last change" date. The AM (or FD) will
> notice that it's not up-to-date and they can ask you to update it.
Thank you for the explanation.
Last questions:
- is there something like a template for an N
André Luiz Rodrigues Ferreira wrote:
> I'm creating a meta package for install a lite desktop for old
> machines with poor hardware.
> I would like to receive opinions about my packages list:
I'm glad to see someone working on this. I hope you manage to find a
consensus for some good default packa
On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 12:13:57AM -0700, Erast Benson wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-04-13 at 00:04 +0200, Loïc Minier wrote:
> > Why not simply Provide: sunwlxsl all of the
> > time, doesn't it provide sunwlxsl on other arches?
>
> But how? sunwlxsl is something which is only present in
> OpenSolaris-b
On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 12:13:57AM -0700, Erast Benson wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-04-13 at 00:04 +0200, Loïc Minier wrote:
> > Why not simply Provide: sunwlxsl all of the
> > time, doesn't it provide sunwlxsl on other arches?
>
> But how? sunwlxsl is something which is only present in
> OpenSolaris-b
Hi,
I am putting the following (source) packages up for adoption:
- tilp: TI calculator <-> PC communication program for X
- tiemu: Texas Instruments calculators emulator
- skinedit: skin editor for TiEmu
- tidev-modules: Sources for drivers for Texas Instruments calculators link
cables
And
On Thu, 13 Apr 2006, Luca Capello wrote:
> I fear of the fact that my wiki page will be outdated, while my
> involvement in Debian not. Probably it's a specific problem of mine,
> as I try to be the most perfectionist I can and... without success.
>
> Obviously, as soon as the wiki page will be a
Hello!
On Wed, 12 Apr 2006 19:48:36 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Apr 2006, Luca Capello wrote:
>> I wouldn't measure an NM commitment WRT a wiki page, at least if
>> she/he doesn't want to deal mainly with web pages.
>
> Writing a wiki page is like writing a mail... you can cut & pas
MJ Ray wrote:
> Does anyone know the current status of maintainer Christoph Wegscheider?
> Last maintainer uploads:
> * qiv 2005-05-23 (sponsor Thomas Viehmann cc'd)
I sponsored Justin Pryzby's qiv C++ transition NMU in January and
haven't had any interaction with Christoph, sorry. Christoph's only
This is pretty exciting, especially for people like me who loved Eiffel
when we were young idealistic students but wandered away due to the
fragmented community and the pain of having to write a wrapper every
time you want to use a library. Will ISE release the Gtk wrappers they
obviously have an
On Thu, 2006-04-13 at 00:04 +0200, Loïc Minier wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Apr 12, 2006, Erast Benson wrote:
> > +Provides: sunwlxsl [solaris-i386]
> > Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}
>
> Why not simply use Provide: ${misc:Provides} and set misc:Provides to
> sunwlxsl on solaris-i386?
OK. Th
Henning Makholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No [expletive deleted] way. Debian is a volunteer organization. This
> means that we don't get paid. Lots of the various kinds of work people
> do for debian are mind-bogglingly boring - one random thing that comes
> to mind is the work Frank Küster is
Linas Žvirblis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Miles Bader wrote:
>
- evince
>>> Any particular reason for not just using xpdf?
>>
>> Especially since xpdf seems to do a much better job of rendering many
>> pdf documents... [Evince has nicer looking widgets though.]
>
> Not only that, but
45 matches
Mail list logo
