Re: RFC: Proposal for official screenshot repo

2007-01-06 Thread Yaroslav Halchenko
Indeed, given applications are not good examples for this matter. Although it would be somewhat a waste of bandwidth, but having a screenshot of a CLI application with output its produces for a typical use case sounds like a good idea IMHO. Or, to make it less waste, I suggest to allow for a 'scre

Re: Etch Software RAID Upgrade Trouble & Suggested Installer Improvements

2007-01-06 Thread Roberto C. Sanchez
On Sun, Jan 07, 2007 at 01:25:31PM +1100, Russell Coker wrote: > On Saturday 06 January 2007 18:35, Claus Fischer > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > 1. Rescue mode needs MD devices > > > >The rescue mode of the installer needs a step > >to activate MD devices. Currently, only the plain > >

Re: Etch Software RAID Upgrade Trouble & Suggested Installer Improvements

2007-01-06 Thread Russell Coker
On Saturday 06 January 2007 18:35, Claus Fischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 1. Rescue mode needs MD devices > >The rescue mode of the installer needs a step >to activate MD devices. Currently, only the plain >disk partitions are visible; that's no help. Sounds like a reasonable requ

possible problem with ftp.us.debian.org

2007-01-06 Thread Nikita V. Youshchenko
Hello. Since some time I noticed that after some executions of 'apt-get update' I'm getting 'md5sum mismatch errors'. I've just tracked this thing down. My apt setup used apt-cacher, whith 3 mirrors configured: ftp.de.deban.org, ftp.uk.debian.org and ftp.us.debian.org [probably this is default

Re: Preseeding and debconf

2007-01-06 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
[Vincent Bernat] > Should I fill bug against ssmtp as well or is this behaviour > considered correct ? This behaviour is correct. The configuration in files on disk is authorative. The debconf values are only used and should only be used if there are no config values in files on disk. This is s

Bug#405860: ITP: enlightenment-0.17 -- The Enlightenment Window Manager, release 0.17

2007-01-06 Thread Debian Enlightenment Packaging Team
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Debian Enlightenment Packaging Team <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: enlightenment-0.17 Version : 0.17 Upstream Author : Carsten Haitzler and the e17 devel team * URL : http://www.enlightenment.org * License : BSD

Processed: This is not a proposal that can be implemented in make

2007-01-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 404715 general Bug#404715: make: add an option to allow system wide gcc options Bug reassigned from package `make' to `general'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administ

Re: This is not a proposal that can be implemented in make

2007-01-06 Thread Roberto C. Sanchez
On Sat, Jan 06, 2007 at 08:59:47PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote: > Le samedi 06 janvier 2007 à 13:32 -0600, Manoj Srivastava a écrit : > > Something like this needs to be designed from a system > > perspective, and needs, probably, to cooperation the package build > > system. > > > >

Re: This is not a proposal that can be implemented in make

2007-01-06 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le samedi 06 janvier 2007 à 13:32 -0600, Manoj Srivastava a écrit : > Something like this needs to be designed from a system > perspective, and needs, probably, to cooperation the package build > system. > > Since this is something that cant be done by a single pacage, > I am re

This is not a proposal that can be implemented in make

2007-01-06 Thread Manoj Srivastava
reassign 404715 general thanks Hi, Something like this needs to be designed from a system perspective, and needs, probably, to cooperation the package build system. Since this is something that cant be done by a single pacage, I am reassigning this bug. (For example, my employ

Bug#405853: ITP: vdr-plugin-spider -- VDR plugin providing the card game "Spider Arachnid"

2007-01-06 Thread Christian Meder
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Debian VDR Team <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: vdr-plugin-spider Version : 0.1.2 Upstream Author : Thomas Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://toms-cafe.de/vdr/spider * License : GPL Programming Lang: C Des

Bug#405850: ITP: vdr-plugin-sudoku -- VDR plugin that provides Sudokus

2007-01-06 Thread Christian Meder
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Debian VDR Team <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: vdr-plugin-sudoku Version : 0.1.2 Upstream Author : Thomas Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://toms-cafe.de/vdr/sudoku * License : GPL Programming Lang: C Des

Bug#405846: ITP: vdr-plugin-solitaire -- VDR plugin providing the card game "Solitaire"

2007-01-06 Thread Christian Meder
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Debian VDR Team <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: vdr-plugin-solitaire Version : 0.0.2 Upstream Author : Patrick Maier * URL : http://www.djdagobert.com/vdr/solitaire * License : GPL Programming Lang: C Description

Re: woody removed from mirrors

2007-01-06 Thread Florian Lohoff
On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 11:39:48AM -0500, Kevin Mark wrote: > > Is there a schedule for non-US and security fixes to disappear and where > > will they disappear to ? > After Woody, non-US was removed as it was not needed anymore. As for > maintaining non-us repositories (for woody or any thing olde

Bug#405825: ITP: openyahtzee -- classic poker dice game

2007-01-06 Thread Zak B. Elep
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: "Zak B. Elep" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: openyahtzee Version : 1.5.1 Upstream Author : Guy Rutenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://openyahtzee.sourceforge.net * License : GPL Programming Lang: C++ Descrip

Re: umask-dependent debian/rules

2007-01-06 Thread Bas Zoetekouw
Hi Nikita! You wrote: > I would like to ask, is it considered a bug or not, if debian/rules > implicitly depends on umask 022 (and produces packages with broken file > permissions if umask is more strict). > E.g. see #399058. > If this is considered a bug, I guess it may be a subject for mass

Re: Bug#322762: no blocking bugs anymore

2007-01-06 Thread Luk Claes
Daniel Schepler wrote: > On Friday 05 January 2007 20:56 pm, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: >> Hi, > It appears that inform's postinst still creates a /usr/doc symlink, and this > seems to have been missed. > > What's the appropriate severity for a bug to be filed against inform? important Cheers Luk

umask-dependent debian/rules

2007-01-06 Thread Nikita V. Youshchenko
Hello people. I would like to ask, is it considered a bug or not, if debian/rules implicitly depends on umask 022 (and produces packages with broken file permissions if umask is more strict). E.g. see #399058. If this is considered a bug, I guess it may be a subject for mass bug-filing... Ni

Re: Etch Software RAID Upgrade Trouble & Suggested Installer Improvements

2007-01-06 Thread Adrian von Bidder
Yo! Having some rescue tools available in the installer medium is nice, but I usually prefer to use some full live CD system (Knoppix in my case) for the more involved rescue operations. (Especially since I usually download the businesscard ISO to install - and limiting what's being shipped is

Preseeding and debconf

2007-01-06 Thread Vincent Bernat
Hi ! I am using preseeding to configure quickly a package : - debconf-get-selections | grep ^packagename - debconf-set-selections < file.seeds - dpkg-reconfigure -pcritical -fnoninteractive packagename This works with most packages. I have recently filled a bug against ocfs2-tools (#404877

Preseeding and debconf

2007-01-06 Thread Vincent Bernat
Hi ! I am using preseeding to configure quickly a package : - debconf-get-selections | grep ^packagename - debconf-set-selections < file.seeds - dpkg-reconfigure -pcritical -fnoninteractive packagename This works with most packages. I have recently filled a bug against ocfs2-tools (#404877

Re: Not depending on shlibs because of plugins?

2007-01-06 Thread Andreas Metzler
Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] > You could move the plugin's additional dependencies into Recommends, > using "dpkg-shlibdeps -vRecommends" [...] -v is a typo, -d is the correct thing, e.g this dpkg-shlibdeps /usr/bin/xine \ -dRecommends /usr/lib/xine/plugins/1.1.2/xineplug_decod

Re: Bug#322762: no blocking bugs anymore

2007-01-06 Thread Daniel Schepler
On Friday 05 January 2007 20:56 pm, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: > Hi, > > > Set any bugs about /usr/doc stuff to being blockers of this bug report. > > Use this as a tracking/coordination bug for the remainder of the > > transition. > > > > Note that once this transition is complete we will need to do s

Re: RFC: Proposal for official screenshot repo

2007-01-06 Thread Luis Matos
Sáb, 2007-01-06 às 12:01 +0100, Bernhard R. Link escreveu: > * Luis Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070105 18:13]: > > > Such a gallery should at least include some notice about the copyright > > > owners and licenses of the parts it is composed from, best with also > > > links to the source packages us

Re: RFC: Proposal for official screenshot repo

2007-01-06 Thread Bernhard R. Link
* Luis Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070105 18:13]: > > Such a gallery should at least include some notice about the copyright > > owners and licenses of the parts it is composed from, best with also > > links to the source packages used. (And the one operating that gallery > > ask a lawyer if more is

Re: Etch Software RAID Upgrade Trouble & Suggested Installer Improvements

2007-01-06 Thread Alexey Feldgendler
On Sat, 06 Jan 2007 08:35:59 +0100, Claus Fischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 7. There needs to be a command to copy all data Between cp, tar, rsync & friends there are dozens of variations how to copy over the files of a running system to another location, but none is perfect:

kudos, Re: db.debian.org (and related infrastructure) updates

2007-01-06 Thread A Mennucc
hi I keep statistics of my email before I activated "greylisting" and "sender verification callouts", my average was ~200 spam/day (with peaks of ~400) ; after that, it is ~40 spam/day (and most do not pass thru debian.org, but are delivered directly at my account) so I want to kudo all people

Bug#322762: no blocking bugs anymore

2007-01-06 Thread Amaya
Joey Hess wrote: > I note that we still arn't 100% sure we've caught every last upgrade > issue involving /usr/doc, since AFAIK puiparts has not been used to > test upgrades of everything. Pity :( > Also, I see that there are still some lintian warnings about it at > http://lintian.debian.org/rep

Re: Bug#322762: no blocking bugs anymore

2007-01-06 Thread Amaya
Santiago Vila wrote: > No, the next step is to close the bug and celebrate it. As love ly as it sounds, I'd like to see what piuparts has to say about it :) But att the pace we are moving (piuparts) I expect to fix this in a different release. -- ·''`. If I can't dance to it, it's