> "Roberto" == Roberto C Sánchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Interesting. I have ~1600 packages installed on my development machine
> and I do not experience the slowness you talk about. It was installed
> about 3.5 years ago.
> How much RAM/CPU does the machine have? How fast are the di
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: debreaper
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : myself
* URL : None yet (will be on alioth in pkg-gnome if there
are no objections)
* License : GPL
Prog
On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 05:19:25AM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> Anyone have any thoughts on where and how this should be documented?
> Which documents do we need to make patches for and how detailed should
> the description in each document be?
I think the appropiate location is the Release No
On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 11:34:53AM +1100, Russell Coker wrote:
> The current functionality in regard to Xen is seriously broken. A reasonable
> person will expect that when a Xen virtual machine is configured with a
> single Ethernet interface then it can be restarted at any time and get the
>
On Fri, 30 Mar 2007, Adam Borowski wrote:
> It's not that. It's /var/lib/dpkg/available.
>
> Try this:
>
> for x in /var/lib/apt/lists/*Packages;do dpkg --merge-avail "$x";done
> (or "dselect update")
> Install+purge of an empty package:
> 9-ish seconds on one box (my home desktop, years
Package: mutt-ng
Severity: normal
I hereby want to orphan mutt-ng as ist isn't maintained upstream
anymore [0]. To synchronise the package with mutt and fix the new
and upcoming security issues isn't my intetion as I then have to
carry over the upstream work.
[0] http://mutt-ng.supersized.org/
T
Hi folks
raptor.d.o is down until at least tomorrow. During a planned system move
something got wrong and the machine is now in an undefined state and
needs manual intervention by an vm admin.
Bastian
--
Women are more easily and more deeply terrified ... generating more
sheer horror than the m
* Christoph Haas:
> What might be the cause? Is there some fragmentation effect?
It's probably ext3's directory hashing. It tries to access the files
in /var/lib/dpkg/info in hash order, which leads to essentially random
disk I/O.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject o
On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 08:57:03PM +0200, Loïc Minier wrote:
> Indeed it accounts for some part of the problem; after I cloned and
> replaced my /var/lib/dpkg/info tree with the copy, the figure dropped
> from 22 seconds to 15 seconds.
It's not that. It's /var/lib/dpkg/available.
Try this:
f
Heya,
yesterday I've contacted the original bug submitter of #361253 via
personal mail and he told me that he doesn't have the time to take care
of packaging zenoss at all and that I should just do it, so I'll hijack
this wnpp bug and package zenoss within the next days.
If anybody else is working
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Magnus,
Magnus Holmgren wrote:
[...]
> Since I liked it very much I immediately started adding and rewriting code
> and
"me too" ;)
> submitting my suggestions for improvement to the BTS, but unfortunately Joel
Yes, I also sent him an email s
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jonny Lamb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libphp-facebook
Version : 0.0.020070306
Upstream Author : Facebook, Inc. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.example.org/
* License : FreeBSD
Programming Lang: PHP
Des
On Fri, Mar 30, 2007, Joey Hess wrote:
> It can also lead to a kind of "fragmentation", since during an initial
> install these files tend to be fairly close together on disk while over
> time new files will be scattered about and more seeking needed to read
> them all.
Indeed it accounts for som
Hi,
* Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-03-30 20:29]:
> On Fri, Mar 30, 2007, Christoph Haas wrote:
> > It appears like apt-get/aptitude/dpkg dealing with the list/database of
> > installed packages is terribly slow at times.
>
> I think dpkg spends a lot of time reading all /var/lib/dpkg/in
Loïc Minier wrote:
> I think dpkg spends a lot of time reading all /var/lib/dpkg/info/*.list
> files. These are not big and this is typically in cache between dpkg
> runs, and I think this is the reason that cold dpkg runs are very very
> slow.
It can also lead to a kind of "fragmentation", s
On Friday 30 March 2007 12:22, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
> Pointers? Debpool is a nice tiny tool, but lacks some major useful
> features and has a few annoying bugs. It could be improved. It's a pity
> it stales.
I'd like to suggest, then, that a project be started on Alioth, let's
say "savin
On Fri, 30 Mar 2007 11:02:49 -0500, Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Fri, 30 Mar 2007 09:23:38 +0200, Michal Čihař <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> said:
>> Hi On Thu, 29 Mar 2007 21:23:28 +0200
>> Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> If you encrypt to yourself, how is the voting syste
On Fri, 30 Mar 2007 09:23:38 +0200, Michal Čihař <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Hi On Thu, 29 Mar 2007 21:23:28 +0200
> Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> If you encrypt to yourself, how is the voting system supposed to
>> decrypt it?
> It was encrypted for two keys, both of them can decryp
On Fri, Mar 30, 2007, Christoph Haas wrote:
> It appears like apt-get/aptitude/dpkg dealing with the list/database of
> installed packages is terribly slow at times.
I think dpkg spends a lot of time reading all /var/lib/dpkg/info/*.list
files. These are not big and this is typically in cache
debian sid installed about 9 years ago, actually on amd64 (but with
32bit kernel and 32bit userland ) sempron 3300+ with 1 gigs of ram.
The system is on a dm-crypted in aes256 device over software raid1 composed
by two slow ide disks, (so, I/O is *VERY* slow), i have something like 2500
packages
Hi,
On investigation, I found a mishandled corner case in devotee
which had caused 4 ballots to be incorrectly rejected (the other 137
rejections, each one of which I have nw manually inspected, are still
valid rejections). These four ballots, from 3 individuals, have now
been accepted
On 3/30/07, Christoph Haas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
what has always annoyed me is now ready to be asked on this list. :)
It appears like apt-get/aptitude/dpkg dealing with the list/database of
installed packages is terribly slow at times. I have roughly 1800 packages
installed and it sometimes
On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 04:11:46PM +0200, Christoph Haas wrote:
> On Friday 30 March 2007 15:43, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 03:39:29PM +0200, Christoph Haas wrote:
> > > It appears like apt-get/aptitude/dpkg dealing with the list/database
> > > of installed packages is te
On Friday 30 March 2007 15:43, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 03:39:29PM +0200, Christoph Haas wrote:
> > It appears like apt-get/aptitude/dpkg dealing with the list/database
> > of installed packages is terribly slow at times.
>
> Interesting. I have ~1600 packages installed
On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 03:39:29PM +0200, Christoph Haas wrote:
> Dear list...
>
> what has always annoyed me is now ready to be asked on this list. :)
> It appears like apt-get/aptitude/dpkg dealing with the list/database of
> installed packages is terribly slow at times. I have roughly 1800 pac
Dear list...
what has always annoyed me is now ready to be asked on this list. :)
It appears like apt-get/aptitude/dpkg dealing with the list/database of
installed packages is terribly slow at times. I have roughly 1800 packages
installed and it sometimes takes 20-30 seconds to install a single
On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 06:51:52AM -0400, Roberto C. S?nchez wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 10:13:47AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 05:09:12AM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> > > >Russ Allbery wrote:
> > > >So, here's a possibly weird proposal.
> > > >
> > > >What
On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 06:51:52AM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 10:13:47AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 05:09:12AM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> > > >Russ Allbery wrote:
> > > >So, here's a possibly weird proposal.
> > > >
> > > >What
On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 10:13:47AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 05:09:12AM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> > >Russ Allbery wrote:
> > >So, here's a possibly weird proposal.
> > >
> > >What if we had some mechanism whereby people could indicate interest in
> > >maintain
On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 01:42:05AM +0200, Daniel Leidert wrote:
> Am Dienstag, den 27.03.2007, 23:41 +0100 schrieb Magnus Holmgren:
>
> > DebPool is a Debian package archiver written in Perl by Joel Aelwyn
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. Like mini-dinstall it's a lightweight replacement
> > for "the re
On Friday 30 March 2007 00:50, Steve Greenland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Logging and blocking can all be done at the proxy, though. No need to
> transfer the remote IP to the internal server.
Logging can be done at the proxy. Blocking - maybe not. IP address based
restrictions on service for
On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 05:09:12AM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> >Russ Allbery wrote:
> >So, here's a possibly weird proposal.
> >
> >What if we had some mechanism whereby people could indicate interest in
> >maintaining a package should anything happen to the current maintainer?
> >Have it be a
I think everyone missed the important part of my message.
so I'm soliciting comments on it again.
>But perhaps the best "solution" is to document prominently that if you
>replace your network hardware, you should delete the line associated
>with the removed hardware from
>/etc/udev/rules.d/
On 3/30/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello, debian-devel.
Yes, this library needed for generating pdf docs from PHP.
Could you package it into next version?
Which library?
--
Andrew Donnellan
ajdlinuxATgmailDOTcom (primary)ajdlinuxATexemailDOTcomDOTau (secure)
http://a
>Russ Allbery wrote:
>So, here's a possibly weird proposal.
>
>What if we had some mechanism whereby people could indicate interest in
>maintaining a package should anything happen to the current maintainer?
>Have it be as non-confrontational as possible by having it not indicate
>any feeling about
Hello, debian-devel.
Yes, this library needed for generating pdf docs from PHP.
Could you package it into next version?
--
regards,
volk rich web-design mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECT
36 matches
Mail list logo
