Quoting Pierre Habouzit ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Hi,
>
> As some of you may know, I've been the original creator of bts-link[0].
> Though, I have currently neither the motivation, nor the time to
> maintain it, or run it on a regular basis[1].
>
> I believe bts-link has become an important piece of
Hi,
Is there a canonical list of symbols defined by each of the
Debian architectures, e.g. do I test for Sparc using
__sparc or __sparc__ ? How about m68k, hppa, etc?
My first guess was that would be contained on http://ports.debian.org/
but no such luck.
Thanks,
-Steve
signature.asc
Descri
On Tue, 11 Nov 2008, Daniel Baumann wrote:
to avoid such things, especially with defining naming terminology for
things that covers such broad aspects of debian, a poll on your
sub-project only mailinglists is probably not enough, and imho at least
one of either d-devel or d-project should be CC
Andreas Tille wrote:
> Your remark above just ignores that the concept tries to profit from
> synergies inside these projects which for instance are reflected in
> these tasks or bugs pages, a common technique to build metapackages etc.
that's not my point; my point is that i don't see why a bunch
On Tue, 2008-11-11 at 00:20 +0900, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 12:11 AM, Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > - You state that screenshot will be released under the same term of
> > the screenshot-ed package, why so? It seems to me rather arbitrary
> > and makes
On Mon, 2008-11-10 at 16:25 -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
[...]
> ,[ Proposal 2: allow Lenny to release with proprietary firmware ]
[...]
> | 4. We give priority to the timely release of Lenny over sorting every
> | bit out; for this reason, we will treat removal of sourceless
> | fir
Theodore Tso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Another consequence of making it easy for the users to add non-free to
> the repositories so they can download firmware necessary to make their
> hardware useful is that a huge number of users may end up enabling
> non-free just to make their hardware work,
Michelle Konzack dijo [Sun, Nov 09, 2008 at 08:24:44AM +0100]:
> Sorry, I am not nativ english spaker...
> And yes is is what I have meant...
Neither am I, so I'll try to get this point across one last time.
> And there are several 100 cases where in general the projects are 100%
> open, but fo
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Charles Plessy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Package name: libnet-amazon-s3-tools-perl
Version : 0.07
Upstream Author : Mark Atwood
URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/Net-Amazon-S3-Tools/
License : LGPL
Programming Lang: Perl
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 12:32 AM, Christoph Haas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So are we safe as long as we don't include non-free packages and claim that
> the screenshots are licensed under the terms of the application itself?
> IANAL and find that gibberish from your quoted posting pretty hard t
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 9:08 AM, Raphael Geissert
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * When browsing the packages list it would be great if you could also provide
> links to browse packages by name (e.g. A, B, C, etc, you get what I mean).
> * Have you considered storing more information together with t
Christoph Haas wrote:
> Fellow developers...
>
> it took a little longer than I expected but I finally launched
>
> http://screenshots.debian.net
Great! thanks for your great job
>
> after two weeks of programming fun.
[...]
>
> Please take a look at the site, consider uploading screenshots
On Montag, 10. November 2008, Jon Dowland wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 03:05:32PM +0100, Christoph Haas wrote:
> > Have fun and let me know what you think.
>
> Thank you for this; it looks very nice!
>
> Some quick comments:
>
> * don't list packages with only pending screenshots in the list o
Noah Slater wrote:
[...]
>
> I do think the page lengths, or result count per page, could be increased.
>
+1
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: freecad
Version : 0.7.1672
* URL :
http://juergen-riegel.net/FreeCAD/Docu/index.php?title=Main_Page
* License : LGPLv2.1+
Programming Lang: C++, Python
Description :
Miriam Ruiz wrote:
I'm not exactly sure that I like the new name, to be honest.
I saw the name and initially thought it was related to blender.
http://www.blender.org/
Brian May
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTE
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 12:02:24AM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> IMO the BTS has taught us that SOAP is the good way to go, on top of
> that we can have whatever programming language API we need.
I'd agree that it's tought us the value of *an* API, but I (at least)
have yet to love SOAP. Exce
Hi,
> | Reinhard Tartler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | | | | | |
I think you've missed to count
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
here.
Cheers,
Bernd
--
Bernd Zeimetz Debian GNU/Linux Developer
GPG Fingerprint: 06C8 C9A2 EAAD E37E 5B2C BE93 067A AD04 C93B FF79
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 03:05:32PM +0100, Christoph Haas wrote:
> Have fun and let me know what you think.
Thank you for this; it looks very nice!
Some quick comments:
* don't list packages with only pending screenshots in the list of
screenshots. There's a few packages at the moment listed
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 04:46:10PM +0100, Christoph Haas wrote:
> Thanks. I love positive feedback. Developers often tend to point out
> errors way more than enjoying what's already there. :)
My pleasure :)
> > Suggestion: just name a license and stick to it.
Given the comment from pabs (which
Hi Christoph,
many thanks for this effort - I admit I started dreaming of such a thing
in the beginning of this year - it does not happen that often that dreams
become true that fast. ;-)
On Mon, 10 Nov 2008, Christoph Haas wrote:
Thanks to the framework used (Pylons) I can fully control whic
Hi,
With a new option added to the list, the discussion period is
extended again, by a week, starting 10 Nov 2008 21:28:29.
The proposals, tentatively, as reproduced below.
|+---+---+---+---+---|
|
On Sun, 2008-11-09 at 18:43 +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> Frank Lin PIAT wrote:
> []
> > I have question which is directly related: shouldn't a package own and
> > declare all the configuration files that it uses, even if it doesn't
> > install or modify it?
> [...]
>
> No. Not all configura
Am 2008-11-10 12:56:26, schrieb Karl Goetz:
> Why are they making hardware that can transmit on *any* frequency? Why
> are they not making hardware that transmits in the 2.4GHz ISM band
> perhaps with firmware to 'fine tune' it? Seems strange to pour lots of
> money into making an all-band radio th
Am 2008-11-10 09:54:24, schrieb Johannes Wiedersich:
> I think the best way out of this dilemma is to add a 'non-free firmware'
> section and make this section part of official debian. A provision is
But this should be a "volatile" archive, which allow the upload of new
firmware releases and not
Am 2008-11-09 12:19:06, schrieb Josselin Mouette:
> Why in the world would we do that when we have all that???s needed to
> simply move the firmware images to non-free?
And what, if peoples do not want to use non-free but get there hardware
working?
The best would be to create a new flavour cal
Am 2008-11-08 15:29:44, schrieb Thomas Bushnell BSG:
> It seems to me that, if this is really true, then the hardware
> manufacturers have been lying to the FCC for years, claiming that the
> user cannot reprogram the card, without explaining that, in fact, it's
> just that users may not know how t
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Package name: elmerfem
Version: 5.4.1
Author: CSC -- IT Center for Science Ltd (Finnish Ministry of Education)
License: GPL
URL: http://www.csc.fi/elmer/
Elmer is an open source mutiphysics simulation package developed by CSC
in collaboration with Finnish universi
On Sat, Nov 8, 2008, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Why not just support it in non-free exactly the way we do other things?
Indeed. Arguably, documentation is even more important than making
non-Free firmware trivially-accessible to users, and users might be
tempted to add non-free to their repo s
On Montag, 10. November 2008, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 03:05:32PM +0100, Christoph Haas wrote:
> > it took a little longer than I expected but I finally launched
> > http://screenshots.debian.net
>
> First of all thanks a lot for the effort, the result is already real
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sandro Tosi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: pythontracer
Version : 8.10.16
Upstream Author : Eyal Lotem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://code.google.com/p/pythontracer/
* License : GPLv3
Programming Lang: Python/C
2008/11/10 Miriam Ruiz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> 2008/11/10 Christoph Haas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>> I can even offer JSON, SOAP, XML, whatever if needed. Some URL that can be
>> used in an IMG/SRC tag should probably be sufficient for packages.d.o.
>> I'll soon document the URL schema so everybody ca
Hi,
On Wed, 8 Oct 2008 12:16:53 +0900
Hideki Yamane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I see no proper fix, except using an /etc/default file, which is ugly.
>
> Using /etc/default/unbound is reasonable, I think. Some of daemon packages
> (e.g. rsync) are not started by default because it is set i
Le Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 01:51:05PM +, Neil Williams a écrit :
> That is where I found "Blends" confusing - it conjures up images of
> mixing two different things into one.
This tempts me a lot to mix stable and backports.debian.org (once it exists) in
our shiny new blender :)
By the way, I re
2008/11/10 Christoph Haas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> So are we safe as long as we don't include non-free packages and claim that
> the screenshots are licensed under the terms of the application itself?
Yes, in my opinion that should be enough.
Miry
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
w
2008/11/10 Christoph Haas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I can even offer JSON, SOAP, XML, whatever if needed. Some URL that can be
> used in an IMG/SRC tag should probably be sufficient for packages.d.o.
> I'll soon document the URL schema so everybody can use it. Just let me
> know what information you
Package: wnpp
Owner: Max Vozeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: yagtd
Version : 0.2.4
Upstream Author : MiKael NAVARRO <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : https://gna.org/projects/yagtd/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: Python
Description
On Montag, 10. November 2008, Miriam Ruiz wrote:
> 2008/11/10 Christoph Haas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > I can even offer JSON, SOAP, XML, whatever if needed. Some URL that
> > can be used in an IMG/SRC tag should probably be sufficient for
> > packages.d.o. I'll soon document the URL schema so everyb
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 4:46 PM, Christoph Haas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Montag, 10. November 2008, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 03:05:32PM +0100, Christoph Haas wrote:
>> > it took a little longer than I expected but I finally launched
>> > http://screenshots.deb
On Montag, 10. November 2008, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 12:11 AM, Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > - You state that screenshot will be released under the same term of
> > the screenshot-ed package, why so? It seems to me rather arbitrary
> > and makes impossible
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 03:16:06PM +0100, Guus Sliepen wrote:
> Please do not reduce images in size. The screenshots of, for example, dillo
> and
> amiwm are horrible. If you have a guideline of having a maximum size of
> 800x600 pixels, just give an error when someone uploads a screenshot that is
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 12:11 AM, Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> - You state that screenshot will be released under the same term of
> the screenshot-ed package, why so? It seems to me rather arbitrary
> and makes impossible to bundle all screenshot together on a media
> and di
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 03:05:32PM +0100, Christoph Haas wrote:
> it took a little longer than I expected but I finally launched
> http://screenshots.debian.net
First of all thanks a lot for the effort, the result is already really
cool and in perspective it is amazingly useful!
> Have fun
On Mon, 2008-11-10 at 15:29 +0100, Christoph Haas wrote:
> On Montag, 10. November 2008, Guus Sliepen wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 03:05:32PM +0100, Christoph Haas wrote:
> > > it took a little longer than I expected but I finally launched
> > >
> > > http://screenshots.debian.net
> >
> > [
Fellow developers...
it took a little longer than I expected but I finally launched
http://screenshots.debian.net
after two weeks of programming fun.
It is an effort to help users get an idea what a certain application does
and how it looks like by offering screenshots. It was suggeste
2008/11/10 Miriam Ruiz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> that I don't particurally like the game, but if it has been voted and
s/game/name/
Sorry,
Miry
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Montag, 10. November 2008, Guus Sliepen wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 03:05:32PM +0100, Christoph Haas wrote:
> > it took a little longer than I expected but I finally launched
> >
> > http://screenshots.debian.net
>
> [...]
>
> > Have fun and let me know what you think.
>
> Please do not
2008/11/10 Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Mon, 10 Nov 2008, Miriam Ruiz wrote:
>
>> I'm not exactly sure that I like the new name, to be honest.
>
> Well, the renaming was announced on debian-custom list and all lists
> of existing CDDs (also for instance on Debian Junior list[1]). And,
>
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 03:05:32PM +0100, Christoph Haas wrote:
> it took a little longer than I expected but I finally launched
>
> http://screenshots.debian.net
[...]
> Have fun and let me know what you think.
Please do not reduce images in size. The screenshots of, for example, dillo an
On Mon, 2008-11-10 at 13:28 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Nov 2008, Neil Williams wrote:
>
> > I guess what are talking about here is the mirrors. Do all Blends use
> > unchanged Debian mirrors?
>
> Yes. What else would you expect if it says _inside_ Debian? A Debian
> Pure Blend has
Le Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 02:30:54PM +0100, Dominique Dumont a écrit :
> Charles Plessy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > This is a dependancy of libace-perl (ITP #468760), which is a dependancy of
> > BioPerl.
> >
> > Is the Debian Perl group interested in hosting this package? Otherwise we
> > wi
On Mon, 10 Nov 2008, Daniel Baumann wrote:
so then call them 'Debian Foo' team, since this is what they are and no
different to the various teams we have already (where some of them are
not limited being 100% packaging oriented; e.g. kde team that releases
livecds).
Strangely enough people are
Hi,
http://ftp.skolelinux.org/skolelinux/etch_needs_love.html and
http://ftp.skolelinux.org/skolelinux/lenny_needs_love.html now show (part of)
the answer to the question "how far is Debian Edu from Debian?":
Source packages in Debian etch main: 10225
Source packages in Debian Edu etch local: 2
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ricardo Mones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: clawsker
Version : 0.5.0
Upstream Author : Ricardo Mones
* URL : http://www.claws-mail.org/clawsker
* License : GPLv3+
Programming Lang: Perl
Description : Configu
Andreas Tille wrote:
> Yes. What else would you expect if it says _inside_ Debian? A Debian
> Pure Blend has no separate mirror - THIS is the basic idea of the concept.
so then call them 'Debian Foo' team, since this is what they are and no
different to the various teams we have already (where s
On Mon, 10 Nov 2008, Neil Williams wrote:
I guess what are talking about here is the mirrors. Do all Blends use
unchanged Debian mirrors?
Yes. What else would you expect if it says _inside_ Debian? A Debian
Pure Blend has no separate mirror - THIS is the basic idea of the concept.
If so, w
On Mon, 2008-11-10 at 12:32 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Nov 2008, Neil Williams wrote:
>
> > I was never particularly clear on why "Custom" was a bad name to use.
>
> Actually "distribution" was the worst part of the old name.
ok
> Before we have another round of discussing names:
On Mon, 10 Nov 2008, Neil Williams wrote:
I was never particularly clear on why "Custom" was a bad name to use.
Actually "distribution" was the worst part of the old name.
Before we have another round of discussing names: Could everybody
who is really interested in the projects please have a
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 8:07 PM, Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm confused by the new name - what are we blending and why confuse
> "Pure" and "Blend" in the same name?
>
> Emdebian is a customised Debian too - we will have two flavours soon, a
> functionally-identical but smaller De
On Mon, 10 Nov 2008, Miriam Ruiz wrote:
We realised that the old name Custom Debian Distributions just sended
the wrong message to outsiders: The conclusion that CDDs are something
else than Debian was to "obvious" if people did not read the relevant
documentation. So we finally found a raw con
On Mon, 10 Nov 2008, Adeodato Simó wrote:
What does "raw consensus" mean here? It doesn't seem to be an existing
English idiom... :-) [Maybe you meant "rough", I don't know.]
Yes, sorry - I intended to writh rough (perhaps I should ask co authors
for announcements next time).
In practice the
On Mon, 10 Nov 2008, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 10:26:46AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
Renaming Custom Debian Distributions to Debian Pure Blend
- -
[3] http://cdd.alioth.debian.org/blends
^^^
On Mon, 2008-11-10 at 11:53 +0100, Miriam Ruiz wrote:
> 2008/11/10 Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > We realised that the old name Custom Debian Distributions just sended
> > the wrong message to outsiders: The conclusion that CDDs are something
> > else than Debian was to "obvious" if peop
2008/11/10 Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> We realised that the old name Custom Debian Distributions just sended
> the wrong message to outsiders: The conclusion that CDDs are something
> else than Debian was to "obvious" if people did not read the relevant
> documentation. So we finally fou
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Charles Plessy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Package name: libweakref-perl
Version : 0.01
Upstream Author : Tuomas J. Lukka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/WeakRef/
License : Same as Perl
Programming La
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Charles Plessy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Package name: libmath-random-perl
Version : 0.71
Upstream Author : John Venier and Barry W. Brown
URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/Math-Random/
License : same conditions as Perl, p
* Andreas Tille [Mon, 10 Nov 2008 10:26:46 +0100]:
> Hello,
Hi Andreas,
> So we finally found a raw consensus for a new name:
> Debian Pure Blends
What does "raw consensus" mean here? It doesn't seem to be an existing
English idiom... :-) [Maybe you meant "rough", I don't know.]
Chee
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 10:26:46AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Renaming Custom Debian Distributions to Debian Pure Blend
> - -
> [3] http://cdd.alioth.debian.org/blends
^^^
.oO( Have you thought about renaming the
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 12:56:26PM +1030, Karl Goetz wrote:
> Why are they making hardware that can transmit on *any* frequency? Why
> are they not making hardware that transmits in the 2.4GHz ISM band
> perhaps with firmware to 'fine tune' it? Seems strange to pour lots of
> money into making an a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Peter Palfrader wrote:
> On Sat, 08 Nov 2008, Theodore Tso wrote:
>
>>Fortunately for us, at the
>> moment I am not aware of large numbers of highly popular laptops or
>> servers for which non-free firmware
Le lundi 10 novembre 2008 à 03:28 +0100, Marco d'Itri a écrit :
> Myself, I'd like a Debian fork with RHEL kernels anyway...
lol
--
.''`.
: :' : We are debian.org. Lower your prices, surrender your code.
`. `' We will add your hardware and software distinctiveness to
`-our
71 matches
Mail list logo
