On Mon, Jan 04, 2010 at 11:02:51AM +1100, Brian May wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 06:12:28PM +0200, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> > If we're talking about Linux 2.6.32 support for pv_ops dom0 here, then
> > that's
> > in progress, see:
> >
> > http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2009
On Mon, 2010-01-04 at 10:38 +1100, Brian May wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 09:49:24PM +0300, William Pitcock wrote:
> > > Xen is unsupportable due to clueless upstream, who has been in a
> > > constant FAIL state regarding support of current kernels for years.
> >
> > Do you have any proof for
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Alexander Gerasiov
* Package name: wordpress-xrds-simple
Version : 1.0
Upstream Author : DiSo Development Team http://diso-project.org/
* URL : http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/xrds-simple/
* License : Expat
Programm
On Jan 04, Brian May wrote:
> Somewhere I got lost in this discussion.
You did not, he did.
> In that case, how can correct programs be broken if IPv6 is not supported?
> Surely it is just a matter of binding to IPv4 and ignoring the error that
> occurs when trying to bind to the IPv6 socket (or
On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 06:12:28PM +0200, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> If we're talking about Linux 2.6.32 support for pv_ops dom0 here, then that's
> in progress, see:
>
> http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2009-12/msg01127.html
>
> the 2.6.32 tree should be available shortly after J
On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 09:49:24PM +0300, William Pitcock wrote:
> > Xen is unsupportable due to clueless upstream, who has been in a
> > constant FAIL state regarding support of current kernels for years.
>
> Do you have any proof for this claim? xen.git seems pretty up to date to
> me (2.6.31.6
Brian May writes:
> In that case, how can correct programs be broken if IPv6 is not
> supported? Surely it is just a matter of binding to IPv4 and ignoring
> the error that occurs when trying to bind to the IPv6 socket (or vice
> versa if IPv6 is supported but not IPv4)?
I don't believe that co
On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 11:26:34AM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 04:55:27PM +1100, Brian May wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 01:21:55AM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > I believe we will have Xen hypervisor and Linux dom0 packages, but they
> > > will not be supported to
On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 11:10:41AM +0100, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
> > > a) netstat garbling the addresses of connected endpoints
> > This is one of the reasons why bindv6only should be set.
>
> I'm not arguing about bindv6only. I'm only arguing programs should work
> without ipv6 loaded.
Somewhe
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Ernesto Hernández-Novich (USB)"
* Package name: libtemplate-plugin-clickable-email-perl
Version : 0.01
Upstream Author : Nik Clayton
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/Template-Plugin-Clickable-Email/
* License : BSD
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 561961 wontfix
Bug #561961 {Done: Holger Levsen } [general] general:
add a language-selector like ubuntu
Added tag(s) wontfix.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 561966 wontfix
Bug #561966 {Done: Holger Levsen } [general] general:
Centralized configuration for the hinting style and dpi
Added tag(s) wontfix.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 561962 wontfix
Bug #561962 {Done: Holger Levsen } [general] general: On
desktop enviroments open .deb files with "gksu gdebi-gtk" by default
Added tag(s) wontfix.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need ass
On Sun, Jan 03 2010, Magnus Holmgren wrote:
> On måndagen den 7 december 2009, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
>> On Sun, Dec 06, 2009 at 01:17:30PM +0100, Patrick Schoenfeld wrote:
>> > But how do you fix a package to do what its supposed to do,
>> > when it isn't installed anymore?
>>
>> You don't need
On Sun, Jan 03 2010, Magnus Holmgren wrote:
> On måndagen den 7 december 2009, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
>> On Sun, Dec 06, 2009 at 01:17:30PM +0100, Patrick Schoenfeld wrote:
>> > But how do you fix a package to do what its supposed to do,
>> > when it isn't installed anymore?
>>
>> You don't need
On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 08:01:10PM +0100, Bastian Venthur wrote:
> I'm sorry to bring this topic up again, but what is the status of Python
> 2.6 and Squeeze? I wrote a mail to doko on 2009-12-13 asking him what
> his plans are and if he needs help but didn't receive an answer yet. Has
> anyone mor
On måndagen den 7 december 2009, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 06, 2009 at 01:17:30PM +0100, Patrick Schoenfeld wrote:
> > But how do you fix a package to do what its supposed to do,
> > when it isn't installed anymore?
>
> You don't need to. When the package is purged, and ucf doesn't exis
On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 12:47:54PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 9:01 AM, Brian May wrote:
>
> > 1) I believe Xen, with paravirtualization (that is without QEMU) is more
> > secure
> > then KVM (or Xen) with QEMU.
>
> I haven't heard this claim before, do you have any referen
- "Gabor Gombas" wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 06:31:20PM +0200, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
>
> > So the change has happened, lthough it took painfully long to get
> the
> > upstream Linux pv_ops framework in shape and all that.. and
> obviously
> > the pv_ops dom0 patches still need to get
Bastian Venthur wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm sorry to bring this topic up again, but what is the status of Python
> 2.6 and Squeeze? I wrote a mail to doko on 2009-12-13 asking him what
> his plans are and if he needs help but didn't receive an answer yet. Has
> anyone more information?
python 2.6 wi
- "Marc Haber" wrote:
> On Sun, 3 Jan 2010 16:55:27 +1100, Brian May
> wrote:
> >Like I said previously, I think dropping Xen support is a mistake
> because KVM
> >requires QEMU and QEMU seems to have a reputation of being insecure.
>
> Xen is unsupportable due to clueless upstream, who ha
On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 07:33:07PM +0100, Gabor Gombas wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 06:31:20PM +0200, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
>
> > So the change has happened, lthough it took painfully long to get the
> > upstream Linux pv_ops framework in shape and all that.. and obviously
> > the pv_ops dom0
Hi all,
I'm sorry to bring this topic up again, but what is the status of Python
2.6 and Squeeze? I wrote a mail to doko on 2009-12-13 asking him what
his plans are and if he needs help but didn't receive an answer yet. Has
anyone more information?
Cheers and happy new year,
Bastian
--
Basti
On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 06:31:20PM +0200, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> So the change has happened, lthough it took painfully long to get the
> upstream Linux pv_ops framework in shape and all that.. and obviously
> the pv_ops dom0 patches still need to get merged upstream.
That was opposed quite stro
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Ernesto Hernández-Novich (USB)"
* Package name: libtemplate-plugin-number-format-perl
Version : 1.02
Upstream Author : Darren Chamberlain
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/Template-Plugin-Number-Format/
* License : G
On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 11:23:28AM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 01:21:55AM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > I believe we will have Xen hypervisor and Linux dom0 packages,
>
> The hypervisor works well, but the Linux Dom0 packages are not available
> yet, upstream is again f
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, pkg-e-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
--- Please fill out the fields below. ---
Package name: enna
Version: 0.4.0
Upstream Author: The Enna Project
URL: http://enna.geexbox.org
License: LGPL
On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 10:46:38AM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Sun, 3 Jan 2010 16:55:27 +1100, Brian May
> wrote:
> >Like I said previously, I think dropping Xen support is a mistake because KVM
> >requires QEMU and QEMU seems to have a reputation of being insecure.
>
> Xen is unsupportable due
Brian May, le Sun 03 Jan 2010 16:48:06 +1100, a écrit :
> On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 12:47:54PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 9:01 AM, Brian May wrote:
> >
> > > 1) I believe Xen, with paravirtualization (that is without QEMU) is more
> > > secure
> > > then KVM (or Xen) with Q
On Jan 03, "Bernhard R. Link" wrote:
> You can call bullshit whatever how often you want. That does not change
> that many people have had those problems and thus have ipv6 backlisted
> (or not even compiled in if they have their own kernels built) and
> programs not working with that are broken.
Brian May writes:
> http://blog.orebokech.com/2007/05/xen-security-or-lack-thereof.html links to
> http://taviso.decsystem.org/virtsec.pdf.
> I don't know for certain this applies to KVM, however I would assume so.
Only to a certain extent. Nowadays Linux guests in KVM use virtio
for disk/netwo
Florian Weimer writes:
> Have you got any suggestions for increasing productivity with proper
> IDE support for medium-sized C and C++ code bases?
>
> I've got a hunch that proper browsing support (searching for
> definitions/references, displaying static call trees) might help me to
> navigate un
On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 04:55:27PM +1100, Brian May wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 01:21:55AM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > I believe we will have Xen hypervisor and Linux dom0 packages, but they
> > will not be supported to the degree that ordinary kernel packages are.
> I can't see any Xen ke
On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 01:21:55AM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> I believe we will have Xen hypervisor and Linux dom0 packages,
The hypervisor works well, but the Linux Dom0 packages are not available
yet, upstream is again fading behind.
Bastian
--
What kind of love is that? Not to be loved;
On Sun, 3 Jan 2010 16:55:27 +1100, Brian May
wrote:
>Like I said previously, I think dropping Xen support is a mistake because KVM
>requires QEMU and QEMU seems to have a reputation of being insecure.
Xen is unsupportable due to clueless upstream, who has been in a
constant FAIL state regarding s
* Marco d'Itri [091230 10:37]:
> On Dec 30, "Bernhard R. Link" wrote:
>
> > > > I routinely blacklist the ipv6 module. There are far too many
> > > > programs breaking or doing stuff I do not want if it is loaded.
> I call bullshit on this.
You can call bullshit whatever how often you want. That
On Sun, 3 Jan 2010, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> It does require virtualisation extensions, but most x86 processors sold in
> the last few years have them.
My SE Linux Play Machine is currently running on a P3-800 system with 256M of
RAM. I would like to continue running on that hardware until someon
37 matches
Mail list logo
