[ Bcc debian-mentors as some prospective DD might be interested in
packaging those ]
Hello,
I would like to be able to use ubuntu's indicator applets in Debian but
very few of the required packages are in Debian (only libindicator is
available).
Here are some of the design pages if you don't kn
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 11:47:49PM -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> Bastian Blank dijo [Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 05:54:28PM +0200]:
> > Hi folks
> >
> > I'm currently thinking about which version of Xen supporting in Squeeze.
> > There are two possibilities: 3.4 and 4.0. 3.4 is currently in testing
> > and
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 585826 gnome
Bug #585826 [general] general: gnome trash is full
Bug reassigned from package 'general' to 'gnome'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
585826: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bug
On 14/06/10 09:36, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> I hope we can find maintainers for all those. Should they be maintained
> within the Debian Gnome team ?
No. They are not GNOME modules and we're already quite loaded.
Cheers,
Emilio
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
w
Hi,
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 09:36:02AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> I would like to be able to use ubuntu's indicator applets in Debian but
> very few of the required packages are in Debian (only libindicator is
> available).
I'd like too, thus I packaged libindicator (sid) and
xfce4-indicato
On Mon, 14 Jun 2010, Evgeni Golov wrote:
> I'd like too, thus I packaged libindicator (sid) and
> xfce4-indicator-plugin (NEW) :)
I saw libindicator and wondered why indicator-applet was not in the same
batch and investigated and found your RFP and this led me to this mail.
:)
> > The missing so
Hi,
Currently vim packages (vim-nox, vim-gtk) on sid are still linked to the
old python2.5.
(Even though it seems possible to compile with python 2.6, according to
the debian-vim changelog changelog and bug #566842)
Being linked with an old Python version, vim python plugins tend to fail
whe
On 14 June 2010 16:35, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> I believe that now we fixed ~everything which can be fixed, so this
> leaves us with the proprietary Java implementation which apparently Sun
> is unwilling to fix.
Is there software that still requires this proprietary Java
implementation? I hear open
Hi,
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 12:14:37PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Jun 2010, Evgeni Golov wrote:
> > I'd like too, thus I packaged libindicator (sid) and
> > xfce4-indicator-plugin (NEW) :)
>
> I saw libindicator and wondered why indicator-applet was not in the same
> batch and in
Le lundi 14 juin 2010 à 20:45 +1000, Brian May a écrit :
> On 14 June 2010 16:35, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> > I believe that now we fixed ~everything which can be fixed, so this
> > leaves us with the proprietary Java implementation which apparently Sun
> > is unwilling to fix.
>
> Is there software
Le lundi 14 juin 2010 à 11:32 +0200, Evgeni Golov a écrit :
> I'd like too, thus I packaged libindicator (sid)
Hi,
Could you avoid changing the packaging system when you take things to
Debian? We do use cdbs for those because it makes easier some of the
things we are doing, we could need to add a
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 12:27:30PM +0200, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> Le lundi 14 juin 2010 à 11:32 +0200, Evgeni Golov a écrit :
> > I'd like too, thus I packaged libindicator (sid)
>
> Hi,
>
> Could you avoid changing the packaging system when you take things to
> Debian? We do use cdbs for those
Na grupie linux.debian.devel napisałe(a)ś:
> I believe that now we fixed ~everything which can be fixed, so this
> leaves us with the proprietary Java implementation which apparently Sun
> is unwilling to fix.
> Unless the maintainer believes that we can get a fixed version before
> the release the
Le lundi 14 juin 2010 à 13:25 +0200, Jarek Kamiński a écrit :
> Na grupie linux.debian.devel napisałe(a)ś:
> > I believe that now we fixed ~everything which can be fixed, so this
> > leaves us with the proprietary Java implementation which apparently Sun
> > is unwilling to fix.
> > Unless the main
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 01:25:11PM +0200, Jarek Kamiński wrote:
> Na grupie linux.debian.devel napisałe(a)ś:
> > I believe that now we fixed ~everything which can be fixed, so this
> > leaves us with the proprietary Java implementation which apparently Sun
> > is unwilling to fix.
> > Unless the ma
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 01:18:39PM +0300, Oren Held wrote:
> Currently vim packages (vim-nox, vim-gtk) on sid are still linked to
> the old python2.5.
> (Even though it seems possible to compile with python 2.6, according
> to the debian-vim changelog changelog and bug #566842)
>
> Being linked wi
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 08:45:58PM +1000, Brian May wrote:
> On 14 June 2010 16:35, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> > I believe that now we fixed ~everything which can be fixed, so this
> > leaves us with the proprietary Java implementation which apparently Sun
> > is unwilling to fix.
There's no bug, so t
Hi joey,
Am Sonntag, den 13.06.2010, 10:59 -0400 schrieb Joey Hess:
> Joachim Breitner wrote:
> > Would this be something that could be used by default in Debian, maybe
> > for squeeze+1?
>
> You're suggesting making the package standard priority. This is not a
> decision within the purvue of th
m...@linux.it (Marco d'Itri) writes:
> I believe that now we fixed ~everything which can be fixed, so this
> leaves us with the proprietary Java implementation which apparently Sun
> is unwilling to fix.
I think there are probably other proprietary applications that people just
haven't tried usin
Hello people,
I'm trying to merge josm and josm-plugins in a single source package, so that
it's easier to maintain them both.
I succeeded in changing the buildsystem and doing the necessary patching to
make it work; however I'm having an issue now. My layout consists in
josm_X.Y.orig.tar.gz, and j
On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 20:00:28 +0200, David Paleino wrote:
> Hello people,
> [..]
Ahah! I got it.
> [..]
> $ ls -1 *.gz
> josm_0.0.svn3329.orig-plugins-0.0.svn21666.tar.gz
> josm_0.0.svn3329.orig.tar.gz
> $
doesn't accept dots. So, I changed that to *-plugins-svn21666, but
it obviously u
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Eric Evans
* Package name: libclhm-java
Version : 1.0
Upstream Author : Ben Manes
* URL : http://code.google.com/p/concurrentlinkedhashmap/
* License : Apache License 2.0
Programming Lang: Java
Description : high
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Eric Evans
* Package name: libhighscale-java
Version : 1.1.2
Upstream Author : Cliff Click
* URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/high-scale-lib
* License : Public Domain
Programming Lang: Java
Description : hig
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Eric Evans
* Package name: libyaml-snake-java
Version : 1.6
Upstream Author : Andrey Somov
* URL : http://code.google.com/p/snakeyaml
* License : Apache License 2.0
Programming Lang: Java
Description : YAML parse
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Eric Evans
* Package name: cassandra
Version : 0.7.0
Upstream Author : Apache Cassandra Team
* URL : http://cassandra.apache.org
* License : Apache License 2.0
Programming Lang: Java
Description : highly scalable
On 11/06/2010 09:54, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Right, I was being silly. Also, the word "experimental" adds more fear
> to the user than just "devel", which is good. Let me rephrase then. How
> about we accept MORE packages with LESS checks in Experimental, and have
> new maintainers forced in that r
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: jholt
* Package name: googlecl
Version : 0.9
Upstream Author : Tom H. Miller
* URL : http://code.google.com/p/googlecl/
* License : Apache 2.0
Programming Lang: Python
Description : command-line access to (some)
Quoting Christian PERRIER (bubu...@debian.org):
Sorry for the followup in an -announce mailing list, but my announce
(which was written offline) includes an error:
> [1] http://d-i.alioth.debian.org/doc/l10n
The right link is http://d-i.alioth.debian.org/doc/i18n
signature.asc
Description: D
On Mon, 2010-06-14 at 12:14 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Jun 2010, Evgeni Golov wrote:
> > > - indicator-applet https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/indicator-applet
> > > RFP: http://bugs.debian.org/534556
> >
> > No GNOME here, no way to test, sorry.
>
> Is that really the only
Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
Hi,
> It is not the case. The OpenJDK has some problems with font management,
> slower with Swing and a few other problems.
> However, I am not aware of software not working with the OpenJDK (ie
> requiring the proprietary Java).
ISTR OpenJDK and JDBC4 do not exactly wor
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Package name: gnome-paint
Version: 0.3
Upstream Author: Rogério Ferro do Nascimento
URL: http://code.google.com/p/gnome-paint/
License: GPL-3
Description: simple, easy to use paint program for GNOME
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
31 matches
Mail list logo
