Hi
I have a strange problem when building the sdcc package. Compilation fails
with the following message:
ccache i486-linux-gnu-gcc -pipe -ggdb -g -O2 -Wall -I. -I../.. -
I./../../support/Util -I. -c sdcclib.c -o sdcclib.o
i486-linux-gnu-gcc: No such file or directory
but if I manually enter
Quoting Paul Wise (p...@debian.org):
> I agree with the other Australians in the thread; the east-coast
> timezones are currently all the same but might not be in the future so
> we shouldn't rely on them being the same and we should allow selection
> of Australia/Sydney vs Australia/Melbourne.
Su
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 10:18:04AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> I agree with the other Australians in the thread; the east-coast
> timezones are currently all the same but might not be in the future so
> we shouldn't rely on them being the same and we should allow selection
> of Australia/Sydney vs Au
I agree with the other Australians in the thread; the east-coast
timezones are currently all the same but might not be in the future so
we shouldn't rely on them being the same and we should allow selection
of Australia/Sydney vs Australia/Melbourne.
I would suggest doing what Ubuntu do for timezo
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
* Package name: drupal6-trans-pt-br
Version : 1.5
Upstream Author : Portuguese, Brazil translation team
* URL : http://drupal.org/project/pt-br
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: po
Descri
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Philippe Gauthier
* Package name: jappix
Version : 0.4
Upstream Author : Valérian Saliou
* URL : http://project.jappix.com/
* License : AGPL
Programming Lang: PHP, JavaScript
Description : The first full-featured
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 12:28:18PM +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
>Christian PERRIER writes:
>>[...]
>>That's indeed insane..:-). Hobart (Tasmania), Melbourne (Victoria),
>>Sydney (NSW) and Canberra (ACT) have the *exact* same time rules
>>(including DST).
>
>But they didn't always; and with the tendenc
Christian PERRIER writes:
> The timezone choice in D-I is supposed to be user-friendly and easy to
> understand for the average citizen of the said country.
FWIW: the existing Australian timezone choice in D-I seems fine from the
point of view of the Australians I've seen do installs (including
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 09:34, Alexander Zangerl wrote:
> not so great, because these are very uncommon. for example, you never
> hear "eastern time" being used on the radio; here (qld/nsw border) they
> say "it's hh:mm, that's hh+1:mm in nsw" when we're in that fun period
> of the year where the
Package: wnpp
Owner: Nicholas Bamber
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org,debian-p...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: libhttp-negotiate-perl
Version : 6.00
Upstream Author : Gisle Aas
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/HTTP-Negotiate/
* Li
On Tue, 22 Mar 2011 19:54:05 +0100, Christian PERRIER writes:
>I currently propose to offer the following choices in D-I:
>
> Victoria, ACT, NSW, Tasmania (Eastern Time, DST)
> Queensland (Eastern Time, no DST)
> South Australia (Central Time, DST)
> Northern Territory (Central Time, no DST)
> West
Package: wnpp
Owner: Nicholas Bamber
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org,debian-p...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: libhttp-cookies-perl
Version : 6.00
Upstream Author : Gisle Aas
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/HTTP-Cookies/
* Licens
Le Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 11:54:47AM +, Mark Hymers a écrit :
>
> I'm not entirely sure where this should be documented, it's not really a
> policy thing as it's specific to the archive. Suggestions welcome.
Dear all,
Since the binary package control files is documented in the Policy, that wi
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Gilles Filippini
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
* Package name: macwidgets
Version : 0.9.5
Upstream Author : Kenneth Orr
* URL : http://code.google.com/p/macwidgets/
* License : LGPL
Programming Lang:
Christian PERRIER wrote:
> I currently propose to offer the following choices in D-I:
>
> Victoria, ACT, NSW, Tasmania (Eastern Time, DST)
> Queensland (Eastern Time, no DST)
> South Australia (Central Time, DST)
> Northern Territory (Central Time, no DST)
> Western Australia (Western Time)
Hello,
I need some help from Australian people.
Debian Installer includes (in tzsetup) a way to choose a timezone
among multiple timezones, when users have picked a country that has
more than one timezone.
I'm currently working on this as things change constantly in such
matters.
As preliminary
On Tue, 22, Mar, 2011 at 01:57:42PM +, Hector Oron spoke thus..
> Hi Mark,
>
> 2011/3/22 Mark Hymers :
>
> > The current design is the Binary packages can contain an additional
> > control field: Built-Using.
>
> First of all, thanks very much for taking care of it, that probably
> will get
>> The current design is the Binary packages can contain an additional
>> control field: Built-Using.
> First of all, thanks very much for taking care of it, that probably
> will get us going.
> I just would like to point out that current design solves half of
> the problem (being GPL compliant
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 14:33:09 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 22.03.2011 14:20, Philipp Kern wrote:
> > On 2011-03-22, Matthias Klose wrote:
> >>> The current design is the Binary packages can contain an additional
> > ^^
> >>> control field: Built-Using.
> >
Hi Mark,
2011/3/22 Mark Hymers :
> The current design is the Binary packages can contain an additional
> control field: Built-Using.
First of all, thanks very much for taking care of it, that probably
will get us going.
I just would like to point out that current design solves half of
the pr
On 22.03.2011 14:20, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On 2011-03-22, Matthias Klose wrote:
>>> The current design is the Binary packages can contain an additional
> ^^
>>> control field: Built-Using.
> [...]
>> that would be too strict for e.g. gcj-4.5
>> Built-Using: gcc-4.5
On Tue, 22, Mar, 2011 at 01:51:00PM +0100, Matthias Klose spoke thus..
> that would be too strict for e.g. gcj-4.5
>
> Built-Using: gcc-4.5 (>= 4.5.2-1~), gcc-4.5 (<< 4.5.3)
>
> would be correct, however this already can be expressed in the build
> dependencies, so I assume packages like gcj-4.x,
On 2011-03-22, Matthias Klose wrote:
>> The current design is the Binary packages can contain an additional
^^
>> control field: Built-Using.
[...]
> that would be too strict for e.g. gcj-4.5
> Built-Using: gcc-4.5 (>= 4.5.2-1~), gcc-4.5 (<< 4.5.3)
> would be corre
On Tue, 22, Mar, 2011 at 12:18:31PM +, Simon McVittie spoke thus..
> On Tue, 22 Mar 2011 at 11:54:47 +, Mark Hymers wrote:
> > the main people [Built-Using] should be used by, as far as I know are
> > cross-compiler builders and the d-i and kernel-wedge people
>
> Also the ia32-libs family
On 22.03.2011 12:54, Mark Hymers wrote:
> On Mon, 14, Mar, 2011 at 02:04:30PM +, Hector Oron spoke thus..
>> Hi,
>>
>> 2009/11/2 Mark Hymers :
>>> On Mon, 02, Nov, 2009 at 12:43:42PM +, Philipp Kern spoke thus..
Of course it is a sane approach but very special care needs to be taken
>
On Tue, 22 Mar 2011 at 11:54:47 +, Mark Hymers wrote:
> the main people [Built-Using] should be used by, as far as I know are
> cross-compiler builders and the d-i and kernel-wedge people
Also the ia32-libs family of packages, until they get superseded by multiarch?
S
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
On Mon, 14, Mar, 2011 at 02:04:30PM +, Hector Oron spoke thus..
> Hi,
>
> 2009/11/2 Mark Hymers :
> > On Mon, 02, Nov, 2009 at 12:43:42PM +, Philipp Kern spoke thus..
> >> Of course it is a sane approach but very special care needs to be taken
> >> when
> >> releasing to ensure GPL compli
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 4:57 PM, Jeffrey Ratcliffe wrote:
> On 22 March 2011 00:49, Paul Wise wrote:
>
>> The mount could trigger unknown kernel vulnerabilities in filesystem code
>
> The USB Stick would be automounted anyway. How is this different?
Automounting is disabled on desktops that do t
On 22 March 2011 00:49, Paul Wise wrote:
> I personally wouldn't use that script for a number of reasons:
I adapted the script, changing various things. In particular, I use
unison-gtk, which means that nothing is done until you confirm the
changes.
> The mount could trigger unknown kernel vulne
Am 22.03.2011 07:10, schrieb Tollef Fog Heen:
> ]] Micah Anderson
>
> Hi,
>
> | Also insserv is Priority: optional, so we can't count on that being on
> | every system.
>
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=551745 is already
> filed. I have no idea why it hasn't been fixed yet,
30 matches
Mail list logo
